A Short History of Nazi-Satanism by Spencer Sunshine -

Christian Post posits FBI is in aeonic battle twixt Good and Evil

Berkeley University has just published an 'academic' polemic against Satanism which will horrify all decent people. Not because the accusations of perversion, rape, extortion and murder under the guise of Satanic-Nazi far-right thuggery are real, but because it is just the latest reprise of the 1990 Satanic Panic which has kept so many 'academics' in work since it began in the U.S. in the late 1980s.

This, soon to be notorious, document is given in full below (see here) along with rather more informed glosses by the SAFF in blue type in the right-hand margin which show just how far off the mark the author of this paper, Spencer Sunshine, really is. If you are a freethinker you should read it to be aware of what is coming.

A new generation of suckers at the FBI forgot they had already extensively investigated these claims and one of their experts write Kenneth Lanning, had written the FBI's definitive document on Satanic Ritual Abuse (FBI document 136592 by Jan 1992) which pronounced mad accusations of the grooming, kidnapping, killing and eating of babies by some world-wide Satanic Conspiracy to be fantasies worked-up by sectarian interests with an axe to grind, and made recommendations that the FBI should not waste their time with it.

Because FBI agents had not read Lanning's report, today's FBI enrolled Joshua Caleb Sutter, a self-proclaimed Satanist with long - established ties to white supremacist organisations, as an informant into today's world of international Neo-Nazidom, spawned by new Internet networks.

The FBI paid Sutter £100,000.00 dollars to entrap Neo-Nazi Satanists and of course Sutter not only was able to find them aplenty to keep the mesuma flowing, he also actually hunted down 60 year old writings from a defunct obscure British Satanic Group called The Order of Nine Angles and invented a new branch of it in the U.S. which he called O9A, to recruit putative right-wingers with Nazi obsessions. (https://www.vice.com/en/article/fbi-bankrolled-publisher-of-occult-neo-nazi-books-feds-claim/ )

The British government is dutifully doing the same thing by financing an extreme Left activist group called Hope Not Hate, which working with Prevent, an agency set up by the UK to originally deal with Islamic extremism but which has been infiltrated and hijacked by Islamists who seek to exaggerate the prevalence and influence of the 'far-right' in order to disguise the prevalence of constant cases of Islamist terrorism which plainly show that Prevent has not been able to reduce or affect the growth of Islamist violence in the U.K. These people intend to prove an equivalence between Radical Islam and Nazi groups that does not exist. Part of that brain-washing is to portray a worked-up threat from the Far-Right in the U.K. not only by portraying conservative voters as violent right-wing thugs but, even worse, violent far-right thugs who could be demonised as SATANISTS! and be child-abusers as well.

Thus the hunt was on in both the U.S. and the U.K. to 'other' anyone who did not toe the Lefties' line. In this Alice in Wonderland impropaganda, anyone who objected to Immigration was classed as 'far right' to 'prove' that the threat from them was as bad or worse than that from Radical Islam. This is why only a few days ago the British Government literally locked-down 80,000 people under house arrest in Gosport to stop locals protesting again of an invasion by illegal immigrants by positing them all as 'far-right' and therefore robbed them of their democratic rights and freedom of movement like some Stalinist pogrom.

The SAFF saw this happening and published an expose of how it was being done, with the help of the ever woke BBC and other lap-dogs of the media back in 2019 with claims of a double-Satanic-murder in Wembley. The key thing which ignited the idea in the Danyal Hussein case, they maintained, was that he had obtained information on human sacrifice from a network of deadly Satanists on the internet. The truth was very different as you will see if you read it. ( https://saff.nfshost.com/danyalhussein.htm )

As fear of children being groomed on the internet had reached fever pitch (mainly due to organisations which used new technology to sweep the web for examples of it - self-fulfilling prophecy) governments in panic began to talk of imposing new restrictions in law on social media companies and removing any anonymity for internet users, which all came to a head in the last few years with draconian censorship laws imposed by Nations across the Western World, who had been stampeded into doing so by a threat which had no basis in fact but which suited their paranoia.

The horrific worst-case-scenarios used as examples by them were outliers, just like Danyal Hussein was. How the campaigners against pornography get away with positing scares and causing knee-jerk reactions with the authorities, is out lined in the SAFF's research about the first and perhaps largest organisation to begin doing it, the Canadian Centre for Child Protection, (see foot of page below the pdf for full story)

The FBI jumped on this latest SRA bandwagon and have issued ridiculous public warnings about the O9A and for good measure lumped it in with peripheral international scares ('764', 'Maniac Murder Cult', etc.) under a new category of their own invention; Nihilistic Violent Extremism (NVE). This is because, when you drill down 'Satanic' involvement turns out to have been largely peripheral and broadening out the category to Nihilistic Violent Extremism enables a wider catchment which suits both the FBI and those sectarian campaigners who seek confirmation of Satanism under every Sofa.

This is not the first time the FBI have made this mistake. In March 1988 one of their agents traveled to the UK to investigate (false) claims of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse (see image, right)

So what we have here folks is a double-decker strategy by the Leftards and Mandarins in the Global NGO Bureaucracy, the tail which wags Governments across the globe, to revivify the Satanic Panic.

The Leftards want to demonise right-wing voters as Untermensch in the eyes of the authorities. Sub-humans with latent Nazi proclivities coupled with inherently evil and irredeemable souls.

They want to portray everyone who is conservative (small c), those ordinary middle-of-the-road centrists as well as nationalists and patriots, as violent unsophisticated ignoramuses, unworthy of any rights - exactly as the Nazis did to the Jews.

The ideology has come full circle with them, Nazi hunters of the Left are actually hunting themselves and YOU will follow their plan because, being decent human beings, how can you possibly resist capitulating to the arguments against the Satanic-Nazi ritual abuse of adults and children? After all, the FBI tells you it is true and those in the hallowed halls of Academe like Spencer Sunshine have confirmed it!

SAFF Analysis of The Methods NGOs Use to Exaggerate Threats

The use of the Canadian Centre for Child Protection (C3P) C3P services rely on the use of a Web Crawler (Project Arachnid) an automatic bot which searches websites across the internet using algorithms to automatically discover child pornography. Such bots are notoriously unreliable and can return many false positives, including non-pornographic pics of kids on holiday which abound on Facebook and other social media sites. (algorithms can seek out flesh tones in photographs but mostly Arachnid downloads images into a giant database to compare with a mega-database of known abusive images provided by law enforcement).

Other web crawlers do a similar job without all the fanfare. The first was the Internet Watch Foundation which originated what Arachnid does. Google have themselves now set up a Web Crawler to do the same job in a slightly different way. Because of these and other difficulties any images automatically identified as child-porn have to be checked by humans and then passed to the appropriate authorities to filter out duplicates, historic photos already known about, medical photographs, and general false-positives.

Apparently several staff members may have to rate an image to classify it as pornographic. One would have thought kiddie porn would be instantly detectable, but obviously C3P are using definitions so all encompassing that it needs several people to decide whether an image or video is slightly pornographic, which would suggest an over-eagerness to up the numbers of hits and bulking the numbers by including innocent Facebook photos of kids having fun in the bath, or holiday snaps of prepubescent offspring in skimpy swimming costumes. These would probably be their first-level hits. C3P loudly proclaims astonishing 'hit' numbers of over a million images and videos of 'child sexual exploitation' each year. We cannot find any stats on how many of those are actually transferred to the police and result in prosecutions. Very few I'll wager. Clearly there aren't a million cases of children being abused on the internet each year. Once the false positives have been weeded out, many of the rest will be historic abuse images, and duplicates ( which, now 'in the wild' are apparently traded and uploaded and copied by paedophiles continually). Even so all these go down as separate instances of child pornography in C3Ps statistics. This exaggerates the perceived threat from on-line kiddie-porn and will result in a suitable rise in funding for C3P so they can 'catch more abusers'.

But SAFF research shows that catching current abusers from on-line evidence like this is negligible. Whilst Arachnid will probably do a good job of extirpating kiddie-porn from the internet and is therefore worthwhile, saving children who are being abused will probably be a fraction of one percent of the traffic they deal with. Their 385 page report 'Survivor's Survey' was first published in 2017, yet the C3P survey was undertaken to be specific to their remit; i.e. to discover what victims of child-porn think about the psychological effects on them. It did not set out to validate instances of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse nor Ritual Abuse. In fact out of 385 pages there are only four (4) mentions of Satanism and eighteen (18) mentions of ritual. Even with the very detailed statistics provided on the feelings of those who were abused as children and then had those abuses exposed in film on the internet, there is little if any overlap with any of the known cases of claimed SRA in the U.K. for the simple reason that there has never been a film/video found which contains incriminating evidence of Satanic Ritual Abuse.

Additionally it must be underlined that the sample of victims who responded to this survey was just 150 and the lassez faire method used of allowing respondents to pick and choose which sections of the survey to fill in, meant that there was little scientific control. So a small sample is then corrupted by the fact that there was no corroboration whatsoever of the victims statements. They are simply taken at their word.

We have no statistics for instance of the number of people in the sample who suffered from Pseudologia Fantastica or no screening for people filling in the questionnaire for a sick joke (which is a major consideration for Childline as the longest established child-abuse reporting telephone service in the UK, which gets a high proportion of false calls).

In the stats we do have from The Survivor's Survey inconsistencies are legion. For example. 84% of the sample said that images of their abuse had been 'uncovered' but further questioning lead to a total of 86% of that number admitting that it had been uncovered by them telling their therapists about it. With an N=111 figure this indicates that only 16 people in the C3P Survey were likely to have been the victim of internet porn.

In other words 95 respondents did not have a valid trial or prosecution to prove their story. Additionally out of this sample 93%, a very high figure, said they had had to switch therapists before they were satisfied with the help they were getting. In other words they kept on until they found therapists whom they felt confident would believe and support everything they said without question. Presumably therapists who challenged their story or asked for more information were dumped in preference to those who just swallowed their narrative whole. Add to this the figure of 58% who had never reported their abuse to police and you can see that the value of this report is very suspect, yet
child and adult victims' activists think it is wonderful enough to draw enormous conclusions about the needs of victims in the UK and demand government changes on the back of it.

The Original Malleus Maleficarum

For far too long this infamous handbook has been held by academics as a valid insight into the historical occurrence of Witchcraft in the 15th century. The 'confessions' given by witches who were tried by it have been believed to be factually correct , influencing all later commentators and, indeed, our entire society's view of paganism and pre-christian religions.

The MALLEUS MALEFICARUM (Latin for The Hammer of The Witches) was written by Dominican friars Henry Kramer and Jacob Sprenger with Papal endorsement. This notorious document was drawn up in 1484 by the Church as a handbook for would-be Inquisitors on how to identify, torture and eradicate Pagans from society. It became the de-facto training manual for all European witch-hunters and can safely be said to have driven the witch-mania of those times.

Used as a manual to inflict the most disgusting and horrendous tortures on men and, mostly, women, under the guise of God's Holy Writ the Malleus Maleficarum caused hundreds of years of persecution of non-Christians throughout Europe and in particular subjugated womankind for centuries.

It was perhaps the most despicable project in all of history.

A New Malleus Maleficarum For Our Times

We want this website to represent a fair cross-section of opinion. Would you like to add more Information, Observations, Personal Experience, Criticisms or Corrections to SAFF files and publications? Reach us at tony-rhodes@saff.org.uk