SAFF Logo


The Obituary Roger Cook didn't want you to see


Cook Report - The Devil's WorkRoger Cook 'shuffled off this mortal coil' on 15 June 2026. The glowing Obituaries which followed in the Mass Media listed his many programmes and achievements,
but not a single one of them mentioned or commented on his notorious Cook Report special on SRA, one of the last 'documentaries' he ever made.
Why? 

Because it was one of the biggest Hoaxes in Television history and fools thousands even today.

Cook's hour-long THE DEVIL'S WORK was the epitome of the genre he himself created and turned out to be utterly and wholly untrue in every claim it made.  It basically duped nine million viewers into believing in a phantom, and was key in kick-starting the Satanic Panic of the 1990s. A hysteria of historic importance which lasted until the government's own special inquiry into it pronounced it all fiction in 1994 and which, by that time, had destroyed the lives of 86 children and their innocent parents.  You can see how utterly ridiculous this Cook Report was, simply by clicking on the title graphic to the right to view extracts from it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37FlWtg0Kzo  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37FlWtg0Kzo

The history of the SAFF's decade's long fight to tell the public the Truth is rarely seen; and would never be seen if it were left to the Mass Media to comment.  Were it not for our unique websites ( https://saff.nfshost.com https://saff.nfshost.com or  http://www.saff.org.uk  www.saff.org.uk ) which contain tons of exceedingly valuable and historic information on the Satanic Panic which you will not find anywhere else in the world , and which is used by researchers, academics,  and proper journalists on a daily basis.   The people who run the world would prefer you not to know just how you were indoctrinated, nor how the institutions of state, the justice system, the police, the child-care system, the political system, the NHS and the rest, all failed the People multiple times over that decade and since. 

Typical hysterical SRA headlineToday of course, with hindsight, all sane individuals scoff at the very idea that a network of hidden Satanic groups are abusing, sacrificing and eating '4,000 children a year' across the UK, but during the Satanic Panic, which Roger Cook engendered, the public imagination became much less sane.   The lies were SO big, SO outrageous, SO impossible NOT to believe, that almost every single person in authority jumped to back the idea that SRA existed and hundreds of false cases were generated wasting an estimated £100 Million pounds of resources and destroying faith in previously respected institutions like the NSPCC which worked directly with Cook's Team to eagerly jump on the SRA bandwagon.  At that time and up until 1994 the SAFF was the ONLY organisation to publicly decry the lies and publish the Truth of all the false cases which got to court. Most people just trusted in what Cook had falsely claimed.  

For our pains in simply sticking to the Truth we were vilified, falsely accused of being 'paedophile apologists' and generally treated like radical liars with a hidden agenda, instead of the saviours of society which we actually were.  In this climate Cook and his ilk were able to get away with the most atrocious implications which no decent journalist, then and now, would ever consider using.  Roger Cook and his team played on atavistic prejudices and fears deep in the human subconscious, and like all witch-hunters before him, profited from it immensely. Cook was wrong, wrong, wrong, about SRA but he didn't care. The lie was too big, too enormous to own up to, so the creep just kept on compounding his deceit throughout his life and insisting he was right in the first place.  He could have said he was sorry to Chris Bray, and the other people he had falsely accused but instead he doubled-down on his lies, whilst his CTV contract enabled him to evade accountability by crushing any opposition with law-fare which priced his victims out of justice. 

The document reproduced below, is the SAFF 'Quiz-master' web-page which Roger Cook ordered to be Banned from the Internet in 2002. He demanded that Central Television, a multi-million pound organisation, use their company lawyers to put pressure on the SAFF's website providers, who instantly capitulated and closed down the SAFF site without even telling us or allowing an appeal!  They would not even enter into correspondence about it. Our ISP said they could be destroyed by CTV, and the SAFF was just a flea on the arse of a pig, so we could get lost. 

But you can't be sued for telling the Truth, so we immediately instigated TWO new SAFF sites with different ISPs.  One as a replacement and another as a backup, to avoid the public losing all the valuable facts and other unique truths from our on-line Research Library about the LIES concerning Satanic Ritual Abuse which were at that time widely believed.  That was a mountain of unnecessary work for our whole team, took weeks and for a fledgling organisation with limited resources, cost a great deal. It lost all our successful meta-data on the net and made us 'invisible' for some months,  but we had to be sure that another cowardly ISP did not capitulate to the multi-million pound CTV and rob the people of access to the false claims surrounding the SRA controversy. To be sure of continuing our work, when our new websites went live we reluctantly censored the 'Quiz' web-page Cook specifically complained about, took those pages down and instead put up a 'placemarker' just as you see it below (first example).

This ban remained in force for 24 years. Now that evil Roger Cook is dead and his guaranteed one million pound legal indemnity contract with CTV has ended you can at last see the facts he didn't want his public to see, below. Like all SAFF research, it stands up well to the passage of time.  Some of the claims that the News of The World made against Cook in their expose of his TV tricks and practices they could not prove (all anecdotal, he-said-she-said comments). The NoW apologised in print for those, after an 18 month long legal battle with Cook - everything else in our page was bang-on-target.  They always have been.

Ironically Cook was SO paranoid about an imagined 'conspiracy' against him that he actually wrote in his last book 'More Dangerous Ground', summing up his TV career, that the SAFF were in league with the News of the World who were out to destroy him.  You can see how asinine this is when you look at the multitudinous instances where the News of the World pushed the Satanic Ritual Abuse narrative in hysterical headlines!

We had no contact with the News of the World concerning Roger Cook.  We were not part of any conspiracy of any kind.
This completely untrue and speculative lie is typical of Cook's responses in relation to the SRA panic.  After all, he did tell nine million viewers in the UK, via his 'Devil's Work' , that he had found 21 definite cases of SRA within Britain -  and in the intervening 37 years not a single one of those cases ever came true. NOT ONE.

Cook Gets hundreds of thousands yet not on TV nowOn the SAFF's voluminous website you can find other examples of SAFF reports which Cook railed at over the years but which he could not bully us to censor. But that did not stop him from trying to pull the wool over your eyes. 

One would be the amusing instance where Chris Bray actually bumped into Cook in Malaga airport face-to-face and doorstepped him in reverse.  The master-doorstepper had just been doorstepped by one of his victims! And we had a photo of it happening as proof!   That really upset Cook and he demanded we take that web-page down because, get this, under then newly enacted Human Rights Law in the U.K. it 'invaded his privacy', solely because we had mentioned the location of his home address.  .

But SAFF did not publish  Cook's home address, we simply mentioned the locality. We weren't doxing him.  It would not be possible for anyone to pin-point his actual address (even though we had it exactly) from the locality we gave, yet he was apparently so outraged that the SAFF had managed to discover his home, that his legal attack dogs demanded we take that page down. Clearly, this was proof of Cookies' hypocrisy.  He had earned millions from invading the privacy of others in his televised 'doorstepping' finales outside THEIR homes, yet was here bleating about the SAFF reversing the treatment! 

Cook moaned that ' we were inviting his enemies to take action against him'.  The idea was bonkers. If we had wanted to dox him to some imagined mafia hit-man or IRA executioner why would we publish it?  We could have quietly emailed the info to admin@sinnfein.ie !  Clearly we did no such thing, our intention was to show Cook that hiding in a leafy property barricaded by 10 foot walls and electronic gates did not put his SRA lies beyond the reach of Justice. 

What we actually published was:  

'Safe behind the electric security gates of his swish Limpley Stoke Mansion, near Bath, Cook has remained out of the limelight since his last series'.

That was it. No photo, no indication of whereabouts his home was in Limpley Stoke.  There are hundreds of mansions and luxury houses in Limpley Stoke!  Besides it wasn't the address he was really worried about, was it? It was the fact that he had been 'doorstepped' by a victim who was fighting back. That's what he wanted to keep from his press and public. The false claim of doxing was the lawyerly path to censoring the whole story.  We told his CTV lawyers to get lost and said we would delete all the address details  and keep the rest of the page up on the web. You can see and read the 'Cookie Doorstepped!' webpage here: https://tabloidtv.nfshost.com/cookmalg.htm  https://tabloidtv.nfshost.com/cookmalg.htm

There are dozens more stories about how the SAFF has thwarted the SRA lies of Roger Cook since he pushed 'The Devil's Work' onto the British public in 1989, but I don't need to rehearse these in this potted Obituary; you can find them all in minute detail on.  https://tabloidtv.nfshost.com/   https://tabloidtv.nfshost.com/    I suggest you start with the webpage that appeared to offend Cook the most, the 'Quiz Master' page which he banned, and which we have republished on this page below.

In summary.  In 1989 when Roger Cook's influence and power within the British Media was at its peak he thought he was King of the heap. He presumed he could do nothing wrong and took a step too far. He destroyed his reputation with a Tabloidesque documentary on a supposed national threat of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse which had no basis whatsoever in fact. A shock-horror story too good to miss.  So his programme FABRICATED a narrative to suit the rumours.

The Devil's Work
can now be seen as an object-lesson in how far the Media will go to control and direct the mind of the Masses.  Cook and his team employed the most devious media tricks possible; slight of hand, deceitfulness, partial reporting, constructive entrapment, fraudulent implications and downright criminal false editing of historic interviews, to convince 9 million people in Britain that they should be outraged, then he blamed it all on Chris Bray, an innocent Leeds bookshop owner.   Chris Bray discovered Cook's plan to victimise him months in advance, when one of Cook's 'expert advisors', Dianne Core, threatened him with an 'upcoming Cook Report'.  Mr Bray wrote to Cook beforehand providing him with inside information about those fundamentalists, including his 'expert advisors'  whom Cook allowed to scope his programme, and tons of documentation about false claims of SRA in UK and USA.  Mr Bray  did this  on February 2nd 1989 six months before Cook had finished his Devil's Work (eventually broadcast on July 17th that year) but Cook had made his mind up to shaft Mr Bray and STILL went ahead regardless. 

Astonishing Books after the fireShortly after The Devil's Work was broadcast the hatred against the bookshop Cook had falsely implicated in that utterly untrue narrative was so great that it was firebombed by fundamentalist fanatics causing the shop to close down. 

 As time passed and the SRA cases Cook had claimed began to collapse, one by one, it became clear even to outsiders that there was something wrong with the program. Yet Cook did not 'fess up', nor did he apologise, instead he consistently and purposefully over several decades added to his lies to persecute the bookshop owner further - even though the Broadcasting Complaints Commission found him at fault and had specifically told him NOT to do that in their official hearing which he attended in 1990. 

A completely innocent man was chosen by Cook for persecution. Not because he had done anything wrong, but because, by daring to provide a full spectrum of philosophical and religious belief, he had upset the extremist Bible-Thumpers who then made up lies about him and  fantisised about false SRA cases, the very same false tales Cook used in the programme to carry his narrative. 

It was the worst kind of Trial by TV possible. The bookshop owner was simply providing freedom of thought and speech, but how dangerous is that when 95% of people live in a fearful world of their own psychosis due to imposed ignorance like that which Cook engendered?  Long before Freedom of Thought and Speech were a 'thing', decades before the fad to 'Cancel' alternative political and philosophical views became fashionable, the forces of repression honed their axes on the utterly mythical Satanic Ritual Child Abuse Myth.  Cook was largely responsible for hyping that hysteria. 

When the bookshop owner fought back with facts Cook's  defenders began to defer blame to his Cook Report Team, he was, they said, just a figure-head and did not write the script or do the research himself.  Cook was no fool. He vetted everything.  He saw the Satanic Panic was falling apart in front of him, yet continued to hound Mr Bray over the years, changing his tack to try to portray Mr Bray as a lunatic radical false accuser himself!   If you can't counter The Facts, attack the sanity of the person offering them eh?   

The despicable acts Cook took, in order to keep his big money rolling-in were legion, including having his 'last word' in his book More Dangerous Ground, published in April 2007. The vile Cook did not take this opportunity to assuage his false claims or even posit a seed of doubt, he instead doubled-down on attacking the bookshop owner with more lies, in a special chapter which tried to rewrite history and reinforce the lies in the minds of his followers. Cook took one last try to  portray Mr Bray as an Arch-villain whilst reinforcing the heinous lies in his 'Devil's Work' 18 years earlier! His intention was to swamp history. To distribute more lies than Mr Bray could distribute the Truth, so that Lies would become the Facts of the Future, like something out of  Orwell's '1984'. 

Even though in the 18 years which had passed since Cook broadcast his 'Devil's Work' there had not been a single case of SRA proven through the courts. Not one.

Every SRA case Cook warned you about in his documentary was FALSE. The SRA myth was not a crusade to save children, it was an act of pure religious hatred. Religious prejudice designed to crush a spiritual freedom-fighter, whilst duping, confusing and keeping the Plebs ignorant.  For that Cook's legacy is his unadulterated shame which follows him into history.

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”
― George Orwell, 1984


Now the Truth can be told, and at last YOU can see it.  

Lughnasadh 2026



The Censored Web-page 'placeholder' follows:   This is all you were allowed to read for 24 years. 


TAPED CRUSADER TURNS QUIZ-MASTER

......2002 News update on the Daring Doorstepper.......

A bespectacled, aging Roger Cook (right) was caught on camera recently when he came out of obscurity to act as quiz-master at a do near Bath in aid of a Christian organisation.   When he was TV's hottest property he told his audience that he wouldn't allow his targets to hide behind the 'no comment'  - now Cookie is Old News  but is said to cherish his privacy closing out the public behind electric gates  and security systems.  That's Entertainment folks!    The innocent people whose lives  The Cook Report affected in his Trial by TV heyday can't reach him now but is corpulent Cookie still suffering from the reputed 'Satanic Curse' of  the aftermath of his Occult-bashing days?  

....................................The rest of this page has been deleted under orders from Carlton TV. ...........

YOU THINK YOU LIVE IN A FREE COUNTRY AND HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHAT YOU READ BUT YOU ARE WRONG!   YOU MAY AS WELL BE LIVING UNDER A STALINIST REGIME.  

This page has been censored by the British Media Conspiracy against The Truth.  The hypocritical British Media is known throughout the world as the worst of all. It publishes any trash it likes with impunity whether it affects the lives of innocents or not, but let just one small group of freedom fighters publish facts for public consumption which they don't want you to see and they will use their power and money to crush a free debate, just like Stalin and Goebbels did.   They dish it out daily but they can't take it when the tables are turned.....................

After 24 years the Original Fully Uncensored webage Cook banned is revealed below: Enjoy!


 

TAPED CRUSADER TURNS QUIZ-MASTER

......2002 News update on the Daring Doorstepper.......

A bespectacled, aging Roger Cook (right) was caught on camera recently when he came out of obscurity to act as quiz-master at a do near Bath in aid of a Christian organisation.   When he was TV's hottest property he told his audience that he wouldn't allow his targets to hide behind the 'no comment'  - now Cookie is Old News  but is said to cherish his privacy closing out the public behind electric gates  and security systems.  That's Entertainment folks!    The innocent people whose lives  The Cook Report affected in his Trial by TV heyday can't reach him now but is corpulent Cookie still suffering from the reputed 'Satanic Curse' of  the aftermath of his Occult-bashing days?  

TV LIES LAND TAPED CRUSADER WITH  3/4 MILLION POUND LIBEL GAFF

A stunned Roger Cook emerged from the High Court holding a £700.000 pound libel bill yesterday as TV insiders began to whisper about the strange run of  catastrophic failures and embarrassments which Cookie and his team have suffered since his ill-fated documentary on Satanism. Has The Cook Report team been hexed? Read the astonishing chain of events and Judge for yourself.

Cook's infamous "The Devil's Work" special, unveiled so-called Satanic Ritual Child Abuse to the British people during July 1989. Riding high on the hysterical Satan Scare which was gripping the U.S.A. at the time this Cook Report has become the epitome of tabloid television. In the process Cook victimised a completely innocent bookshop owner in a TV witch-hunt seen by nine million viewers. The Cook Report portrayed the man as an organiser and promoter of Satanic Child Abuse and a seller of corpses. He was nothing of the kind and had spent months trying to tell Cook the truth but he refused to listen.  Following broadcast the man's bookshop was firebombed by religious fanatics and his business (which had been established peacefully and lawfully for 20 years) was destroyed.

Cook's programme was hammered by the TV critics and, as we all now know with hindsight, has been totally discredited. Not one of Cook's 21 claimed cases of Satanic Abuse were genuine. Advisors to his programme turned out to be paranoid religious fanatics who took Cookie for a ride and were later exposed by other Television Programmes or national newspapers for their part in promoting the Satanic Abuse Scare.  The full story is revealed exclusively here on the SAFF website.  

Corporal Cooper gets £700.000 from Roger CookExceptionally bad luck seems to have dogged Cookie and his cohorts ever since this programme. The £700,000 libel bombshell was the last straw. Has Cookie been cursed?

IS THIS HOW THE HOODOO BEGAN?

The morning after The Devil's Work was broadcast a live on-air confrontation occurred on Radio Leeds between the victimised bookshop owner and Cook's main researcher, Tim Tate. Passions ran high and the heated interview ended with the bookshops owners exsufflation that justice would be seen to be done. Within a five year period, he prophesied, the Cook Report Team would be made to recant their lies in public and indeed this prophecy came true almost to the day when The Government's definitive report on Satanic Ritual Abuse was published and concluded it was all a myth.

The Broadcating Complaints CommissionWithin months Cook was brought to book at a Broadcasting Complaints Commission  hearing which found his team guilty of unfairly victimising  Mr Chris Bray, the bookshop owner.  Such admonition had never happened to Cookie before. Something different was occurring. The tide was beginning to turn against the Taped Crusader.

Next the unbelievable happened. The Master Doorstepper was doorstepped himself on prime-time national television. A Dispatches Channel 4 special trapped  Cook in the Central TV canteen with a list of his teams misdemeanors including :

  • Putting  salt in a woman's eyes to make her cry for the camera,
  • Paying quislings  £80,000.00 for their 'testimony',
  • Fabricating evidence and ignoring incontrovertible information which disproved Cook's case against his target.

The Mail on Sunday had a bust up with Cook over further allegations and the press critics mauled him.

"Checkpoint meets The Avengers" wrote Thomas Sutcliffe of the Independent;

"Cook would probably have the edge in idiocy"  snarled Anne Billson of The Times;

"Disturbing only because of the shoddy style in which it was carried out." jibed Naomi Porter of the Eastern Evening News;

"If satanists have stuck pins into an effigy of Cook it'll maybe make him jump to it and bring some real action into investigative television" lampooned John Gibson of the Edinburgh Eve. News;

"Mr Cook is a slimeball and  if Old Nick is really on the prowl he should cast him into the pit of eternal agonies forthwith!" disparaged Mark Sanderson of Time Out.

Other journalists were equally as scathing.

""Cook Report had more holes than Keith Floyd's colander" (YEP);

"Scary as a Carry on Hammer film" (Sunday Mail);  

"Unintentionally amusing aspects" (Daily Express);

"Too disturbing? Too silly I'd say" (News of World);

"Devil Didn't register" (Evening Telegraph);  

"Devil of a letdown"(Sun);

"Surprised that it was allowed to go ahead at all" (Daily Mail);

"Usual Tabloid TV fodder" (E. Independent);

'The Devil's Work' was becoming a special alright, but not in the way Cook had intended.

To cap it all a viewer wrote a complaining letter to the TV times. She was shocked and disgusted. Not by Satanists, but because Cook had allowed Gays to be labeled as 'Devil worshipping child-molesters'.

Other allegations suddenly began to surface. Cook's team had cynically 'doctored'  a 5 year old interview by one of his targets and edited out qualifying statements subsequently broadcasting the distorted piece to make the man appear to be condemning himself!  

Then it was revealed that, unable to find an evil enough Satanist in the U.K., Cook had actually paid for an American Satanist to be flown to the U.K. specially to enact a ritual for his cameras!  

Fathers fury at son being falsely termed a Satanist In the meantime the father of a man featured as a Satanist by Cook complained to CTV that his son had never been a Satanist nor a member of a Satanic group! Cook's The Devil's Work was beginning to look more like the script for a Carry On film than a serious documentary.

Mike Townson excusing Cook Report tacticsSoon the Cookie Curse drew a wider arc as the Cook Report's executive producer Mike Townson was lambasted on Channel Four's Network programme by a defecting Cook Report Team researcher. Townson admitted using hidden cameras for entrapment and was then criticised for unnecessarily forcing confrontations in the street. Townson admitted that (although IBA guidelines require journalists to request an interview first and only doorstep people if they refuse) the Cook Team doorstepped without such a request when they felt it necessary.

Judge Jury and Executioner? But how honourable and impartial are these people who use the principle of 'public interest' to justify taking sides and victimising  innocent people regardless of the facts in nationwide Trial by TV?

Not a lot , according to MP Roger King who complained about Cook to the Lord Chancellor in 1990 because of  Roger's preemptive programme about two British girls held on drug smuggling charges. Mr King went so far as to accuse Roger Cook of  risking the girls' lives.

Then Cookie had devoted Christians in Cambridgeshire up in arms by confusing the Churches of Christ with the Central London Church of Christ. He told viewers that this was a cult which broke up families. Sloppy research Cookie!

As if stung by all this negative criticism,  the Corpulent Crusader screened a programme which attempted to substantiate the Devil's Work in a 1990 'update'. He interviewed Maureen Davies, the woman who manned the Helplines after the show, giving the false impression that his claims in Devil's Work had been substantiated.  Cook said that the programme had received over 900 calls. "We have been having phone calls from children and adults of all ages sharing how they have been Ritual Abused as a result of  Satanism." said Davies.

The Woman who acted as expert on Roger Cooks programme was a dudUnfortunately for Cook and Mrs Davies, Victoria Macdonald of the Sunday Telegraph wasn't as gullible and later pressed Maureen Davies in what was to become her last interview to the press. Maureen admitted that ' she had never had to deal with anyone younger than a teenager' and that victims 'are rarely children'. So the Devil's Work had been ALL ABOUT the supposed Satanic Abuse of children yet their ace expert SRA adviser had never met any!   

Later that year Davies, a prime mover in the promotion of the Satan Myth and a self-declared opponent of the bookseller who was targeted in Cook's programme ,  was exposed by a BBC Wales' Week in Week Out documentary which accused her of  manipulating and misrepresenting evidence to make people believe in a scare which didn't exist and involvement in the failed Rochdale SRA case. Ironically the reporter , Julian Mercer, ended the programme by doorstepping Davies.  Despite all her previous public lectures, essays, publications, and 'expert' involvement with the Cook Report , for some reason  Maureen  didn't want to talk to Julian. You can see a short clip of her slamming the door on him here:

Following quickly on the heels of this programme came World in Action's discrediting of the Satanic Ritual Abuse allegations with their documentary 'Devil's Advocates'.

Then came Panorama's 'In The Name of Satan' which gave the now reeling Roger  the coupe de grace by showing the scare to have been a complete invention imported from the U.S.A. - Exactly what the Leeds bookseller had told Cook (in writing) before the Taped Crusader falsely accused him in front of nine million viewers!

The Devil's Work had come apart at the seams, and Cook's reputation in investigative journalism was rapidly following the same trajectory. When the false child-abuse case against the American Satanist featured in the Cook Report  collapsed and other convictions against test cases in the U.S.A. were overturned  Cook began to look decidedly wilted. In fact he went down with malaria!

TITTLE TATTLE TATE:

Tim Tate's Book Children for The Devil is pulpedAs if these occurrences weren't enough to cause a seed of doubt in Cook's mind  the next crisis was a body-blow to the Taped Crusader. Cook's Chief researcher on The Devil's Work was Tim Tate, a colleague who had worked with Cook during his Checkpoint days and with him co-authored a book titled ' Know Your Rights'.  The irony of this became apparent when Tate was made to apologise in court for libelous statements concerning police involvement in the Broxtowe Child Abuse Case which was heavily featured in the Cook Report and formed a  considerable part of Tate's ill-fated book, 'Children for the Devil'. The book, based squarely on research Tate had done for the Cook Report, was  subsequently withdrawn from sale and pulped (click here to read about it).

This news was featured in a piece in Private Eye Magazine. It lead to a farcical series of  correspondence between  Tate and Eye readers where a discussion about Tate's inaccuracies resulted in an impromptu competition to discover the maximum number of errors he had made in his research!

To add insult to injury came the stunningly hilarious Benny Hill sketch which pastiched Cook and his team doorstepping an Asian businessman and getting the wrong victim after tearing his house apart in the process.  So near the bone that it has become something of a classic it has been repeated several times since to the great enjoyment of the media community. Cook was fast becoming an object of ridicule. Was this all co-incidence? Or the supernatural?

The finally ignominy came when the notorious Broxtowe Child Abuse Case, the lynch-pin of Cook's programme, was finally put to rest as having no Satanic context whatsoever by a combined police and social services enquiry.

All very mysterious.

Not long afterwards Cook was interviewed for The Garden Party programme and was asked point blank whether he ever got it wrong.

"The process is very thorough" he said "they are very good researchers. I don't think we  have gone as far as going on the air and getting it wrong in any big way.  There are always minor errors." Cook said sheepishly.

Minor errors?

  •  A nationwide scare about Satanists raping, torturing, and killing children, ritually aborting adolescent rape victims and forcing them to kill their offspring,  which had no basis in fact?
  • Inferring that Arthur Scargill had paid off his mortgage with Libyan funds when he didn't have a mortgage in the first place?
  • Accusing an innocent family man of  organising child abuse and selling dead bodies?
  • Alleging that Corporal Cooper savagely beat up an Army recruit when he didn't?
  • Falsely defaming and besmirching the professionalism of a doctor with madcap theories about SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome)

NOTE:  ( Dr Jane Winstanley was defamed by Cook in his programme: "Cot Death Poisonings" (Series 10 Cook Report November 1994). The program implied that Dr. Winstanley, a fertility specialist, had given negligent advice or was involved in practices that endangered infants, linking her to the controversy surrounding cot death caused through supposed poisonous exudations from cot mattresses.  An independent study later found no evidence to support the Cook Report's claims about the mattresses. Dr. Winstanley sued for libel, and the case was settled with a substantial payout and an admission by Central Television that the allegations were false and defamatory. )

Arthur Scargill was fitted up by the Cook Report using convincing tabloid TV tactics including testimony from 'witnesses' who had axes to grind.  The gist was that Scargill had misappropriated hundreds of thousands of pounds from a 'Libyan Slush Fund' which had originally been intended for cash strapped striking miners, but it was all unproven, untrue and part of the improperganda used to break the power of the NUM.   Channel 4's Dispatches series, doorstepped Cook about it on 22 April 1991 and you can see it happen in real time in this extract here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79ZMT5MUdYA

If these are the Minor Errors Cookie, what have you planned for major ones - world war III?

The acute embarrassment of having to fork out three quarters of a million pounds due to entirely non-sustainable, libelous, allegations by the Cook Report resulted in Central Television's damage limitation propaganda. After Cook's failure in court journos were told that the Taped Crusader had made 800 programmes and that CTV had 'absolute faith' in him. The implication was that the errors in Bullied to Death were an exception. But as we have seen they were not that much of an exception.

Cook retorted that 'it was the only settlement of any size awarded against him in 25 years of investigative broadcasting.'    What he failed to say was that Central TV had forced the issue to court and gone part-way through a High Court trial before coming to an agreement when it became obvious that their case could not be sustained. This defamation wasn't an unfortunate mistake which the team rushed to correct when alerted to the truth about Cpl Cooper's innocence, the fact is that CTV could have ended the upset at any time but chose to run it to court.  

They did a similar thing at the Broadcasting Complaints Commission hearing with Mr Chris Bray.  Mr Bray turned up alone for the proceedings and ranged against him were six of the Cook Report team including a high-flying CTV Brief and Cook himself!    A battle between a multi-million pound TV company which is doggedly willing to risk millions to law-fare its opponent to destruction is an unequal battle which highlights the inequalities in the British legal system.  Ironically, it is a form of bullying in itself.  The process which is mostly to blame for spawning excessive programmes like The Cook Report which can prey upon innocent people with impunity through 'corporate apartheid'. Turning out programmes which are sometimes grossly unfair and going far beyond the requirements of entertainment, yet rarely achieving a standard which qualifies for the appellation of  'investigative journalism'.

Is it any wonder that the public don't get to hear about conflicts and injustices concerning victims who haven't the funds to fight back?  The bookseller targeted in Cook's appalling 'Devil's Work' couldn't sue because his livelihood had been destroyed by the firebombing of his shop by sectarian vigilantes a week after Cook's broadcast.

How many of Cook's victims are silent sufferers of the injustice of trial by television?  Ask the lady doctor who was victimised over SIDS? The completely innocent bookseller who was accused of child abuse and selling dead bodies.?  The honourable Corporal who was portrayed as a violent bully when he wasn't? The Miners' leader who was made to appear dishonest when he isn't?   Viewers may wonder why they are being spoon-fed this self-righteous kitsch?  The answer could be in Cookie's origins.  In parochial mild-mannered New Zealand, where Cook hails from, crime is almost non-existent and news so scarce that Snake Bites get headline billing. A Taped Crusader in New Zealand is a contradiction in terms. Is that why we have to suffer his moralising instead?

In the 18th Century a man used to travel the Music Halls and immolate himself  on stage. It was standing room only at every venue whilst John Thackery publicly amputated bits of himself. The Cook Report must have a similar appeal as his fans wait expectantly for someone's fist to strike Cookie's nose. It's an illusion; he's only been accosted 18 times in 800 programmes.  That could be because the motley crew which he brings with him on every 'doorstepping' are always there, just out of camera view.   Now that Cookie has retired into obscurity he prefers to while away his time asking questions of a different kind, let's hope he is more accurate as a Quiz-Master than he was as a self-appointed TV Crusader.  

Ends.



We want this website to represent a fair cross-section of opinion. Would you like to add more Information, Observations, Personal Experience, Criticisms or Corrections to SAFF files and publications?  Reach us at tony-rhodes@saff.org.uk

Click here to return to the Sub-Culture Alternatives Freedom Foundation (SAFF) frontpage