Even Before his trial commenced the BBC broadcast an hour long special documentary by Anne Leer (BBC TWO This World - Norway's Massacre 9.00pm BST Sunday 15 April) which concluded that Breivik was a ratbag Nazi. In a clear attempt to direct debate over the trial her documentary made no mention of Breivik's extremist Christian beliefs and motives. It selectively extrapolated several small quotes from his 1500 page European Declaration of Independence to 'confirm' Leer's take on the killings whilst ignoring the bits in the EDI which clearly showed him to be a Christian Killer. Leer appeared to have forgotten the media's reporting at the time of the killings when they almost unanimously accused Islamic extremists of perpetrating another Mumbai sectarian massacre on Utoya. When they are brown skinned, young and Asian they must be Islamic sectarian terrorists but when they found out the killer was white skinned and blonde haired they immediately switched from reporting a sectarian massacre to calling him a mad Nazi! The tacit approach is that only coloured people are fanatical enough to kill for their gods. ON Monday 16th April 2012 Anders Behring Breivik, wearing a black suit, white shirt and gold coloured tie, stood up in the dock at Oslo to enter his plea of 'not guilty'. Breivik pleaded not guilty to charges of "acts of terror", telling the court: "I acknowledge the acts, but not criminal guilt". His trial for the murder of 77 people had begun. The media circus surrounding the trial was instantly treated to a sample of the circus Breivik had planned. He folded his right arm across his chest and then thrust it into the air giving a clenched-fist salute. He was immediately accused by the world's press of performing a Nazi Salute and this made many of the main headlines. The BBC scavenged their researc to follow up the 'meaning' of Brievik's salute at length on their website.Breivik: What's behind clenched-fist salutes? Just a handful however, actually bothered to do some proper journalistic research. They realised that Breivik had already presaged this moment on Page 110 of his EDI where he wrote:
This trial is expected to last for 10 weeks. Let us hope the world's media get up to speed on what Breivik is trying to do here; because otherwise he may begin to make them look very, very stupid. Falling for the easy option of stigmatising him as a mad Nazi is an insult to the victims. The whole of Norway, and particular the grieving parents, want to know, as do we, why, an educated, softly-spoken, polite young man from the heart of well-heeled Norwegian society, the very antithesis in fact of a mad Nazi, felt justified in murdering so many innocent people in cold blood. ![]() Child Sacrifices to Moloch!Extract begins: Some people consider the New World Order (NWO) to be a scheme orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group: a covert fringe-Masonic organization sometimes called the 'Illuminati.' .. Accused of NWO involvement is the highly secretive international think tank and influential lobbying group known as the Bilderberg Club. Also criticized is the historical Bohemian Grove secret society where some of the world's most powerful and influential men meet in a redwood forest in Monte Rio, California. The exclusive elitists of Bohemian Grove allegedly worship a 40-foot owl statue representing the fire god Molech, and they engage in an ancient Canaanite ritual of simulated child sacrifice. This mock human sacrifice is known as 'The Cremation of Care.' .... But the worst nightmare of 'Masonic child sacrifice' came to the world on July 22, with the Oslo Massacre. Masonic 'Knights Templar' Anders Breivik, a Norwegian, confessed to a shooting rampage at a liberal political youth camp on Utoya Island of Norway that took 68 young lives, after carrying out a bombing in Oslo, which killed 8..... ( Source: New World Order and Masonic Child Sacrifice by Peter Fotis Kapnistos )
BULLSHITThe New World Order Conspiracy Myth is a dustbin of impressive sounding rumour linked to a reintepretation of historical happenings which give the myth credence. The NWO myth has caught the imagination of millions of armchair conspiracy nuts on the internet and by virtue of its very popularity this dubious information now appears for serious consideration in websites, internet libraries and forums, many of whom have no idea that they are doing the dirty-work of Jew Baiting for vicious troublemakers whom they would normally deplore.Most people who host NWO ideas do not realise that its source is worked up from vicious anti-semitic propaganda floated at the turn of the twentieth century in the form of a forged document, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which purported to be a secret Jewish Zionist Industrialists' plan to take over the world. The intention of the authors was presumably to incite religious hatred by Christians against Jews prior to WWII. And to the eternal shame of idiots who unknowingly further it, it has since bolstered and enthused neo-nazi and Jew haters worldwide. The NWO myth was first cobbled together in disparate form on the text-only internet of the 1980s when it's extreme right wing political extremism and religious hate was clear for all but the most dim to see, but it has since been constantly modified, extended, added to, mixed with factual occurrences and 'polished' for general consumption until today the story is so complex and appears so certain that it is referred to and treated as though actual fact; witness Kapnistos's confident offering in the above extract, 90% of which is pure fiction. The NWO Myth symbiotically grows in response to dramatic world-happenings and the 1989 Satanic Ritual Child Abuse Myth borrowed the idea of a pan-global freemasonic child abusing network from it. In time-honoured practice this was then fed-back into the NWO story as 'proof' In case you aren't yet clued in, extreme right conservatives are invariably WASPS (white Anglo-Saxon Protestants) so Freemasonry is attacked because of the WASP preoccupation with hate for Roman Catholicism, from which Freemasonry developed. By attacking and discrediting Freemasonry as an outpost of Vatican machiavelianism, Catholicism is shown to be not only religiously counterfeit but actually in league with Satan as the illustration below from a 15c Reformation pamphlet shows.
![]() The International ConnectionOn 19th January 1989 the Schiller Institute held an international conference in Rome about the then coming Hot topic; Satanic Ritual Child Abuse, which clearly set out the fraudulent claims about freemasonry and their supposed involvement in child abuse and white slavery as though fact.You will see. that it is a combination of Bolshevists, Communists, and liberal bankers in the West, and , which to some of you may come as a surprise, for others not, that actually Satanism as a political factor in world politics is part of the problem we are dealing with. (extract from opening speech by Helga La Rouche) Over 300 delegates including key members of the British phalange of activist social workers who started the Satanic Ritual Child Abuse Myth in the U.K. went home to popularise the 'Freemasonic conspiracy'. The Rome conference was a networking device designed to promote the NWO lie. It was hosted by Helga La Rouche the wife of disgraced CIA informant Lyndon La-Rouche who played off both left and right political factions in the 1980s with his 'Rouchies' (private network of information gathering and propaganda which greatly influenced the US. media). La Rouche was later jailed and his network faded but not before he had heavily promoted the NWO / Satanic Ritual Child Abuse Lie in his mouthpiece the New Federalist magazine. Under the guise of the Martin Luther King Foundation (nothing whatsoever to do with Martin Luther King!) top satan hunters from the U.K. were financed to visit the U.S.A. to tell inflated stories to back up the NWO lie.
we will make sure, that one way or the other, the ideas and programs of Lyndon LaRouche will be realized. We want to announce this campaign, for which Lyn has correctly given the slogan some time ago; to do nothing less than to kill Satan. I want to end my remarks by saying, so help us God through our arm, and I am confident that Christ will be victorious over Satan' (extract from opening speech by Helga La Rouche) Ironically, it was the progression of the manic NWO myth by extreme right-wing fanatics which created the anti-freemasonic crackdown in Britain in the 1980s and gave left-wing activists enough 'evidential rumour' to mount an attack on Freemasons in the U.K. There was a pogrom on Freemasons in the Police and government which brought totally unnecessary limitations on Freemasonic membership to innocent adherents. The main claim against Freemasonry was that it made members' duty to the police subservient to their duty to Freemasonry and therefore their actions could not be trusted. Nobody questioned this even though the same accusation could have equally been levelled at any policeman who was a committed Christian. SAFF exposes of the way the Irish Government, Police and Authorities all conspired against their duty to protect the Roman Catholic Church in order to cover-up widespread child abuse by Priests is clear evidence of that. This astonishing coupling of the political right and left was also evident throughout the Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth. The Myth of SRA was created by right-wing Christian fundamentalists to frighten society into complying with their wishes for greater paternalistic control over society, bring a stop to liberality, divorce, unmarried mothers, feminism, homosexuality and a suppression of all non-Christian beliefs.
But the myth also worked highly
in the favour of extreme socialists and other left-wingers who saw it
as an opportunity to strengthen social work promote victimhood and
recruit 'patients' to fuel demands for further funding from government
for another bout of neo-marxist social engineeering. So the stupid left-wingers could not resist playing into the hands of the extreme right and doing their dirty work for them. They were in fact digging their own graves at the expense of liberty and freedom of thought which were supposed to be some of their fundamental tenets! Of course by 1994 the government official investigation into SRA proved it was all nonsense but the pogrom against Freemasons is still accepted as valid by fools in authority. This falsity bolstered the untruth about the existence of SRA to those who did not want to relinquish their belief in NWO. One of the prime sources of the idea of both Satanic Ritual Child Abuse and the New World Order Myth is David Icke. The 'Moloch' connection is on his website. Icke's indulgence is not simply eccentric, it is often totally false. For instance, in his forum section discussing supposed evidence to convince surfers of the existence of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse a contributor gave a personal account about an occult bookshop, Astonishing Books, in Leeds. The contributor said that the shop had a room in the back in which satanic ritual child abuse used to take place. This is completely and utterly false but very typical of the many thousands of lies floated about SRA because it appears too big a statement to be untrue, when in fact it is completely without any substance. The bookshop owner has emailed Icke several times demanding that the lie be taken down. He has never received a reply but he knows that the emails got there because shortly afterwards Icke began emailing him sales letters to the very same 'reserved' email box! Icke's entire site may be equally as false as this section. How is one to tell? How many hundreds of thousands of people are reading it and being convinced about the NWO and SRA when the 'evidence' offered is a downright lie? How are surfers like yourself supposed to know and trust Icke's opinions when his site is so woefully inadequate that it can't be bothered to correct a lie of this magnitude when informed of it? On what will you base your decisions about whether SRA exists or not? It is not surprising to us therefore to see the tragedy of Utoya capitalised upon by freaks who are even now distributing the supposed links between Breivik, The NWO, freemasonry, satanism, Moloch, and child sacrifice on the net as though fact. Undoubtedly these motifs will appear as 'fact' in future editions of the Myth. For example one ultra-conservative website had the cheek to headline: Breivik’s Own Words: He is a Pagan, Not Christian!Even though there is AMPLE incontrovertible evidence that he is a committed Christian whose actions are based on his CHRISTIAN beliefs as we clearly prove on this page. In the Yesodic Miasma of the NWO Internet freaks truth becomes lie and lie becomes truth quicker than career politicians can do a U turn. Especially if the lies are to protect their own interests and keep their followers in the dark. Therefore we are taking time out to scotch these lies below. Source:There is no God called MolochMolech, or more accurately Moloch, is NOT the name of a Pagan god. The word is a Canaanite term for a form or style of sacrifice. The imagined illustration of Moloch at the top of this column is a 19c German drawing based on descriptions in ancient texts which have since proved to be flights of fancy. In short it is fictitious.Pagans/satanists did not and do not sacrifice children to Moloch. Ancient biblical propaganda written by the Canaanite's enemies (the Hebrews) and, later worked up by the Romans who vanquised Canaan and who would also have an interest in showing them as decrepit, is all we have to go on. The rest is sectarian supposition. There is no god called Moloch, Phoenican or otherwise, but child sacrifice was practised by many tribes and races, including the Jews themselves, apparently : "It is now generally accepted that the word Molech was not the name of a god but a technical term for child sacrifice, indicating that the Israelites were once accustomed to burn their children as sacrifices, probably to Yahweh.In short, at that distant time in the history of mankind, almost every tribe or society was daft enough to be doing it and are equally guilty. The point is that it had nothing to do with a god called Moloch or Molech. That idea comes directly from untrustworthy passages in holy writ which have since been re-transcribed. To suggest that Anders Breivik was somehow committing child sacrifice to Moloch on instruction from the Illuminati by shooting teenagers on Utoya is a scandalous corruption of the facts which will only add further pain to the grief of the parents.
Particularly when you remember that Breivik is a fundamentalist Christian who has himself been influenced by the NWO myth.(see below)Molech (or Moloch) appears frequently in fundamentalist Agent Provocateur Andrew Boyd's Book 'Beyond Belief' (see here for more information) which has done much to spread the fiction about Molech worldwide through his links with the Christian fundamentalist networks. Boyd's Book repetitively uses Molech to justify the grand Satanic Conspiracy which Boyd believes exists. "Dieties invoked at these ceremonies included Molech..[who has] associations with child sacrifice and, death through burning." (page 668)To further enhance the point he prints an opinion from Vera Diamond, (a psychotherapist who claims to have treated cases of Satanic Ritualised Abuse) "Molech seems to be [a diety name] particularly associated with eating babies". Although Molech has had some bad press in the past he has neverbefore been accused of eating babies. In fact Moloch was the Ancient Supreme Fire God of the Canaanites and he was worshipped by many early Hebrews to the chagrin of their Elders. King Solomon even built a temple to Moloch on the Mount of Olives according to the Old Testament. In fact most of the information we have about Moloch has come from the Old Testament where partisan recording is clear (his name is intentionally mis-pointed in order to discredit it by analogy). The worship of Molech is several times represented in the O.T. as demanding child sacrifices. Through burning - Never through eating. Notice here the mechanic of 'negative derivation' which is well-evident throughout the Satanic Myth. It is required that Satanists are most-heinous. Just burning children is not evocative enough - they have to EAT them. [Ed: Today Breivik shoots them!] Victim Imposters provide the testimony. 'Experts' seek to provide the corroboration. Past myths are searched for a baby-eating monster but when one can't be found, a twist of the tale occurs and Moloch becomes a baby-eater par excellence. Boyd KNOWS that no biblical scholar has ever said that Moloch eats babies. After promoting the idea that Moloch demanded child sacrifice, he allows Ms Diamond to add the twist in the tale which is then taken up by other pro- sramists as fact. The inversion of the Old Gods into the New Devils is a regular occurrence throughout history and some biblical scholars contend that Moloch (the literal hebrew translation being 'King') did not require child sacrifice by burning but child PURIFICATION by passing children through smoke from a fire. There is no concrete evidence to suggest that Moloch demanded child sacrifice but the tale has been used for a long time to justify Abraham's consideration of sacrificing his first born son to Yaweh in the Old Testament. A reference to Sir James Fraser's Golden Bough will show that this is a common worldwide purification ceremony which has its parallels at different times in different lands. Indeed it is notable that The Beltaine Fire festival of the Celtic Pagans of Britain includes a purification right in which children and adults jump through the need-fire smoke and drive their flocks through smoking embers in order to purify themselves and their animals FROM any forces which may be lurking. It will come as no surprise to many to discover that this positive ceremony has ALSO been hi-jacked by the fundamentalists and interpreted as child sacrifice. True to form Boyd includes the innocuous Beltaine festival , without further explanation, in his 'Calendar of Satanic Sabbats' in his book, along with Samhain, another major Celtic feast which did NOT involve human sacrifice and which has no connection whatsoever with Satanism! Celtic Paganism has, of course, nothing whatsoever to do with Satanism, nor with Semitic gods but most of the population have been conned into considering the Old Pagan gods to be devils of some kind after a thousand years of wicked propaganda by the Christian church. The Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth is simply an updated example of the same defamation. It's still a good enough frightener to successfully suppress a bona-fide religion which is thousands of years older than Christianity. In any event Moloch is the Tyrian equivalent of the Hindu Agni and is not connected in any way with the worship of Satan as Boyd contends in his book. Ends: Full background on Moloch can be seen here Ends: |
The Christian bias of the World's Media was clearly exposed when the newspapers and TV orignally blamed the massacre of
over 70 young people on Utoya Island on Moslem extremists. It was, they said, a Mumbai copycat operation.
But when the police captured Anders Behring Breivik, hours later, he was in the process of coolly and systematically hunting down and shooting dead his defenceless victims. The police were expecting a troop of well-armed and trained Moslem extremists but instead caught a single blond-haired blue-eyed Norwegian Christian who had set himself up for martyrdom in what he hoped would be a tipping point in a new Crusade against Islam and the 'ungodly' socialists who had 'ruined' his country. Breivik believes there is a concerted attempt to undermine Christian belief and culture in favour of a global multiculturalism designed to destroy Western Christianity. The world's media rapidly switched boats in mid-stream, re-portraying Breivik as a mad Nazi but how much of this is true and how much of it is to keep the truth hidden? Breivik believes Moslem fundamentalists are using the power-vacuum created by the Socialisticas to begin a surreptitious war against Christianity and take over the West using a development of the tactics that the Soviet's used in the Cold War to infiltrate, undermine and destabilise, entire continents. The Moslem intention, he wrote, was to impose Islamic law through religious struggle (Jihad) whilst the West was occupied with the 'sleeping sickness' of socialism. To Breivik this was simply a re-run of the Moslem Expansionism which caused the Crusades. History was repeating itself and, according to his 'manifesto', Breivik thinks that the people responsible for this destruction of Norway was the Norwegian Labour Party with it's links to the international socialist movement and its intentions to socially-engineer a multicultural globalisation epitomised by the 1971 Coca-Cola advert which depicted a multitude of races and people holding hands on a hill-top.
Coca-Cola PoliticsBreivik exposes 'Coca-Cola Politics' (the term has nothing to do with the company of the same name but reflects the political aim of penetrating disparate cultures to promote a single unified global idea which promises peace and happiness to all based on trite assumptions) by a very detailed analysis of key writings, rare publications and psychological discoveries by eminent and influential people in the pre and post-war Communist Intelligentsia which revealed a strategy of placing agent provocateurs within the educational establishments of countries to reform the culture through clever hidden methods of indoctrination. Breivik maintains that the Communists came to the conclusion that committed Christian Societies were highly resistant to being undermined by the usual tactics which Communism used to destabilise third world countries and that methods and ideologies would need to be put in place which would work progressively over the long-term to breach the mores and principles of Christian societies and replace them with eclectic ideals which would weaken the country and its people. Breivik maintains that these mechanisms have developed their own momentum and continued to work unseen long after the fall of communism, producing, for example, the current ideological mindset of political correctness which often goes entirely against common sense but which is behind many new laws which sound useful but eventually weaken society. Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals. (EDI: page 15)Breivik then goes on to show that much of what passes for modern psychotherapy is in fact a form of dependency which has its origins within these 'hidden mechanisms' which have been unknowingly intimately accepted by the West. In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute, which became known as the Frankfurt School, was modelled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.This is why Breivik specifically chose the Norwegian Labour Party Youth Summer-Camp. His intention was to kill the entire next generation of Labour Party politicians in the hope of averting further multiculturalism. As the internet establishes itself as a largely uncensored platform for the discussion of difficult subjects which would otherwise simply be suppressed, people are finding the balance of power shifting away from Mass Media which is becoming increasingly irrelevant. Real debates are ensuing, not between politicians (who are trained to obfuscate), but between real people who are finding somewhere to air their grievances. This is creating revolutions both intellectually and materially, bypassing both the censorship of information by the media and the increasingly turgid old-style political systems which seem incapable of reform. The 'Arab Spring' is a classic illustration of this effect. The Media surf these new movements, acting as commentators, as though trying to insist they are still in charge of public opinion, but people who know have long-since turned to the internet for proper information. The demise of the world's Media is closely linked to the technological improvements in computer processor speeds and memory storage capacity. Soon this will exceed the level required for instantaneous real-time streamed communication and the Media as we now know it will be a spent force. Blond Hair, Blue Eyes, White Skinned, Steely StareWhen they got to know that the killer was a white man, shock-waves reverberated through the western media, long controlled by left-wing agents of influence. Opinion formers began to realise that beneath Breivik's terrible actions lay confirmation of a seismic shift in world politics. It was paramount that the Media continued to keep the masses asleep and aligned with the way they wanted the world to be. Their stock in trade is repetitive; - use age-old stereotypes and discords to tell the people what to think and then incite them to act to perpetrate the status quo. So their propaganda machine trundled into action yet again.They assured everyone that Anders Behring Breivik is just another lone nut, a far-right Neo-Nazi madman whose philosophies and justifications are an aberation. Breivik. they said, is just a psychopathic monster whose crimes meant nothing in the larger scheme of things. He was termed delusional and insane. His actions were one of those random acts of violence that could not be predicted and which will probably never happen again now that he had been caught; they said. Oh... that's all right then... But is it?. Commentators who are indoctrinated with the usual Xist perspectives did not bother to look further into Breivik's real motives but wrote him off instantly. Some even tried to wipe his name from history. Presumably he wanted to make a name for himself, which is why I won't identify him. His name deserves to be forgotten. Discarded. Deleted. Labels like "madman", "monster", or "maniac" won't do, either. There's a perverse glorification in terms like that. If the media's going to call him anything, it should call him pathetic; a nothing. Source: Charlie Booker, Film Critic, The Guardian.
Breivik is a well-educated, well-read, successful intellectual with a high-IQ. The photograph (right) is from his published diary of him attending his sister's wedding. He comes from a liberal intellectual middle-class family (his father was a diplomat). Breivik had worked in many key positions in large conglomerates in the USA and Europe and started a business in IT which earned him millions by the time he was in his mid-twenties. He is well-travelled and personable, has many friends and can mix socially easily. He is not a sad lonely prat, neither is he a dysfunctional madman. It is easy for the Media propaganda machine to dismiss Breivik as a nut but his story is intensely crucial to the future of the West and we hope that in laying it out here it will avoid the confrontation that may be coming. No Excuses For a Psychopathic KillerNow at the outset I want to say that what Breivik did was horrendous and inexcusable. To cut short the lives of so many promising young people from the Norwegian intelligentsia in such a cold and clinical way is an abomination and there is absolutely no rationale which could justify his actions. I utterly and unreservedly condemn him and send my sincere sympathies to the relatives of his victims. However, if Breivik is more than a madman, which he is, then society needs to look carefully at what caused him to do those atrocious things because my warning for those who think it began and ended with him is that writing Anders Breivik off as another Oswald may cause more innocents to die in the long run.
The European Declaraton of Independence (EDI)![]() In his EDI Breivik introduces his family and tells about his personal growth and the illuminations which brought him to his current views. It will be both compelling and believable to millions. Particularly to right-wing Christian militia types many of whom are beginning to see Breivik as a martyr to the Christian cause. In particular Breivik's ideas and philosophy dangerously melds the previously unconnected right-wing factions of the U.S. with the Conservative Militia in the Balkans, where incandescent grudges still exist in the minds of millions of Christians there about the way Europe interferred in their conflicts in favour of the Moslems. Breivik's EDI includes his personal story. Of how he tried to change things from within the system (he stood as Progress Party Candidate at the Oslo city council elections in 2003) and had first hand experience of the inability of the present process to reflect anything but 'Coca-Cola politics'. It was after this that he moved towards radical political action. The Pauper Soldiers of Christ, Knights Templars of Solomon (PCCTS) was founded by him and, he claims, other leading members of the 'Conservative Revolutionary Movement'. Investigations by the authorities have so far played down this claim. Is this megalomania? The usual divine justification for immoral acts he knew he might have to undertake later? Or are right-wing factions really coming together all over Europe? Burn The Witch!Of course, Breivik's clear Christian motivation has already been re-presented and demonised by the fawning Xist press as having occult connections. It is SO easy for them to press the buttons of Joe Public using propaganda stereotypes which they have indoctrinated people with over the centuries, yet Breivik is without doubt not only a committed Christian but his entire radical philosophy and justification for killing over 70 innocent people is based squarely and irrevocably on his Christian beliefs and Christian history.This point will be hotly refuted by the fundies who have already tried to link Breivik with Satanic practices linked to Human Sacrifice and the New World Order myth (see leftmost column). The truth is that there are 2466 mentions of christianity in Breivik's EDI, all supportive and often using the pronoun 'us' to include the white european Christian lobby. To make the fact absolutely clear we have appended some quotations from Breivik's EDI and diary which, in his own words, clearly state his motivation to kill as being to uphold and protect the Christian religion. We are not here suggesting that ALL believers in Christianity think this way. Most Christians will , rightly, utterly condemn Breivik's crimes
We reproduce Breivik's pro-Christian statements below to show BREIVIK'S CHRISTIAN CREDENTIALSHow Breivik consciously chose to Convert to Christianity
My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion. At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of Canterbury's speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain. (EDI: Page 1403) Breivik's Criticisms of The Church and Plans for the future of Christianity in Europe
Breivik communes with God for Spiritual Insight into his anti-Moslem CrusadeI prayed for the first time in a very long time today. I explained to God that unless he wanted the Marxist-Islamic alliance and the certain Islamic takeover of Europe to completely annihilate European Christendom within the next hundred years he must ensure that the warriors fighting for the preservation of European Christendom prevail. He must ensure that I succeed with my mission and as such; contribute to inspire thousands of other revolutionary conservatives/nationalists; anti- Communists and anti-Islamists throughout the European world. (EDI; page 1459)
Breivik sees himself as saviour of European ChristendomI will always know that I am perhaps the biggest champion of cultural conservatism, Europe has ever witnessed since 1950. I am one of many destroyers of cultural Marxism and as such; a hero of Europe, a savior of our people and of European Christendom. (EDI; page 1435.) Breivik explains how he obtains strength from God to kill and become a martyr
I will probably arrange that just before or after I attend my final martyrs mass in Frogner Church. It will contribute to ease my mind as I imagine I will get tense and very nervous. It is easier to face death if you know you are biologically, mentally and spiritually at ease. (EDI; page 1424)But of Course Breivik did not die a Christian martyr's death. He gave himself up and was captured by the police. This has given the Norwegian government a real headache. Realising the toxic nature of Breivik's philosophies it is vital that the Socialisticas do not give him an open trial which will simply provide him with a platform to justify or rationalise his motives to the public. On no account must the public be allowed to realise that Breivik was not simply another Oswald. Thus in their wisdom the Xists amongst the ruling class have decided to try him in camera and the media are already lining up their stock-stereotypes to fall in with it and dupe the Western world. All this will simply reinforce the radicals and create another Utoya somewhere else in Europe. Breivik has opened a fault-line within democracy in the West and few realise just what the implications are. Brushing it under the carpet is NOT the way to deal with this situation otherwise those poor kids who gave their lives for democracy will have been wasted. He's a Christian Jim, But Not As We Know It...Now many observers will say that Breivik's views do not represent Christians in general and I agree that is the case.They may also say that he is a megalomaniac who is intepreting the history of Christianity to suit himself but with that I cannot agree. What he says is not morally right but it is also not factually wrong. The history of the church is replete with militarist organisations, secret military societies and warrior sects. There are HUNDREDS more of them besides the well known ones like the Knights Templars, Hospitalers of St John, Soldiers of St Columbo, etc . Many of these continue today in muted form and new ones have regularly appeared in modern times, from the Salvation Army to the Jesus Army and Soldiers of Christ etc. The absolutist claims of religion has always provided a justification for people to strive to commandeer society using verbal or physical force. Why else would commissioned padres bless the machinery of war before armies go into battle?
John Freedom, Mortlake, Lammas 2011.
Particularly when you remember that Breivik is a fundamentalist
Christian who has himself been influenced by the NWO myth.(see column
left and below) |
WE TOLD YOU SO in 1999
|
Latest! Breivik launches a new non-nazi 'fascist' party"Anders Behring Breivik, who murdered 77 people in Norway in 2011, says he wants to establish a "fascist" party from prison, claiming this could prevent a repeat of his massacre. In
a 34-page letter, received Friday by AFP, the right wing extremist
issued an "ultimatum" to the Norwegian justice ministry, demanding the
removal of what he described as barriers to the creation of the
"Norwegian Fascist Party" (NFP) and the "Nordic League" (NL). "As a former militant, the most
important thing in my life is to work towards preventing something like
this from ever happening again. The whole intention of the NFP and the
NL is that this does not happen again," he wrote, signing the letter
"Anders Behring Breivik, party secretary and parliamentary candidate for
the NFP and the NL". http://www.thelocal.no/20140906/killer-breivik-wants-to-start-fascist-party Can Christianity and Fascism mutually co-exist?It sounds implausible and yet history proves not .............
In a 1939 Census 94% declared themselves Christian. Nearly all of those involved in the Holocaust regarded themselves as Christian; Indeed Himmler declared that: 'I have never tolerated an atheist in the ranks of the SS. Every member has a deep faith in God'.
|
(c) world copyright holder: The Sub-culture Alternatives Freedom Foundation (S.A.F.F.) Leeds, Yorkshire, U.K.
Then please click here to go to our Feedback Forum - You can leave a message anonymously or just read what others have to say. |