
The Satanic Panic Returns to UK
The Eleven Million Pound Farce which shamed UK Policing is being
revivified by a new generation of Cops and Psychotherapists in 2026.
Police forces across the UK are being instructed to look out for and
investigate both recent and historical cases of “organised ritual
abuse” and “ritualistic abuse,including witchcraft and spirit
possession”. Sound familiar?
In a new“Operational Briefing” document and separate official guidance -
both from the National Police Chiefs’ Council - officers are
expected to believe in the existence of what was originally termed “satanic
ritual abuse”, or SRA, a notion dismissed by a UK government
inquiry more than 30 years ago, as a myth,with no physical, forensic,
corroborating evidence.
That government inquiry report was published in June 1994 following a
series of investigations by police across the UK, in the late 1980s and
early 1990s into allegations of so-called SRA of children, including most
notoriously in Nottingham, Rochdale and the Orkney Islands.
It was commissioned by the
Department of Health from Jean La Fontaine, a professor of anthropology at
the London School of Economics, with expert knowledge of religious
movements. National publicity about so-called satanic abuse followed
sensational claims made by the NSPCC at a press conference launching their
annual report in March in 1990, that children had been sexually abused,
tortured and sacrificed in bizarre rites connected with witchcraft,
satanism or devil worship.
La Fontanel’s 1994 report was titled The Extent and Nature of Organised
and Ritual Abuse: Research Findings. She researched 84 alleged
cases investigated by UK police from Kent to Strathclyde between 1987 and
1992.
She concluded:
“Rites that allegedly include the
torture and sexual abuse of children and adults, forced abortion and
human sacrifice, cannibalism and bestiality may be labelled satanic
or satanist. Their defining characteristic is that the sexual and
physical abuse of children is part of rites directed to a magical or
religious objective. There is no evidence that these have taken
place in any of the 84 cases studied.
“Three
substantiated cases of ritual, not satanic, abuse were found. These
are cases in which self-proclaimed mystical/magical powers were used
to entrap children and impress them (and also adults) with a reason
for the sexual abuse, keeping the victims compliant and ensuring their
silence.”
BRITAIN'S FALL INTO THE WORLD-WIDE SATANIC PANIC WAS STEEPER THAN MOST
Similar“Satanic Panics” occurred around the world in the 1980s and 1990s,
notably Canada,the USA, Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand, but were
officially debunked by various investigations for lack of physical
forensic evidence.
But a hardcore of zealots persisted in spreading belief, especially in
some fields of psychology, psychiatry and psychotherapy, who attribute
some mental health problems to extreme childhood trauma, lack of
attachment and “dissociation” from reality, (a much-disputed valid
diagnosis - Dissociative Identity Disorder, previously termed Multiple
Personality Disorder).
Belief in an even more extreme notion of an international network of
satanist pedophiles ruling the world surfaced in the more recent
Pizzagate and QAnon conspiracy theories, amplified in the
alternative universe of social media and tacitly endorsed by Donald Trump
and Elon Musk. The Pizzagate conspiracy theory – which emerged in the run up to
the 2016 Us Presidential election – claimed Trump’s rival Hillary Clinton
was part of a satanic paedophile ring which trafficked and sexually abused
children in the basement of a pizza parlour in Washington frequented by
Democrats. Problem was,that the pizza restaurant had no basement. (Full background: Private Eye, Ian Hislop Eye
podcast. Page 94 episode 56 31 October 2020). [Also see here for more on how Pizzagate and the QAnon movement has driven other false abuse narratives in recent years ]
UK
police forces were being instructed to recognise and investigate “organised
ritual abuse” and “ritualistic abuse including witchcraft and
spirit possession” Yet Witch-children, a sub-set of the Satanic Panic which wasted police time from 2006 onwards, actually
had nothing whatsoever to do with Witchcraft or Satanism. The people
abusing children in horrific rituals were fanatical fundamentalist
Christians who were beating the Devil out of wayward children. There is
no equivalence whatsoever with any SRA cases prior to 2006 or since, yet
the British Police are still pretending otherwise. (See: https://saff.nfshost.com/stobart.htm for full story)
SATAN SEMINARS RESTART
On 20 March2026 at a “Trauma Recovery Global Conference”, to be
held in Bath, UK, an audience of therapists and professionals who
encounter possible child victims and adult survivors of sexual abuse will
be invited to learn about “denial of complex trauma” and “the
discourse of disbelief around ritual abuse”.
The conference is organised by Betsy de Thierry, MBE, a consultant
psychotherapist and trauma expert with UK Parliament and global
connections, founder and CEO of the Trauma Recovery Centre and
pastor of an Evangelical Christian church, The Sound Church both
based in Bath. She is
billed as a keynote speaker . Betsy de Thierry is described
on the Sound Church website as a 5th generation pastor who
' is a firm believer that following Jesus is life transforming,
and there has never been a bigger need in our world for a church that is
trauma informed and where we see the kind of stuff that Jesus did
happen.'
From this we assume that Mrs Thierry believes in 'signs and
wonders'. Clearly she is a fundamentalist Christian so if she is
promoting the idea of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse as part of a therapy
cure it is troubling. Neo-Paganism has still not absolved the Churches
for murdering 300,000 'women' at the stake for imagined witchcraft
practices. Most fundamentalist churches have a belief in
Possession of the body by Demons and perform exorcisms on people who
come to them for help or absolution. This often occurs after initial
counseling sessions where SRA is diagnosed. We do not know if
Betsy de Thierry believes in any of these things, or whether she
combines spiritual counseling with her therapeutic work, but perhaps she
will clarify her approach to exorcism and whether she believes in the
Devil as a reality? That would make an important difference to any
encouragement for police to accept claims of establishing the existence
of Ritual and Satanic Abuse.
The other keynote speaker at the conference is Dr Elly Hanson, a clinical psychologist
“with a focus on tackling sexual abuse and online harms”.
Online publicity for the conference links to Dr Hanson’s website which
includes a long list of her publications. The most recent is Hanson (2025)
Organised ritual abuse and its wider context: Degradation, deception
and disavowal. A research review and analysis.
It was published in July 2025 by the National Police Chiefs’ Council
(NPCC), the NPCC’s Deprogramming, (which collates allegations of
non-recent, historical cases of alleged child sexual abuse) and NAPAC (The
National Association for People Abused in Childhood).
Ms Hanson’s 70 page report (which has 51 references to the word “satanic”)
led immediately to two major changes to police procedures, to recognise
“ritual” and “ritualised” abuse as instructed to all UK
police forces, published simultaneously.
On 3 July2025 NAPAC published online under the headline “New Report
and Guidance on Organised Ritual Abuse Launched by NAPAC and NPCC: “
Today NAPAC in partnership with the National Police Chiefs’ Council is
publishing a research review and analysis ‘Organised ritual abuse and
its wider context: Degradation, deception and disavowal’ by Dr Elly
Hanson. The report unpacks the nature of organised ritual abuse, its
motives and dynamics, the harm it causes and the barriers survivors face
in speaking out. It also looks at the discourse of disbelief and
conspiracy fictions which have kept it hidden for so long”.
The NAPAC release continues: “The [Hanson]
report is accompanied by an operational briefing which outlines
practical actions to enhance police investigations, victim engagement
and multi-agency collaboration. It addresses both the organised ritual
abuse which is the focus of Dr Hanson’s report and abuse driven by
beliefs in spirit possession or witchcraft. The guidance is both
strategic and operational and is intended as the first in a series of
resources on this subject.”
SO EAGER TO CATCH NON-EXISTENT SATANIC ABUSERS, HYDRANT MUSTA FORGOT THEY GOT EGG ON FACES BEFORE
The Operational Briefing document published by the National Police
Chiefs’ Council, - commissioned by the Hydrant Programme and
NAPAC - published in July 2025 Investigating and responding to ritualistic
abuse, including witchcraft and spirit possession states: “This document
provides a clear, evidence-based overview of ritualistic abuse,including
abuse linked to witchcraft and spirit possession.”
The purpose is to outline “practical actions to enhance
investigations, victim engagement and multi-agency collaboration”.
One of its“Key takeaways” is: “Ritualistic abuse – including abuse
linked to witchcraft and spirit possession – is real.”
Other Key takeaways include: “Disbelief, investigative challenges and
the complexity of belief-based abuse have led to systemic failings in
recognising and responding to these crimes.
“Survivors face extreme barriers to
disclosure, often due to trauma, coercion and fear of not being
believed… Taking disclosures seriously must go together with
timely,professional investigation to prevent injustice, through
disbelief and ungrounded mass panic.”
Under Section Two, Key findings, the Briefing document says:
While the 1980s and 1990ssaw unfounded
allegations that contributed to moral panics, it is essential
toacknowledge that ritualistic abuse does occur and must be
investigated professionally. Survivor testimony, corroborated with
forensic methods, cansecure justice and prevent both disbelief and
modern-day witch hunts.”
Yet Hydrant have many times been castigated for their
eagerness to
believe any tales accusers tell them before they have investigated and
discovered any corroborating facts. In 2016 they were taken to
task by High Court Judge Sir Richard Henriques whose inquiry into their
handling of historic claims of abuse had foundered upon falsely accusing
many 'people of public prominence'. Sir Richard wrote in his
report:
1.41. I remain most concerned that the Hydrant team fail to appreciate the danger of false complaints and that a cardinal principal of the criminal justice process is that a complaint may be false. Arguments advanced in support of retaining the word ‘victim’ and the culture of ‘belief' appear to have been based on the supposition that the level of false complaints is so small that it can be disregarded. There is, of course, a significant difference between the number of false complaints and the number of persons who make false complaints. In Operation Yewtree one complainant, whilst residing in prison, made complaints of the most serious nature against a total of in excess of 40 suspects involving several sexual allegations against many of the suspects. He was interviewed over six days and the subsequent investigation was thorough and proportionate. Officers concluded that ‘his evidence is fatally undermined and is not something that can be relied upon in Court’. I have reviewed the investigation and it is above criticism. In Operation Fairbank the SIO observed that the vast majority of 400 complaints were without merit.
|
1.24. I spent some considerable time with Operation Hydrant officers discussing this topic. I understand the strategic aim of improving the Police Service response to complaints of sexual abuse and the aim to make it easier for victims of sexual abuse to make a complaint to the police. The officers steadfastly insist that the ‘victim must be believed during the taking of the statement’. I disagree. It is the duty of a police officer to investigate. Many decisions in the criminal justice process have to be taken on paper. The police officer taking a statement from a complainant has a unique opportunity to assess the complainant’s veracity. The effect of requiring a police officer, in such a position, to believe a complainant reverses the burden of proof.
It also restricts the officer's ability to test the complainant’s evidence.
|
Yet here Hydrant are again ten years after being publicly criticised
about their eagerness to believe anything an accuser tells them and we
find them buying-in to the nonsense about Witch-children and the even more discredited allegations involving Satanic Ritual Abuse
which have not produced one single case in the 37 years since its
invention, yet readers will find thousands of people on the
Internet claiming they have been Satanically Abused, along with an equal
number who claim to have been abducted by aliens.
The content of Elly Hanson’s 70 page report is a review of masses of
‘research’ promoting a belief in the existence of Satanic Ritual Abuse by
believers in Satanic Ritual Abuse. It is sheer propaganda. It is a
regurgitation of the UK Satanic Panic of the early 1990s and more recently
amplified and spread globally.
The SAFF's detailed response to Elly Hanson's report ( The Excoriation of NAPAC, the NPCC and Hydrant ) points
out that the entire premise of Ms Hanson's theories about the existence
and prevalence of Ritual Abuse and Satanic Ritual Abuse is
fundamentally insecure:
'There
are only a limited number of methodologies under which
sexual abuse can occur so clearly all 'survivor's' stories will match to
some degree, just as the modus operandi of all bank-robberies will match
to some degree. Self-diagnosed 'victims' may well define as
'ritual elements' stereotypes and motifs which appear to indicate
Satanic Ritual Abuse to the untutored, but history shows that almost
always these narratives turnout to be false. Thousands of people
and hundreds of cases of claimed SRA over nearly four decades have
resulted in not a single example of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse (i.e.
Abuse committed in the pursuance of Satanic Liturgy). SAFF has
shown that hardly any of those
claiming to have been 'ritually abused' 'within a 'systematic physical,
sexual and emotional abuse supported by rituals and symbols' (RAINS
own definition of Ritual Abuse ) can recall details of their abuse to
match
known Religious and Cult liturgies. Nothing matches or makes
sense. To overcome this problem the
SAFF presented The Satanic Footprint in 1991, ( https://saff.nfshost.com/footprin.htm
) a paper providing a profile of the most often occurring claims in all
cases made during the height of the 1990 Satanic Panic, and then
applied that profile to old and current cases. Using a prevalence
scheme of this kind every case of Ritual Abuse was found to have
inconsistencies and contradictions about certain known facets which
experts in Occultism would expect to be present in the liturgy of
Satanic or Witchcraft ceremonial. For example; a case would often be
said to involve 'voodoo' motifs when Ackavoudoun is alien to European
Witchcraft. In a substantial number of cases narratives would
confuse motifs of Witchcraft (the remnants of ancient European
Pantheism) with motifs and accoutrements of Satanism & Devil
Worship (an anti-religion which inverts the Dualism of Christianity).
Witchcraft and Satanism actually live in different cosmoses and do
not mix! In short inferences by Ms Hanson
that evidence exists in certain studies confirming that Ritual Abuse
occurs in most if not all cases involving multiple victims, is
simply wrong. For instance SAFF has done sterling work on the
prevalence
of child-abuse by priests ( https://saff.nfshost.com/blackmus2.htm
) and in some of these cases abuse occurred
within churches, and involved religious imagery and objects (e.g. a
priest penetrating a child's vagina with a crucifix), that would
only be 'Ritual Abuse' if the Church itself demanded it in its liturgy
for a particular end. Otherwise it is
simply perverted Sadism by a renegade priest and not connected in any
way to the work of the
Church. Though the SAFF has a 30 year record of hunting
down 1000s of sexually abusing priests, we have never ever said that
they do it
because of their Church Liturgy. But when the term Ritual
Abuse is leveled at Satanists and Witches, the tacit misunderstanding is
that a unique type of extreme abuse is being perpetrated which is
concomitant with their spiritual and religious beliefs. This is what
people like Ms Hanson and NAPAC and Hydrant think, and this fundamental
error is at the root of why claims of Satanic Ritual Abuse are
astonishingly still prevalent after 37 years of every previous case
failing. Anyone who has
tracked real cases of child-abuse knows that all of it is evil, but that
the motivation of the average perpetrator has nothing to do with any
religious or spiritual aim, good or bad.
Thus it is a logical error for Ms Hanson to suggest that there is a
ritualistic motivation at the root of cases. The dastardly nature of
multiple abuse cases cannot be explained away by references to an
imaginary Ritual and Satanic compulsion. The one does not prove
the
other. In sum, her paper rehearses and re-presents very old cases
which were proven untrue back in the day, ( did she think everyone had
forgotten about them? ) and the only new 'evidence' appears to be
sets of mangled statistics which are in themselves contentious.
Her paper may have satisfied NAPAC and the NPCC of the existence of
Satanic and Ritual Abuse, but it has not produced any new evidence to
persuade me that claims of Ritual Abuse are anything other than a
gravy-train for the ever-expanding mental health industry. '
Ms Hanson's list of references includes many papers by Michael Salter,
an Australian and prolific proponent of belief in SRA (see many items on SAFF website and https://saff.nfshost.com/mikesaltersra.htm
). This 5 minute clip from a 2021 Australian TV documentary, The Great Awakening , illustrates the difficulty that crusaders like him have in reconciling the terms Ritual Abuse and Satanic Ritual Abuse.
The purpose of the programme was to warn that right-wing QAnon
activists from the U.S. were influencing the political scene in
Australia by hi-jacking the government's historical sex abuse inquiry to
get the term 'Ritual Sexual Abuse' into the government's
official apology for historic abuse in the institutions of State. The implication of the left-leaning programme
was that politically active right-wing conspiracyloons from QAnon were
trying to validate and promote their fundamental belief that a Satanic
Elite ran Western society and did so by abusing and killing children and
that inclusion of Ritual Sexual Abuse by the prime minister Scott Morrison would confirm
that to the world. The fight was on to stop the QAnon's getting control of the
narrative and, ironically, Mike Salter was interviewed to call out the
QAnons Satanic allegations. You can see and hear him do so by
clicking on the title-screen (right). So here we have a classic
example of Salter playing down the very Satanic claims that he had
earlier supported on the SMART website populated by the very same
Conspiracyloons! That is because, in great measure, the framework
for the Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth was created by U.S. Conspiracyloons in
the early 1980s and taken up and employed by UK child-protectionists in
the late 1980s devoid of the lunatic claims, to make it more palatable
to a British audience. In the event Scott Morrison DID use
the term 'Ritual Sexual Abuse' in his televised apology in parliament and in doing
so enshrined it into Australian child-protection. Which is, more
or less, what Salter and Ms Hanson appear to be wanting to do in Britain.
Although it is common practice for the 'Satanic' appellation to be
dropped in favour of Ritual Abuse, in today's literature, believers in SRA simply cannot
seem to dispense with Satan and always revert to using it as a Prime
Cause. Without it they have nothing.
But look here: Twenty eight years go (1998) in response to a reformulation of the Working Together
guidelines by the British government, the SAFF presented a 40 page submission paper to the
Department of Health to warn them of the dangers in allowing the term Ritual Abuse to be amalgamated into the proposed standard definitions of abuse for all Social Workers. In it we stated:
Those social workers who had supported the
idea of Satanic Ritual Abuse closed ranks to hide the blunders. They
tried to amalgamate the profile of 'multiple perpetrator family and
friends abuse' under 'Organised Abuse'. From then on, for those who
still believed that Satanic Ritual Abuse existed, the term 'Organised
Abuse' became a secret code for 'Satanic Ritual Abuse'. They would have
never dared to admit it publicly then, for the media were taking a deep
interest in the hysteria which was spreading throughout social work, but
as time passed the Satan Hunters in social work continued to pursue
this madness and represent, 'Satanic Ritual Abuse' within their clique
as a subset of 'Organised Abuse'. With the coming of New Labour and new
ministers who have little recollection of what went before the Satan
Hunters have made their game-play and pressed the Department of Health
into officially accepting the reality of Satanic Abuse by insisting that
the term 'Ritual Abuse' should be officially recognised.
THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION. IT PUTS THINGS BACK RIGHT
WHERE THEY WERE BEFORE ROCHDALE AND ORKNEY AND WILL UNDOUBTEDLY CAUSE
FURTHER PERSECUTIONS OF INNOCENT FAMILIES THROUGHOUT BRITAIN.
pp 6. The Dangers Posed to Children if
the Department of Health allow the Term 'Ritual Abuse' to be
incorporated Into Working Together Guidelines.
|
And that's EXACTLY what happened!
The alarming significance of the Hanson report is the
National Police Chiefs’ Council and it’s Hydrant Programme,
which collates cases of non-recent historical sex abuse, have taken it so
seriously they have issued new guidance and an Operational Briefing
document to every police force in UK validating the myth, and instructing
officers to look for and investigate examples of it.
Here we go again!
By Penny O'Riordain
with additional material by John Freedom,
Imbolc 2026.
|