The Lies That Fundies Tell.
- The Hutchinson Hit-List
- The MI5 Buggers.
SAFF dissect the wacky ideas of conspiracyloons on their new martyr Geoffrey Dickens.
"In the 1980s my grandfather an MP at the time campaigned tirelessly
about a VIP peodophile ring, he received so much stick for this - as
you can imagine. He managed to get P.I.E abolished, and named Peter
Haymen in the house of commons.
He was added to a hitlist..
Louise Dickens has pushed this false meme before by retweeting fantasies from @ciabaudo such as:
There was no 'hit-list'. It was a tabloid invention (see right) Arthur Hutchinson was not
a contract killer, he was a psychopath who had served 5 years
in prison already for the attempted murder of his brother-in-law. The
despicable triple-murders and rape which he committed occurred in the same place
and all at the same time following a random break-in at a house in
Dore, Sheffield in 1983 whilst he was on the run from the police who
had earlier arrested him for suspected burglary and rape in another
He was caught on 5th of November 1983 THREE DAYS
after it was reported that the police, had found a 'notebook' of
Hutchinson's with a number
of VIPs listed along with their addresses. The police took the
precautionary step of warning Geoffrey Dickens. So Dickens was
under police protection for a few days until Hutchinson was apprehended.
1: Hutchinson was a
psychopath not a 'contract' killer. There is absolutely no
evidence he was hired by anyone to kill anybody.
2: His crimes
involved theft, burglary and rape to which murder became a wicked ancillary.
3: Hutchinson's notebook could easily have listed places of rich people whom Hutchinson
thought were good targets for burgling, not killing.
4: The only connection Hutchinson had with Leon
Brittan was that the Home Secretary was so appalled with Hutchinson's crimes he put him on Whole Life Tariff,
meaning that he would never ever be released and die in prison.
He is still there today.
These facts are
readily available for anyone who wants to look for them. Louise
Dickens and her 'granddad was on a hit man's list and Brittan paid
for it' conspiracyloons rearrange the world to suit the suspicions of their tiny minds. It's just not true.
"and had his homes
burgaled, obviously looking for the evidence he had on them. "
From 1981 to 1995 when Dickens died we found a handful of reports of
burglary. None at his Lancashire home as Louise Dickens' words seem to
suggest, but one at his London flat and one at his office behind
'suspicious' burglary was in 16 March 1981 (see cutting right - click on
it to get a large format to read).
This is in the heat of the PIE
controversy. Dickens' paranoia is clearly seen here when he says:
'It was a professional job made to look like amateurs' (?) and his reasoning is -
'they only took a music centre and didn't leave any fingerprints'.
Some criminologists would say that this is exactly what petty thieves would do but note the dates;
Dickens says that the break in 'occurred the Friday before last', that is, the 6th of March 1981.
Tom O'Carrol,'s trial ( the organiser of PIE, ) ended on 12th of March.
Three days later, Thursday 19th March, Dickens held a press conference
to maximise the publicity and said he would name other paedophiles in
parliament, a Hull vicar and a GP. The GP , Dr Birt, turned out to
be innocent on trial. The Hull Vicar killed himself on remand after a
mob attacked his vicarage.
Neither of them had anything to do with
Neither of them had anything to do with SRA.
Bunter Deceives Everyone: All this was
somewhat overshadowed because at the same press-conference Dickens also
introduced his mistress and announced he was leaving his wife, Norma,
'don't all rush to the phone please lads, I haven't had time to tell my wife yet'.
This was typical of Dickens' duplicity and dishonesty in his dealings
with the press, the public and his own family. In taking up the
SRA banner of her grandfather Louise Dickens cannot really have known
him for if she did why would she put her grandma through reliving his
treacheries? She forces us to recall that history to prove
to her, and latecomers to the SRA controversy, just how extensive
Dickens' dishonour and dishonesty was.
The flat which had been burgled had been used as the love-nest in which Dickens had
entertained TWO separate women, Pat Briggs and Maureen Knight, in
concurrent affairs over a long period whilst his oblivious and dutiful wife was keeping
house for him 'up North'.
When Dickens chose to
dump his wife in a press conference it caused a sensation that went all
across the headlines nationally BEFORE actually telling his wife that he
was moving in with Maureen Knight. It was left to the Daily Star to do
his dirty work for him. They phoned Norma and told her the news.
reporting her crying and sobbing over the phone in astonishment.
When Pat Briggs,
Dickens other mistress, saw the headlines she realised she had been had
by Dickens too and phoned Fleet Street. Dickens was challenged
with Pat Briggs' statements and he LIED again, absolutely assuring
journalists and everyone else that it was an imagined relationship and
Briggs was stalking him. Briggs then produced love-letters and
poems and other evidence proving that Dickens had conducted a 9 month
relationship with her, including details of his flat and the bed she claimed they had sex on. Is that one lie or two lies from Bunter so
far? Three if you count leading on his wife for 9 months.
Besieged by the media Norma Dickens herself confirmed that
Geoffrey had come clean and told her that he was conducting
two other women.
By April 2nd the
grinning buffoon who had despicably posed for tabloid photographs
kissing Maureen Knight and taken her kids for a seaside jaunt where they
were pictured running hand in hand enjoying themselves
(thoughtlessly twisting the knife in Norma), was having to face
reality. One can imagine the furore at Tory Central Office.
Diplomacy with the press from his local Conservative Association was
deftly handled as though Dickens had been struck with a mind-altering
disease instead of multiple philandering. Bunter quickly returned
Louise's Grandmother whose magnanimity in accepting him back was
amazing. She spoilt him by making his 'favourite steak meal and a bottle
of wine'. There followed a clean up campaign by the Tory press who published several simpering 'how to renew a jaded marriage' articles but if anyone thought Dicken's treachery was just some mid-life crisis they were soon to learn different as on April 5th,
three days after returning to Norma, he was telephoning
his mistress Maureen Knight and was reported as saying that he had
assured her that their relationship was intact. A Sunday Mirror
reporter was actually standing by the side of her when she took the
call. How many Bunter lies is that so far? Six or Seven?
story of Geoffrey Dickens' duplicity did not end there, reportedly
Bunter's affair with Maureen Knight continued for another five months,
until August 1981 when he stood Maureen up after promising to attend a
Royal Wedding ball with her. He then wrote her a 'Dear John' letter
saying it was all off. The News of the World report on it (see right) must have been terrible for Norma Dickens . Maureen Knight said:
the while he was convincing his wife that he wasn't seeing me. She'd
ring the London flat where we spent so much time together and he'd make
clear to her that he was all alone.'
How many deceitful
lies is that Louise? You are defending a despicable,
self-centred, lying bigot. Geoffrey Dickens was not a martyr, he
was a philanderer who didn't care much how his actions affected others,
even those close to him. And you and your conspiracyloon friends
believe his every word? Personally I wouldn't believe anything he said
without proof, and proof is sadly lacking in all his major allegations
and claims of SRA. We commend his work in outing Hayman and
putting pressure on PIE, at least that threat was real. His
meanderings on SRA were utterly and completely different. Those accusations were based solely on Religious discrimination and prejudice.
supposition from conspiracyloons is that the break-in at Dickens' flat
was linked to the PIE trial, but as can be seen from the above, lots
went on there and others may have had access. Even so the
PIE/Hayman debacle was no secret; it had
become common knowledge as far back as October the previous year through
Private Eye magazine. Louise and her conspiracyloons will tell you that Dickens outed PIE and got them banned. In fact it was Private Eye who did all the work in exposing the Hayman link with PIE in great detail in early October 1980 before anyone else in the press or politics had known about it, when the committal proceedings took place at the Old Bailey.
At first it was thought that a whistle-blower policeman had
contacted Dickens to get his help in exposing what can now
be seen as a definite cover-up to protect Hayman and the Establishment,
and indeed there must have been some police involvement because of the insider
knowledge, but it soon became clear that Dickens was being 'enthused
and directed' by a journalist. (still unamed to this day) Labour whip Walter Harrison gave an interview in March 1981 to the BBC in which he said that a journalist was 'pulling Dickens' strings'.
that if the security services had wanted to enter Dickens flat, obtain
information, copy it and get out without being noticed they had the
skill and resources to do so. They could have probably just asked Briggs
or Knight for the key to copy. Making it look like a burglary
been a cretinous act but it suited Dickens' thirst for publicity to
that is what happened. It increased his sense of self-importance.
On the 21st March 1981 (the same day the press broke the news that he was leaving his wife, Norma) Dickens also extended and exaggerated his fantasies about the 6th March break-in
by making claims that his flat had been 'bugged' by the security
services. (see left). He said in other cuttings that he was getting an
electronics expert to check the flat to find the 'bugs'.
Newspaper reports of bugs being found were noticeable by their complete absence afterwards.
If Rent-A-quote dickens had actually found any you could be sure that it would be plastered over the Nationals in short order. In other words Dickens' flat had NOT been bugged, by MI5 or anyone else. Dickens was somewhat of a Walter Mitty character.
PIE AND SRA NOT CONNECTED: It is important to note that there was
absolutely NO connections with SRA or the Occult in these occurrences or
in any PIE claims. They have been tacked-on afterwards by conspiracyloons.
Geoffrey Dickens SRA campaign didn't start until April 1988 long after the PIE debacle.
The PIE period was from March 1981 to March 1986 when Dickens then
switched tack and started a campaign against homosexual priests and
vicars alongside Childwatch which was run by Dianne Core.
At this point Core was pushing the case of Jan Knox a hull vicar who was accused of abusing 28 kids.
Dickens and Core cooperated in assembling a 'dossier' of cases of
priestly abuse which they presented to Lambeth Palace in April
Dickens threatened to name these 10 suspected paedophiles in the
Commons if the CofE didn't take action. When Knox killed
himself prior to trial Dickens' hunt for abusing priests tapered
out. But in late 1987
the first claimed SRA case in the UK had occurred in Broxtowe,.
Nottingham. It became a celebrated cause within social work and
child-protection networks. However the public didn't get to know about
it until Childwatch and Dickens jumped on the SRA bandwagon in April
1988 where it was referred to in Dickens' Commons statement.
There is therefore NO connection whatsoever between PIE and
SRA claims. Dickens switched from PIE to attacking the Church of
England about homosexual priests and then TWO YEARS AFTER PIE switched
tack again to ride the new hysteria of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse.
Any supposed connections have been created by conspiracyloons themselves
who have intermingled one with the other to 'float' a better
fantasy. The existence of PIE does NOT denote in any way proof of the existence of SRA, the two things are entirely separate.
Dickens' second break-in report of 23rd April 1982 appears to be a restatement of the 6th of
March 1981 break-in but presented as new.
On 23rd April 1982, ( over a year after the first
break-in), Dickens obtained publicity from the Daily Mail by linking the
earlier break-in at his London flat with a new break-in at the
home of Timothy Raison (Minister for State at the HO).
There was absolutely no evidence of MI5 involvement in either.
1981 had been a busy year for Rent-A-Quote Dickens but PIE was over and done with by April 1982. For the past 8 months there had been few headlines from Rent-A-Quote other than obvious photo-opportunities such as a sponsored crash-diet with funds going to Huddersfield
Sea Cadets etc. The controversy had passed, he'd dumped his two
'other women' and gone back to Norma, and so there was nothing important
Dickens had to hide from the secret services anyway, though he guestimated 'Data Protection' was the issue the imaginary spooks were seeking (nothing therefore to do with PIE, child-abuse or SRA). This second burglary claim appears simply to be a method of hi-jacking Raison's burglary for Dicken's own self-promotion. Indeed, we can't find any evidence of a police report by Dickens at this time therefore he may actually be restating the previous break-in at his flat on 6th March 1981.
THE THIRD BREAK-IN COMPLAINT:
complaint of a break-in from
Dickens was two years later in December 1983 at his Westminster office
overlooking Dean's Yard. We are told that a desk drawer
was 'forced open' but the only thing taken was 'headed notepaper'.
All MPs have posh notepaper printed for them with their names above a
government crest. Why anyone would force open a drawer to take
letter-headings with Geoffrey Dickens name on them is a mystery.
Desk drawers are notoriously insecure and easy to pick, but again
Dickens exaggerates this incident and
elevates it to a conspiracy to obtain evidence from 'his files'.
Much later (15th May 1992), an MP who took over Dickens' office found a cache of occult magazines in the same desk drawer but he didn't need to break into it, it was apparently left unlocked! Dickens said he'd forgotten all about them. Dickens' approach to security is somewhat mystifying. One minute he is the holder of 'secret' information hidden from MI5 and the next he can't even be bothered cleaning out his desk of 'evidence' to back his claims of Witches killing and eating children.
Bear in mind that since his last bout of self-promotion Dickens had,
that year, been
busy pressing for the restoration of the death penalty and fighting
election at the newly inaugurated constituency of Littleborough and
Saddleworth (June 1983) putting his child-abuse campaigning on the
In August 1983, after getting elected, Dickens began expanding on his campaign against child-abuse by adding '8 names of VIPs'
to his dossier on Hayman & PIE. These names had been mailed
in to him he said. He had received thousands of letters following his
earlier 'naming of names'. He had filtered these postal
accusations based on the number of people who complained about each
said. He had only passed on the names of VIPs which had multiple
accusations and there were 8 of them.
happened to precisely coincide with work by Scotland Yard's Obscene
Publications squad which had gone through all past editions of PIE's
newsletters and made a list of people's names and whereabouts if known.
There were over 300 of them. The OPS visited Dickens for his list
of 8 names. The difference is that the yard's names were
forensically authenticated, Dickens' names were third-hand
suspicions. However soon thereafter Dickens was to gain publicity for a
dossier of 'several hundred names' which could have only been the OPS report.
N.B. : There is a
difference between 300 names of paedophiles and 8 names of VIPs accused
of paedophillary in Westminster. In a population of 60 million 300
paedophiles countrywide would probably be expected. One does not 'prove' the other. 300 paedophiles countrywide does not confirm that 8 rumoured VIP paedophiles existed in Westminster. Geoffrey Dickens hated homosexuals and was a key player in far-right Tory groups which campaigned
against them. He was involved in imposing the infamous Clause 28 in the
local government bill. To Dickens ALL homosexuals were
child-abusers. SAFF have asked Louise whether she believes the
same but she has never replied. In any event fundamentalist
Christians who wrote to Dickens to condemn VIPs could simply be outing
We have many more gay MPs today and there is obviously no
threat to children from any of them. One has to be careful with
Dickens' loose definitions and keep in mind his religious bigotry and
the kind of people who supported him.
THE REAL SCANDAL OF PIE
It does not appear
that any of those PIE members were
ever prosecuted by the CPS. That was very wrong and of course
indicates that a paedophile subculture existed across the UK which the
government decided to ignore. At the time child-abuse wasn't
as high a priority as it should have been. The resources required to
investigate over 300 paedophiles would today be given instantly.
the day it seems that political expediency, wrongly, came first.
Thus the real scandal of PIE is that the government failed to pursue
those 300 names and bring as many prosecutions as they could. Whatever reason they had for doing that was not an attempt to cover up a VIP abuse ring in parliament, because the existence of the 300 paedophiles across the country is not evidence of an abuse ring in parliament.
N.B. Despite inferences to the contrary from Satan Hunters the SAFF have never tried to deny that PIE existed nor have we ever supported paedophiles of any kind. Our Black Museum of Priestly Child Abuse here clearly proves that we seek to expose them.
What the SAFF say is that SRA does not exist.
SRA and PIE are NOT related issues.
appears to have a copy of the 8 names on Dickens' suspect list, though
Lord John Mann recently was reported to have 'seen' that dossier. I
wonder if he meant the 300 names put together by the OPS?
As the government did not act on the OPS report one might
have thought that Dickens' would have then continued his naming and
shaming campaign in the House of Commons under parliamentary privilege to
'out' these 8 VIPs, as was his usual tactics, but he did not do so. This suggests to us that the 8 people were
not paedophiles but MPs who happened to be gay. Dickens capitalised on
those 8 names with the press, of course, but never named them, inside parliament or outside it.
also have expected, in today's climate, John Mann to name those suspects
in the house today too, if he saw those 8 VIP names, which again probably indicates the
unworthiness of the accusations being made against them by Dickens'
event there were absolutely no claims of SRA in any of this. No rumours
of occult rituals or tortures, or anything of that kind.
So there we have it. The facts show that there was probably only one break-in at Dickens' flat/love-nest, on 6th March 1981 and then another 'non-burglary' two years later in his office next to Dean's Yard. It is typical of the way Dickens worked-up publicity for himself that he was able to obtain such repetitive coverage of petty theft and turn it into an MI5 conspiracy to silence him. More or less what his granddaughter and her conspiracyloon friends are doing today.
"During his research
in to CSA, he became aware of SRA, he made his findings public and
reported to the police but obviously nothing was done, except make
him out to be a lying buffoon. (He was a Lying Buffoon!)
"I began a few years
ago looking in to my grandfather's work and came across an
organisation, which if anything just makes my toes curl. They are
fronting as being all about human rights etc. But they clearly
aren't. The curator of this organisation is I believe to be the
former owner of a shop based in West Yorkshire, I can't remember the name
of it but it was a book shop of sorts and the base for exchanging
Child abuse images and information. When grandad named this shop I
understand a group of Christians burnt the shop down. This has
obviously fuelled the hatred of my grandad and now in turn me. "
Dickens has lied. It is actually constructive criminal libel and
the owner of the shop is now suing her. The following are THE
1: THE SAFF IS NOT A HUMAN RIGHTS GROUP LIE: The SAFF is a group which protects Religious Rights and we've been
doing it for 32 years.
We have worked with the UNA and the Commission for Racial Equality, and
with many government departments and with the U.N. over the past three
decades to protect the human rights of minority beliefs from lies and
the kind of agitprop put out by sectarians like Geoffrey and Louise
Dickens. To say that SAFF's work on human rights is a pretence is
ludicrous. She really doesn't want anyone to consider our
work at all does she?
2: THE CHILD-PORNOGRAPHY LIE:
The creator (not curator) of the SAFF was indeed the proprietor of the
Leeds bookshop she mentions but SAFF is a separate legal entity run by
many volunteers whose fine work has been crucial over the past 30 years
to stalling the persecution of Pagans and other falsely accused people
with untrue allegations of SRA. The Bookshop has never exchanged
or countenanced Child-Abuse images of any kind. That is a
downright evil lie from a false-accuser who clearly hates the bookshop
owner because he exposed her grandfather as a lying
3: GEOFFREY DICKENS ACCUSED HIM IN PARLIAMENT LIE: The only allegations Geoffrey Dickens actually made of the Leeds shop
was in the Commons under Parliamentary Privilege and he did that knowing
that he could not be
sued. He knew that had he repeated those things outside the
Commons he would have been slapped with a writ. What he said can
be seen in the image on the right and Louise Dickens rabid false
accusations today form no part of it.
the very day Dickens made his commons announcement the shop-owner sent
him a letter demanding he retract and offering to educate the oaf about
Witchcraft and Paganism. The slimy Dickens refused to reply.
that year, realising that Dickens did not want the Truth, but was on a
fundamentalist campaign to close his shop down, the bookshop owner
sent a solicitor's letter to Geoffrey Dickens' home address, Sycamores,
Greenfield, Oldham. This was sent registered post and he still has a
signed slip for its delivery.
He warned Dickens that if he repeated the libels he would be sued.
Dickens never repeated the libels in public because he knew he couldn't substantiate them.
We thought Geoffrey Dickens was a fool but he was clever enough to not dare to tell those lies in public.
Louise Dickens fell for them and because she trusted in her lying
grandfather's words she has repeated those lies and expanded on them
with fictitious claims. She will realise what that means when the writ for libel is placed in her hands.
THE ONLY EVIDENCE DICKENS HAD WAS COMPLAINTS FROM OTHER FUNDIES:
Her grandfather had absolutely no evidence to implicate the Leeds bookshop owner or his business in any wrongdoing.
When confronted by the shop-owner's MP in Westminster, Dickens is on record as saying that
'Frankly he seems not to know a great deal about your business but is
convinced that what he calls 'a list of sale items' has been complained
about to him by various people.'
In other words complaints from other fundies who disagreed on religious grounds with the books sold by the bookshop.
It was simpy sectarian hatred.
The main thrust of Dickens' Hansard speech was that
the bookshop provided manuals on occultism, witchcraft and Satanism and
sold altar images.
He DID NOT make any reference to child pornography.
He DID NOT accuse the owner of being involved in Satanic Ritual Child Abuse.
utterly despicable false allegations of child pornography have been tacked-on by Louise
She has absolutely no evidence to back up those evil
accusations , which is why she is trawling this Qanon Pizzagate
conspiracyloon forum to try to get dirt on him and the SAFF.
never get any 'evidence' of wrongdoing because the bookshop owner is
utterly innocent of them.
Until she accepts this fact she will be ridiculed every time she states
an untruth and end up paying a lot of money to him in damages.
Like her dishonourable grandfather, Louise Dickens appears ready to say and do anything to smear an innocent man.
She similarly uses terms like 'monsters' and 'vile' and 'makes my toes
curl' in reference to the SAFF even though we have done nothing in
any way wrong. She insults us to avoid facing up to the fact that
her grandfather was a despicable, dishonourable, liar who broke trust
with almost everyone he came into contact with, including his
parliamentary colleagues and his long suffering wife.
The Leeds bookshop was an entirely legal entity involved in honest trade, to 40,000 regular, decent, honest customers.
The bookshop owner has not done anything wrong ever; he doesn't even have a parking ticket against his name.
Geoffrey Dickens' assumption that he must be up to no good because he
sold books on Witchcraft and Satanism revealed only his bigoted
Christian fundamentalist world-view which his granddaughter has aligned
herself with. http://saff.nfshost.com/louisedickens.htm
4: GEOFFREY DICKENS WAS NOT BLAMED FOR THE FIREBOMBING OF THE BOOKSTORE. The Leeds bookshop was firebombed in August 1989 by Christian
Fundamentalists, thirteen months AFTER Geoffrey Dickens started
his campaign. It happened a week after the despicable Cook Report
'The Devil's Work' was broadcast. It was that programme which
caused the firebombing. Grandfather's lies may have fanned the
flames but in his statements following the fire, the bookshop owner
blames The Cook Report directly for it, not Geoffrey Dickens.
This is clearly proven here: http://tabloidtv.nfshost.com
In that very long and detailed history of how the Cook Report
persecuted him, there are only two sideways mentions of Geoffrey
Dickens. Louise Dickens' insistence that the SAFF is victimising
her for Granddad's actions is utterly fallacious. We are simply
highlighting historical errors and lies which she is perpetuating. And
5: THE SAFF DOES NOT BULLY PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN SRA:
Louise claims that the SAFF 'turned on her'.
In fact we have been trying to educate her since 2016 by pointing up
the lies about her grandfather's campaign which she wrongly believes
in. We have done this civilly, though Louise has been antagonistic
and obdurate from the start. We were actually trying to help her to avoid getting herself and her family into the exact legal trouble which her obsessive stupidity over SRA has in the end created.
And the only person who has 'made her toes curl' appears to be the Labour MP Simon 'spanker' Danczuk, whom Louise admitted she had bedded in 2016 whilst planning to write a book about Granddad Geoffrey's child-abuse campaigns. .
"So, what I'm asking
is, does anyone on this group in the UK have any information on this
cult? Take a look at their website, it's vile reading.
This man has seemed
to make it his life's work to slur my grandad and all his work on
protecting children and making people aware of the evil in our world.
And if he had nothing to hide, surely he wouldn't go to so much
The Reason why the bookshop owner continues to point out the lies of Louise
Dickens' grandfather is simply that they involve dastardly false
allegations against himself. A key indicator of the foolishness of
this woman is her insistence that it is somehow unfair for a person who has been falsely accused to counter lies against himself with the Truth.
Does she expect him to remain silent whilst people make
horrendous criminal allegations of the most disgusting kind against
Louise is so sold on grandfather's retrospective saintly image that she appears completely
ignorant of what he actually did. Each time she promotes one of
his old lies in order to try to discredit the SAFF we obviously reply with
FACTS which prove that she's ignorant of what happened. When she runs out of facts she can turn to confabulating things (see; Black Witch stuck pins in a voodoo doll of Geoffrey Dickens on James Whale Show here: http://saff.nfshost.com/louisedickens.htm#phantomw ). IT NEVER HAPPENED. She staked her 'life' on it yet it never actually happened!
If this injudicious
woman wants to continue to lie about innocent people and misrepresent
and libel the good work of the SAFF in the public realm then the SAFF
will have no alternative than to expose hypocrisy and the untruths she often disseminates whenever she promotes them; so the public are not mislead into following another scare.
the granddaughter of Geoffrey Dickens she is being made a celebrity in
the conspiracyloon circuit. She is, without possessing evidence,
promoting the sectarian lies which her grandfather started in 1988 and
which the SAFF discredited at that time. As can be seen by the lies she
glibly trotted out above concerning the
Leeds Bookshop owner and child pornography, Louise adds stuff which grandad did not say and which is completely
untrue. Her self-righteousness is unending.
Yet there has
never ever been any historical allegation about the bookshop concerning
child-pornography. None. Ever.
Where did that come from?
Either she made it up or someone feeding her with misinformation made it up.
Either way it is an evil thing to do to accuse someone of such
serious crimes without one jot of evidence. There is free speech
in Britain and she is free to make statements but must realise that when
they are lies she will be held legally responsible for them.
Obviously the SAFF respects and lauds TRUTH; it is our mission to parry lies with Truth. We have done that for over three decades and sooner or later Louise Dickens will realise that she will not be allowed to get away with slandering or libelling anyone when SAFF has the documentary proof which provides the facts otherwise.
The SAFF confront and correct LIES. If people stop fantasising about
SRA and the SA then we will have no need to challenge them.
example in an attempt to besmirch our intent she has called us a
'Cult'. The SAFF is no more a cult than the National Trust
In various twitter exchanges we have explained to Louise Dickens several
times that we
are NOT a Satanic group and that we do NOT support paedophiles, we
actively hunt them out.
Our membership comes from all walks of life and all religious beliefs,
including Christianity. Volunteers work to assist the aims of the
SAFF when they can because they wholeheartedly agree with them. Many of
our helpers have been the victims of false allegations themselves.
We impose nothing upon them and we do nothing
cult-like. Yet still Louise Dickens refuses to see the
Still she insists that Black is White. Still she defames us and
anyone else she self-righteously considers to be her enemies. She
cannot accept the fact that religious rights extend to ALL
beliefs and that Satanists and Pagans have religious beliefs which are
valid as hers. To protect her fragile world-view she seems driven
to insist that we are liars or disingenuous or in error. She
appears ready to paint us with an evil brush to stop anyone else
listening to us. When the SAFF interjects to stop the
Pagans and Satanists she repeats those untruths which she already knows
we have answered.
SPOT THE MISTAKES COMPETITION: So far we've mentioned over a
dozen factual mistakes, errors and downright lies in Louise Dickens
statement above to Qanon Pizzagate Forum. How many can you find?