Latest News:Police Report no evidence to support 'Nick's' allegations as investigation into Exaro's political contacts begins : See foot of webpage:

Satanic Abuse
Victim-Imposter Lauren Stratford Resurfaces
Pretending to be a  Holocaust Survivor!

Would you believe it! Lauren Stratford, the author of the highly influential SATAN'S UNDERGROUND, well-known as the 'bible' for Satanic Ritual Abuse Therapists, has been caught out pretending to be a child Holocaust survivor! 

Committed Christian activist Stratford went underground herself some years ago after Cornerstone magazine revealed that her book was a complete lie from end to end. Now she's lying big-time again.  Under the assumed name of Laura Grabowski, Stratford infiltrated a holocaust children survivors group and lied about being personally abused in Nazi concentration camps.  

Stratford's strategem was spotted this time and she was outed before she could do more damage but everything in her Satan's Underground,  including the terrible renditions of torture by her supposedly Satanic parents and their subsequent death, was complete fiction - and they were still around to say so!  ( See  the Carol Meyer's case here to show how the myth Stratford invented eventually helped to kill a British nurse )

In the general climate of denial and counter-claim over the controversy about Satanic Ritual Abuse, the therapists and social workers who based much of their 'knowledge' about what Satanic Abusers did on Stratford's supposed personal account of extensive familial satanic abuse, insisted that the Cornerstone magazine expose was yet another confusion strategy by Satanists to undermine the response of society and continued regardless.

That's what they often say to discount SAFF exposes and literature. Stratford's book is still on their required reading-lists and they have continued to recommend her book to 'believers' or outsiders who want to 'know the truth about Satanic Abuse first hand'.

However, investigators have recently re-discovered Stratford, hiding behind another pseudonym and pretending to be a Jewish Child survivor of the Nazi Holocaust!

She had wormed her way into a Jewish survivors' group with horrific stories of her supposed experiences as a child-inmate of the extermination camps!

She had become a celebrity in their circuit with tales which closely resembled those she foisted upon the child scare industry. When investigators identified her, she agreed to speak to them later and then escaped by doing a bunk!

The prejudiced people who are persisting with accusations of Satanic Abuse using her claimed experiences will no doubt say that this is yet another lie by Satanists, but this time Stratford was caught on camera giving a lecture at the Jewish Groups HQ.

No doubt Stratford will turn up in a year or so claiming to having been abducted by Aliens... (see leftmost column - it's not Stratford this time but a classic example of  Hitler's dictum that the bigger the claim the more likely the media are to report it. )

This story could run and run.  The next time that a Satan Hunter tells you that they have 'first-hand' accounts from people who have suffered at the hands of satanic groups ; say the magic words 'Lauren Stratford is a Compulsive Liar' and everything should be well.

Silly Woman Gives UFO Researchers a Bad Name

UFOs Abducting Welsh People

No, This isn't an April Fools' joke, this woman truly believes in what she is saying, and note the uncritical reporting by the cynical hacks at Wales Online whose words give the ridiculous assertions authority and  will therefore affect the tiny minds of other gullible people living in Wales.  Look carefully at the full article below to see an exact mirror of the Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth claims, converted into UFO terms.

Ufologist Hilary Porter claims that aliens are targeting the Celtic tribes

Hilary Porter says she has been abducted so many times she has lost count

Telepathic aliens are targeting Wales in a bid to harvest our superior genetic material that's according to 'abduction victim' Hilary Porter.

While Hilary's stories may sound outlandish or unbelievable, she dismisses those who scoff for being closed minded.

The 67-year-old sought-after speaker and ufologist is claiming a stretch of road between Swansea and Cardiff is a 'hotspot' of alien activity.

Hilary says she was so traumatised by her abduction that she was too scared to return to Wales for four decades.

When she did finally return in 2009 to visit a friend in Llanelli, she drove through the danger area unharmed only to be abducted from her bed within a day of arrival.

Hilary says she has been abducted so many times she has lost count and is convinced that aliens are already among us and only a government cover-up continues to keep it a secret.

'They know what is going on but they are absolutely powerless to stop it,' said Hilary.

However, the active member of the British Earth and Aerial Mysteries Society (BEAMS) believes the tide is turning as people increasingly come forward with their own tales of alien abduction.

Later this month she will be among a host of speakers at the Anomalous Mind Management, Abductee, Contactee, Helpline project (AMMACH) conference, which is expected to attracted hundreds.

Hilary, who has had two experiences of aliens in Wales, holds the belief that extra terrestrials are targeting the Celtic tribe.

The first occasion was in September 1970 as she drive home from a holiday in Ireland with her now ex-husband.

She said as they headed towards the original Severn crossing, they suddenly found themselves on the outskirts of Cardiff outside a garage with no idea how they had got there.

'It was damned frightening. We just blacked out and had no idea how we got there,' she said.

I didn't feel well at all. My husband thought we must have gone to sleep, but that didn't explain how we got there.

Also unexplained was how the petrol level in the car hadn't gone down, she said.

'When we got home I got changed and found triangular suction marks on my stomach, blood suction marks. I thought 'flipping hell, look at that.'

The marks themselves quickly disappeared and it wasn't until seven years later that Hilary had a dream of travelling in what appeared to be a hexagonal spaceship.

Within a short space of time she started suffering flashback memories which, she believes, began to reveal what had really happened in Wales.

Today after years of studying 'experience phenomena', she has come to the conclusion she was teleported by aliens from another dimension.

'They transport you molecularly and can create portals in a wall or closed door,' she said.

'In the flashbacks I was on a beach and could see this alien being who was about 6ft tall and wearing green coveralls.

'I couldn't see his face but he could communicate mind to mind and had a box around his neck for seismic testing and warned me that he was going to cause an earthquake.'

When he did, they were forced to run, she said, and she got into a small round vehicle which took her and the alien on to a small oval UFO.

'I thought flipping eck' she said.

She later created a drawing of the flight deck of the UFO which shows a consul and an alien moving a series of levers, which she describes as looking like those in an old fashioned railway signal box. 'Clearly a cover memory,' she said.

She believes the relatively pleasant events she recalled had been created by the aliens to hide the real nature of the traumatic experience she actually underwent.

On the second occasion, she said she woke at a friend's house to find she had an unexplained black eye.

Hilary revealed that her research has led her to the conclusion that aliens target certain human 'tribes' who genetic make-up is of more interest.

'The Celtic tribes from Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall and Brittany are definitely on the list,' she said. 

'They are trying to make alien human hybrids and it seems the genetic material of these races are more compatible.'

*Ed: Nazi Aliens perhaps?

Source: Walesonline:

 Munchhausen ~ noun :  German raconteur (1720-1797) who told preposterous stories about his adventures as a soldier and hunter; his name is now associated with any telling of exaggerated stories or winning lies.

or Story-teller?

- 'Nick' vs. British History

By Bernie Najarian

Although the term Munchhausen Syndrome was first coined by therapists to describe people who fake dramatic medical conditions (1), the same dynamic is clearly at work in people who proclaim other sorts of false sufferings (2).

Child sexual abuse is a common theme in Munchhausen stories. For example, in the list of  'Ten bizarre hoaxes involving nonexistent people' (5), the top-ranking hoax is the story of former transgendered 12-year-old prostitute J.T. LeRoy, who turned out to be the fictional creation of a 35-year-old woman called Laura Albert (6). Albert, despite having no experiences parallel to those of her creation, justified the fraud, after being caught, by saying

"For me it was created the way an oyster creates a pearl: out of irritation and suffering. It was an attempt to try to heal something. And it actually worked."

The Terrible Yarn-Spinners of Cyberspace

One thing online people learn, sooner or later, is that you have to watch out for the storytellers.

Oh, yes. Do watch out for those storytellers.

You could say that they're seeking attention, but as a professional reporter, I can tell you that I am also seeking attention, in a way. I love it when you read my story. They are doing something much deeper than that - something that I and my fact-exposing ilk are not attempting to do. They are trying to produce a catharsis. They role-play, confronting death and the evils of the world on the level of a heartfelt fantasy, while many others, their audience, sympathetically hold on to their hands.

Here's how I think this deception works: We all die sometime; we all sometimes live in pain. So does anyone we love and identify with. These realities, forming the backdrop for the ordinary pains of our lives, make us angry; they make us bereft; they say that love is temporary and often false. However lovely love may feel, it is disposable, and so, therefore, is respect. We don't owe the truth to any of those who sympathize with our stories, even when we cling to their sympathy. The story of our pain, even when it is expressed in completely imaginary scenarios, is more real than their reality.

The incredible power of storytelling is at its most visible today in Great Britain. The 20th century history of the country is perhaps about to be fundamentally changed by a tale.

The conventional view is that Britain has been ruled by people who are mostly sober and occasionally efficient. Whether populist left or hard-nosed right, they have been true public servants. Of course, as such, they have been prone to the standard range of scandals about love affairs and expense claims, but a few bad apples don't spoil the whole barrel - and should they seem to, you can elect a new, fresh barrel of clean apples.

Westminster Paedophile Ring

The alternative view that has now presented itself is that the British governments in the late 20th century, right and left, were all one seething barrel of rot. They consisted of a conspiratorial cabal of child murderers and rapists, or accessories to those crimes. These evil men and women used secret service spies, police and border officials to abet their lives of constant sadistic self-indulgence. The rule of law was a hoax. No child was safe. In a historic period where we thought Margaret Thatcher acted as a prissy Augustus Caesar, throwing back unions and Argentines and communists from the borders of democratic capitalism, we had instead a British Nero, ruling an empire whose limitless, bloody debaucheries would have been forever covered up - if not for one man.

The name of this man is 'Nick.' This is the man who hopes to rewrite the history of the United Kingdom with his stories.

'Nick' came forward in late 2014 to an up-and-coming journalistic endeavour by the name of Exaro News (7). Exaro, whose slogan is 'Holding Power to Account,' was a 2011 start-up, owned by wealthy London banker Jeremy Booth and managed by investigative reporter Mark Watts.  It was best known in its early years for exposing multi-billionaire Rupert Murdoch's involvement in bribery of public officials by news tabloids in the UK. It had also, however, sponsored a prominent series of investigations about alleged sexual abuse of young people at a hotel called the Elm Guest House in the late 1970s and early 80s.

After the Elm Guest House stories came out, 'Nick' came forward to Exaro and began to tell his own story, which he stated he'd suppressed for 30 years out of fear. His unique trust in Exaro was such that he insisted on having an Exaro staffer with him when he first reported his complaints to the police.

These complaints can be found online in two forms, an official press form and a personal form. The latter is found in 'Nick's' alternatively-pseudonymed Twitter account (@carl_survivor) and wordpress blog. Although the blog was recently restricted to friends only, it was long open and formed a prominent part of the ongoing 'abuse survivors' social movement in the UK. 'Nick' was extensively tied in to the network of people responding as victims to the Jimmy Savile allegations, Operation Yewtree, and so on - the movement that some online sceptics have referred to as 'Operation Compensation' because of the large amounts of money some complainants have collected. There are, however, many complainants who are not eligible for any monetary reward for their exposure.

As an accuser of sexual abuse, 'Nick' is entitled, under British law, to anonymity, but he may also waive this protection. As blogger Richard Bartholomew pointed out on Aug. 7 of this year (8), 'Nick' has openly cross-linked himself to his alternative pseudonym, 'Carl Survivor,' under which extensive first-person accounts of his allegations have been published. The unique facts linking 'Nick's' allegations, made via Exaro and other news outlets, and the oeuvre of Carl Survivor, are as follows:

The Allegations

'Nick' claims to be a witness to three murders of young boys by a cabal of sexual abusers including many high officials; and, he was abused from ages 7-16, 30 years ago. Although Carl, when challenged by barrister Barbara Hewson on Twitter (9), did not openly admit to being 'Nick', his prominent featuring of correlated data breaks all the rules of internet anonymity - and he otherwise seems to be good at anonymity. Ergo, one infers that the 'Nick' - Carl link is not intended to be a secret, but rather is merely a relatively discreet, acknowledged link.     Here's a press version of 'Nick's' allegations made against former Conservative Member of Parliament Harvey Proctor. This is from, Aug. 27 (10).


    Former Conservative MP Harvey Proctor vehemently denied horrific allegations of rape, torture, sexual abuse and murder made against him by a man known only as "Nick" that are said to have taken place between 1978 and 1984.

    "I am completely innocent of all these allegations. I am a homosexual, I am not a murderer. I am not a paedophile," he told reporters in a luxury London hotel.

    The extraordinary offensive is the first time details of the alleged abuse have been made public. Mr Proctor warned "anyone of a delicate or nervous disposition should leave the room" before listing the nine allegations made against him.

    They include tying a young boy to a table and stabbing him with a knife before raping and strangling him in front of 'Nick'. He was accused of sexually abusing 'Nick' on multiple occasions and threatening to cut off his genitalia with a pen knife. 'Nick' also claims to have witnessed a friend being run down and killed by a car and said Mr Proctor was in the group responsible.

    "They amount to just about the worst allegations anyone can make against another person including as they do, multiple murder of children, their torture, grievous bodily harm, rape and sexual child abuse," Mr Proctor said.

    "I denied all and each of the allegations in turn and in detail and categorised that as false and untrue."

[end quote]

I'll add in one more detail from the Daily Mail (11)


    One grim accusation is that Proctor threatened to cut off 'Nick's' testicles with a penknife, only to be stopped from doing so by (former British Prime Minister) Edward Heath. 'Nick' has since produced what he says is the offending penknife and handed it to detectives.

[end quote]

Now, here are parts of the stories as told, without direct accusation against individuals, on the Carl Survivor blog. Ordinarily, I would simply link to the original text, but with this long-open blog having recently been set to private, I feel obliged to quote selected portions so that members of public are able to know the nature of the actual stories that have had such a strong influence on public affairs today.


    I need to go back over 30 years. I spent 9 years at the hands of a paedophile ring that had absolutely no fear of being caught. But how do I know that they had no fear? Well, their actions pretty much spoke for themselves. Some of the men openly told me their names, some their professions, I was taken openly to various locations to be abused, no attempt was made to muffle our cries or screams. I was even taken abroad through a major airport with no questions or passport. Then there were the threats, the threat that me and others could simply disappear and not only would no one question it but they would not care either. On top of all this I and others experienced first-hand what these men were capable of. I would be punished in the most brutal way imaginable, my friends were killed and all done without hesitation or remorse. From what I have learnt about human nature since becoming an adult, you just don't do these things unless you're sure of the people you are with and the protection that you have. (currently inaccessible)

    So I think that it is OK that I don't understand their actions and I wonder if they understand what they did themselves, although they must have done. It takes a considerable amount of thought and action (for someone) to hold my head underwater so I can't breathe, or to burn me or even to rape me. So how did they rationalize it to themselves? How does a grown man think that raping me, boys, children was OK? How can a man inflict unimaginable pain on me and others and live with our screams in their head? How can a man kill my friend and look at themselves in the mirror as though it was the most normal thing in the world? How can a man do those things to another human being let alone a child? (currently inaccessible)

    This is the continuation from my blog 'How it all started'. I was 7 years old and had already suffered physically and sexually at the hands of my father. Now however, I was going to be introduced to the group, something I think that was always his intention. I never saw him as happy as when they seemed to like and accept me into the group. I was in, which meant he was too.

    I don't remember anything unusual about the day, except I suppose for the fact he was being nice to me. I should have suspected something was wrong. I had to wear my school uniform even though I was not going to be going to school that day. Instead I was going to my father's work. I remember as though it was yesterday him telling me to do exactly as I was told and to not say a word. I don't remember feeling scared or anything, but I was confused that he was being nice.
    I was taken into this office and there was another man there waiting, he seemed to know my father. I remember they talked for a bit, but this other man never stopped looking at me, and I think it made me nervous. The man came over and said hello and even shook my hand and he told my father to leave. It was just me and him and I had to stand before him. He started touching my hair and face and then all over my body. He kept saying how beautiful I was and that I was a good boy. I do remember it was quite nice to hear that I was a good boy. He started to undress me and then do some of the things my father did. Despite all that I had been through already with my father, I don't think I expected it to come from a stranger, I just assumed it's what fathers did.

    This man only kissed and touched me and didn't hurt me like my father but I was still glad when it was over. When my father came back, they talked again which is when I saw how happy he was. On the way back home, he even told me I had done really well. I don't think this really registered, although it did add to the confusion that small boy felt. How could he be so nasty one minute and nice the next, why did it make him happy when another man liked me like that, was this all normal? It didn't feel normal, or it might have been I didn't want it to feel normal, but it was happening nevertheless.
    It wasn't long after that first meeting that I was taken to this house, I was ushered into the back room, and that man was there again together with two others. He was pleased to see me and again my father left me there. I was told to undress and do various things in front of them. One of them was taking pictures. I didn't feel right to be standing there naked in front of these three men, but they seemed pleased, which I didn't quite know why. The man the office, told everyone to leave. He started kissing and touching me again, but this time made me do things to him as well. At the end he held me down on the carpet and raped me. He was the same as my father but unlike him he was saying all these nice things to me as he was hurting me. I still didn't understand what was happening to me, except it was hurting and I didn't like it. My face was wet with tears as I was pushed into the carpet. (currently inaccessible)

    February 17, 2015

    Split wide open:

    For the last four months, it has been such a non-stop roller coaster of emotions, and to be honest I am really not sure what I am feeling at the moment. It feels like I am living my two lives again. My functioning life, working, looking after the family, looking after the house. I have to do all of these, no one is going to do it for me. But in my quiet moments and at night I am pretty much a mess. I am empty, the wounds that I have carried since I was a child have split wide open and I am sure getting bigger by the day.

    The abuse I can cope with well now, my counselling has helped me come to terms with that. But dealing with the deaths of my friends is a whole different issue and one that I am struggling with. I have written before about the blame and guilt I have over their deaths, and I read all the lovely comments from people about it not being my fault, but I just can't accept it. Over the past four months I have relived their deaths over and over again. Every single night they return to show how I let them down, how I didn't do everything I could to save them. During the day, when I have a quiet period, my thoughts turn to those times replaying them over and over again wondering what I could have done differently with different outcomes for them. I think it makes it worse that at the moment I can't talk about their deaths with my counsellor, I have to be careful what I say about it here, and I have no one to talk to each and every day, the thoughts, the demons are my own to keep....

[end quote]

Therapeutic Poetry - hallmark of memory creation.

Carl has written extensive amounts of poetry, something he says his therapist advised him to do.


    I've just found out the identity of one of my friends
    So many years of wondering could be at an end
    But dealing with it has taken its toll
    A big deal for me, I'm no longer whole
    I miss him so very much
    Having his warmth, feeling his touch
    He was a lot braver than I will ever be
    His courage was there for me to see
    I hear he has got family alive
    Will they hate me that I survived
    The guilt overwhelming, eating away
    Part of me died that terrible day
    I want to shout, honour his name
    But how can I when I was to blame.
    I think about you every single day
    You're always in my heart, forever to stay

[end quote]

Some earlier text partly explains this poem.


    XX (the friend in the poem - BN) died because of me. I was warned by the group and I took no notice. People tell me that at that age I would have had no idea what the consequences would be then, and that is probably true. However, I knew what they were capable of, I experienced what they were capable of and at the end of the day, I did not do as I was told and because of that my friend died. I knew the rules, you had to do as you were told, without question. So why didn't I do it then? If I had, he would be alive today, but because I was selfish they took him from me. With the other two it was different but I was still to blame. I cannot publish the details here, but I was not strong enough to help my second friend, I tried so hard but I failed. My third friend died because I kept quiet when I should have spoken up. I had an opportunity to put myself forward, but I was too scared and because of my silence, he died. (12)

[end quote]

A police document read out by Harvey Proctor at an Aug. 25 press conference fills in the missing details (13).


    1980 - at a residential house in central London. 'Nick' was driven by car to an address in the Pimlico/Belgravia area where a second boy (the victim) was also collected in the same vehicle. Both boys, aged approximately 12-years-old, were driven to another similar central London address. Mr. Proctor was present with another male. Both boys were led to the back of the house. Mr. Proctor then stripped the victim, and tied him to a table. He then produced a large kitchen knife and stabbed the child through the arm and other parts of the body over a period of 40 minutes. A short time later Mr. Proctor untied the victim and anally raped him on the table. The other male stripped 'Nick' and anally raped him over the table. Mr. Proctor then strangled the victim with his hands until the boy's body went limp. Both males then left the room. Later, Mr. Proctor returned and led 'Nick' out of the house and into a waiting car.

1981-82 - at a residential address in central London. 'Nick' was collected from Kingston train station and taken to a 'party' at a residential address. The witness was among four young boys. Several men were present including Mr. Proctor. One of the men told the boys one of them would die that night and they had to choose who. When the boys wouldn't decide, the men selected one of the boys (the victim). Each of the four boys including 'Nick' were taken to separate rooms for 'private time'. When they all returned to the same room, 'Nick' was anally raped by Mr. Proctor and another male as 'punishment'. The other males also anally raped the remaining boys. Mr. Proctor and two other males then began beating the chosen victim by punching and kicking. The attack continued until the boy collapsed on the floor and stopped moving. All of the men left the room. The remaining boys attempted to revive the victim but he was not breathing. They were left for some time before being taken out of the house and returned to their homes.
Between May and July 1979 - in a street in Coombe Hill, Kingston. 'Nick' was walking in this area with another boy (the victim) when he heard the sound of a car engine revving. A dark-coloured car drove into the victim knocking him down. 'Nick' could see the boy covered in blood and his leg bent backwards. A car pulled up and 'Nick' was grabbed and placed in the car. He felt a sharp pain in his arm and next remembered being dropped off at home. He was warned not to have friends in future. 'Nick' never saw the other boy again. 'Nick' does not identify Mr. Proctor as being directly involved in this allegation. However, he states Mr. Proctor was part of the group responsible for the systematic sexual abuse he suffered. Furthermore, he believes the group were responsible for the homicide.

[end quote]

There have been months of stories in the U.K. press about organized abuse in the '70s and '80s at the Elm Guest House (14) and also at apartments in an area called Dolphin Square, where many prominent political types had their London addresses. Connections have been made not just to politicians and entertainers, but also to the British secret service, especially since a long-dead MI6 secret service agent named Peter Hayman was shown to have been a part of the Paedophile Information Exchange political/social group (15). A former Head of the MI6, the late Maurice Oldfield, is alleged by 'Nick' to be part of the gang that abused him. The involvement of secret service agents is important to the story, since it seems to make every illegal action possible. 
From Proctor's Aug. 25 press release:


    22. The 'gang' is also alleged to have included Lord Janner (a former Labour M.P.), Lord Bramall (Former Chief of the General Staff), the late Maurice Oldfield (Former Head of Secret Intelligence Service - MI6), the late Sir Michael Hanley (Director General of the Internal Security Service - MI5), General Sir Hugh Beach (Master-General of the Ordnance) and a man named Ray Beech.

[end quote]

Members of Parliament, starting with the notoriously homophobic, evangelical maverick Geoffrey Dickens in the 1990s (16) and continuing with Tom Watson, Simon Danczuk, Sarah Champion and others to the present day, have actively sought and collected evidence of paedosexual improprieties by members of the governing elite. While some establishment members have been successfully convicted or posthumously implicated, a prominent cluster of allegations is almost entirely dependent on 'Nick's' say-so.

'Nick's' evidence is far more dramatic even than that given against posthumously alleged boy-spanker and physical assaulter Member of Parliament Cyril Smith (17), because of the murders 'Nick' claims to have witnessed. The allegation that a notoriously shy, seemingly asexual Prime Minister, Edward Heath, was secretly involved in a child sex-murder gang, is one of the most drastically counter-intuitive historical revisions ever proposed. The mainstream Daily Mirror newstabloid, independently of 'Nick', has also gone so far as to state that:

"we can reveal that Heath was present at more than half a dozen Westminster meetings of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange."

No evidence has been presented, so far, for this astonishing idea -  astonishing to anyone who knows the sort of people who dared to sneak discreetly to gay meetings during the period the P.I.E. was in existence, 1974-1984 (18).    The idea of a top Conservative politico showing up at a gathering of the most controversial deviants in existence - effectively committing political suicide if even one person talked about it to anyone they knew - is completely preposterous.  [Ed:  Preposterousness is a common feature of those allegations many of which come from therapy sessions with psychiatrists who believe in a patriarchal conspiracy against children. ]

So far, the only objective evidence that has been revealed to back up 'Nick's' claims is the penknife that 'Nick' has given to police, with the claim that it was the one used when Harvey Proctor threatened him with castration.

'Nick' has nonetheless been rated by police as 'credible and true.' (19). As Proctor and many other people have pointed out, this statement is unprofessionally prejudicial, but one can readily see its raison d'etre. Carl, in his blog, often serves as a peacemaker amongst the warring factions of the political abuse victim movement, and even quotes Mahatma Gandhi.


    This quote seems appropriate for this blog. From Mahatma Gandhi

    Keep your thoughts positive, because your thoughts become your words
    Keep your words positive, because your words become your behaviour
    Keep your behaviour positive, because your behaviour becomes your habits
    Keep your habits positive, because your habits become your values
    Keep your values positive, because your values become your destiny

    So let's each of us see if we can use unity over division, tolerance over intolerance, understanding over aggression and support over distress.

[end quote]

He appears to be a member of the professional class who says things like:


    I know some people will not accept that everything is not in the public domain, but having led independent reviews in my own line of work, I understand that some things have to remain confidential, but it is right and proper that they put as much as they can in the public domain.

[end quote]



    I would like to thank you for inviting me to speak at your conference. I have presented at other conferences as part of my job, but this is the first time that I have spoken to publicly about something so personal.

[end quote]

'Nick'/Carl also serves as a poster boy for the need for abused children to tell their stories, and is constantly referenced by Susan G. Crocombe (@shinybluedress) and other prominent campaigners who stress this theme.

The Incredibly Incredulous

Police, looking for corroboration of stories of abuse by VIPs, were under strong political pressure to state that, unlike in the bad old days, they would not disbelieve and dismiss those coming forward. To call 'Nick' 'credible and true' was a bright, flashy fishing lure that also pleased the political victim movement. If police had been punctiliously accurate about the presumption of innocence, they could better have said 'Nick' was 'credible and verisimilitudinous' - my guess at their actual meaning - but neither they nor most of their intended audience would have the vocabulary for such a statement.

The 'credible and true' prejudgement enraged Proctor, and has fuelled such a powerful backlash that even prominent VIP abuse witch-finders like ex-cop-cum-journalist Mark Williams-Thomas have expressed disbelief about 'Nick' and his stories ( - paywalled story).

Everything hangs on whether or not 'Nick'/Carl is the J.T. LeRoy of VIP abuse. If his accounts are true, he has been subjected to terrible crimes, and has witnessed many more. Insofar as it is possible, given the 30-year time lag, everyone involved in inflicting these horrific tortures and murders should be prosecuted with the same vigour and persistence employed to track down war criminals from the World War II death camps. This is all the more imperative if they were public officials who were protected by corrupted political powers.

If 'Nicks' stories are false, then he is perhaps the most daring Munchhausen ever to have twisted the public's emotions with his storytelling. Now that he has become active, 'Nick' is by no means a shadow-figure. He's a prominent go-getter, a major leader in the victim movement. His 'Carl' alter-ego is busy organizing a national display of mementos collected by people who claim to be 'victims and survivors' of sexual abuse. It had three showings booked, starting in Jan. 2016, as of the time Carl's blog went into private status.


    Raising Awareness for Victims and Survivors of Child Abuse

    Frequently asked questions - updated 17 July 2015

    Where do I send my submissions?

    You can send your submissions to me via facebook, email or twitter.

    What can I send in to represent me in the exhibition?

    Anything. So far people have sent in a variety of photographs (of animals, favourite places, things that mean something to the individual, pictures of them as an adult, pictures of them as a child), poems, drawings we have even had a song submitted. Most people choose to send in a photograph of some sort. However, even if you can't think of anything and still want to take part, let me know and we can always get a picture for you.

    How can I help?
    If you want to physically help, I ask you to get in touch with Mike Pierce at the Southmead Project so that we can co-ordinate offers of help. However, you can also help by donating money to the project at and the biggest help is spreading the word about the exhibition so as many survivors have the opportunity to take part as possible.

[end quote]

The range of phenomena people can swear they have personally witnessed is amazing.The Valais witch trials (20) that occurred in what is now western Switzerland between 1428 and 1447 included personal eyewitness testimonies and confessions to the following events:


    Flying: to have anointed chairs, then gone flying through the air and engaged in plundering wine cellars.
    Lycanthropy: to have killed cattle in the shapes of werewolves.
    Invisibility: to have made themselves invisible with herbs.
    To have cured sickness and paralysis caused by sorcery by giving it to someone else.
    Cannibalism: to have abducted and eaten children.
    To have met and learned magic from Satan.
    Conspiracy: to have planned depriving Christianity of its power over humanity.

[end quote]
Note that the abduction and murder of children is prominent in the list. Whether we look at the early 20th-century anti-Semitic Protocols of Elders of Zion (21) or at modern Satanic abuse fictions, like those concocted about the community of Hampstead by angry divorcee Ella Draper (22), the murder of children by evil forces is a lynchpin of malicious public Munchhausen. When you add together a small catalyst of Munchhausens with a large group of supportive Moralists, then you have the necessary ingredients of a witch-hunt.

Storytellers + Moralists = Witch-hunt.

For more on the stunning parallels on how modern claims of Abuse in High Places gels exactly with allegations made in mediaeval witch-hunts see here:

The entire future of Britain, including its ability to tell its own story truthfully, hangs on whether 'Nick' is Carl Survivor or Carl Storyteller. This question in turn hangs upon whether British judges and police can correctly discern which of these possible Carls is the real one. They are in a deuce of a situation - actual evidence or even corroborative detail from such long-ago cases, especially those involving transient factors like sexual acts and unreported injuries, is almost impossible to find.  Most of the alleged participants they could interview are dead; a few are senile. Police have a penknife they can contemplate, and not much more.

Along with whatever else they collect, they should study 'credible and true' -seeming stories like those of Anthony Godby Johnson and J.T. LeRoy carefully before they make any decisions.

Accessible links:

2. ,


Full unedited source text of this original article above is available on:

Copyright strictly reserved - Bernie Najarian

Police report no evidence to substantiate 'Nick's' Westminster Paedo allegations: Daily Mail

That article in full:


Exclusive by Stephen Wright, Associate News Editor

SCOTLAND Yard is under pressure to shelve its VIP paedophile murder inquiry because detectives have ‘grave' doubts' about the testimony of the key witness.

Officers have not found 'a shred of evidence' to back up claims that a string of senior Establishment figures were responsible for murdering three boys in the 1970s and 1980s.

Many detectives believe the inquiry - which has already cost the taxpayer more than £1million (£1,000,000,00) - is doomed and should be wound up.

Senior figures in the separate judge-led public inquiry into historic child sex abuse have been told informally that there appears to be no substance to the allegations made by a witness known only as 'Nick'.

The quote the Met may regret 'credible and true''Nick' is an alleged abuse victim who was described by a senior Met police detective, Kenny McDonald, last year as being 'credible and true'.

Turn to page 2,
Continued from page 1:

Amid claims that Yard chiefs are 'too scared' to pull the plug on the inquiry, 30 officers in the cash-strapped force are probing the astonishing triple-murder allegation, linked to Dolphin Square in Central London.

It an also be revealed that:

Police initially took Nick's account seriously because he has a respectable managerial job and does 'not fit the stereotype of a child abuse fantasist'

But there are now fears he is a 'Walter Mitty' who has made up the murder allegations.

Police have not been able to identify any of the alleged victims, discover any bodies or find any credible independent witnesses

Sources say a number of officers have 'grave doubts' about 'Nick's' account but fear that saying this in public could put child-sex victims off contacting police.

Details of the Met's fears over the allegations have emerged after former Conservative MP Harvey Procter accused police of a 'gay witch-hunt' when he disclosed that he had been questioned over the alleged murders.

'Nick' says he was abused at depraved 'sex parties' from the age of seven and claims to have witnessed horrific acts at the luxury Dolphin Square estate between 1975 and 1984.


He has described being drive by a chauffeur along with a terrified 12 year old boy to a luxury town house where he watched as a Tory MP strangled the other child.
Nick said he saw a second boy being murdered in front of a Tory Cabinet minister in 1981.
A third boy died in 1979 after being run over by a member of the gang, he alleges.

In November last year, Nick told the BBC that his abusers 'created fear that penetrated every part of me, day in day out' but the Mail has been told that when 'Nick' is challenged on his version of events he 'becomes emotional and the interview is stopped'.

A source said: 'When he contacted the police he had a well-rehearsed script and initially appeared believable. But when you scratch under the surface of his claims, there is nothing there. The notion of an organised paedophile gang of a former prime minister, MPs and Establishment figures is just nonsense. Police have not been able to identify any victims. There is not one shred of credible evidence to support his allegations. The police investigation has been exhaustive but they have drawn a blank.'

Last week Mr Proctor said he had been accused of being part of a child sexual abuse ring along with the late former prime minister Sir Edward Heath, ex-home secretary Lord Brittan and former had of MI5 and MI6.

He was accused of being part of a 'gang' which murdered three boys and abused may others at Westminster sex parties in the 1970s and 1980s.

There is also mounting concern among officers about the role of an 'investigative' news website called Exaro, which has close links to campaigning Labour MP Tom Watson. An Exaro journalist accompanied Nick to his first police interview and one was involved in a heated exchange with Mr Procter at his press conference last week.

Paedophile Madness

The former detective who helped expose the Jimmy Savile scandal has warned that many of the allegations against high-profile political figures are unsubstantiated and amount to 'paedophile madness' Mark Williams-Thomas said the behaviour by some in the police, media and on the internet posed 'a very real danger of undoing all the good that has been done' since he revealed Savile's serial offending.

Last night in a statements issued through Exaro, 'Nick' declined to comment 'given that there is an ongoing police investigation'.

Mark Watts, editor in chief of Exaro said ' A small number of ill-informed commentators have criticised Exaro over its reporting of the allegations by 'Nick'. The criticisms have however, each been made on a false basis. Far from reporting 'rumours' as alleged, we in fact reported testimony from a witness that we at Exaro - and experienced detectives who specialise in child abuse and in homicide- regard as credible.'

Tory MP Nigel Evans said 'If it transpires this exercise is either politically motivated or a politically correct procedure costing valuable time and resources then clearly its time for the police to put up or shut up.'

There is no suggestion that the behind-the-scenes problems with the Yard murder probe will affect the inquiry into abuse which is being overseen by Justice Lowell Goddard.

Scotland Yard would not confirm that officers had found no evidence to support 'Nick's' claims. Nor did it comment on where Detective Superintendent McDonald stands by his claim that 'Nick' is a 'credible and true' witness.

Source: Daily Mail

(The Sub-culture Alternatives Freedom Foundation (S.A.F.F.) Leeds, Yorkshire, U.K.

We want this website to represent a fair cross-section of opinion. Would you like to add more Information, Observations, Personal Experience, Criticisms or Corrections to SAFF files and publications?
Then please click here to go to our Feedback Forum - You can leave a message anonymously or just read what others have to say.