Contents of This Webpage.
CLICK on the links below to go
to the Subheadings - use your browsers back button to come back to this
The Wong, Alton, Sinason Axis.
Read what the Telegraph's Religious
Correspondent had to say about the gullibility of Satan Hunters
PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THAT SATANISTS MIGHT EAT YOUR BABY.
GMT 22 Mar 2002
abuse is back. Yesterday, a private meeting at Westminster, chaired by
Lord Alton, discussed assaults on children by hooded, chanting
Satanists. "You may be aware," the organisers said, "that, for several
years, there have been reports of the ritual abuse of children and in
some cases ritual murder. The rituals reportedly often involve the
Black Mass and the wearing of robes. Adult survivors of ritual abuse
are divulging important evidence regarding the large scale of this
problem in the UK."
One of the organisers,
Wilfred Wong, an evangelical Christian, is campaigning for ritual abuse
to be made a specific crime, so that the Satanists - responsible for
"hundreds, if not thousands" of sexual assaults and murders - can be
brought to justice. "But so far little has been done," he says
That is a matter of opinion.
In the early 1990s, far too much was done. In Rochdale, 20 children
were removed from their homes after a six-year-old boy told teachers he
had seen babies murdered; the claims were dismissed by the High Court.
In the Orkney islands, village gossip about satanic practices led to
the removal of nine children from their homes; after a £6 million
inquiry, all charges were dismissed and social workers criticised for
planting ideas in children's heads. In 1994, a three-year Department of
Health inquiry by the anthropologist Prof Jean La Fontaine into 84
alleged cases of ritual abuse found no evidence of Satanism in any of
What the inquiry did expose,
however, was the tangle of folklore and urban legend that produced the
scare. The ingredients included: stories of baby sacrifice borrowed
from 19th-century anti-Catholic propaganda (many Satan-hunters are
anti-Catholic fundamentalists); the anti-Semitic blood libel; corny
images of devil-worshippers owing more to The Wicker Man than to any
real occult rubric; television cartoons (the Orkney allegations
featured adults dressed as Ninja Turtles); and the scatological
rambling of small children.
As Prof La Fontaine points
out, paedophilia is the most potent representation of evil in modern
society; it is not surprising that it should become conflated with
older folk devils, or that groups with a distrust of the Establishment
- fundamentalists, feminists, social workers - should prove receptive
to such a myth. What is surprising is that they have been able to
sustain their belief in the face of the empirical demolition of their
They have done so by
retreating into the time-honoured logic of the conspiracy theorist: the
absence of evidence proves the effectiveness of the conspiracy. The
resourceful Satanists dispose of bodies by feeding them into mincing
machines, dissolving them in acid baths, burning them in furnaces or
just eating them. How do they get away with it? Dr Joan Coleman, a
psychiatrist who spoke at yesterday's meeting, says the abusers have
"Masonic connections", though an American campaigner, Prof Cory
Hammond, thinks they are part of a Nazi conspiracy led by a renegade
The anti-Satan lobby has
also seized opportunistically on isolated crimes. Last September, the
torso of a five-year-old black boy was found in the Thames. Valerie
Sinason, a psychotherapist at St George's Hospital in London, told the
press that the case bore all the hallmarks of a ritual murder. "Sadly,
I do not think this is a one-off," she said.
Of course she doesn't. Miss
Sinason, the main speaker yesterday, is on the record as saying that
Satanists are breeding babies for ritual murder, a practice she
described to the Catholic Herald as "an Auschwitz in peacetime". Until
now, not one body has surfaced to corroborate this theory, which
explains why the ritual abuse lobby is so eager to claim the Thames
torso for Satanism. But this, too, is nonsense. The little boy may have
been ritually killed - but by an African witchdoctor harvesting body
parts for the magical medicine known as muti. It has nothing to do with
Prof La Fontaine's verdict
on Valerie Sinason goes to the heart of the problem. "It's depressing
to find someone who has a position at leading London hospitals who is
so cut off from what research methodology is, and what rational
evidence is," she says. When Miss Sinason announces that she has
"clinical evidence" of infanticide and cannibalism, she means that her
patients have told her stories about them. The implication is that,
because the suffering of these people is real, their "memories" must be
Miss Sinason's claims are so
implausible that they are unlikely to win much of an audience this
time. The real cause for concern is the influence on our thinking about
a range of social problems: chronic fatigue, cot death,
post-battlefield stress, autism. In each case, it is more emotionally
satisfying to identify a single cause - an undiscovered virus, chemical
warfare, the MMR jab - than to accept that nasty things happen
randomly, or are produced by a mixture of causes.
It is not just that we have
lost faith in science: it is also that we have done so without
bothering to understand the limits within which science must operate.
Statistical probabilities are hard to grasp; we prefer to encounter our
evidence in the form of human interest stories. Proper research, which
is fundamentally about measurement, lacks entertainment value: Prof La
Fontaine's report cannot compete with the Hammer Horror scenario of
satanic abuse, just as the painstaking work of real archaeologists
pales in comparison with the tales of "lost civilisations" that
television companies, to their shame, still commission.
facts have a way of fighting to the surface. Lord Alton - who says he
is keeping an "open mind" on satanic abuse - might want to consider the
following story. Last year, Jeremy Laurance, the health editor of the
Independent, was alerted by a well known psychotherapist to the
existence of pictures on the internet of a man eating a dismembered
baby. The paper ran the story. A week later it apologised. "Let's not
beat about the bush. I've been had," said Laurance. It turned out that
the photographs were a hoax by a Chinese performance artist. And the
gullible psychotherapist? Valerie Sinason, of course.
Catholic Inroads Into
" For the
pope's private Masses in the Apostolic Palace. Attending Mass in the
small chapel was a rare privilege for the occasional head of state,
like British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his family."
According to the head
teacher, David Owens, it's all thanks to a Labour prime minister. "Tony
Blair opened the door in the debate on faith schools," he explains. "So
it's time for people like us to strike while the iron is hot."
The school is part of the
Carmel Christian Centre, one of a growing number of locally based
hard-line Christian organisations. The aim of these groups is to spread
a fundamentalist form of Christianity. The followers believe that the
Bible is literally true and not open to any degree of interpretation.
They are the only "true" Christians because they have confessed their
sins before Jesus and become "born again". Those who have not converted
In the cathedral I saw a sign. God help us. The message I received from
Saint Therese... and who it was about
Matthew Parris Another miracle! Having now visited the casket
containing pieces of her foot and thigh bone, all my doubts about the
supernatural powers of St Therese of Lisieux have fled. You may
remember that some weeks ago, as a lapsed militant atheist, I
experienced a miraculous reconversion to my dastardly faith after
contemplating the arrival at Portsmouth (for a tour of Britain) of a
casket containing some of the relics of St Therese. Well, yesterday the
19th-century French saint sent me another sign. It happened like this .
. . I had decided to visit the bones yesterday at Westminster
Cathedral. Already there was a near-carnival atmosphere surrounding the
bones. A temporary fish -and-chips stall had sprung up beside a
smoothies-and-coffee tent. In front of the cathedral was a huge array
of steel-barriered paddocks for pilgrims queueing for the relics.
Following other pilgrims, made my way into the cathedral, joining a
long queue. Something like a shopfront faced me: Candles, Roses. I
bought a red rose. I passed a first-aid alcove for those seeking
medical help from St Therese, and huge banks of burning candles. A
notice declared: Lighting a candle is a prayer, which is not the case
Then came a gallery of photographs of the young Therese. She looked a
good and lovely person, and I'm sure she was. Apparently Pope Benedict
has declared a special grant of indulgences to pilgrims to these
relics at Westminster. One indulgence may be gained each day and may be
applied either to a soul in Purgatory or the pilgrim himself or
herself. A Lutheran rage rose in my gorge. Jesus would have been
incandescent. I think I'm a Protestant atheist. And then the relics. Or
rather the casket containing the relics. Clutching my rose, I
stood in front of the glass box, touching it; staring; then (like them)
touching my rose on to the glass. Then I left, my experience complete.
Or was it? At the front of the cathedral, among the departing
pilgrims, was a man apparently alone. It was Tony
Blair. He half-acknowledged me, and walked away. Blimey. Can these
relics help a man become president of Europe? This was no
photo-opportunity: our former Prime Minister and warrior for Western
values had not expected to see a journalist;his expression betrayed
that. So he really means it. Means it not just about God, but the God
to whom Catholics think they have access. I didn't know whether to be
impressed, or horrified. Both, I think. Thank you, St Therese. And God
help us, every one.
Blair Babe, Ruth Kelly faces yet more controversy over efforts to
square membership of Opus Dei (hard line Jesuit international political
intrigue) with her day-to-day duties as Minister for Women and Equality.
" For the pope's private Masses in the Apostolic Palace. Attending Mass
in the small chapel was a rare privilege for the occasional head of
state, like British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his family."
Ann Widdecombe ( Who recently left the
Anglican church and converted to Catholicism.) is favourite to be next
British ambassador to the Vatican . She would be the first Roman
Catholic woman to be appointed to the post and would succeed Francis
Campbell, the current ambassador. The post, which comes with an
official residence in Rome, was created after the
Reformation, yet was not given ambassadorial status until 1982. Â It
had never been held by a Catholic until Mr Campbell was appointed by
Tony Blair in 2006. Â At the time there were questions over
whether a Catholic would be able to be objective in serving the
Government in negotiating with the Holy See, but the diplomat is widely
admired for the job he has done.
New Pressure Group has Christian Mission,
Political candidates in Ribble
Valley are to be called to account at the General Election by a new
pressure group, the Movement For Christian Democracy which just formed
a branch here...the movement was set up by David Alton and Ken
Hargreaves in November 1990 and now has 5,000 members. [Lancs Evening
Post 18 Feb 1992]
The visit of Cardinal Daly, Archbishop of Armagh, to Parliament on
December 1st as a guest of the Catholic Community in both Houses draws
nearer...ne will address a gathering of ....over 200 MPs, Peers,
Ambassadors. I have never been involved in such a timely event which
has generated such interest....welcoming representatives of the Papal
Nunciature.. The three Parliamentary Christian Fellowshisp for Members
staff and wives of MPs and Peers, whcih contain a majority of the
Protestant Christians in Parliament will be playing their part, many
attending Mass for the first time. [Christopher Graffius, (David
Alton's Aide-de-camp at Westminster) writing in the Catholic Times 28
[Alton retires from parliament]
David Alton mentions the work he will do with the Movement for
Christian Democracy, now 10,000 strong, and spreading its wings.
This is the politics of the future, unhampered by the Parliamentary
[Christopher Graffius, Catholic Times 6 august 1995.] [Alton
inaugurated the MDC in 1990 Graffius worked for 9 years as Alton's
gopher in Westminster and the Jubilee Campaign]
English Church-man magazine 1 st July 2016
CHRISTIANS DEMAND ACTION AGAINST SATANIST RITUAL ABUSE
by Wilfred Wong
Satanist Ritual Abuse (SRA)
exists in Britain and is a growing problem, harming and destroying the
lives of an increasing number of children and vulnerable adults because
the UK authorities are simply not taking this crime seriously, a
conference in London of about 60 Christians heard on Saturday 21 May 2016. The conference was organised
by the Christian organisation, the Coalition Against Satanist Ritual Abuse (CASRA). The conference was entitled:
“Satanist Ritual Abuse - The Battle for Justice”.
Conference speakers included Andrew Boyd, a Christian journalist who is
the author of "Blasphemous Rumours", one of the leading books on SRA in
[It is an appalllingly researched book
of selective fundamentalist twaddle. No honest person can portray
Blasphemous Rumours as 'a leading book on SRA in Britain'. You
can see how badly researched it is and how it hoaxed the British Public
in 1992 here: http://saff.
Boyd conducted two years of intense and extensive
research across the UK on SRA. Boyd said that there is "compelling"
evidence for the existence of SRA in Britain. This includes SRA cases that were successfully prosecuted in
Britain’s criminal courts. He urged that Britain should have specific
criminal laws on SRA just as some states in the US have done.
An English SRA Survivor, Victoria Ash, described her long battle for
justice, which has lasted for over 25 years. She said that the local police have repeatedly refused to
properly investigate her SRA allegations. [The
police refused because what Vicky Ash has said is palpable nonsense and
she cannot produce any forensic evidence, locations or names to enable
them to take it further - you can see her drivel here:
But her ongoing campaign managed to prevent her alleged
Abuser from starting a nursery for 40 young children.
Victoria described her horrific experience of SRA as including being
sexually abused from as early as 3 to 4 years old, being drugged and
taken to Satanist rituals, which involved the killing of animals,
babies or children, being forced to watch pornography and also to have
sex with animals. Indecent photos were also taken of her.
[Except that no such photos have ever been
found! No animal carcases have been produced and Satanists
don't kill animals in their rites anyway; The SAFF undermined fantasies
about Satanic Animal Sacrifice here:
they are simply not true]
Robert Green, the leading campaigner on Scotland’s largest, current SRA
case, the Hollie Greig case, said that Hollie, a young woman with
Down’s Syndrome, had identified 23 alleged Satanist Ritual Abusers,
including a senior police officer, 2 Head Teachers, 2 Social Workers
and a Judge. Green said that Greig has described not only experiencing
SRA but also witnessing the Satanists ritually sacrificing a man. The
Scottish Police have refused to thoroughly investigate Greig’s
allegations and tried to silence Green by imprisoning him at least
[ Robert Green was a psychopathic nutter who
pressed his false allegations too far and was sentenced for stalking a
judge. There was no abuse in the Hollie Greig case, Green
invented it all. Here's the actual facts
Wilfred Wong, the Chairman of
CASRA, and a Child Protection Campaigner with 23 years experience of
working on SRA, emphasised that SRA had to be clearly, publicly and
extensively identified in Britain as SRA, and not as anything else. He
said that too many attempts were made to dilute the name of the
problem. Some of these attempts were well-intentioned but misguided,
while others had a more sinister objective to further conceal the
reality of SRA from public knowledge.
Wilfred emphasised that
effective and diligent law enforcement against SRA is crucial. The
public have to know more about SRA so that they in turn strongly
pressure the UK authorities to fulfil their duty to protect children
and vulnerable adults from Satanist Ritual Abusers, by bringing such
abusers to justice, instead of simply looking the other way, which is
what happens most of the time.
[ All this is Wong bullshit. It is not
the first time such palpably untrue things have been said. In the
1990s in America Christian Cult Cops searched for SRA just as Wong is
doing today. One of the most ardent was Randy Emon.
He too was an evangelical Christian who wanted to alert society to the
evils of SRA and thought the justice system and police weren't doing
enough. Emon spent two years
investigating every allegation of SRA that came along and then when he
had amassed all the facts realised that it didn't exist.
All the allegations were fantasised by OTT fundamentalists
. Click here
for a short video of it: You can watch him being interviewed here
where he explains his findings.
There is no such thing as
Wilfred Wong says, “There is
plenty of evidence that SRA exists in the UK. For example, there are
several SRA cases that have been successfully prosecuted in the British
courts. Given the very high standards of proof and evidence required in
Britain’s criminal courts in order to secure convictions, this is
conclusive evidence of the existence of SRA But for every SRA case
that is successfully
prosecuted in Britain, there are many more that are not, because the
police won’t thoroughly investigate them or the prosecuting authorities
refuse to prosecute the cases.”
[ Wong contradicts himself. First he says that the reason why people
don't take SRA seriously is that the justice system is biased against
it and filled with Satanic Abusers so cases never come to court,
but then goes on to say that the fact that TWO cases in 30 years have
been ascribed to SRA by the media - they weren't true SRA as we will
show if you read the links below - is proof that hundreds of cases of
SRA are hidden! What kind of logic is this?
Here's the SAFF analysis of Wong's two cases:
Links to articles about Jimmy Savile being a Satanist who engaged in SRA:
[Links to SAFF analysis of the Savilemonster scare and how fundies like Wong
tried to hi-jack it, adding Satanism where no satanism existed:
Kenneth Lanning FBI specialist in Violent Crime and SRA says:
"There was once a time when I naively believed that if you
presented a certain amount of logic and common sense to these people
you could change their minds, what I discovered is that there is
nothing you can say,there's no amount of common sense, logic or
investigation you can use, no matter what you come up with they have an
alternative explanation that is consistent with their belief in this
Interviewed in Antony Thomas's In Satan's Name, Discovery Channel, Oct 1997,
Ritual Child Abuse does not exist. It is a
figment of the minds of extremist Christian fundamentalists like Wilfred
Wong who search out co-incidences, rumour and the testimony of
fools and knit them together to try to portray a cohesive story which
has no basis in reality.
Wong Spreads Religious Hatred
A Key Christian extremist who helped along
the 1990 Satanic Panic returns to Fan the Flames of Religious
Intolerance in clear breach of the 2006 Religious Hatred Laws. We
reveal the inner workings of Sectarian Troublemakers which outsiders
Sectarian slander and mediaeval biblical
defamations are reappearing in Britain as Wilfred Wong winds-up a
new-wave of conspiracy-loons with Sectarian Lies designed to produce
Wong and his clique of Fundamentalist apparatchiks are trying to
firm-up the old lies which have caused the UK so much trouble in the
past three decades. Their witch-hunt divides society and
antagonises divisions within it. It is not just anti-social, it
is a form of Religious Terrorism which disgraces Britain in the 21st
century. And it matters
to you, because as the false-accusations begin to flow, you could
easily be their next victim. Recently, Wong has taken to the
airwaves to repeat lies about the Pagan Religion and associate innocent
people with crimes linked to those lies. This is the prime definition of
Religious Hatred in the 2006 Religious Hatred Act and the SAFF are
preparing a case against him for the Crown Prosecution Service. In
the modern world it is against the law to use Sectarian Lies to falsely
accuse or disadvantage another person or belief. Criticism
and debate is par for the course, criminal lies and false accusations is
quite another thing.
No matter how honest and honourable you are, no matter how
inconsequential you think your life is, it only needs one of
these new religious witch-hunters to make a false accusation against you and
your life could be utterly destroyed, as has happened to, literally,
thousands of innocent people over the past few decades. You
need to understand that these SRA fundamentalists are not a joke, they are
taken seriously in the corridors of power by politicians who do not realise the dangers. You need to know how a tiny
co-incidence could end up being your death warrant after denunciation
by the Religious Mob. Since the 1990 Satanic Panic you have been
asleep to their machinations, but the SAFF hasn't and here's what
they've been up to:
The Real Satanic Abuse DaVinci Code?
Wong isn't your regular bible-thumper, he's been at it since the late
1980s. In his youth he acted as the foil for Lord David Alton's
Catholic machiavellianism within the corridors of Westminster.
For years he worked with Christopher Graffius on the Jubilee
Campaign. Alton, a hardened believer in the existence of
Satanic Ritual Abuse and one of it's main parliamentary promoters,
inaugurated the Catholic inspired Jubilee Campaign and pushed
it relentlessly in his regular columns in the Catholic Universe and
Catholic Pictorial newspapers.
It was always
billed as an 'ecumenical' group to bring all of the various Christian
churches together yet it was based at St John's Seminary,
Wonersh, Surrey, which specialised in training and teaching radical
catholic lay-preachers and priests and, to be honest ,was hardly
ecumenical. For example, in April 1995 Alton lead a delegation
from the Jubilee Campaign to the Vatican. In a personal
meeting with the Pope Alton updated him on what Jubilee Campaign had
The focus of the Jubilee Campaign is somewhat
difficult to describe because it was a wrapper for many different
Catholic fundamentalist projects over the years, but essentially
it was a front for introducing fundamentalist Catholic teachings into
the British political system, the holding of 'ecumenical' prayer
meetings in the Palace of Westminster, ecumenical lunches, and
coalescing support for Christian agendas such as restricting abortion,
fighting homosexual rights reform, attacking Islamic teachings, getting a
predominance of Christianity in Education and bringing in Censorship of
TV and Videos and much else.
You need to realise that the activites of
the Jubilee Campaign ran in parallel with the 1990 Satanic
the 200 or so evangelical Christians in Parliament came within their
ambit, including Dame Jill Knight (homophobe and mover of
Clause 28 in which Geoffrey Dickens, a lay preacher and the original
front-runner for early SRA claims, was seconder) and many others.
This formed a fifth column of very powerful Christians in
parliament which is still subtly controlling and amending our laws to
suit their own idea of Holy Writ 30 years later.
You can see
Graffius bragging about the effectiveness of the Christian Prayer
Chain, which, when called into action for David Alton's 'Video Nasty'
classification law in 1994 blocked the House of Commons switchboard and got Alton's biggest political success.
Graffius was writing in the esteemed Catholic Times newspaper,
with a claimed circulation of 20,000. He not only explains how
readers can become part of the 'Prayer Chain' but gives two telephone
numbers. The first which tells them who their MP is, and the second to
use to leave a message on his phone! These prayer chains had
earlier been done by letter. The most infamous such group was
'Writelight' which had been going since the 1970s. Writelight, run by
evangelicals, kept a database of fundie addresses and mailed out
letters to them that they then signed and sent in to their MPs to urge
the adoption of fundie arguments or resist liberalisation of laws on
homosexuality etc. The TV ministries in the US in the early 1980s
did the same thing and changed the direction of US politics.
course in 1994 the Internet was in it's infancy but the Prayer Chain
idea was quickly transferred on-line. If you check out www.change.org
petition site which has forced a number of debates in parliament,
you will find over 4,400 ongoing petitions by Christians furthering
their world-view. This is not a wrong thing to do, but it is
wrong to do it in such a way that people holding different
opinions cannot see what is happening and inject their own opinion
because in that way it becomes an ambush of the democratic process.
All this evangelical activity began in the early 1990s
first claims of there being a threat from Satanic Abusers. The
SAFF saw these false SRA claims as being a result of the immanence of
the turn of the century. Whenever a new century hoves into view end-time
paranoia always increases. Believing Armageddon is near the
Fundies seek evidence of the 'Devil's work' prior to the Tribulations (
i.e. last battle with Satan before the earth destructs) which is predicted in their holy
books. History illustrates the reoccurrence of beliefs in
impending threats at such times and so evangelical and fundamentalist
activity increases on all fronts. False claims of Satanic Ritual
Abuse were a cocktail of worst fears which bring wavering Christians
back into the fold and motivate Christians to influence the democratic
Indeed shortly afterwards Alton inaugurated the Movement for
Christian Democracy which was designed as a fledgling political
party setting up a network of 10,000 evangelicals who worked to 'out'
any local candidates who had non-biblical aligned policies and liberal
personal lives. The SAFF pointed all this out at the time in our
special report here:
Lord Alton Uses Mother of Parliaments to Restart the Satanic Panic.
In respect of their self-appointed overseas remit
the Jubilee Campaign worked to defend Christian
activists in other countries who had got themselves into trouble by
provoking the local authorities. You know the kind of thing;
local laws say no bibles, so Christian activists smuggle in bibles, get
caught distributing them and then complain of religious persecution
when they are imprisoned.
One of the
Jubilee Campaign's first projects was to work with Jewish 'Refusnik' groups in Russia
who had been denied the right to leave the Soviet Union to emigrate to
Israel. Few people now realise that it was the Catholic church
which encouraged a resistance network against Russian atheism and
supported Solidarinocz thru Lec Walesa which began the
fall of the Soviet Union, eventually bringing down the Berlin Wall
in 1989. This great victory against 'godlessness' is why Pope John
Paul II was so swiftly beatified after his death. During this
period many activist Catholics in high places did their best to stir up dissent in
Soviet Russia and set public opinion against Russia here in the
After the Soviet Union was dismantled the Jubilee
Campaign turned it's attention to sex-tourism, child prostitution
and street-girls in South East Asia and elsewhere. Wilfred Wong
travelled with David Alton on a fact-finding tour. Later, in
September 1992 Alton announced that Wilfred Wong had been given charge
of a new sub-group The Freedom Foundation. It
doesn't exist today and SAFF can't find anything relating to its work,
however Jubilee Campaign continued its progress, though it had a
change of name to the Jubilee Trust in 1994 when it became an
official charity, and then morphed again in 2014 to 'Chance for
During the years 2016-2018 Chance for
Childhood charity turned over donations worth nearly four million
pounds. In short, Wong may sound like an OTT
conspiracy-monger but he is synchronised into powerful and influential
lobbies in the Catholic world and has boasted about organising
conferences and meetings about SRA in Westminster.
Wilfred Wong's life-long commitment to Catholic expansionism is clear.
The initial SRA allegations in the 1990 Satanic Panic were thoroughly quashed by Prof La Fontaine's
definitive government report in 1994 which did not find any of the 86
claimed SRA victims' cases to have any Satanic content whatsoever.
see here http://saff.nfshost.com/fontaine.htm
Prof La Fontaine's definitive
government report in 1994 did not find any of the 86 claimed SRA
victims' cases to have any Satanic content whatsoever
this didn't stop Lord David Alton who immediately announced a campaign
to discredit La Fontaine's government report. In the
cutting (right), you will see that Alton refers to 'other
evidence' about SRA which he says 'was ignored'. He can only be
referring to Valerie Sinason's much vaunted 'Devil Report' which
was unwisely paid for by the Department of Health in 1991. On the
strength of this unpublished report SRAhunters would try to convince
outsiders that there was 'more evidence' which gave the nay to Prof. La
Fontaine's government report but few people had actually seen that
'evidence'. The report was kept secret for 27 years until the SAFF
eventually obtained a copy from the DoH archives and exposed it as
inaccurate nonsense devoid of any genuine academic rigour, here: Devil Report
There was no other evidence of SRA! La Fontaine had seen it all,
interviewed all sides, and had unique access to all the confidential
cases claimed to be SRA. Her report, rightly concluded that it was a
figment of the minds of fundamentalist activists, because that's what it
The Thames Torso and SRA
Believers in SRA who had made the running in the 1990s dropped from the headlines until the Thames Torso case occurred in 2002. On
the back of this case ( which the SAFF covered in detail here:
) . A renewed SRA hysteria occurred with false claims that the
Torso was a 'ritual killing', this claim was, as you might
have guessed, made by the very same people who had created the failed
1990 Satanic Panic. As SAFF's masterly
analysis showed, the police failed to find 'Adam's' murderer because
their investigation was hijacked by SRAhunters.
In response to the Thames Torso case, Wilfred Wong organised a meeting in
Westminster chaired by Lord David Alton to restate the same old SRA
allegations which had been disproven many times in the intervening
decade. Alton had himself backed the idea of SRA in the early
1990s. He repudiated the government's
own SRA report which concluded that no Satanism was involved in any of
the 86 abuses claimed as being SRA during the 1990 panic. So by
this time some of the quality papers refused to bite and were not
convinced by Wong's attempt to reintroduce SRA on the back of the Thames
Torso case. A number
of critical reviews were published, including The Telegraph, whose
article was wryly headlined:
The article is reproduced in full in the leftmost column(click
here to read) The Telegraph ridiculed
Wong, Alton, Valerie Sinason and the other troublemakers who had helped
start the original scare. Again the Satan Hunters ducked
their heads and went quiet, but Jubilee Campaign
popped up again in Sept 2004 with a report of the plight of war orphans
and street kids from the Democratic Republic of Congo. One
section dealt with 'witch-children'
'People Who Believe That Satanists Might Eat Your Baby '
5.15 In addition, we took evidence on the phenomenon of
'witch children' cited in the All Party Parliamentary groups
report. Although witchcraft has always been practised in
the Congo, and deep superstitions remain ingrained in their
lore, over the past decade a new and disturbing trend has
emerged. In a climate of deep poverty families who cannot cope
with the up-bringing of their children, or who have a child
with behavioural problems or disabilities, declare the children to be
witches or involved in sorcery. This is used as a pretext for abandoning
their children to
The Witch-Children phenomenon finally hit the
headlines in the UK in 2006 and was misrepresented by the Child
Scare Industry and most SRA hunting Christians as Satanists abusing children.
The SAFF exposed this sectarian lie in our piece on the Stobart Report
In fact the cause of children being physically abused was
the activities of Christian pastors and priests from the missionary
churches in Africa who, in their own paranoia and constant search for
Satan, accused wayward children of being possessed with the Devil and
then put them through tortuous Christian exorcism ceremonies and
physical beatings to drive the devils out, some of which involved cutting them
and dripping molten candlewax on them, burning them, and even in some
cases killing the poor kids. Precisely those things in fact
which Wong claims Satanists and Pagans do to children but of which there is no evidence!
I wonder how many of these abusing Pastors Wong has harangued with his
holier-than-though righteousness? Very few I'll wager in
comparison with his constant bleating about non-existent Satanic Ritual
The truth is that Witch-Children had nothing to do with Witchcraft or Satanism, the abuse occurred
within Christian churches because of hyper-aggressive fears of the
Devil by Christians in those churches. The same kind of fears and false
allegations which Wilfred Wong is rehashing today
2012 the very same suspects who had been flogging the dead horse of SRA in
the 1990s had hi-jacked the Witch-Children scare and neatly allied
it to the still unresolved Thames Torso hysteria to try
to play the race card. In a letter to the Guardian the heretofore
unknown Committee on Ritual Abuse, wrote a
collectively signed letter which said:
'Witch-Children' scare had
nothing to do with Witchcraft or Satanism, the abuses occurred within
Christian church exorcisms.
were pleased to see your report (An abuse of faith, Social care, 18
January) outlining the evidence of the numbers of black children
subjected to violence linked to witchcraft. This is extremely
concerning and many of us have worked with such children and adults
from the black communities who have experienced abusive aspects of
juju, Santeria, witchcraft and possession in the UK. While our major
religious institutions are now putting safeguarding procedures into
place, children (and adults) from smaller religious groups do not have
that safety. We are also concerned as individuals and as a committee
that the ritual abuse of white children (and adults) is less easily
acknowledged (the Kidwelly case in 2011). It can be far easier,
sometimes for racist reasons, to accept the ritual abuse of black
children (witness the Adam Case known as "Torso in The Thames" in
2001), and especially from working-class backgrounds. The white
middle-class children (and adults) and those who work with them and
support them are subject to implications that such experiences, if the
victim is not black, must be bizarre delusions. This makes it harder
for disclosures to be made and for the police to help, and delays the
understanding of the impact of ritual on all children and adults when
This was a tortuous and deceitful definition of Witch-Children
which misrepresented the actual causes which had nothing whatsoever to
do with either racism or Paganism (the religion of witchcraft).
paragons of virtue seeking to protect children did not mention the MANY
instances of white children who were being abused and tortured and
killed in Christian exorcism ceremonies, or simply beaten to death
because the Lord said that one should not 'spare the rod and spoil the child'. The SAFF have hundreds of
such cases recorded, yet for all the Committee on Ritual Abuse appears
concerned those don't exist.
Letter to Guardian Jan 23 2012
Dr V Sinason, Rachel Wingfield, Prof Joseph Schwartz, Dr Sandra Buck, Dr Joan Coleman, Carole Mallard,
Wilfred Wong, Deborah Briggs, Dr Pat Frankish, David Leevers, Orit Badouk-Epstein, Lynn Greenwood
Committee on Ritual Abuse, London
single one of these 12 signatories had been key movers in the failed
1990 Satanic Panic and their allegations during that time had all come
to naught, just as their prognostications over Witch-Children also came
to nothing. You will note two things; Wilfred Wong is one of the
signatories and The word 'Satanist' is notable by it's absence.
The Media did not react to the CRA rallying cry, probably because the SAFF had undermined
belief in the CRA's claims about the Thames Torso and Witch-Children
Two years later
in 2014 Wilfred Wong started a new organisation which was a development
of the now seemingly defunct Committee on Ritual Abuse. called CASRA
which clearly did mention Satanism. ( Coalition Against Satanic Ritual Abuse) .
As soon as SAFF spotted and focussed public
attention on CASRA it's website was taken down.
LARGER IMAGES: By the way, please note that all the
images shown on this webpage can be clicked on and enlarged to get
readable copies. Place your cursor over the image, right-click your
mouse, choose 'view image', when the image opens up click in the centre
with the magnifying glass for a full size copy. You can do this with
all the documents on this page. SAFF don't hide anything.
English Church-man Duped
Then in July 2016 Wilfred Wong published a
sensational article in the English Church-Man magazine.
'Christians Demand Action On Satanist Ritual Abuse' calling on all
Christians to take part in the battle. You can see that article in
the leftmost column,
It is a call to arms, a demand for new laws
against Satanists and Pagans. This was clearly a change
in strategy. Wong had moved out from the secular world into the
The English Church-Man is a hard-line fundamentalist Protestant
journal which promotes the religious differences between Catholic and
Protestant ideology based on Biblical Writ. Previously, Wong had
Satan Hunters in child-protection (almost all the signatories to the
CRA letter to the Guardian had been from this clique), the majority
were activists from the secular world, but Wong was now openly calling for fundamentalist Christians to
act against Satanic Ritual Abuse in an avowedly vehement Sectarian group. What had happened?
It appears that Wong, an ardent Catholic, had somehow got in under the radar
of this absolutist Protestant group. Perhaps he had begun to liaise
with the growing clique of Christian fundamentalist Satan-Hunters
created by social media. These SRA conspiracyloons are almost
universally Protestants, but are often so preoccupied with their
aim to prove the existence of Satanic Ritual Abuse that they do
not understand or take into account the historic fault-lines between
Catholics and Protestants.
The coterie of Conspiracyloon Protestants therefore were
either ignorant of or purposefully ignored Wilfred Wong's life-long
work for the Papacy. The English Church-man group obviously did not bother to check
because under normal circumstances Catholicism is an
anathema to the ECM. Their newspaper has for years contained
articles attacking Catholics, and the Papacy, yet here they are
allowing Wilfred Wong to not only infiltrate their magazine but promote
a long term Catholic strategy through which the Vatican can affect the
laws in Britain to suit their biblical reach.
To say this would
completely undermine the trust of ECM's Protestant supporters is
an understatement, they will be livid. The article on the right (see Pope Francis The Fox image) is how
the English Church-man group thinks of Catholics and Catholicism and here is a quote from it:
The Papacy is a demonically energised apostate system
that will be judged and utterly condemned by the Lord.....The Papal
programme is wicked and wilful and its genius in means and method,
[English Church-man magazine 30th June 2017]
attacks on Catholicism are a frequent occurrence in the magazine, as
you can see from the image above. 'Pope Francis The Fox', is a
regular column equating the Pope with Satan.
How on earth did English Church-man fall for allowing Wilfred Wong
in to indoctrinate their readership with articles on SRA?
Will stalwarts of the ECM now be protesting alongside Catholics in Westminster?
Can we be allowed a conspiracy theory of our own? Are
Alton and Wong members of Opus Dei? Don't snort in derision too quickly, Ruth
Kelly, (Blair's Education Secretary ) was outed as an Opus Dei member
in 2005. Blair himself converted to Catholicism during his time in
office (see his visit to St Theresa's Relics in leftmost column).
Other defections occurred from the CofE to Catholicism during the 1990s, notably
Anne Widdecombe. The Jubilee Campaign had indeed
coalesced Catholicism in Parliament. Alongside (right) you
can see a picture of Widdecombe celebrating her conversion to
Catholicism with Alton, her 'sponsor', on 2nd May 1993.
leftmost column you will find a report from the Catholic Times (11th
Sept 1993) about the Jubilee Campaign organising a Prayer
Breakfast attended by 850 people, including 'the majority of Christians
in parliament'. Wong is a product of this Catholic missionary
More was to come, a year later, on 22nd September 2017 Wilfred Wong spoke at a
Conference in London on Satanic Ritual Abuse. His co-speaker was Rainer
Kurz, an OTT believer in the existence of SRA who has links with
the Roman Catholic church in Germany and attends RC church conferences
there on SRA. (see right)
If you need any more proof of how Catholics have steered the
British political agenda under the noses of the Great and the Good over
the past few decades you can find it here:
an expose of Alton's
promotions of the SRA myth in Parliament
Wilfred Wong's Faulty Evidence
There's six major things wrong with Wilfred Wong's 'evidence' about SRA.
1. Almost all of what Wong says has either been disproved years ago, or is wilfully fictional.
2. It doesn't matter how many times Wong asserts that SRA exists,
there is no evidence that it does. Yet he won't stop accusing people of it. Bad man.
3. It does not matter how vehemently Wong pronounces it,
SRA is plainly just a figment of the minds of fundies.
4. It does not matter how certain Wong is in his own belief
about it - he has no proof that it exists outside his tiny mind.
5. It does not matter how many victim-imposters queue up to
claim they've been satanically abused - none of them have ever come up
with ANY forensic evidence to support their claims which have been in
almost all cases proven fantasy.
6. It does not matter that many other Christians would rather believe in SRA to
fit in with their sectarian world-view -here is NO evidence of
a pan-global Satanic sub-culture which abuses children as part of its
Suggesting that some people with a slanting connection with
occultism or Witchcraft have sexually abused others is not the same
thing as saying that a special form of child abuse exists
which is created by the demands of the liturgy of the Satanic or Pagan
all, there are, literally THOUSANDS of abusing Priests within the
Catholic church and even the SAFF don't try to float the ridiculous
idea of Christian Ritual Child Abuse!
The reason is clear
to anyone with any sense. The abuses conducted by those Priests
comes from the darkness of their own hearts, not from the liturgy or
aims of Christianity.
Wong's ferreting out of co-incidental
information and misinterpreted cases tied to the tall
tales of compulsive liars and mentally unstable witnesses does not prove
SRA. His constant attempts to try to prove his belief in the
existence of SRA is simply Religious Hatred.
Remember dear reader, that is exactly what Goebbels did to the Jews in
Germany to create a climate of hate which ended up killing six million
The majority of Germans were Catholics at the time.
The image on the right shows an academic study that indicates 94% of
Germans were Christian. Lately some academics have tried to
discover why the German people 'fell for Hitler's lies about the
Jews'. The reason is staring them in the face.
The SAFF has traced the intimate historic link between Christian
fundamentalists, the Blood Libel and the Final Solution in great detail
It will make painful reading for most Christians but the
documentary evidence is set out there for everyone to see. All that
Wong is doing is rehearsing those same evil Religious Hatreds against
Satanists and Pagans who are, like the Jews were, utterly innocent of
allegations of child abuse and murder.
However, there have been thousands of cases which believers
like Wong have tried to push as SRA which have failed.
Every single one of the cases held up as SRA in the 1990s Satanic
Panic, which Wong supported FAILED. The Congleton Case,
The Manchester Case, The Epping Case, The Broxtowe Case, The Ayrshire
Case, The Isle of Lewis Case, The Rochdale case, the Orkney Case,
and more, were all found not to have been caused by Perverted
Satanists, but by Bigoted believers in SRA who had created
situations out of nothing. The SAFF has made a list of
these failed cases for you to see here:
People today may have forgotten the history of the claims
Wong is re-stating. He's saying,: Forget the fourteen (14) major
inquiries, the Clyde Inquiry which cost millions, the Rochdale SSI
inquiry, the governments own 1994 La Fontaine report, the JET report
and all the rest; he's asking you to ignore the failure of
every single case that he himself believed in and promoted in 1990.
It doesn't matter how many times Wilfred Wong asserts that SRA exists, over the past 30 years
he's been making these claims absolutely no evidence has been found to say
that it does. No bones, no bodies, no locations, no forensic
He's asking you to forget about those cases which are actually proof
that SRA does NOT exist! He is trying to flog you an
utterly bonkers idea that somehow all of those failures were a
conspiracy by Satanists, The police, The judiciary, The
government, The social services, the courts and the local authorities ,
the Media, Academics, Specialists, Experts, every witness against SRA and a cast of tens of
thousands of people were, Wong appears to be claiming, actors in a conspiracy which
would be utterly impossible to sustain for five years, let alone 32 years. Not once,
but hundreds of times. .
Every single one of the cases held up as SRA in the 1990s Satanic
Panic, which Wong supported, FAILED.
Does Wong Prefer Chasing Imagined Satanists than Real Abusing Priests?And
here's the rub; in contradistinction with the lack of evidence for SRA,
during the very same period there has been incontrovertible evidence of
thousands of Roman Catholic Priests abusing children in their
There is no debate about Priestly Abuse, most of the hundreds of
priests brought to court plead guilty. There's no need to
rattle on about hidden conspiracies over Priestly Abuse. Priestly
Abuse is endemic. The Vatican has paid out an estimated four
BILLION dollars in hush-money over the past two decades to
silence victims of Priestly Abuse.
The English Church-man magazine itself regularly calls out abusing
Catholic Priests - here's an example, in the image on the right, which
blames the late Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor for hiding and whitewashing
paedophile priests. This was published in EC magazine 22 Sept 2017, the
very day Wong was attending an SRA conference to flog his 10 'proven'
false cases of SRA in London!
So what is happening here? Is society seeking to reduce the
appalling number of children being abused? For if we are then
surely it would be better to highlight and root out Priestly Abusers in
the Catholic Church which, by the RCC's own estimates, make up an
estimated 4% of all ordained priests?
Yes folks, there's plenty of work for Wong to do saving thousands of
children by unearthing
abusive priests in Britain but is he doesn't appear to want to campaign
for that? In the Wedger-Wong video interview Wilfred Wong actually
compares Priestly Abusers with Satanic Abusers and excuses the former
by saying that Priests don't abuse children because of the demands of
their religion, whereas Satanists do. That is a Sectarian Lie
Wilfred. There are no instances of Satanists abusing children
because of the demands of their religion, but there are literally
THOUSANDS of victims of Perverted Priests. In the U.S. alone
there have been documented over 10,000 (ten thousand!) victims of
Priestly Abuse; the SAFF estimate hundreds of thousands of child
victims world-wide. Look Wong, you can waste your time blathering
on about SRA and futilely trying to establish 10 proven cases in 30
years if you like but don't try to minimise the disgusting proven
activities of the Priesthood you support which has undeniably abused
thousands. Stop turning over stones and instead look back over
your own shoulder you hypocrite.
The SAFF years ago made the point that one of the best
ways of covering up tens of thousands of child victims of Catholic
Priests is to make up stories about Satanists doing the same.
The SAFF realised this truth decades ago. It is why
we were the very first organisation to do statistical research on the
incidence of Priestly Abuse when nobody else anywhere in government and
the Media was interested in addressing it. It resulted in our
historic 1991 report: The Black Museum of Priestly Abuse
Which proved the threat of Priestly Abuse to children and
which we backed up with extra statistics in 1996 - Black Museum II here:
which proved that though many girls were abused by priests, 8 year old boys were most at risk.
It was from this SAFF work in protecting children that the atrocious
methods the church had used to whitewash and cover-up it's own priests
was exposed. Does that ring a bell? Well it should,
because what the Catholic church did was create a world-wide network to
transfer abusing priests from country to country and cover-up child
abuse at a high-level. Exactly what Wong is claiming Satanists
Is the brainwashing becoming a little clearer now?
The SAFF created the climate which has resulted in
historic priestly abuse inquiries in all Western countries. You
can see some of these in-depth investigations with astonishing facts
about the extent of official church cover-ups, here:
So whilst Wong and his ilk were wasting their time and yours chasing
after phantom Satanists, the SAFF was quietly doing work to actually
protect real children from the most horrendous abuse within the RCC and
other churches. Evil is as evil does.
24 Sectarian Lies Wilfred Wong Tells You About Paganism and Satanism:
The Quotations below are taken from a long video
interview on Satanic Ritual Abuse which Wilfred Wong gave to Jon Wedger
on 26 march 2019. It's up on the internet and has been viewed by
thousands of people. Presumably all those who viewed it will
believe in the Sectarian Lies perpetrated in it. The entire
interview is a pack of untruths and misdirections. We have chosen
24 glaring errors, mistakes and Sectarian Lies to prove it to
you. There are other lesser untruths throughout this notorious
video and you can see the full interview here:
Sectarian Lie No.1:
WW: "[Satanists] especially like to target children, because they believe that this is
something that the devil wants them to do "
Who says the Devil wants Satanists to do these things?; Nobody but Wong.There are no extant Satanic or Pagan Rites which
demand that children must be involved and certainly none which say they
must be abused. Wong cannot produce documentary evidence of any
such rites. It is a figment of his imagination
Sectarian Lie No.2:
WW: "Part of SRA is to force children to sexually abuse
each other and part of SRA is to force children to do things that
corrupt them. For example, forcing them to watch pornography or using
them to make pornography or both.' Wilfred Wong.
Wong is dissembling, there has not been one instance where
Satanists or Pagans have been caught forcing children to sexually abuse
each other. There has not been one case where Satanists
or Pagans have forced children to watch pornography. It's a
Sectarian Lie No.3:
WW: "In the Satanist calendar, there are specific dates that are set aside
for Satanist orgies"
Satanists do not have
a 'Satanic Calendar'. The most influential books on modern
Satanism are The Satanic Bible, and The Satanic Rituals,
both by Anton LaVey. In 1966 LaVey created Neo-Satanism and these
books have guided Neo-Satanists ever since. There is not one date
in either book! There are no Calendars and no festival timings
given. There are no events of any kind tied to the Solar or Lunar
cycles on which traditional religion (for example Paganism and
Christianity) is fixed. The Satanic Rituals gives only five
main Satanic Rites and they can be worked at any time of the year as
the operant wishes. There are no 'specific dates set aside for
Satanist Orgies'. It is a Sectarian Lie.
Sectarian Lie No4
WW: "One of the signs that SRA is being inflicted on a child is the
regular use of drugs, and the Satanist orgies that we mentioned
earlier, uh, it’s also common for drugs to be taken at such orgies. Uh,
Satanists are very, uh, quick to use drugs,in their
practices and it’s not surprising that sometimes Satanist covens
engage in drug trafficking."
There has not been one case in which Satanic groups have been found to have
trafficked drugs or been prosecuted for dealing in drugs. Satanic
rituals are public property and there is no published Satanic or Pagan
rite which demands the use of drugs. It's a Sectarian Lie.
Sectarian Lie No.5:
WW: "Satanist covens which committed human sacrifice were in existence in England
as far back as 1961, .. So the
existence and the extent of SRA that exists today is much bigger than
when Audrey (Harper) joined the coven, back in 1961. And what they were
doing is very similar to what the covens do today,
Wong bases this 'false-fact' on the testimony of
Audrey Harper who says she witnessed the sacrifice of a baby at a
Satanic ceremony in the early 1960s. However, as we will show below,
Neo-Satanism did not exist until 1966 and Harper was talking about what
she termed ' Black Witches' not Satanists. Harper's false
tales of sacrifice were investigated by the British police TWICE and in
both instances they found 'no case to answer'. In her book Dance
with the Devil, which Wong quotes from she admits this by saying:
'I could not give them names and addresses, times and dates, phone numbers and car registrations,
the nitty-gritty details needed for a successful police investigation'
In other words Harper could not produce one jot of proof
of her fantasies that the police could go on. Why couldn't Harper
take them to the places she lived at and frequented with the
'Satanists' for five years? Why couldn't she name any of the
Sectarian Lie No.6:
Why couldn't she remember any telephone numbers or dates or addresses
of anyone else? Why was there only one sacrifice of a baby in the five years she was
with the 'coven'? What were the 'satanists' doing for the next 4 years, 11 months and 30
The truth of course is that Harper's story was worked-up.
There was no sacrificed baby and there was no Satanic Coven in Virginia
Water in the 1960s.
The SAFF has dissected her book and proven it false here:
Wong has absolutely no proof of any human sacrifice other than the
story Audrey Harper tells and SAFF have proven that to be untrue. There has never been a murdered victim of Satanic Ritual Abuse. It's all Sectarian Lies.
WW: "They love to promote death, so where death
occurs, like abortion clinics, er, and abortion can be seen - and I
believe is - a modern form of child sacrifice. ... 'They would go
there to do their rituals. They're even attracted to suicide spots,
spots where there are a lot of suicides."
Complete fabrication. There is
absolutely no case in which Satanists have been found frequenting
suicide spots or abortion clinics, not one. It's just
sectarian bad-mouthing and black propaganda.' Notice that Wong
does not extrapolate on his own extensive anti-abortion work for Lord
David Alton. Alton was the leading UK political activist fighting
for a reduction in Abortion rights. He invested most of his political
career doing it and even broke with his party, the Liberal Democrats, because
of their stance on it. Wong's fight against the right of women to
elect for an Abortion goes back decades.
Sectarian Lie No.7:
Early on in the SRAmyth, the SAFF spotted that the SRA meme was in fact
a symbolic wrapping up of the worst fears of Anti-Abortionists. Fundies
have many times tried to link the two with a nod and a wink to
their sold audiences. As they failed to restrict Abortion in the
UK, their accusations about adolescent girls being used as 'breeders'
to produce embryos for 'sacrifice' grew in number. Their hatred for Abortionists was simply transferred onto
The first instance of abortion being
designated 'Satanic' occurred during the false
Nottingham Broxtowe SRA case here
: when Andy Croall the fundamentalist inspired deputy director of
Nottingham Social Services ( who were handling the case ) was suspended
after he said 'Abortion is a form of child abuse' on Channel
4's After Dark programme on 9th March 1991 which concerned claims of
SRA in the Broxtowe case. If you click on the photo you can see the video in which he
made that claim.
The uproar from social services unions was immense as Croall's
statement stigmatised all women who had had abortions. Croall, an
Elder of the Restoration Church and a rabid anti-abortionist
eventually resigned from his post and took up a directorship with the
Christian fundamentalist group Caring Professions Concern a wacky
association of fundamentalist doctors and psychiatrists and medical people,
who actually tried to exorcise some patients in hospitals in their care. On 16th June 1991 the Daily Mail
exposed CPC practice of exorcising poorly patients in NHS hospitals and a report went to Sir Robert Kilpatrick,
then head of the General Medical Council.
Croall eventually travelled the country lecturing on Satanic Ritual Abuse, a bit like
Wong does now.
During the Broxtowe
case the Nottinghamshire police consistently said that the
evidence showed that there was no satanic aspects involved but the
fundie social workers in control of the case tried to browbeat the police
into changing their minds. This drawn out controversy enabled SRA fanatics to
portray Broxtowe as evidence of SRA when it wasn't. Eventually in
1997 a comprehensive and detailed independent report (the JET report)
concluded there was absolutely no satanic content to the case and
showed in detail how the fundie social workers had put words into the
childrens' mouths whilst searching for satan. Thus the first use
of the idea that Satanists and Witches were linked to abortions came
from this widely publicised controversy but the idea was utterly
without foundation and was of course simply the fears of a lunatic
fundamentalist agitator. Wong can produce no evidence whatsoever
to back up this accusation. Witches and Satanists do NOT conduct
abortions. Like everyone else female witches make their own decisions
based on their own personal situation, the majority of whom revere life
and would, in my opinion, choose not to terminate unless there were
exceptional implications otherwise.
(6mins:20secs in) Wedger asks about Orkney case, says it was included in his police
training for child protection.
Wong says: Yes, I’m aware of that. I’m also aware that many of
the survivors of the SRA there sadly harmed themselves or took their
of the children taken into care under false allegations of Satanic
Ritual Abuse in Orkney ever harmed themselves or took their lives. What
they did do was take the Social Services department to court in 1996
and won. Each were given £40,000.00 compensation because of the false
allegations of SRA they had been subjected to. There had not
been one person accused who had been involved in Satanism or ritual
abuse and not one child had been abused at all in any Satanic
ceremonies. Why therefore would they want to kill or
harm themselves? Two troublemaking social workers
who believed in SRA virtually created the case from scratch even though
one of them, Liz McLean had earlier been involved in the Rochdale SRA
allegations which had also failed a year previously. Wikipedia
says of her:
Liz McLean, the
who led the interviews with the children, had also been involved in the
1990 Rochdale "Satanic Abuse" case. She was later sharply criticised by Lord
Clyde in the official inquiry into the South Ronaldsay case, and in
another investigation into similar allegations in Ayrshire
how Wong and Wedger's prejudice is clear to see when the light of Truth
is shone on their statements. Obviously the dimwits who follow
Wedger and trust in their word are just kept in the dark It's
Sectarian Lie No.7
Sectarian Lie No.8: Children are Sacrificed at Halloween Parties:
Wedger tries to assert that children are often abused at
that their faulty child memories mean that
cops and Social Services are overlooking an epidemic of abuse by treating it as regular abuse and not Satanic. Watch
him spin this untruth here:
( 13:12) Wilfred Wong says: "Yes, you’re
right. Um, in fact, a lot of these so called ‘parties’ are actually
Satanist orgies. And in the Satanist calendar, there are specific dates
that are set aside for Satanist orgies. And sometimes, the police miss
these signs - in fact probably often they miss these signs because of
the general denial of SRA’s existence, "
Having set up the completely unproven idea of kids being abused at 'regular'
parties, he then jumps to compound his sectarian bile by mentioning
only one type of party which is 'evidenced' in Audrey Harper's book (mentioned
later) where a baby was claimed to have been sacrificed at
Halloween. There has never been a case where abuse has taken
place in Pagan or Satanic rites at Halloween and certainly no human
sacrifice has ever been recorded. Wong Lie No.8!
Sectarian Lie No.9:
(15mins :01secsin) Wedger says he's personally spoken with two 'victims' who say
they were satanically abused by Ted Heath and he then misrepresents the
Conifer report saying it found that Heath was a Satanist and abused children in
satanic rituals.Then Wedger confirms the untruth that Conifer found evidence of SRA in
the Heath accusations
(see later at 52:20)
Wilfred Wong says: 'Now, the Operation
Conifer report which came years later acknowledged that six witnesses
independent of each other identify Edward Heath as being involved in
Disingenuinely, Wong is referring to para 8:11 in the Operation Conifer Report, the chapter
dealing with Ritual abuse allegations where Wilts say that SIX people made
accusations; however two paragraphs further down that page the report also says
quite clearly that: 'Following investigation, no further corroborative
evidence was found to support the
disclosures that Sir Edward Heath was involved in ritual abuse.
Now Wong, a retired barrister, must know full well that the Conifer report
completely debunks the Heath SRA claims. He cannot have missed that paragraph when reading that page, yet
here portrays the accusations as proof of SRA in backing up the first untrue statement from Wedger about the
Conifer Report whilst omitting to mention to his listeners the third paragraph which concludes that NONE of
the Heath accusations were proven valid. The Conifer
report actually concluded that there was no evidence to substantiate
the allegations made against Heath whether or not they involved SRA.
There were plenty of 'ordinary' abuse allegations made about
Heath; SRA allegations were a minor outlier. The Conifer
investigation found no evidence for either but would you know that from
what Wedger and Wong have said? Lie No.9!
Sectarian Lie No.10: Ten 'proven' cases of SRA.
(18:00) WW: Okay, first let me just
touch on the list of successfully prosecuted SRA cases in this country,
and especially in light of how difficult it is to get a successful
criminal prosecution in this country. This is very strong evidence of
the existence of SRA. This list was put together in the early nineties
by two British journalists, who put together two separate lists on successfully prosecuted SRA cases. One was put
together by Tim Tate, and the other was put together by Andrew Boyd.
Both of them are professional British journalists who have both written
two separate books on SRA in, in the UK.
Now from my memory ALL the ten cases Wong used were done by Tate but
some of them
were nicked by Boyd for his Beyond Belief book. Wong proceeds
to pick out what he seems to think is the most convincing example of SRA from this
list of 10 claimed cases.
(19:46) WW: November, 1982, Malcolm and Susan Smith, and Albert and Carol
Hickman, were convicted in Telford, Shropshire for a series of sexual
and physical assaults against children during the course of Satanic
rituals. Malcolm Smith carved an inverted cross on one child’s abdomen,
and branded her genitals with a red hot altar knife. So the inverted
cross on the child’s abdomen, that is quite commonly used Satanic
The SAFF actually undermined this case in 1991
when Tim Tate first tried to float it in his book Children for the
it in detail at http://saff.nfshost/tatebkli.htm.
None of the participants in the Smith/Hickman case were genuine
Not even genuine Witches or Pagans,
They had no connection with any occult network
They did not use genuine satanic rituals.
Their abuse had occult trappings only to spice up their sex -
they were not genuine Satanists and there was no genuine Satanic ritual
involved, the main take-away from this case was that Smith was a compulsive liar
and it came out that the Hickman sisters were actually long-time
members of the Salvation Army, not Satanists!
Whatever Wong tells you must be checked for so far his batting average
is such that I don't believe a word that comes out of his mouth.
The Malcolm Smith/Hickman case is NOT a proven case of Satanic Ritual
Read the SAFF's 1991 expose of these 10 cases here and you will see that
none of them qualify as Satanic Ritual Abuse. What Tate and Boyd
did was simply trawl all trials for any occult connection and then work
that peripheral connection up, leaving out salient information which
indicated otherwise (like the fact that the Hickmans were regular
churchgoers ) to try to convince the reader that it was proof of a
pan-global Satanic conspiracy to sexually abuse and kill children.
Obviously it was not!
Of course if the viewer does not know about the chequered
history of Tim Tate in relation to claims of Satanic Ritual Abuse even
that might be forgiven, but as he was a major proponent of the
(mentioned above) and he was the researcher and co-producer of the
discredited Cook Report 'The Devil's Work' which
claimed that 21 cases of SRA existed in Britain. What viewers won't
know is that every single one of those claimed 21 cases failed in
the course of time. Not only that but the book in which Tate
researched his 10 'proven' cases of SRA was withdrawn and pulped
due to libellous inaccuracies a short time after publication. That's right, Wong is using data to convince you of SRA from a book which had to be withdrawn and pulped.
We will have to assume that Wong is so badly informed that he did not
know all this before giving Tate a glowing report and then trying to
re-foist his 10 'proven' cases of SRA onto his fundie friends in this
interview. The SAFF dismantled the inaccuracies in Tate's book,
Children for The Devil,
Wong then goes on to say that he got some of
his 10 'proven' cases from Andrew Boyd. Boyd was a key player in
the 1990 Satanic Panic. Not yer average fundie, Boyd was a member
of the Petersfield Christian Commune and edited God's Word
Now, a Holy tract sheet to be given away in the street to passers
by. He also helped edit and write for Prophecy Today the
journal of Prophetic World Ministries. You can see the
type of utterly manic religious hatred published by Boyd in the image
on the right. 'Europe will be under water'
'Hillsborough disaster a warning from god' 'Muslims plan to kill
Madonna' and so on.
Wong relies on
information in Andrew Boyd's book Beyond Belief and tries to
present him as a quality trustworthy journalist but nothing could be
further from the Truth. Almost everything Boyd has written and produced
has been contradicted over the years. His book Beyond Belief was
first published late in 1991, and formed the 'research' for the
notorious Channel 4 TV documentary 'Beyond Belief' which Boyd produced and directed. It was
broadcast at 10.30pm on the 19th February 1992 to nationwide headlines
by making the claim that it was to feature an actual video of
Satanic Ritual Abuse taking place. The idea was to crush the
opinions of anyone like the SAFF, and others, which had, correctly,
maintained that there was no evidence of SRA.
The advance promotion was picked up by almost all British
newspapers and treated as a statement of
fact. When the programme was aired the press went wild concluding
that this was indeed prima facie proof that SRA existed and no one
could now deny it. However, within a few days unique
research by the SAFF proved that it was NOT a film of SRA at all, but a
little known 18 rated performance art video by The Temple of
Psychic Youth rock band. By producing the original video the
SAFF was able to show that everything about the content of Boyd's
programme had been lied about or misrepresented. By that time
the Obscene publication squad had 'busted' Psychic TV's Brighton HQ,
but the investigation found nothing of course.
SAFF proved that it wasn't a film of SRA at all, that was a
lie. The video was a little known 18 rated performance art video
by The Temple of Psychic Youth rock band.
When Scotland Yard demanded to
speak to 'Jennifer' the witness who had said on Boyd's
programme that she was the SRA 'victim' in the video, Channel 4 TV
refused to let the police see her! Channel 4 were panicking
like mad. They had broadcast a hoax story as though true and caused a
nationwide panic, so to salvage their reputations they tried to
double-down and cover up the facts.
For a while there were threats by Scotland Yard to prosecute Channel 4
but before this happened, separate detective work by the Daily Mail
located 'Jennifer' and she completely recanted
her story, saying that she had lied because she had been forced into
recovering SRA memories during 'counselling' at a key Christian commune
(Ellel Grange) which was closely connected with the
Reachout Trust and
other fundie groups which had foisted allegations of SRA onto
So again, what appeared to be evidence of SRA turned out to be the
fantasies of Christian activists and converts whose minds had been
'turned' in 'deliverance' ministry. The hard fact is that
fundamentalist Christians imagine these things and cram them into the
minds of vulnerable people who pretend to be victims. There has never
been any objective, independent, forensic evidence that SRA
exists. It is all a harmful fantasy.
Within a week Boyd had admitted on air in an interview in The Right
To Reply programme that he KNEW that the video was performance art
by TOPY but didn't bother mentioning that to viewers! Same old Same old.
Thus the second biggest SRA hoax of the 20th century had been
perpetrated on the UK population. The video was unreal, the
victim was unreal, the Satanic Abuse had never happened.
Subsequently The SAFF challenged almost every single fact in Boyd's
book and found them untrue, exaggerated, wanting, or
misrepresented. THIS is the person whom Wilfred Wong
tries to tell you was a British Journalist who had 'strong' evidence of
SRA! The SAFF published a detailed expose of all this in
the Devil Video Hoax here:
Anyone who even considers trusting opinion that Boyd's cases had some validity
should seek professional help. The 10 cases Wong has popularised
are NOT proof of SRA and his word is quickly becoming dishonourable. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, 'To make one error is bad luck, to make 24 of them is downright carelessness'.
Sectarian Lie No.11: Satanic Sacrifice going on since 1961
(25:21) Wong states that SRA has been going
on long before the 1990 scare and that it started at least in
1961. He is using Audrey Harper's book 'Dance With The Devil' ,
to establish that date - Harper claimed she was a member of a
witchcraft coven during the early 1960s!
is a double sectarian lie. The first
untruth is that there is prior proof. Harper, herself a fundie agent
provocateur, only publicly confessed her supposed 1961 witchcraft
experiences during 1988. Therefore we have the questionable
sight of a woman who had recently converted to Christianity (Like
Jennifer') in 1986, making murder allegations about witchcraft in the
1960s, 28 years after the event!
Her book, written in
1990 is NOT proof of the existence of SRA in 1961 as Wong claims.
Wong must know that the police investigated Harper's
accusations and concluded there was no evidence of any such crime.
If it had found evidence Harper would be in clink as an accessory in
murdering an infant. I find it astonishing that a
self-righteous bigot like Wong would even associate with a woman who
has confessed to being involved in the murder of a 9 week old baby, let
alone use her story as 'proof' of SRA. We therefore have the
spectacle of fundie Wong exaggerating the implications of fundie
Harper's unproven allegations about her supposed experiences in witchcraft
in 1961 which the police say never happened anyway.
We therefore have Wong
'confirming' Harper's false allegations about her supposed
experiences in witchcraft in 1961 which the police say never
Note well that Harper was a key part of the
team, the first fundie group which foisted SRA onto the UK in
1987 but suspiciously changed her supposed insider's view of Witchcraft
suit the evolution and growing hysteria of the 1990 Satanic Panic.
In 1987 when first detailing her 'initiation' she did NOT include
claims of baby sacrifice but said that a cockerel had been
sacrificed. She repeated this cockerel story for some time
until December 1988 when she switched to saying that it was a baby
and not a cockerel that had been sacrificed. That is what caused
the police to investigate her. The SAFF have dissected and
dismantled almost every assertion in Harper's crappy little pot-boiler Dance
With The Devil and have proved that she knows nothing about
genuine satanism or Witchcraft - as far as we are concerned her story is made up.
You can read how we
exposed her sectarian lies here:
Sectarian Lie No.12 : The Kidwelly Case.
Wong says: "A more
recent case, which was the Kidwelly case, on 11 March 2011, Colin
Batley, the leader of a Satanist coven was convicted at Swansea Crown
Court of more than twenty sexual offences against children, including
11 rapes. He and other Satanists had ritually abused children in
Kidwelly, Wales, where their coven was based. The children, some as
young as 11, were subjected to organised and systematic abuse.",
(21:48 ) "I even attended a briefing by a
police detective, who spoke about how they successfully managed to
crack this SRA case. Um, so it is no secret that there are several
successfully prosecuted SRA cases in this country "
The SAFF debunked the Kidwelly case here:
This was 90% Brothel and 10% occult Temple.
Batley was a pimp.
Although Batley did follow occult precepts none of the abuse occurred
during those ceremonies . The main
'victim' (a young woman) who gave evidence for the prosecution about
SRA had actually been having a consensual affair with Batley but fell
out and, during the time she was giving evidence to the police, had
started an affair with Batley's son instead. The only 'children' in the
case was one 15 year old lad who had unlawful sex, not in a ceremonial
framework, with some of Batley's 'harem' who were all actually
working prostitutes, not satanic handmaidens.
What else? Well, other people regularly involved in the brothel were NOT
involved in the occult at all. One of these was, strangely, not prosecuted. Most of the sex between Batley and
the 'SRA victim' occurred in a seaside caravan. It
is difficult to see what satanic purpose this would serve.
In short this case was not a typical case of imagined SRA at all, but
just depraved idiots committing sexual excesses.
The SAFF exposed the true
details behind the shock-horror Kidwelly headlines here:
The Kidwelly case is certain NOT proof of
the existence of a pan-global satanic child-murdering network of
Satanists. There were no human sacrifices, no baby sacrifices, no
occult tortures and no Satanic ceremonial. The prosecution made great
play on Batley's interest in Aleister Crowley's system of Thelema but
despite Wong's idiotic insistence that Crowley was a Satanist, he
clearly was not. You can check out the truth on Crowley here:
The Kidwelly case has nothing to do with genuine
Neo-Satanism or Paganism and is not proof of occultists abusing
children in their rites
Sectarian Lie No.13: The Helen-G List
( 51:15) WW: "Yes. She had a
system. Erm, her system, the-the woman was- her name was Dr. Joan
Coleman, and she died not too long ago in her eighties and, er, she
told me her system was, that at least two SRA survivors who are
independent of each other, had to identify the same name for the name
to go on the list. And just to show you how accurate her list is, her
list includes the name Edward Heath
The Helen-G List was
first exposed and disproved by the SAFF here:
It was clearly a fabrication by a disturbed patient
of Joan Coleman a psychiatrist who was one of the major players in
foisting the 1990 Satanic Panic on Britain. After writing
Helen-G's accusations down, Coleman then began to add to them with the
imaginings of other patients' stories which she came into contact
with. There was never any attempt to qualify, question or
investigate the fantasies. She just recorded every silly thing
that poured out of her patients' sick minds.
The Helen-G List was first compiled around 2006/2007 long after Joan
Coleman had started RAINS (Ritual Abuse Information Network and
Support). RAINS was first inaugurated with Valerie Sinason in 1989 and
had hundreds of members during the 1990 satanic panic. As Wong
was several times linked with Sinason (see the Committee for
Ritual Abuse ,above, where both are signatories) I'm also presuming
that he knew Coleman in the early years as well. Coleman was a
liar who glibly falsely accused people who disagreed with her take on
The question is this: Why was there no mention of Edward Heath
and VIP abuse for the seventeen years prior to the Helen-G List?
The answer is: Because the mad tales of VIP abuse in Westminster were
not then current but were worked-up later , post 2007, AFTER the
Helen-G list began to be distributed to other SRA believing therapists.
It is a classic illustration of the way that memes developed within the
SRAhunter sub-culture. All new memes were passed around their
network and contributed to a central body of 'knowledge' on SRA which was then
used by other 'therapists' to help their loopy patients winkle out
recovered memories of imagined abuse in high places.
If you read the original Helen-G list
scooped and published by the SAFF here) and read SAFF documentation
in it to show how inaccurate and dishonest the information is, you will
see that it in no-way proves the involvement of Edward Heath in
Satanic rituals or any form of abuse. The Helen-G List is not a 'smoking gun', it is more a smouldering pile of horse-muck.
Furthermore, as the nutter Helen-G made dozens of other
false accusations against important people, I want you to ask yourself
why only Edward Heath was focussed upon by SRAhunters?
There is a simple answer.
He was dead and so could not give the nay or sue.
All the other named VIPs who were still alive sued the pants off anyone
who dare repeat those untrue allegations. Lord McAlpine being the
classic example, when Channel 4 fell for the lies in the Helen G
List which were used by a serial accuser called Stephen
Messham. When McAlpine sued Channel 4 for repeating those false
allegations in an interview with Messham the TV company demanded that
Messham give them evidence so that they could mount a defence. Messham
recanted instantly and said that he'd made a mistake in identification
and that it probably wasn't McAlpine who had abused him!
Channel 4 paid out a fortune to McAlpine who gave it all to
charity. However, the list still has some idiots believing in
it. Robert Green, the self-appointed crusader of the Holly Greig
SRAmyth, which dumb Wong believes is some kind of hero, sent a copy of the Helen-G
list to the Chief Constable of Wiltshire, Mike Veale, as 'proof'
of SRA when Veale was conducting Operation Conifer, the UK's most
in-depth investigation into claims against Heath and other VIPs.
After spending nearly 2 million pounds drilling down into all aspects
of Heath's life the conclusion by Wiltshire police was that there was
absolutely no evidence to suggest that Heath was involved in any form
of Satanic or Ritualised Abuse. The Helen-G list was
Ted Heath wasn't an abuser and neither was McAlpine yet here Wong is telling you that you should trust in the Helen-G List
and that it is factual. I wouldn't believe a word that came out
of this man's mouth.
Sectarian Lie No.14: Dianne Core was Silenced
(55:12) WW: Yes. I think it's important to note that in
1991, a book was published called Chasing Satan by Dianne Core, who was
one of the activists - one of the first activists - speaking out about
SRA publicly, and she got the usual hatchet job done on her- '
Wong goes on to say that Core
pointed to the fact that Satanists are not 'regular
paedophiles' and are wanting to infiltrate government and take over society to impose a Satanic world on everyone
else. Bit like the Jubilee Trust then eh? This is a reference of course to
Core's 1989 speech to Lyndon La Rouche's Rome conference
on SRA and Freemasonry in which she urged a Spiritual War on
Satanists. Wong is
basically implying that nobody in authority can
be trusted unless they are committed Christians.
What Wong didn't tell you is that after being amongst the pathfinders in
trying to establish SRA as real, Core 'retired' in 1991 after it
became clear that she had never really had even one genuine SRA
case and her reputation had been sullied with extreme right-wing links
and poor judgement in interfering with an ordinary instance of abuse in
Hull to redefine it as Satanic which the
said had ruined their case against a 'normal' abuser. Then
and only then did the media, rightly, turn against her.
The book Wong thinks is so illuminating Chasing Satan, was a
collection of half truths and sectarian lies. Core's book went on to
claim that 4,000 children A YEAR were being sacrificed to the
Devil in the UK alone but as she had never ever had even one genuine
SRA case how would she know? The idea that 4,000 murders can go
undetected in the UK every year is absolutely preposterous. Think
And what does Wong say about Core's claims that Satanists make
necklaces made from dead babies fingers and use their fat to make black
candles from? Well he'd fully believe that tosh of course,
because it suits his sectarian purpose. There has not been one
instance ever of babies being 'melted' to be made into black candles. No
necklaces made from babies fingers have EVER been found.
Just Sectarian Lies.
Sectarian Lie No.16:Jimmy Savile Was a Satanic Abuser.
(57:58) 'I noticed a change in people's attitudes since the revelations about
Wong now drags in Jimmy Savile: Remember that the sole accusations about
Jimmy Savile being a satanist come originally from two patients of Valerie Sinason's who ten years before the Savile
hysteria, mentioned him whilst under therapy , a bit like Helen-G had implicated Ted Heath and other VIPs in
non-existent Satanic rites. At this time Savile was still alive, but Sinason had
apparently not then bothered to mention the meanderings of her patients.
We will have more to say about Savile below, meanwhile:
Sectarian Lie No.17: Wong attacks Hoaxtead
(58:42) '.. what do they (Satanists) do? They set up groups like HOAXTEAD..
Wong and Wedger infer, without a
shred of evidence, that Hoaxtead are satanists simply because they, like the SAFF,
publish inaccuracies, lies and distortions about the Hampstead SRA case. If you haven't seen Hoaxtead's great work on the
Hampstead SRA case then you should peruse it because they were
instrumental in combating the hysteria there
and getting justice for the falsely accused parents.
Hoaxted are NOT Satanists and they certainly do not protect or support child abusers, but what does
truth matter to Wong who can glibly falsely accuse anyone who
contradicts his Sectarian Lies?
Sectarian Lie No.18: Wilfred attacks the False Memory Groups
(1:04:00) WW: Well, if you
look at the history of the so-called false memory movement, it's mainly
traced back to two people who are themselves involved in child abuse...
This is an absolute
misdirection. Firstly Wong is referring to one member of the American
False Memory Society who was not accused of paedophillary but was
falsely accused of supporting reducing the age of consent. The
British False Memory society is a completely different
proposition, funded by government and staffed by respected high-level
academics, doctors and neurosurgeons. Does Wong hope that by dissing
the U.S. group he will misdirect listeners away from the UK False
Memory Society which has done
and is still doing excellent academic work proving that recovered
memories is impossible and that most patients subjected to Recovered
Memory therapy will be lead to confabulate SRA stories by leading
questions from therapists who are believers in SRA? You can
see why Wong would want to stop other people from considering the BFMS's
impeccable work! Judge for yourself, read lots of very helpful
and totally trustworthy work by the BFMS here:
Sectarian Lie No.19: Even Journalists are Satanists and Can put Hexes on you:
Next Wedger attacks an
unnamed 'journalist', the impression given is that this journalist is
working for the Satanists. Wedger says during the conversation he had with the
journalist they had said that they knew about
Wilfred Wong. Wedger asks Wong if he thinks
he (Wong) has been cursed!
The implication is that the journalist is a part of the Satanic
JW: And, would you say because, because of the work you do and there
was even a - a journalist was set out to debunk the work that I and my
group are doing and your name was mentioned, you see, she said “Yes, I
know who that is”. I mean, do you think these people would have cursed
you, put hexes on you, may have done rituals you know to- to see your
WW: They may have. I don't care! The fact of the matter is, there's a
job to be done and that's exposing SRA.
A perfect example of paranoia laced with persecution complex. Of course there is
absolutely no evidence that this unnamed journalist was a Satanist and
no evidence that anyone has cursed anyone else. If Wedger and
Wong were really committed to their work why didn't they NAME this
journalist? Because they know that if they did they
could be exposed as liars and sued. Never believe
anything these SRA hunters say unless they offer proof to back up their
allegations. If you want to see more of Wedger's
paranoid nonsense you might be interested in his video with the
granddaughter of Geoffrey Dickens here:
because it is replete with imagined Satanic curses, attacks, death
threats and non-existent murders.
Sectarian Lie No.20: Savile was a Necrophiliac
Next Wedger turns again to Savile and tries to link-in the utterly fallacious accusations about
Savile being a necrophiliac to claims of SRA. Wong flies off at a tangent talking about
Satanists at Highgate Cemetery in London.
(1:14:00) JW: There was a porter
as well, I think –
WW: - at a hospital -
JW: Saint James’s Hospital and he had access to the mortuary.
At (1:16:13) Wong goes on to say that
satanists have 'been on the back foot' since 2011 when the Savile hysteria hit and that now is the time for
Christians to destroy them.
Of course there is absolutely NO evidence that Jimmy Savile was a
necrophiliac. The official investigations into his volunteer work at
Leeds General Infirmary and at Stoke Mandeville and Broadmoor hospitals
did not find any evidence of that.
In the extensive 253 page inquiry by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS
trust there were two mentions of necrophilia. One witness,
who worked at Broadmoor said that Savile told him he would 'mess about'
with dead bodies in the mortuary but this was in the form of a sick
joke, not sexually, which of course is the definition of
Necrophilia. Several other witnesses said that other
people had told them that Savile was a Necrophiliac, in other
words there was no first-hand evidence and it was all rumour.
In the even more comprehensive Stoke Mandeville investigation
report (358 pages) there were again, two sources of he-said-she-said
third-hand evidence where witnesses said that someone had told them
that Savile was a necrophiliac. Again these witnesses had no
evidence whatsoever of Savile being a Necrophiliac and the third
parties who told them about it could not be found or would not
respond to requests to tell their story to the inquiry.
In the six major inquiries into Savile's activities the only
actual third-hand evidence which contained checkable facts came from
another witness in the Stoke Mandeville report who said that
she had been told that two trainee nurses had seen Savile 'having
sex with a dead body' through a grille/air-vent in the wall of the
mortuary. When the inquiry checked, no such grille had
ever existed. In other words their evidence was false.
despite the rumours of Savile's predilection for necrophilia there
was no evidence of that in any of the six independent investigations
There was evidence of 'mortuary humour' and Savile did shock people by
showing them a ring made from a glass-eye supposedly from his dead
friend, but there was no evidence whatsoever that Savile was having sex
with dead bodies (necrophilia) nor was there any evidence of any
kind that he was doing it in Satanic Rituals. In relation to
necrophilia Satanism was never mentioned by any witness. In case
Wong and Wedger are dumb enough not to know it, you don't need to be a
Satanist to be a necrophiliac! They may think the two go together but they don't.
In the six in-depth investigations into Savile
there was no evidence of any kind that Savile was involved in Satanic
Rituals. Satanism was never mentioned by any witness
Additionally, in the six major reports published after in-depth investigations into allegations of
abuse by Jimmy Savile, including one for the Crown Prosecution Service,
there is not one mention of Satanism. These reports
listed ALL official complaints against Savile and therefore are proof
that he had no involvement in Satanism.
It is ironic that Savile is used by Wong, the ardent
Catholic, to further the Satan Myth because Savile had been a
life-long Catholic himself and had met the pope in 1986 and been given
a Papal Knighthood in 1990 for charity work for the faithful !
The 'Savile is a necrophile' rumour gained widespread acceptance
before all these inquiries took place by the publication in the
national press of unwise statements by Paul Gambaccini, ( ironically
later himself falsely accused of sexual abuse), which the media
misrepresented as though Gambaccini had first-hand knowledge of
it. In reality, again, it was rumour. Gambaccini said he
had been told in the1980s by a third party, that someone had told
the third party that Savile was a necrophiliac. Rumour not fact!
Sectarian Lie No.21: Highgate Cemetery
WW: Yes, er, so they would be attracted to
graveyards, er, cemeteries to, er, sometimes even try and access the
bodies in those graveyards. Especially freshly buried bodies for their
rituals and, erm, for example, Highgate Cemetery is notorious for
Satanists rituals has-has been for many years and Audrey Harper
describes one of her coven’s rituals at Highgate Cemetery, back in the
early 60s. Erm, there are also other places which they may
Now hardly anyone Wong talks to today about this would probably remember
The Highgate Vampire but the SAFF do. The ONLY instance of
strange goings on at Highgate was indeed in the closing years of the 1960s,
when a self-styled satanist, David Farrant
and another publicity seeker Shaun Manchester, were
getting acres of local and national publicity by claiming that a
Vampire was haunting Highgate Cemetery. The
Highgate Vampire scare caused the cemetery to be the haunt
of ghost and vampire hunters, not Satanists.
At that time Highgate cemetery was a forlorn and dilapidated place, overgrown and neglected. Teenagers
hung around there for a laugh vandalising everything. Today, partly because it contains the grave of Karl Marx,
it is much more cared for and a gentrified area to boot, but in the late 1960s the Victorian mausoleums
had been vandalised and corpses were relatively easy to get at. One day Farrant was caught near the
cemetery by police with a wooden stake and taken to court for 'desecration'. This is the single case
which turned Highgate into a 'cause celebre' for vampire-hunters and ghost hunters.
Vampire Hunting and ghost hunting has since become a regular component of
mainstream TV of course. What it does NOT signify is evidence of
Satanic Ritual Abuse! However SAFF believe that to pad out her book
Audrey Harper worked a fictional account of a modified form of the Highgate
Vampire into her Dance With the Devil and we've explained how she did
You should also know that Geoffrey Dickens ( who Wilfred Wong elsewhere says he worked with on
SRA) himself quoted this Highgate story when talking to the Sunday Times on 24 April 1988 ('Black Magic on the Back Bench')
where he told the columnist that:
'...bodies have been taken from the grave, and their heads cut off. People have cut the heads off and then sexually
abused the skeleton'.
The political columnist wrote:
'I sit very still wondering just how it is possible to sexually assault a skeleton but Geoffrey is off and
This outburst was a couple of weeks after Dickens first met Audrey Harper and
was told her story about being a witch with desecrations at Highgate
Sectarian Lie No.22: The McMartin Pre-School Nursery Case
At (1:16:13) Wong
actually has the gall to bring in the McMartin case as though it adds
to the sum of knowledge on SRA and implies it has proven it in the U.S.
; he implies that Satanists infiltrate nursery schools to obtain
children to abuse.
The McMartin Nursery School case was the first in the U.S. in which SRA claims
were made. It began in 1983 and resulted in the longest and most expensive trial
in U.S. criminal history. FBI investigations and cross-questioning of accusers
during various trials and retrials proved beyond doubt that there
was absolutely NO evidence of SRA.
In 1990 all the accused were exonerated of causing any harm to any
McMartin was a 'perfect storm' of lies, deceit, fantasy and duplicity
and a classic example of how false SRA cases are created from
nothing. Yet here Wong is telling listeners that it somehow
'proves' the existence of SRA. If Wong still believes this was a
case of SRA then he has a slimmer grasp of reality than I had thought.
The true history of it is here: McMartin Case.
Sectarian Lie No.23: Marc Dutroux
Wong drags in the Marc Dutroux paedophile ring case. The despicable Dutroux
headed up a paedophile network linked to high-up members of the Belgian
Elite some of which allegedly covered up for Dutroux who was
busted in 1996 after bodies were found following chaotic and careless
Although a genuine Satanic group Institut Abraxas (a
high-profile media-savvy group of occultists well known in Belgium) was
investigated as a side-issue as the investigation grew (remember that
claims of SRA were being made virtually daily in the 1990 satanic
panic) , the only link to the Abraxas Institute was an
anonymous memo found at the crime scene. Some consider this memo
to have been planted after the affair became public to deflect blame
from the terrible errors made by the Belgian Police. (when the
police searched Dutroux's hide-away they missed a hidden cellar in which
Dutroux had imprisoned two girls. The police boarded the place up and
unknowingly, left the poor girls to die from starvation - their bodies
were found later) There were many other problems with the
investigation and Belgian people were up in arms, literally about theses
deficiencies. Many high-up members of Belgian society and corrupt policemen were
claimed to have been involved in Dutroux's industrialised abuse of young girls, so a quick occult scapegoat could have been useful.
Institut Abrasax was thoroughly investigated, none of
Dutroux's perpetrators were members of it and it was dismissed from
Satanic Abuse was not a feature of any
of the deaths of any of the victims. Two other girls had been imprisoned and
abused by Dutroux for years and were released alive, they gave a full account of their abuses
and none of that abuse was Satanic or performed in Satanic
Rituals. The Dutroux case was NOT a case of SRA.
Sectarian Lie No.24: Edward Heath
Wong calls the Heath case 'a smoking gun' which proves both
and SRA. Of course this Wedger-Wong video interview was made in March 2019 and,
as you may know, the British government's extensive judicial inquiry
into Historic Abuse and cover-ups (IICSA) concluded a year later and completely scotched Wong's take on the Heath controversy.
IICSA spent months giving people who had accused Ted Heath an
opportunity to state their case as well as taking evidence from police,
politicians and friends of the late Prime Minister.
IICSA's Heath strand concluded in February 2020 saying
that there was absolutely no evidence of
any abuses in their investigation. That means there was no substance to
Wong's claims that Heath abused people in Satanic rituals.
Indeed in July 2019 one of the main accusers of Heath turned out to be a liar and was imprisoned
for 18 years for perverting the course of justice by lying about abuse
by Heath in order to fraudulently obtain £22,000.00
Earlier in 2015 another false-accuser 'Darren'
recanted similar claims made against high-profile
VIPs. Amazing how Wong's assured manner on SRA never
includes details like that when he's talking about Heath eh?.
At (1:24:00) Wedger asks Wong to read from the bible and
wong assures Wedger that if he continues fighting against evil, god
will protect him from the 'bullshitters' who say that SRA doesn't
exist. Wong infers that all good Christians should do this.
Well Wilfred there's only one
'bullshitter' around here and this webpage has just shown who it
is. You have no documentary evidence to prove any of your
dastardly allegations. You are a sectarian Bigot willing to say
anything about any competing religious belief. You are a
sectarian troublemaker who seems to care not one whit for the many
thousands of people who have had their lives destroyed by this evil SRA
myth. Lives have been lost. People pushed over the limit by
an evil Myth you are still promoting, have committed suicide.
Look the Felstead family in the eye and tell them that people who
repudiate SRA are evil 'bullshitters' you selfish cretin. You
can read Carole's story here:
The death of their daughter was caused DIRECTLY by those who promulgated the SRA myth.
From where I'm standing you certainly won't get into heaven for furthering these Sectarian Lies.
the entire Wedger-Wong video is an epistle to lunatic fundies to hunt
down imaginary Satanic Abusers.
As you will have seen,
very much of the Wedger-Wong interview is a classic fundamentalist
attack on Paganism/Witchcraft and Satanism. Wong puts forward,
not evidence about what Satanists have been discovered doing, but a
sectarian polemic on the battle between good and evil as it is seen by
the Catholic church. Later in the interview he lets slip some
revealing manic fundie statements which breach the 2006 Religious
Hatred laws. To my mind Wong is an evil man, promulgating evil
Sectarian Lies for which there is absolutely no proof other then his
ingrained Catholic mind-set of mediaeval religious prejudices
indoctrinated into him from birth. Wong is a pariah. He
quotes the bible at the drop of a hat, but always to suit himself. He
is so busy accusing others he doesn't, for instance ever quote Proverbs
6:16-19 where God lays out the Seven Deadly Sins which are detestable
to Him. Just to remind Wong of his biblical responsibilities,
here they are:
These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
By John Freedom
With Arnold Frampton
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
Mortlake, July 14th 2020