Contents of This Web page.
CLICK on
the links below to go
to the Subheadings - use your browsers back button to
come back to this
contents list.
MEMORY WARS!
Unique SAFF Timeline of the Invention
and Development of DID - and a Who's Who of
MPD promoters and SRA Movers & Shakers
1908: Eugene
Blueler publishes the first works on defining
Schizophrenia and coined the syndrome in common use
today. The idea of MPD is a corruption of his work.
1944: By 1944 there were only 74 recorded
cases of claimed MPD within all previous medical
literature and the diagnoses on each case was
indefinite/debatable.
1952: Morey Bernstein, amateur hypnotist,
puts Virginia Tighe in an experimental trance that
sparked off revelations about Tighe's alleged past
life as a 19th-century Irish woman called Bridey
Murphy.
1954: The Denver Post writes
sensational articles on Bridey Murphy and it becomes a
national sensation.
1956: Doubleday publishes
Bernstein's book 'The Search for Bridey Murphy'. Later
that same year the movie 'In search of Bridey
Murphy' was released.
1957: Publication of The Three Faces
of Eve by psychiatrists Thigpen and
Cleckley, who revivified the idea of MPD based
on experiences with one patient ( Chris Sizemore
). The Media get in on the act and an
influential film ensues. At this point the vast
majority of psychiatric professionals perceived MPD /
DID as speculative.
1966: Professor. J Eysenk, a leading
light in psychiatry, published his seminal 'Fact
and Fiction in psychology' He found
that psychiatric interventions have no greater rate of
resolution than not treating patients and allowing
them to come to terms with their situations
themselves. In other words therapy has doubtful
value.
1970: The spiritual revolution of the
'sixties' had developed into a wholesale melding of
fringe philosophical ideas, spirituality and
self-help. A new breed of 'psychologists' and
'therapists' were being trained. Thus therapists
who had not been properly trained in Freudian Analysis
thought that 'Aquarian Age' techniques (
such as re-birthing, role-playing, recovered memories,
primal scream, and the use of hypnotic
trance, etc. ) were short-cuts to the traditional and
accepted method of Analysing patients.
1972: Fundie Mike Warnke (Mike Warnke
Ministries) publishes 'The Satan Seller' a
supposed account of him running a 1,500 strong Satanic
Cult in the US desert which never existed.
1973: Doreen Irvine writes From
Witchcraft to Christ, an early polemic
against Paganism & Witchcraft ( which did
not, by the way, mention Satanic Abuse). Irvine was
exorcised many times over a period of some weeks and
claimed that 88 Devils (Alters) were cast out of her.,
before she was 'cured' of Witchcraft.
1974: The highly influential book 'Sybil'
was published, and later made into a sensational TV
Series. The book and the series misrepresent Sybil's
case as real.
1976. Robert Rieber called Sybil "the
third most famous of multiple personality cases."
and presented a detailed discussion of the problems of
iatrogenic treatment of "Sybil Isabel Dorsett,".
1979: Ted
Gunderson (fundie) retires from the FBI and
begins to discover and develop the Illuminati and
Satanic Mind-control Conspiracy memes. It
is his work (backed up by the authority of his
supposed insider knowledge of the Secret Services)
which creates the basis of the modern New World
Order - Zionist - Qanon - Pizzagate axis which
enters DID demonology and is perpetuated today through
. SMART
to which many key UK SRA promoters are now allied
(RANS, Laurie Matthews, Sarah Nelson etc) froming the
'mind-control' phalanx who maintain that Cults and
Satanic Abusers use sadistic trauma to coerce their
victims.
1980: ' Michelle Remembers'
is published. It was the account of a relationship
between Michelle Smith and her psychiatrist Laurence
Pazder (whom Smith later married) which was a
re-run of Sybil but placed squarely in the
context of SATANIC ritual abuse. It was
the first ever mainstream book to make Satanic Abuse
allegations in the public arena.
1980: '[the radical feminists]
platform throughout the 1980s was not the
traditional class warfare but the new politics of
gender. This became translated into a theory where
men were substituted for the capitalist ruling class
as the oppressors with women and children their
captives. In this world-vision sexual abuse was
posited as a universal means of control of women and
children as an induction into patriarchy,
perpetuating the evils of history which had been
caused by the violence of men. '
1980: BAPSCAN(British Association for
the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse
& Neglect) is inaugurated as an offshoot attached
to the NSPCC, consisting of a majority of leading edge
feminists and radical social work ideologies. They
will later publish articles on SRA in their journal Child
Abuse Review.
1983: First accusations made in the
McMartin Pre-school case. An emotionally unstable
mother, Judy Johnson, claimed her son had been
abused by his (estranged) father and teachers at the
school. This meme (common in marriage breakups
where custody is contested) would repeat in many cases
during the SRA panic (see Fran and an Keller
case 1991) and featured in a renewal of the SRA
scare in September 2014 in the Hampstead
false SRA case 31 years later, where
childrens' testimony was fabricated against their
father and other innocent people in the school they
attended by the estranged mother and her boyfriend.
1986: Judy Johnson drank herself to death.
1986: September: Pamela Klein is featured
in the Maidenhead Advertiser as a “psychologist
specialising in child sexual-abuse"
1986: Larry Jones CCIN (Cult Crime Impact
Network) holds first Satanic Abuse
Seminar in US. Speakers include Mike Warnke and
Sandi-Gallant, a San Francisco cop specialising in
gangs, who implies Satanic Crime is a real issue - a
stance she later publicly retracts in 1988.
1986:
Gunderson and Larry Jones publish 'File 18' a
supposed profile of Satanic Crime compiled from a
newsletter/bulletin board alliance of a fifth-column
of fundamentalist ex-cops and serving policement. File
18 is full of SRA mania and is mailed out to 3,000
members throughout the country and to police
HQs.
1987: Dr F Jonker's starts the Dutch
Oude Pekela mass SRA hysteria by misdiagnosing a child
as having been abused.
1987: May: Sue Richardson promulgates a
new Cleveland sex-abuse policy.
1987: June: The Cleveland Mass-Lifts
Scandal occurs in the county of Cleveland,
England. 121 children are taken into care on the
basis of a new, idiotic belief by leading edge radical
feminists using the trick 'anal dilation syndrome'
test. All children are eventually returned to
their innocent parents.
1987: July 13: After four years of police
investigations and preliminary hearings the McMartin
Trial begins. Seven employees of the nursery are
charged with abusing 40 children.
1987: first report of a ‘satanic abuse’
case in Congleton, Cheshire
1987: October: The
Broxtowe Satanic Abuse case begins in
Nottingham, England. This was the FIRST claimed case
of SRA in the UK.
1988: The compulsive liar and confidence
trickster Rose Laurel Wilson published 'Satan's
Underground' a horrific tale of how she
supposedly was sexually abused and tortured by
murderous Satanists. There was no psychiatric
intention in Wilson's book and she had no feminist
pretensions, she was just an out and out liar.
Satan's Underground was probably a main influencer of
the Satanic Panic in the U.S. and it was then imported
into the UK where the SRA scare hit the headlines from
July 1989 when to their eternal shame the NSPCC
publicly backed it.
1988: Ellen Bass and Laura Davis publish
their controversial book 'Courage to Heal'. Which
contains a self-diagnosed case of a woman who
recovered memories of having been Satanically abused
as a child.
1988: MP Stuart Bell publishes his book 'When
Satan Came to the Boro' detailing the mistakes
of the Cleveland Scandal where 197 children were
kidnapped from their innocent parents by the State in
dawn lifts.
1988: Pamela Klein and Norma Howes set up
a child-abuse business in south east England
1988: Jan 27: Sandi Gallant US 'cult cop'
is interviewed in the first SRA article published in
Britain by the Colchester Gazette. She
confirms the threat of Satanic Ritual Abuse. It
causes a great stir.
1988: March: . Dianne Core of Childwatch
and aide-de-camp to Geoffrey
Dickens MP invites Ted Gunderson compiler
of FILE 18
(a notorious police and fundie research/source
document containing
lies and inacuracies on SRA) to visit UK to
investigate the SRA case she suspected she had just
discovered in Hull. In September 1991 after detailed
investigation the police declare there was no SRA
involved.
1988: April 15: The British Public
are for the first time warned about the threat of
Satanic Ritual Child Abuse when Geoffrey Dickens
forces an ajournement debate in the House of Commons
and says Witches and Satanists are abusing
Children in their rites. The National and
Local Media instantly accept the lies and jump on the
bandwagon to create a hysteria to find it.
1988: The methodist Evangelical
Alliance committee ‘examines evidence' from the Reachout
Trust and joins with them to create a coalition
to campaign against SRA.
1988: October: Pamela Klein ‘diagnoses’
the first case of ‘satanic abuse’, from Kent
1988: October: Sandi-Gallant gives an
interview to 'Green Egg' magazine in the US admitting
that her original claims on SRA were overblown and
unsubstantiated. That message doesn't get to the UK.
1988: November: Nottingham workers agree
they have a satanic sex ring
1989: March: Dianne Core of Childwatch,
Hull, a key player in the early promotion of
SRA, opens a branch in Munich under the aegis of The
Schiller Institute linked to CIA shill and
right-wing apparatchik Lyndon La Rouche.
1989: MAY: Evangelical Alliance study
group on Satanic Abuse accepts
input from Maureen Davies and other pro-SRAMists in
London. The
Reach-
out Trust is a leading member of the Evangelical
Alliance.
1989: May: Maureen Davies from
Reachut Trust gives Lecture to Clwyd Social Services
& North Wales Police.
1989: May 3: The Cook Report
team descend on Astonishing Books at the
Sorcerer's Apprentice Bookshop in Hyde Park,
Leeds. Yorkshire, to
'doorstep' the owner and film the final part of their
now discredited tabloid TV programme
The Devil's Work.
1989: JUNE: 29 Conference on Child
Abuse held in York, includes a work-
shop on Satanic Abuse. Lecturer Jeff Hopkins.
1989: July 17: The NSPCC, the UK's most
trusted child-charity hold a press conference claiming
that 17 of their branches had discovered cases of SRA.
The
British press go wild. Every single one of
these 'cases' turned out to be hysterical suspicion. Not
one real case resulted.
1989: 17 July: ‘Devil’s Work’,
Central TV’s Cook Report is broadcast. Says
Satanic Ritual Child Abuse is rife and says it has
found 21 cases. Cook's programme is made with
cooperation of Reachout and RAINS.
All 21 cases mentioned collapse or are
proven false in the course of time.
1989: August 13: Fundamentalist
fanatics firebomb Astonishing Books, an
esoteric Bookshop in Leeds, Yorkshire which
Dickens named in his April 15th commons statement and
which had just been featured as the 'villain' in the
Cook Report's Devil's Work. The
S.A.'s loyal customer base spontaneously sends in
donations to help the shop rebuild and offers
voluntary assistance to fight the fundie menace.
1989: August: Lecture on SRA
with West Midlands Police Training
Corps,
Birmingham. Speaker: Maureen Davies (Reachout Trust).
1989: August 25: Reachout lecture at
Bramshill Police College, Reading.
Speaker: Maureen Davies
1989: September: Norma Howes & Pamela Klein
(Child Abuse Consultants
group) organised conferences on
Satanic Abuse at Reading.
Judith
Dawson and Christine Johston
disclose 'horrors' of Broxtowe
Case
publicly for first time. U.S.
Police officer spoke - claimed a
baby had been
cooked in a microwave oven during a satanic ceremony.
1989: September: Norma Howes &
Pamela Klein organise a conference
on
Satanic Child Abuse at Dundee at which Davies was
invited to help. She
arranged for David Woodhouse from Ellel
Grange to give a
'Christian
presentation' of the Satanic Abuse 'problem'
1989: October: Maureen
Davies visits USA fundies for a three week
sojourn She meets and networks with Moody Bible
College, Jack Roper, Robert Morley, Larry Jones, Mark
Warnke,
Pat Pulling (BADD) , Mark Kilroy, Robbie
Mahandras, Charles Stromer, Carol Matrisciana
(Jeremiah Films) and Bob Larson amongst others. She
speaks on Christian radio and TV channels, attends
Satan seminars and stands in for Lauren Stratford, the
discredited victim imposter who wrote 'Satan's
Underground'
1989: October: SAFF is officially
inaugurated as an NPO by Chris Bray of the Sorcerer's
Apprentice Bookshop to counter fundamentalist lies and
agitation. The donations of people who have already
sent funds is used as operating capital along with a
sizeable donation from himself. Volunteers staff and
run it.
OCTOBER 1989: Satanic Ritual Abuse Seminar held at
Aberdeen, UK .
1990: May: Klein along with Ray Wyre
introduces satanic child abuse to New Zealand and Oz.
1990: 14 January: Protecting Children
in the 1990s, Seminar held at the
Crown Hotel in Harrogate, Yorks, organised
by Department of Health
Social
Services Inspectorate for Directors of
Social Services & Child
protection coordinators throughout Northern
England. Rochdale Director
of Social Services attended this seminar
(pre Rochdale case) which included a
workshop on Satanic Abuse .
1990: January 18: Six defendants in the
McMartin Case are acquitted and found not guilty.
1990: January: Lecture on Satanic Abuse at
Child Abuse Seminar, Bolton, Lancs.
Speaker Maureen Davies (Reachout Trust).
1990: January: Lecture on Satanic
Abuse to Church of Scotland
Study
Group in Edinburgh. Speaker, Maureen Davies (Reachout
Trust).
1990: January: the first Trafford arrest
in what became known as the Trafford /
Manchester SRA case. (suspect is released after
questioning)
1990: February 16: Caroline
Marchant, a 24 year old SRA victim imposter is found
dead from an overdose in Rev. Kevin Logan's 'SRA Safe
House' in Blackburn Lancs. She is
the first known casualty in the SRAmyth.
1990: February 19: Harvest House
withdraws the book Satan's Underground from sale as
its first-hand acount of Satanic Abuse is exposed as
a pack of lies
1990: March
11: The Bogus Social Worker scare begins.
Reports occur from around the UK of paedophiles
pretending to be social workers invading parents'
homes and stripping and photographing their
kids. When the UK press hype this, suddenly
reports become a flood. Over 60 cases are reported
to the police. SRA believers like Geoffrey
Dickens and Dianne Core evilly massage the scare by
insinuating a Satanic connection.
1990: March: BASPCAN
conference held at Swanwick, Derbys; in
conjunction with The Social Workers'
Christian Fellowship. Speakers on
Satanic
Abuse: Maureen Davies, Judith
Dawson, Christine Johnston (Broxtowe
Team 4)
1990: April:
Presentation to All Party Child
& Family Protection
Group. (a private committee) House of
Commons, London. Chair. Dame Jill
Knight. Presenters Maureen Davies, Marshall
Roland.
1990: May 7: Ray Buckey, the
remaining accused in the McMartin case is re-tried on
six counts.
1990: May: Department of
Health holds Study Group &
Conference on
Satanic Abuse at Elephant &
Castle. Maureen Davies (
Reachout) and representatives of NSPCC and
National Children's Home
push for government funding and action.
1990: May: Child Abuse
Conference entitled Facing the
Unbeliev-
able, Ritual Abuse and Satanic
Crime, is hosted by Social Care
Resource Centre at Cardiff university who invite
Reachout Trust to give a presentation on SRA
Organiser expects '100 Social workers
from all over Britain' to attend. Speaker on
Satanic Abuse; Maureen Davies.
1990: May: The Rochdale
Satanic Abuse Case begins. A cause celebre for DID
therapists, an inquiry later proves it a figment of
the minds of two Christian social workers.
1990: June: Rochdale workers are ‘trained’
to detect SRA by the Reachout
Trust
1990: July 7: The
Effect of the Occult on Society; Satanic Abuse
Day semi-
nar hosted by the National Viewers &
Listeners Association (Mary Whitehouse)
at the
Wirral Christian Centre, Birkenhead. Speakers Maureen
Davies and Rev.
Kevin Logan both directors of Reachout
Trust.
1990: July 27: Ray Buckey is
released and all charges dismissed. It had been the
longest criminal trial in U.S. legal history. There
was absolutely no abuse at the McMartin pre-school, it
had all been hysteria. Buckey had been imprisoned for
5 years for nothing.
1990: August 6-7: Fourth International
Conference on Incest at Northwich
Park Hospital Harrow. Vera Diamond (RAINS) spoke
on Satanic Abuse and said that she
was absolutely convinced that children have been
killed during rituals. Sue
Hutchinson of S.A.F.E. group
confirmed this.
Valerie Howarth vouched for Hutchinson and
psychiatrist Norman Vaughton told
the audience that 10,000 human sacrifices
per year occur in U.S.A. most being
'specially-bred foetuses'.
1990:
August 13:After in-depth investigations Manchester
police (at the centre of Bogus Social Worker Scare)
and with liaising with other police forces around
the UK declare that not one of the cases was
substantiated. It was pure mass
hysteria.
1990: September: International
Congress on Child Abuse held in
Germany.
Allan Levy senior British barrister
'who has handled ritual
abuse
allegations in the courts', speaks in a session
on Satanic Abuse. Sue
Richardson & Marietta Higgs
(CAUSE) presented a 'vindication'
of
Cleveland.
1990: September 13: Mass lift of 13
children taken into care in the Trafford/Manchester
SRA case. All returned to their parents after
case collapses later.
1990: October: Fundie activists from
Orkney attend a Satan Seminar in Aberdeen and 'sit
through two days of SRA lectures by Maureen Davies'.
1991: February 27: Orkney girl in care
'reports' satanism; 9 more children are taken into
care in South Ronaldsay which turns into a national
scandal known as The Orkney SRA case resulting in a
£6M Public Inquiry concluding in 1992 proving there
was no SRA.
1991: February: Lecture to students, Campus
Crusade for Christ, Bangor
university. Speaker - Maureen Davies.
1991: March 17: Scottish Sunday
Times reports kids have been indoctrinated with SRA
fears during 'exorcisms' by fundies running the Rousay
Summer camp in Orkney and that a clique of
evangelicals are behind the SRA scare there.
1991: A therapist treating a child
after his parents separated, used leading questioning
to get false SRA allegations against Fran
and Dan Keller, who owned a Day Care business in
Oakhill, Texas. Convicted on multiple charges
they were sentenced to 48 years in prison. In
2017 new evidence proved the Kellers entirely innocent
and they were exonerated and released. They had
rotted in prison for 26 years for something they never
did.
1991: March: Maureen Davies Lectures on
Satanic Abuse at St Michael le Belfry Church at
York.
1991: March: Conference on Child
Abuse, Ritual Abuse and the
Christian
Response to it, held int Sheffield.
Keynote speakers and co-organisers
are
Andy Croall and his wife. As deputy director of Notts
social services fundie Croall pushed SRA in the Broxtowe
Case.
1991: March: Living in The Light &
Facing The Darkness: Conference
on
Satanic Abuse at Swanwick, Derbys; hosted by Social
Workers' Christian
Fellowship to an invited audience
where the press were banned. Speaker;
Maureen Davies on behalf of Beacon
Foundation/Reachout.
1991: April 7th: Maureen Davies, the prime
fundamentalist involved in pushing the SRA myth is
exposed as a bender of the truth in a full page Daily
Telegraph Article Holy Crusader On the Trail of Satanism
which says she was behind the mistakes of Rochdale
and Orkney.
1991: May: Nottingham Public Meeting on
Child Abuse involving NUPE. Sue
Richardson (CAUSE) protests against media Criticism of
Soc.Workers in
Rochdale & Orkney. Beatrix Campbell attends
along with Judith Dawson
(TEAM 4).
1991: F.Jonker's article on Oude Pekela is
published in the NSPCC's BAPSCAN Child Abuse Review
as 'evidence' of SRA.
1991: June: Stephen Hempling a Police
Surgeon and GP with a practice in Brighton writes an
influential article for the Child Abuse
Review stating that over an 18 month period he
had examined 90 children for indications of Satanic
Ritual Abuse and diagnosed 7 of those children to have
been Satanically abused. These claims hit the
headlines nationally but within days the Sussex police
countermand his claims saying that there there have
been no connected prosecutions in these cases and
there are NO indications that any of the children were
abused in Satanic Rites.
1991: eight children are removed and kept
from their homes in Ayr SRA case. Allegations later
found false and the children returned.
1991: September 16/19: BAPSCAN
(British Association for the Study and Prevention of
Child Abuse & Neglect ) First National Congress
on the Prevention of Child
Abuse & Neglect, Leicester
University. Speakers on
Satanic Abuse; Maureen Davies; Roland Summit (inventor
of the child-abuse-accommodation syndrome) . The NSPCC
was heavily involved in funding BAPSCAN. BAPSCAN was
later renamed Association of Child Protection
Professionals. Their flash website
mentions this first 'congress' but does not
mention Satanic Ritual Abuse which featured heavily in
it and which many of its then members promoted. The
journal of BAPSCAN/ACPP is Child Abuse Review
1991: September 23: Ritual Abuse of
Children & Young People (one
day
conference) Speakers:
Tim Tate,
Ray Wyre, Judith Dawson,
Beatrix
Campbell. Venue changed to Sedgeley Park Police
Training College, same
date because SAFF planned a protest outside.
1991: June : Tim Tate publishes his Children
For The Devil, Ritual Abuse and Satanic Crime,
an insider's view of the SRA controversy with 'proven'
cases of SRA historic and current. Within months
it is withdrawn and pulped for libellous inaccuracies.
1991: September: 4th National Conference
on Sexual Victimisation of
Children organised by Norma Howes and held at
Reading University, is
CANCELLED at 11th hour 'due to lack of
support'. People billed
to
speak on Satanic Abuse were Jerry Simandel
(U.S. Cult Cop) Heather
Richardson, Sue Hutchinson (SAFE)
1991: October: 'Britain's biggest
ever child care conference' held in Birmingham
features Beatrix Campbell attendee reports that
Campbell rows with a Channel 4 TV director
over claims that media have misrepresented
truth about Orkney SRA case
by
taking the parents' side.
1991: October 1st: Maureen Davies is
exposed as promoting false SRA cases in the Welsh
weekly documentary series Week-in Week-out two
programme special. In contradistinction to her
eagerness to mislead Social Workers and Therapists
during the past few years, she refuses to be
interviewed and is
doorstepped here:
1991: November 11/15: Gathering
Evidence from Children, Course held
at
Liverpool University for established Social Workers
includes workshop
on Ritual Abuse. Organiser Mary Gregg Dept of Clinical
Psychology.
1991:
December 1: British Judge rules that Pamela
Kline 'is not a legitimate therapist' in the Epping
Satanic Child Abuse case, which is thrown out at the
Old Bailey
1992:
January: Kenneth Lanning the FBI's specialist in
Ritual Child Abuse publishes his official
report concluding that SRA does not exist.
1992: February
19: Channel 4 TV screen : Beyond
Belief by Andrew Boyd, a
fundamentalist Christian purporting to show actual
video evidence of SRA. Turned out to be one of the
biggest hoaxes of the 20th century. In the book he
researched which underpinned the TV
documentary (Blasphemous Rumours ) Boyd
quotes Jonkers and the Oude Pekela case as a
proven case of mass Satanic Abuse even though the
Dutch authorities had by that time disproved it.
1992: March 26: Diane Core appears in a
German TV documentary Der Gott Des Gravens
making insupportable accusations of the existence
of SRA in Britain.
1992: April: Day seminar at Keele
university involving Jeff Hopkins
(RAINS member).
1992: A £2 million police inquiry is held
into a claimed SRA case in Hull which Core undermined.
Police concluded a second time that there was no SRA
involved. Core has never found one genuine SRA case.
1992: David Long, a social worker with
inside knowledge of the Broxtowe SRA case publishes
his
'Where Reason Sleeps' diatribe against false
claims of SRA, outlining the main players pushing the
fallacy.
1992: August 13th: A Swedish TV company
making a documentary on SRA called No Greater
Evil (Octopus)
interview Dianne Core and Geoffrey Dickens about SRA
and contribute £1,000.00 to Childwatch funds.
1992: September 24: Sexual Abuse Past
Present Future. Ray Wyre Beatrix Campbell.
Details on Network Abuse (another euphemism
for SRA) at Keele University
1992: October 27: Lord Clyde's official
report on the Orkney SRA fiasco in which 13 children
were taken into care, is published. He concludes
there was no Satanic Abuse involved.
1992:
November 5th: Working Together To Protect
Children. Does not use
term Satanic Abuse but the euphemism 'Organised
Abuse'. Speakers: Ray
Wyre; Marietta Higgs; Valerie Howarth; Michael
Hames (Met. Obscene pubs. squad); Peter
Bibby; Marianne Tranter.
1992:
December: first arrests in the Pembroke ‘mass abuse’
trial with SRA overtones.
1993: May 5:
The West Memphis
Three
SRA case allegations begin. In 1994 two teenagers
are imprisoned for life and another is given a death
sentence for the supposed Satanic killing of 3
children. The trial is a farce. In 2010 they are all
released as innocent.
1993: Bishop Auckland satanic abuse case
begins - collapses in due course.
1993: Shieldfield
Nursery Crimes fiasco begins. In a McMartin
copycat case false allegations are levelled at two
innocent nursery nurses by Satan Hunters.
1993: Roma Hart, one of the first victims
of DID therapy to break her hypnosis starts her
campaign to get justice and expose the dangers of MPD
/ DID (see 'Case Histories' above on this web-page).
1994: Jim Schnabel published his seminal
work on schizophrenic patients who Self-Victimised and
traumatised themselves under therapy: Chronic
Claims of Alien Abduction and some other traumas
as self-victimization syndromes:
1994
Official Hulsenbek committee in Holland concludes
there is no SRA in any of the claimed cases there.
1994: May 26: 'Devil Cults Slay 100'
Daily Mirror reports that Valerie Sinason is claiming
that: '[Therapists] have treated patients who
have detailed at least 100 murders'... 'They are
mutilated, made pregnant, their babies used in
sacrifices.They are tortured and killed and the
bodies disposed of'
1994:
June: April: Professor Jean La Fontaine
Report. Official government report on claims
of SRA concludes saying it doesn't exist in any of
the cases claimed by 'survivors' who underwent MPD /
DID therapy .
1994:
The San
Antonio 4 case begins in U.S. Four women
are put on trial for Satanic Abuse and spend 15
years in prison before new evidence proves them
innocent.
1995: Ayr inquiry finds social workers
fomented the claimed ‘satanic-abuse’ case there and
are disciplined. No Satanic Abuse involved.
1996: March 21: A speaker from the
BFMS is shouted down and refused a platform to present
his lecture at a Seminar on Ritual Abuse in Bradford.
In contradistinction Valerie Sinason is applauded when
she presents a report on the incidence of Satanic
Ritual Abuse in her work at the Tavistock Clinic.
1996: September: RAINS issue a printed
letter to its members imposing strict secrecy and an
almost cult-like approach to dealing with non-members
and inquirers/journalists who have not been
vetted. Current members are made to sign a
non-disclosure 'confidentiality bond'.
RAINS has become a closed secret society.
1996: September: RAINS conference at
Warwick University Chaired by Norma Howes. Speakers
include Catherine Gould (the inventor of the now
infamous Satanic Indicators) and Valerie Sinason.
Sarah Nelson's presentation claims there are 1650 SRA
victims in Edinburgh alone! Mail On Sunday newspaper
headline reporting it says: Satan Abuse
Zealots Meet to Plan New Witch-hunt.
1996: October 4: The Rikki Neave murder
trial begins. His mother is found guilty of
'neglect' and jailed for 7 years. Sensational claims
were made during the trial of Satanic sacrifice
and Mrs Neave is given the monica ' the most
evil mother in Britain'. SAFF produce
evidence to show it is a lie. and 25
years later James Watson was arrested for the crime.
1996:
October: The Sinason-Hale 'Devil Report' is
commissioned by the UK Department of Health amid
great controversy.
1997:
June: The
Creation of Satanic Ritual Abuse. A 12 page
paper for the University of Illinois, USA, by
Bette L Bottoms and Suzanne L Davis, explains
exactly how and why the SRA hysteria occurred.
1998: In the Sinason/Galton 2003 Interview Galton
says ' In 1998 she founded the Clinic for
Dissociative Studies, which has seen more DID
patients than any other single treatment centre in
the United Kingdom.'
1998:
February 1: "A British Psychological Society
report stated that 13 out of 800 psychologists who
answered a survey had worked with clients who
claimed they were victims of Satanic Ritual Abuse
and they believed them." 'Witch Hunters' Daily
Mail
1999:
Beatrix Campbell and Judith Dawson Jones' book Stolen
Voices a supposed polemic against SRA
disbelief, is withdrawn due to libellous
inaccuracies .
2000:
February: Sir Ronald Waterhouse publishes his
wide-ranging report on child-abuse in institutions
and care homes in the U.K.
2000: February 10: Sinason announces
conclusions which she says are the results of her
interim report on SRA 'The Devil Report',
claiming it proves the existence of Satanic Abuse.
Tellingly the report itself is never published but the
SAFF obtains a copy which is found to be dross and publishes
it here.
2000: February 9: 11:39 GMT BBC
Radio4: Police investigate satanic abuse
charges. Despite the continuous false
accusations and singularly failed cases of SRA, on the
strength of supposed interim findings of Sinason's
'Devil Report' the Metropolitan Police have
seconded detective Inspector Clive Driscoll to work
with Sinason one day a month to check and follow up on
what her patients are saying. Yet Sinason's
report clearly is nonsense and contains no proof of
SRA whatsoever, as you can check here.
2000:
Wilfred Wong organises a satan seminar at the House
of Commons featuring as guest speaker Valerie
Sinason who lectures to MPs about the 'reality' of
SRA, presumably misrepresenting her 'interim'
conclusions in the Devil Report as proof of SRA when
they are nothing of the kind.
2001:
February: UK Department of Health
confirm to the Independent newspaper that
they have received Valerie Sinason's Devil
Report but have no intention to publish
it. One of the concluding recommendations of the
report is that there should be multidisciplinary
teams hunting down SRA as recommended by F.Jonker
from the Oude Pekela case!
2002:
February 25: Izzy's Promise (RANS) hosts a
Satanic Abuse Conference in Dundee.
2002:
March 21: Sinason and other RAINS members
lecture to MPs in a private meeting at the House of
Commons in an attempt to link a renewed promotion of
SRA to the then current case of the Thames
Torso. Their nonsense
is not well received by the press.
2002:
July: the two innocent Shieldfield nurses are
awarded maximum libel damages against members of
their Newcastle review panel.
2002: Sinason's move towards DID
begins with the publication of “Attachment,
Trauma and Multiplicity: Working with Dissociative
Identity Disorder”
2003:
the Royal College logs over 100 complaints against
paediatricians compared with fewer than 20 in 1995.
2003:
August: The BFMS publish a key article showing
in detail how false memories are created by DID
therapists and the methods
they use to do it.
2003: October: Isle of Lewis SRA case begins
with co-ordinated raids by police on homes in Lewis,
Leicestershire, Yorkshire and Dorset. After a
long inquiry it is later ruled in 2004 that there is
no substance to any of the SRA claims.
2004: The National Lottery gives a
£340,000 in grant aid to Izzy's Promise of Dundee, the
charity outreach of RAINS
Scotland ' to raise public awareness
about organised and ritualised abuse '
Even though they've spent the last 16 years trying to
prove it exists and failing.
2004: July 16: Laurie Matthews, head of
RANS/Izzy's Promise, travels to lecture at the
loopy SMART conference in USA on "The
Fight Against Ritual Abuse in Scotland."
Ignoring the fact that every single one of the claimed
cases of SRA in Scotland failed after doing tremendous
damage.
2004: December: The Metropolitan Police
child protection unit arranges for officers to undergo
training in Satanic Child Abuse by ACAL a group of
Christian lawyers who believe implicitly in SRA and is
fed false facts and propaganda about its existence.
Police go public with ridiculous untrue claims about human
sacrifice.
2005: January 8th: Rochdale children
taken into care have now reached the age when they are
out of the thrall of the legal system and can tell
the full story of how their lives were ruined by
false accusations of SRA.
2005:
Carol Myers dies in mysterious circumstances
whilst undergoing MPD / DID therapy for supposed
Satanic Abuse during which she falsely accuses her own
parents of SRA. A police investigation finds
nothing. Her parents since conduct a
crucial campaign to discover the true facts
surrounding her death from DID which they blame on her
therapists.
2006: Steven Oglevie is Ellen Lacter's mentor. He
identified and treated MPD / DID patients who were
diagnosed as having been Satanically Abused. In 2006
(three years before Lacter was invited to speak at the
London
2009 Seminar (below) his reputation was
shattered when an SRA patient sued him for
implanting false memories! This lawsuit was a
direct unmasking of the dangers and falsities of DID
2006: The
Witch-Children scare was created by 1000s
of children being abused in church exorcism
ceremonies. Some were actually killed.
Hypersensitivity to possession by the Devil by
fundamentalist Christians is at a hysterical level.
2006: The ESTD (European Society for Trauma and
Dissociation) was established.
2006: The British branch of ESTD (ESTDUK) was opened
by Sue Richardson. Richardson was a key member
of the coterie of Radical Feminists behind the
Cleveland mass child-lifts scandal of 1987, the
forerunner of SRA.
2006: January: ‘When Satan Came to
Town’, The Real Story, BBC North West
documentary about the Rochdale SRA case, the children,
now adults, tell
their story.
2006: Harrison Pope and colleagues publish an analysis
of academic papers associated with MPD from 1984 to
2003 which shows a sharp peak in articles in the late
1990s followed by a steep decline after it was exposed
as unsafe.
2007: December. Valerie Sinason lectures on DID
to the influential London Safeguarding
Children Board. Sinason was billed as the
Director of the Clinic for Dissociative Studies
and her seminar Dissociative Disorder and Ritual
Abuse proved conclusively that DID was using
unsubstantiated SRA claims to make a comeback.
2007: Some irresponsible media types did a
remake of the Sybil film, still portraying the case as
reality even though discredited.
2008: February: SRA hysteria explodes
again in claims of Satanic Abuse at the Haut
de la Garenne children's home in Jersey. (later
fully discredited)
2009: September: The journal Current Psychiatry
carried an article by Numan Gharaibeh, a staff
psychiatrist at Danbury Hospital, Danbury,
Connecticut, calling for DID to be removed from DSM-5
because of conflicting support for it within the
Medical Professions.
2009: September: After a thankful absence
of Satanic Seminars for five years a new one is held
at the Bowlby
Centre in London featuring a host of new
players pushing DID and SRA, along with the usual the
hard-core of SRA believers still making unproveable
claims about abuse. (see here).
2010 Sinason's Clinic for Dissociative
Studies was being funded almost entirely by the
NHS as Private Eye Magazine revealed (issue
1325)
2011: March: The Kidwelly
SRA case is brought to trial. A Welsh brothel is
passed off as a Satanic Cult.
2011: April: Sinason and her followers
collectively start a campaign to have DID recognised
within psychiatry as a genuine therapeutic technique.
2011: July: Whilst this 'push to establish DID
as real' campaign was ongoing the SAFF unearthed
evidence that Valerie Sinason was being sent 'Satanic
Abuse Victims' by the notorious conspiracyloon David
Icke,
2011: November 3: The Archbishop of York makes a
public demand for Exorcisms to be paid for by the NHS.
2012: January 23: An open letter is published in
the Guardian newspaper signed by Valerie Sinason
and Wilfred Wong and 10 others from the Committee
On Ritual Abuse, insisting that SRA exists.
2012 Simone Reinders et al begin the first experiments
in trying to prove the existence of DID using
electrodes and encephalographs. This was the
forerunner of using MRI scans.
2012: The Savile Hysteria explodes into
British headlines. The policeman in charge of
Operation Yewtree investigating 450 victims claiming
to have been abused by the DJ is the same one who
organised Satanic Ritual Abuse seminars for the Met in
2004.
2013: January 13: Valerie Sinason is
featured by the Sunday Express claiming that Jimmy
Savile was a Satanic
Abuser based on DID memories from two of her
patients.
2013: March: Professor Elizabeth Loftus
gives a presentation at Goldsmith's University of
London. Loftus refers to numerous experiments
and research conducted by herself and others over 40
years which show that a third of the poppulation are
susceptible to false memories.
2013: Carol Myer's family publish a sensational book
on their daughter's death implicating the NHS and
various therapists who 'treated' her with DID, titled
Justice
for Carol. which shows how the medical
profession covers up its malpractice. The book heavily
criticises Valerie Sinason's input.
2014: ESTD publish an article by Suzette
Boon-Langen headed: The treatment of victims
reporting ritual abuse by organised networks; a
reflection on 30 years of clinical experience'
indicating that the ESTD is directly linked with and
promotes old-style 1990 Satan Hunters.
2014: Final official inquiry into the SRA hysteria at
Haut
de La Garrenne children's home in Jersey is
concluded: There was no SRA involved.
2014: April: Stoke Mandeville Hospital's
inquiry into Savile's abuses concludes that there were
no Satanic Connections.
2016: February: Operation Midland
is disbanded with no prosecutions made at a cost of
1.8 Million pounds. All allegations are false
2016: July: Wilfred Wong, along with Andrew Boyd,
inaugurate a Sectarian campaign calling upon all
Christians to fight to outlaw Witchcraft and
Paganism using despicable ancient blood libel
accusations of them killing children in rituals.
2016: October: Judge Henrique concludes his
Inquiry which found serious errors in police
investigations into false allegations of sexual abuse
by overly trusting the accounts of self-diagnosed
victims and castigated the police for not using
common-sense and checking allegations before believing
in them.
2017: January: At the yearly ESTD conference in
Berne, Switzerland, Dr. Brendan O’Mahony, Professor
Becky Milne and Dr. Kevin Smith presented a
revolutionary paper demanding that DID therapists be
compulsorily called to attend first-level police
interrogation of claimed SRA victims to 'interpret'
the evidence for the cops!
2017: January: Rainer Kurz delivers two lectures at
the same ESTD 2017 conference. One on Recovered
Memories, and another on
'Organised Ritualised Crime Abuse Network (ORCAN),
a supposed network of criminal satanic abusers in the
UK which Kurz has fantasised. On his website
Kurz carries an article promoting the lies about
Hampstead SRA case (ruled false by a judge in 2015)
and gives it as a lecture to the European Congress
of Psychiatry held in Florence in 2017.
2017: Operation Conifer (inquiry into late
Prime Minister, Edward Heath and VIP
abuse in Westminster publishes its closure
report - all allegations are false
2017: June 17: Fran and Dan Keller are
found innocent and set free. They had spent 26
years in prison due to false SRA allegations.
2017: September 22: Reiner Kurz appears at a
Satan Seminar held in London organised by Canadian
counsellor Sandra Fecht, another long-time believer in
SRA. Wilfred Wong is co-speaker making untrue
claims of Satanic Ritual Abuse. Kurz lectures on 'Family
court Child Snatching'.
2019: July 28: Carl Beech is sentenced to 18
years imprisonment for knowingly perpetrating
the most despicable false abuse allegations. In
a letter to the Guardian the coterie of SRA believers
propounding DID, including Valerie Sinason, infer
Beech was a real victim and should get sympathy.
2019 January: Sabine McNeil, ring-leader of the false
allegations of SRA against Christchurch School,
Hampstead, is
jailed for 9 years for perverting the course of
justice.
2019: July 28: Another public letter signed by 38 SRA
believers and DID practitioners is published in the
Guardian, arguing that the number of false-accusers is
'small'. Amongst the signees are old hands at making
failed SRA claims, including Valerie Sinason, Reiner
Kurz and Sue Richardson.
2019: September: Simone Reinders, a Netherlander, who
is a leading player in the coterie of SRA hunters in
Europe within the panoply of the ESTD published the
results of a Dutch and English funded project
to try to use MRI scanners to identify people
suffering from DID.
2020: February: The government's own Historic Abuse
Inquiry (IICSA) after taking the most extensive
evidence judged that the idea of a conspiracy of
abusers in Westminster was bunkum.
2020: September: Dutch Radio company Argos, presents
circumstancial evidence to promote renewed
belief in the existence of SRA in the 'Shards of
Glass' documentary
2020: October 5th Following public outcry after
Shards of Glass is broadcast, a motion is
accepted unanimously by the Dutch Parliament for the
Dutch government to start an investigation into the
existence of SRA in Holland.
2020: November: Wilfred Wong and five other people are
arrested and remanded in prison for 'abducting an 8
year old child at knife-point' after kidnapping the
child and driving him 230 miles from his home.
The case is ongoing as we write and we
will report on it soon. )
Timeline Ends:
-----------------------------------------------
Case Histories
The Woman
Who Had 48 Personalities - New Scientist
Roma Hart was 26, a single mother, from
Winnipeg in Western Canada, studying at Manitoba
University to become a teacher, and working two jobs,
when she was referred to a psychiatrist for stress. In
a sworn affidavit, seeking to sue the psychiatrist for
medical malpractice, Ms Hart states:
“ In October 1986 I was diagnosed
with multiple personalities by Dr Colin Ross. In
October 1986 I began multiple personality therapy
with Dr Colin Ross as a psychiatric out patient at
the McEwan Building of the St Boniface Hospital.”
Her affidavit
continues:
“Dr
Ross’s multiple personality therapy caused an
immediate worsening of my mental health. My initial
problem of stress became a problem of nightmares,
incest, satanic ritual abuse, murder, torture, and
alien abduction. I had no memories of any of those
activities in my life but Dr Ross told me that my new
memories were flashbacks of real events. I complained
that I was getting worse and I was told that in MPD
therapy you always get worse before you get better. I
soon became very suicidal.
“Dr
Ross’s multiple personality therapy included extremely
high and untested amounts of Halcion (a sedative). In
January 1987 after I first took the drug Halcion I
complained to Dr Ross that it made me feel very upset.
He replied that my new ‘upset’ feeling was caused by a
personality called ‘Desi’ who was upset. For every
Halcion side effect there was a personality to blame
instead of the drug… I would experience Halcion
withdrawal symptoms after only three hours from my
previous dosage: anxiety, muscle cramps and shaking. I
experienced severe Halcion withdrawal symptoms in
January 1990… I was addicted to Halcion.”
Ms Hart’s
affidavit states that in January 1990 Dr Ross discharged
her from St Boniface Hospital
“on
an unsupervised, extremely high and drastic drug
switch from almost 52.0 mg. of Halcion per day to 320
mg. of Valium per day.” Dr Ross left St Boniface
Hospital in November 1991. and Ms Hart eventually
weaned herself off Halcion and complained to her
family doctor that she continued to suffer withdrawal
symptoms and after-effects for several years.
In March 1993
she heard a radio talk show programme about false
memories and people falsely accused of satanic ritual
abuse and the following month attended a Winnipeg False
Memory support group. There she began to wonder whether
her memories of Satanic abuse, alien space ships and
mind control were false. By then she had already
concluded she did not have multiple personalities – 48
of them at their peak. And eventually Roma Hart became
one of a growing number of recovered memory and MPD
“retractors”.
Ms Hart was encouraged to write her story about multiple
personality therapy and it was published in a newsletter
by the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, based in
Philadelphia, formed in 1992 to support families falsely
accused and also former patients who had suddenly
recovered ‘memories’ of childhood sexual abuse, many of
them diagnosed as harbouring multiple personalities, and
then realised the memories were false. Within two years
the FMSF had been contacted by 6,000 families.
When Roma Hart eventually realised she did not have
multiple personalities and her memories were false she
sought to sue Dr Ross for malpractice. Expert opinions
and legal advice seen by New Scientist supported
her. But after delays caused by a succession of lawyers,
by the time she was able to bring her malpractice claim
to court it was ruled to be out of time, beyond the
statute of limitations in March 2015. Today she is
pursuing the hospital for an apology for the diagnosis
of MPD, an acknowledgement that it happened and caused
her harm, that they were responsible for the harm and to
make amends for the harm caused."
Source: 'Do You Remember?' published in Skeptic
Magazine Spring 2015. First published as 'The Woman
Who Had 48 Personalities' in The New Scientist (Sept
2013).
Bennett
Braun, the DID therapist which DID therapists don't
want you to know about.
'But perhaps the
greatest blow to the SRA/MPD movement was the
investigation into the irresponsible quack antics of an
MPD therapist from Rush University Medical Center
by the name of Bennett Braun. As the head
of a “Dissociative Disorders” Unit, Braun took one Patty
Burgus under his care treating her for severe and
prolonged depression, the resistance to treatment of
which was quite enough to convince Braun that a satanic
cult was somehow involved. Burgus would suffer
continuous treatment at the hands of Braun and his troop
of clowns for two years. Hypnotized, sedated, and
reminded that the only way to achieve healing was to
recall the memories of satanic ritual abuse that were
surely hidden in the compartmentalized recesses of her
mind, Burgus would come to believe that she contained
over three hundred personalities, had been involved in
cannibalism, infanticide… all the standard satanic
unpleasantness.
Eventually, Burgus herself began to doubt her own
“recovered memories” and began seeking corroborative
evidence for the cult activity that her therapists had
lead her to believe existed. As the drugs and
hypnotherapy wore off, Burgus came to recognize that it
was all a sham. Seeking legal remediation for the
malpractice she suffered, Burgus was eventually paid a
settlement of $10.6 million, and Bennett Braun – perhaps
the most widely recognized expert in MPD at the time –
had his medical license suspended.
Independent Report on the proceedings at SMART's 2009
Conference:
Aad
(aka Adrian) Sti
Abel Learwellie
Abigail (Abigail Mar
Adah Sachs
Adrian J. Connolly
Adriano Schimmenti
Agnieszka Widera Wys
Aisha Ashraf
Ajita Acharya
Alena Kryvanos
Alex Keuroghlian
Alexander Veerman
Alexandra Lorian
Alfonso Martinez-Tab
Alikki Russell
Aline Terpstra
Alison Hernandez
Alison Miller
Alissa Beuerlein
Alix Amar
Allison N Gilson
Alyssa Jones
Alyssa Owens
Amanda Bell
Amanda Ellis
Amanda Jones
Amanda Wolfe
Amber Davies
Amber Lei Hopkins Mo
Amie Myrick
Amy Choi
Amy Christianson
Amy E. Ellis
Amy Huddleston
Amy Mozolik
Amy Taylor
Anabel Gonzalez Vazq
Anastasia Doulis-Pol
Andre Aleman
Andre Marquand
Andre Mauricio Monte
Andrea B Goldberg
Andrea Barbour
Andrea Rechtin
Andreas Laddis
Andrew G. Pari
Andrew Leon
Andrew Moskowitz
Andrew M. Leeds
Andrew Theiss
Angela Fosmark
Angela Greenig
Angela Kendal
Angela Ridings
Angelica Staniloiu
Angelina Cavazos EMD
Ann Emilie-Clare Smi
Ann Henry
Ann Marie Beckett
Ann Reilly
Anna Brees
Anna C. Orcutt
Anna Fogarty
Anna-Konstantina Ric
Anne Collier
Anne David
Anne Dietrich
Anne Milliken
Anne Mills
Anne P. DePrince
Anne Winter
Anne (A.M.J.) Paans
Annedore Hopper
Annemiek Van Dijke
Annette Diehl
Annette M. Schlossna
Annette Renee Vielle
Annie Doczi
Annita B. Jones
Anthony Joseph Pigna
Anthony Tranguch
Antoon Willemsen
April Clarke
April Prita Manganie
Arianne Struik
Armagan Ozdemir
Arne Blindheim
Aryeh Levenson
Ashley Ford
Astrid Davidson
Athena Phillips
Audrey A. Wagner
B
Baerbel Benzel
Barbara Elsner
Barbara Lewison
Barbara S. McConnell
Barbara Winter
Barbara W. Snow
Barry K. Litt
Barry Levy
Bart Schofield
Beatrice Simpson
Beatrix Campbell
Becky Carter
Becky Malave
Becky Russell
Ben Adams
Benjamin Israel
Benjamin Keyes
Bernet Elzinga
Bessel Van der Kolk
Beta Leung
Beth Ellen Hancock
Beth K. Martin
Beth Rogers-Doll
Beth Toomey
Bethany Bjur
Bethany Brand
Beverley Johnson
Bill Bonacker
Birgit Elisabeth Pfi
Blair (James) Buntin
Bob Rosen
Bob (Robert John) Ke
Bobbi Renderer
Bonnie Zinn
Brad Foote
Bradley C. Stolbach
Bree Weizenegger
Brenda J. Saxe
Brenda Rohren
Brendan McPhillips
Brent Forester
Brian J Moss
Brian W Grant
Briana Lynn Snyder
Bridget Williams
Brii Sebastian
Bronwyn Tuffy
Brooke Lopes
Bruce A Levi
Bruno Waldvogel
Bryce W. Kaye
Camille Adams
Camille Ann Hood
Candyce Zito
Carla D. Hancock
Carla Hamoen
Carlos Arturo Velazq
Carmen Southam
Carol Andreassen
Carol Dyer
Carol Hamilton
Carol J Sherman
Caroline Brock
Carolyn Allard
Carrie A. Hunter
Cassandra Bransford
Cate Evans
Catherine Anita Hyne
Catherine Classen
Catherine D Klatzker
Catherine E. Hansen
Catherine Horvath
Catherine Jensen
Catherine Keech
Cathy G. Neuhauser
Cathy Kezelman Blue
Cecelia A. Bushery
Centerstate NY Socie
Chantal Cohen
Charlene B Spears
Charles H Rousell
Charme S. Davidson
Cheryl Seaman
Cheryle Jones Andrew
Chloe Wilkinson
Christa Krüger
Christel Kraaij
Christianna Flynn-Ch
Christina E. Hirst
Christine Courtois
Christine Forner
Christine Fritze Wal
Christine Hatchard
Christine Marks
Christine Rothberg
Christine Scher
Christine Sells
Christopher Fichtner
Christopher H. Rosik
Chuck (Charles A) Be
Cindy Hammonds
Cindy (Cynthia Ann)
Cody Evans
Coleen Lawlor
Colin Ross
Colleen Koncilja
Con Stough
Connie M Siciliano A
Connie Mitchell
Connie (Constance A)
Constance Dalenberg
Coral Compagnoni
Cornelia Wilbur
Corrina Rinella
Cristina Domingues
Cynthia Amodeo
Cynthia E Parker
Cynthia Jane MacLeod
Cynthia Kiddoo
Cynthia Mansbach
Cynthia Shaffer
Cynthia Wilson
C. Lange
Daeho Kim
Dalal Musa
Dale B Ault
Dana Wehle
Daniel Nothmann (She
Daniel Shaw
Daniela Wiethaeuper
Danielle Kay Dittmer
Dave Lord
David Blihar
David Eliscu
David Gleaves
David Howsam
David Hubbard
David L. Calof
David Radmore
David Seagull
David T. Bice
David V Baldwin
Dawn LaCarte
Dawn Sage-Chychula
Deanna McClannahan
Debbie Harvie
Debora Romeo
Deborah Azoulay
Deborah Christensen
Deborah Galaska
Deborah Horan
Deborah L Shapiro
Deborah Mata
Deborah Mikita
Deborah Miller-Froh
Deborah Rubin
Deborah R. Orkiszews
Deborah S Cohen
Deborah Woolley
Debra Ann Snow-Trues
Debra Hoke
Deby L Williamson
Dee Blinka
Deirdre A. Cole
Deirdre Kramer
Della Yaroshko
Denesia Huttula
Denise Brend
Denise J. Gelinas
Denise U Tordella
Dennis S. Pilon
Diana Lett
Diana (Diana Lynn) O
Diane Adlestein
Diane Clare
Dianne Goshorn
Dick Veltman
Dina Levi
Dolores Prof. Mosque
Don F. Novak
Donald E. Sloat
Donald Kuhlman
Donna Hicks
Dorinna S. Ruh
Douglas Bremner
Douglas Hanson
Dov Wills
Drew Miele
D. Michael Coy
D'Lane S. Miller
Eddy Fracarossi
Eden Wudneh
Edith Resnik
Edward Groenendal
Edward O'Brien
Edward Tick
Eileen Aveni
Elaine Cowen
Elaine M. Yamada
Elaine Veracruz
Eleanor Gloria Rosen
Eli Somer
Eline Vissia
Elisa Monti
Elisabeth Allan
Elisha Hurley
Elissa Stein
Elizabeth Ann Holzha
Elizabeth Davis
Elizabeth Hess
Elizabeth Howell
Elizabeth Michelena
Elizabeth Olson
Elizabeth Pearce
Elizabeth Polomik
Elizabeth Schenk
Elizabeth S. Bowman
Elizabeth Weiss
Elizabeth (Liz) McCa
Ellen Littman
Ellen P. Klein
Ellie Fields
Elliott Delgado
Ellyn S. Goldstein
Emely J Ortiz
Emily Dowdell
Emma Hapke
Emma Sunshaw
Erdinc Ozturk
Eric Vermetten
Erica Riley
Ericha Scott
Erin McLaughlin
Erno Jan Hermans
Esta Porter
Esther Goldstein
Eva Irle
Eva Schoen
Eva Teirstein Young
Eva Usadi
Eva Wolfsohn
Eve Carlson
Eveline Smilack
E. Ann Lee
Farnsworth Lobenstin
Fiona Lee Boyle
Fiona P Gallacher
Flo Holt
Frances K Johnson
Frances Waters
Frank Corrigan
Frank E. Shull
Frank Putnam
Frank White
Franklin D Hurt
Gabriele Case
Gail Kalin
Garrett Deckel
Gary Loomis
Gary Mayne
Gary Peterson
Gayle Nauska
Genevieve Chandler
Genny Garner
George Edward Abbott
George F Rhoades
George Kalpaxis
Georgia Allred
Gerald Puk
Geraldine Mapel
Geri Buthman
Gil Shepard
Giles Sieburg
Gina Waggoner
Gina / Jean Manlove
Ginger Rhodes
Gloria Steinem
Godehard Weniger
Gordon Francis McCau
Grace Tomas-Tolentin
Gregory R Smith
Guochuan Tsai
Guy Macpherson
Gwen Marlatt Vela
Hanna Egli-Bernd
Hans Markowitsch
Hans Strasburger
Hans-Lukas Zuurman
Harriet Mall
Hassaan Tohid
Heath Wise
Heather Davediuk Gin
Heather Genovese
Heather Hall
Heather Hruby
Heather Jean Hart Ke
Heather MacDuffie
Heather MacIntosh
Heather Pierce
Heide Halik
Helen Rosenberg Waks
Helen R. Friedman
Helene Boyd
Henk (Hendrik Albert
Hilde Van der Velde
Hillel R. Sternstein
Hirokazu Kikuchi
Hollie Hannan
Holly J Strohbeck
Holly Jayamohan
Howard Weissman
Hugo Schielke
Huub Jaspers
Irene, Ai-ju Chang
Irina V Diyankova
Irina Vogt
Isil Necef
J Kathryn Ryan
Jaap Haaksma
Jack Howley
Jack Werstein
Jacqueline Quak
Jacqueline Stewart
Jacqueline Zagrans
Jacques Jean Gouws
Jaime B. Willis
Jaime Wallace
Jakob (Jaap) Korf
James Asbrand
James Chu
James Coane
James Counsellor
James Craft
James C. Thomas
James Fisher
James M. Dodds
James P Brady
James Stephen Bove
Jamie D Kirkpatrick
Jan Freeman
Jan McNeill
Jan Williams
Jane A Hull
Jane Hart
Jane Jacobs
Jane Parker
Jane R. Wheatley-Cro
Janeen Locker
Janelle M. Salah
Janet Anne Beauregar
Janet C. Wilson
Janet Migdow
Janet M. Fry
Janet Nimer Wilson
Janice Di Luzio
Janice Dorothy Bryer
Janice Schultz
Janina Fisher
Janine Stevenson
Janna Henning
Jasmine Rose Alexand
Jason Hatcher
Jason Karageorge
Jean Gargala
Jean Goodwin
Jean Penczar
Jeanie McIntee
Jeanie McIntee
Jeannine Zoppi
Jean-Michel Darves-B
Jee eun Kim
Jeff N Gilchrist
Jeff W Schumacher
Jenia (Evgenia) Kapl
Jennifer Ann Burbrid
Jennifer Clarke
Jennifer Cochran
Jennifer Copeland
Jennifer Jacyszyn
Jennifer Lois Barbie
Jennifer Madere
Jennifer Oatman
Jennifer R Werries
Jennifer Raymond
Jennifer Silva
Jennifer Worth
Jenny Helene Potzler
Jenny Putnam
Jerald M Gottlieb
Jerome Lamagna
Jesse Viner
Jessica Campbell
Jessica Erin Culp
Jessica Fritzges-Whi
Jessica Mixon
Jessica R Schwarting
Jessica Villerius (f
Jessica Walsh
Jessica Woolliscroft
Jill Hardee
Jill Pettigrew Austr
Jillian Harrington
Jillian Hosey
Jim Helling
Jim O'Rourke
Jim Seymour
Jo Christner
Jo Gorrell
Jo Hew
JoAnn M. Majesky
JoAnne Clark
Joan F Pollak
Joan Golston
Joan H Boyd
Joan M. Haliburn
Joan Petty
Joan Turkus
Joanna Filidor
Joanna Hurley
Joanne G Brumm
Joanne Zucchetto
Jocelyn Kressler
Jocelyn Laverinto
Jocelyne Filion
Jodi L Bills-Guitron
Jody Bowle-Evans
Johan Den Boer
Johanna Dobrich
Johanna Lynch
Johanna Schröder (a
John Allen Rasberry
John A. O'Neil
John Biggs
John Bligh Nutting
John B. Cardinali
John Chianelli
John Durkin
John Krystal
John Levitt
John L.E. Walker
John Wedger
Johnny Powell
Joji Suzuki
Jon Little
Jonathan Ames
Jonathan Cleveland
Jordan E Cart
Joseph Ciorciari
Joseph J. Dambrauska
Joseph Yaskin
Joyanna Silberg
Joyce Marie Andresen
Joyce (Joy) C Morene
Juanita S Ross
Judith Chapperon Geb
Judith Cohen Oshinsk
Judith Gulko
Judith Ierulli
Judith L. Wyatt
Judith Margolin
Judy Brady
Judy Denise Williams
Judy Lightstone
Julene Adele Pommert
Julia Barry
Julia Bry Schwab
Julia M. Soler
Julia Sayre
Juliana Cocola
Julianne Cusick
Julianne Maki
Julie Galassini
Julie Wiles (We are
June M. Conboy
J.A. (Jan) Ewing
Kara Fowler
Karen A Haggard
Karen Belfontaine
Karen Binder-brynes
Karen Daniels
Karen Elliot
Karen Gill Reynolds
Karen Gutherless
Karen Hopenwasser
Karen Hutchins
Karen Lee Hennessy
Karen Marshall
Karen Marshall
Karen Miller
Karen S Schrock
Karen Wiens
Karl Brynolf (Bernie
Karri Lewis
Kate McMaugh
Kate (Mary K) McDowe
Katherine Glenn
Katherine Wald
Katherine (Kate) McC
Kathia Lopez Murdock
Kathleen Adams
Kathleen Eagle
Kathleen M Martin
Kathleen S Graves
Kathryn A Downing
Kathryn Reynolds
Kathy Allard
Kathy Steele
Kaycee Beglau
Kaye-Ailsa Rowan
Kelly Jo Hapgood
Kelly Muhonen
Kelly Rothert
Ken Benau
Ken Benau
Ken Genlik
Keri Michele Zwerner
Keri Roberts
Kevin Connors
Kevin Drab
Kevin Peel
Kim Baldwin
Kim Swanson
Kim Swett Havenner
Kimberly Benson Smit
Kimberly Brenninkmey
Kimberly Matoka
Kimberly Turner
Kirsten Stach
Kiwamu Tanaka
Kris SantaMaria
Kristen Henshaw
Kristi (Kristi Lynne
Kristin Sheikh
Kristina Cordeiro
Kristine Keele
Kristy Eldredge
Kurtis Walton
Lacie Morrison (Brau
Lana Brown
Larrainne Hilton
Larry F. Sine
Larry (Lawrence M.)
Lars Madsen
Laura Ballard
Laura Epstein
Laura Fontaine
Laura Goldstein
Laura Lawyer
Laura Lee Baker
Laura M McLaughlin
Laura Reagan
Laura Slaughter
Lauren E Jones
Lauren Lebois
Lauren Miller
Lauren Phillips
Lauren S Becker
Laurie M Belanger
Laurie M. Kahn
Laurie Parker
Lawrence Compagnoni
Leah Keating
Lee Ann Mitchell
Lee-Anne Woznak
Lenore Newell
Leone C. Legan
Leslie Ann McKenna
Leslie G. Cohn
Leslie K Rogers
Letizia Adorno
Lewis P. Giles
Lilith Rose
Lillian Ng Gui
Linda Alexander
Linda Antoniazzi
Linda F Rogers
Linda Gantt
Linda Heaviside
Linda LaRue Scott
Linda M. Young
Linda S. Jones
Linda Tepper
Linden Ramdeholl
Linzy Bonham
Lisa Danylchuk
Lisa Gilbert
Lisa Hanson
Lisa Inoue
Lisa Lewis
Lisa M Rocchio
Lisa Panisch
Lisa Polenberg
Liz Hall
Liz L Ornelas
Logan Larson
Lora Wiens
Loralee Ann Carter
Loren Joan Farber
Lori Bellan
Lori Grifo
Lori Johnston
Lorraine Garcia
Lorraine Wright
Lou A Lichti
Louisa Bidwell Putna
Lowen Alexander Clar
Loyce Hamilton Burns
Lutz Jäncke
Lynda Majure Ruf
Lynette Danylchuk
Lynn Crook
Lynn James
Lynn M Hazard
Lynne Anderson
Lynne Harris
Mae Cheung
Maggie Phillips
Makini Brice
Mandy Bostwick
Manouk Van Egmond
Mara Tesler Stein
Marc Bush
Marc Muret
Marcia A. Dunn
Marcia Weiner
Margaret Hainer
Margaret H. Eichler
Margaret Leitold
Margaret Louise O'Ne
Margaret Martin
Margaret Masci
Margaret Walker
Margo Zysman
Mari Lilly
Maria Ballard
Maria Clements
Marianne Kennedy
Marianne O'Leary
Marilee Snyder
Marilyn Korzekwa
Marion J Brown
Marion Oke
Maritza Erazo
Mark E. Babcock
Mark E. Roseman
Mark F. Schwartz
Mark K Wade
Mark Sideman
Mark Steven Greenber
Mark Zimmerman
Marsha Mintz
Martha Schmitz
Martha Temple
Martin Dorahy
Mary A. Halas
Mary Bartell
Mary Elizabeth Kelly
Mary Ellen Bertling-
Mary Jane Pringle
Mary L. Gannon
Mary Moore-Farrell
Mary O'Leary
Mary Zaudtke
MaryBreen O'Connor
Matthew Wakefield
Maureen C. Dion
Maureen O'Brien
Maybelle Filler
Mechteld Giesen
Meg Rich
Megan Alsop
Meira Ellias
Melanie Haddox
Melanie Hetzel-Riggi
Melinda L Bloos
Melissa Jacqueline D
Melissa Noel Renzi
Melissa Pickett
Melissa Taylor
Melody London
Meredith Glick
Meredith Redding (Hi
Michael Brown
Michael Daubney
Michael Gilbertson
Michael Gruenfeld
Michael H. Foust
Michael J. Yonkovig
Michael Mierendorf (
Michael Quiñones
Michael Salter
Michael S. Lang
Michele E. Burgner
Michele Marie Wilken
Michele Yarberry
Michelle Groff
Michelle L Kamla
Michelle Martin Hurl
Michelle Miller
Michelle Miller - un
Michelle Ruth Reid
Michelle Saelin
Michelle Stevens Sca
Michelle To
Micki Halloran
Micki McDonough
Mindy Jacobson-Levy
Mirel Goldstein
Miriam DeFant
Mirjam Van der Vegt
Mona Lee Yousef
Monica Caroline Blum
Monica Indart
Monica Leonie Meerba
Monika Turner
Mozart Smyth
Myrna Linda Frank
Myron Walters
M-Marsel Mesulam
Nadine Baker
Nancy A. Payne
Nancy Ellis
Nancy Fair
Nancy Hayes-Gary
Nancy Jayne Rubin
Nancy Lieurance
Nancy Rivas
Nancy Wachtenheim
Nancy Yerly
Naomi Halpern
Naomi Rosborough
Natalie Cherrix
Natalie Grindy
Natalie Hung
Natalie LeQuang
Natalie M. Walch
Nathalia Grauvogel
Nel Draijer
Neva Shebini
Nicholes Weingarten
Niels Van den Berge
Niki Gomez-Perales
Norine Elisabeth Lyo
Norma Howes
Noula Diamantopoulos
Nurullah Bolat
Ole Buschman
Onno Van der Hart
Paatrick Poor
Pam Pare
Pam Stavropoulos
Pamela Sobo
Paola Dazzan
Patricia Ann Turner
Patricia Bratt
Patricia Hahn Jeffre
Patricia Jean Bastan
Patricia Ventura
Patricia Witvoet
Patrick Whalen-Brown
Patti J Levin
Patti Thompson
Paul Dell
Paul Frewen
Paul Robert Darnell
Paula Biles
Paula Eagle
Paula Hurwitz
Paula Kenney
Paula Murray
Paula Soto
Paula Thomson
Paula Wolk
Peggy Lee Kolodny
Peta Sharrock
Peter Alan Murray Pi
Peter Brooke Mosley
Peter Hellsten
Peter Liebermann
Peter Maves
Philip Bromberg
Philip Coons
Philippe Gauvreau
Phyllis Klein
Phyllis Solon
Pirjo Smith
Polly Bell
Prof. Judith K Danie
Rachel Breskman
Rachel Friedman
Rachel Goldsmith
Rachel Thomas
Radhika Krishnan
Ralf Vogt
Ralph M. May
Randall L. O'Brien
Ratna Ratna
Ray Sizemore
Rebeca Gonzalez-Sche
Rebecca B Lee
Rebecca Howard
Rebecca Kennedy
Rebecca Kennedy
Rebecca Stilling
Rebecca Szymanski
Rebecca (Rebecca Ann
Regina Morrow Robins
Reinhild Draeger-Mue
Remy Aquarone
Renee Rathke
Renée Potgieter Mar
Reshma Lagomarcino
Rhett Brandt
Rhonda Hughes
Rian Dob
Rich (Richard) Felic
Richard Chefetz
Richard Harris
Richard Hopman
Richard H. Hodgin
Richard Kluft
Richard Loewenstein
Richard M. Cross
Richard Westberry
Rick Hohfeler
Rita A Crockett
Rita Fisler, BvdK's
Rita Petersen
Rob Pramann
Robert Joel Smith
Robert Neimeyer
Robert Savoy
Robert Schwab
Robert Slater
Robert T. Muller
Robert (Robert John)
Roberta Mariel Estar
Roberto La Marca
Robin Day
Robin G Shapiro
Robin Kellett
Robin L Beaumont
Robin R. Spiro
Roby Abeles
Robyn Anne Van der Z
Robyn Brickel
Robyn G Tuft
Rochelle Epstein
Rochelle Sharpe Lohr
Rocio J Tharp
Roger Carleton
Roger Luechinger
Ron James Llewelyn
Rosalind M. Monahan
Rosamond Elizabeth N
Roseann Lynch
Rosemary Masters
Rosita / Rosa Cortiz
Rossana Wullems
Rosslyn Chandler
Roxann Hassett
Roxanna Whitney Wolf
Roy J Mathew
Ruth Blizard
Ruth Calland
Ruth Cohn
Ruth E Gonzalez
Ruth Lanius
Ruth M. Schofield
Sally E. McCollum
Sally Hill
Sally M. Wood
Samantha King
Sandi Plant
Sandie Fox
Sandra Bouabjian
Sandra Dixon
Sandra F Carrier
Sandra L. Francis
Sandra Paulsen
Sandra Pratt Martin
Sandra Shuleshko
Sandy M Alletto
Sanne Terlingen
Sara Aboul-Hosn
Sara Eldridge
Sara Gluck Schwartz
Sara Rependa
Sarah ES Watt
Sarah H Leavitt
Sarah Jane Smith
Sarah M Grimshaw
Sarah McGregor
Sarah Mills
Sarah Olson
Sarah Y. Krakauer
Scott Pelking
Scott Petersen
Scott W. Trylch
Sean Edward Burns
Serge JL Goffinet
Seri Gohde
Sevilla King
Shahab Lotfinia
Shana Ann Gibney
Shannon Bell
Shannon E Strader
Shannon Goecke-Watso
Shannon Haragan
Sharon K. Farber
Sharon Lake
Sharon (Sharon Elain
Shawna Ragan
Sheila Crandles
Sheila Ishii
Sheila Klein
Sheila M Cahill
Sheila Sturgeon Frei
Sheldon Itzkowitz
Shelley Pusich
Sheralyn Cox
Sherri Grady
Sheryl Martin
Shielagh R. Shusta H
Silke Vogelmann-Sine
Sima Chalavi
Simone Jacobs
Simone Reinders (NWO
Sjirk Kuijper
Sky Snogren
Sonia Smuts
Sophie Fink
Sophie Pollock
Sophie (Zipa Leah) S
Stacey Lynn Seibel
Stacey M Boyer
Stefan Morkis
Stefan Schaffeld
Stefanie Marie Conso
Stephanie A Hawotte
Stephanie Cress
Stephanie Elizabeth
Stephanie K. Glassma
Stephen J. Westra
Stephen M. Ash
Stephen R. Beck
Steve Williams
Steven Lazrove
Steven N. Gold
Steven (Steve) Frank
Su Baker
Sue A Leatherbery
Sue Masters
Sue Moran
Sue Partridge
Sue Richardson
Susan Adams
Susan Bolotin
Susan Brann
Susan Budney
Susan Diane Couch
Susan Diane Piowaty
Susan Gobbart
Susan Hale Zeichner
Susan Hyatt
Susan Hyatt
Susan Hykes
Susan J. Rautio-Diet
Susan Kinkead-Acree
Susan Mary Scanlan
Susan Overhauser
Susan Pease Banitt
Susan Pinco
Susan Pollard
Susan Wendelborg
Susanne M Morgan
Susanne Nick
Susanne Zapatero
Susie Schafer
Suzanne Arbeid
Suzanne Findlay
Suzanne Rutti
Suzy Lee
Sylvia Solinski
Tally Tripp
Tammy Ichinotsubo-Ez
Tammy Rovane
Tamra Hughes
Tara Williams
Teresa Allen
Teresa Bertoncin
Teresa Moorhead
Teri Reisser
Terry J. King
Terry Kelly
Terry Kerler
Thea Samit
Theresa A Mitton
Theresa Albini
Thomas A Lytle
Thomas Carlton
Thomas E. Meiring
Thomas J. Rostafinsk
Thomas Krisher
Tiffany Peterson
Timi Schuessler
Timothy Brewerton
Todd Grimm
Tom Tates
Toos Gabriels
Tovah Means
Tracey Wiese
Tracey Wilkins
Tuba Mutluer
Tung (Tung Minh) Pha
Tyson D Bailey
Ulrich Lanius
Ulrich Sachsse
Una Smith
Ursula Gast
Valarie Lynn Harris
Valerie Bryant
Valerie Cardenas
Valerie Kasten
Valerie Macri-Lind
Valerie Poltoratzsky
Valerie Rosen
Valerie Sinason
Valerie Van Loggeren
Vedat Şar
Veronica Mollere
Vicki Gordon
Victor W. Welzant
Victoria Donahue
Vikki Sinnott
Virginia Barnes Rick
Virginia S Frazier
Vivian Alvarez
Vivian C Dent
Vivianna Nieto-Foust
Warwick Middleton
Wendy Forbush
Wendy H Arundale
Wendy Lemke
Wendy S. Upadhyay
Wendy Whittington
Wierd Duk
Willa Wertheimer
William H. Smith
William Roy Newman
William Walters
Winja Lutz
Wouter Hanegraaff
Yael Dank
Yael Margolin-Rice
Yafen Wu-Pang
Yenys Castillo
Yoki Mertens
Yolanda Martín Higa
Yolanda R. Schlumpf
Yuichi Hattori
Yvette Goldurs
Zack Hamingson
Zoe Ambre Landers
Zohre Soorgi
carrie ann Cherep-Ca
|
PSYCHIATRIC
VOODOO!
The Royal College of Psychiatry embraces Phrenology
within Modern Psychiatry to validate spurious
Dissociative Identity Disorder.
Can it really be true that junk-science
akin to phrenology is today being used to diagnose Dissociative
Identity Disorder in the UK, USA and Europe?
Absolutely, and in this astonishing Special Report
the SAFF exposes the workings of a new kind of
Frankenstein therapy which will mentally incarcerate
hundreds of thousands of ill people, if the medical
fraternity
allow it to prosper. If you or anyone you know has
mental issues you must read this to protect yourself.
How DID was invented and how harmful is it to
patients?
Back in the bad old days of the Satanic Ritual Abuse Scare
of the 1990s most of the people who promoted the idea of
SRA came from a coterie of Psychiatrists and Feminist
therapists treating patients who, apparently,
spontaneously under analysis, began to adopt different
personas. Different characters would pop-up in their
minds when they were under hypnosis, or when subject
to trance techniques which were believed to 'recover'
forgotten memories of past sexual abuse which had been
repressed. The key common-denominator in all
these patients was not their psychoses, but the fact
that all their therapists believed that there was an
epidemic of Ritual Sexual Abuse which had been hidden
and which they were courageously exposing.
The 'personalities' which
appeared during these sessions could be male or female,
young or old, beautiful or ugly, clever or idiotic,
strong or weak. When an adult woman patient,
(it was invariably women who suffered from DID),
suddenly began talking in a teeny-weeny child-like voice,
their psychiatrist / psychotherapist would 'help the story
along' asking leading questions about the person's
childhood, so the patient could 'flesh-out' the
'personality' of what was then termed their
'Alter'.
After many sessions of 'therapy' some patients would
generate dozens of these 'Alters' ; there hardly
seemed an end to them. Most patients stopped at
creating a handful of Alters, which were trundeled out in
subsequent sessions by being called-up by the therapist,
almost like Faust would call up Mephistopheles, ( and this
similie is rather closer to the mark than some readers
might believe, as we will show below).
The 'Alters' of DID patients would often begin competing
with each other, sometimes fighting and insulting each
other in the process, like a poor TV
soap-opera. Verbatim case-histories are almost
humorous in the way that patients and therapists jostle to
create sensible sounding stories out of the babble
produced by DID therapy. So what is happening?
Dissociative Identity Disorder is a Mind Control
method which implants fantasies.
Of course any sensible therapist would have immediately
seen these 'Alters' as a chimera resulting from the
repetitive questions of the therapist. Indeed
Sigmund Freud warned against unconsciously feeding one's
patient with clues as to where to go next during
analytical sessions. The danger was that the
patient would subconsciously pander to the expectancies
of the Therapist and tacitly confabulate personas.
Most of the patients who were filtered into MPD/DID
techniques had a long past history of orthodox
psychological treatment which had not cured them.
To the coterie of therapists and
psychiatrists who were using DID to seek out abuse this
lack of response to orthodox therapeutic methods was a
clear 'symptom' that exceptionally evil sexual abuse was
being 'hidden' and so their intention was not so much
to cure the patient from their psychoses, but prove that
they had been abused.
The
intention was not to cure the patient of their
psychoses, but prove that they had been abused.
Campaigning Therapists appeared more interested in
claiming that they had uncovered the hidden abuse they
suspected was there; rather than resolving a
patient's problems. For example, none of these therapist
ever thought that a patient who did not produce SRA
'Alters' during therapy indicated that they had not been
abused and so had nothing to recall. They just kept
on insisting until the patient made something up!
None of these DID therapists
ever thought that a patient who failed to produce
SRA Alters during RMT indicated that they had
had nothing to recall.
Many of these women patients were chronically mentally
ill. Mainstream psychiatry was not curing them and
so they were passed down the line to the new breed of
Feminist Therapists who specialised in DID. The
truth is that since 1966 when Prof. J Eysenk
published his seminal 'Fact and Fiction in Psychology'
it has been a psychiatric secret that interventions
have no greater rate of resolution than not treating
patient and allowing him/her to come to terms with his
situation himself.
'Eysenck found that spontaneous remission
in severe neurotic disorders is such that some 45
percent recover after one year and over 70 percent
after two years, without any form of psychiatric
treatment.
Within 5 years 90% of all cases recover. Orthodox
psychiatric and psychoanalytic treatment produces
effects which are not in advance of these figures and
in many cases may even be below them.'
Fact and Fiction in Psychology (pp 154).
Psychiatric treatment
has no greater rate of resolution than
allowing the patient to come to terms with his
situation himself.
Today there are hundreds of thousands of academic papers
written on Psychiatric treatments and methods but
you will not find one of them which analyses or rates
recovery statistics!
Whilst psychiatry is very helpful to reveal how people
might feel about their illness all complexes are
ultimately treated by the patient him/herself coming to
terms with it. The psychiatrist simply identifies
the crux of the problem within the patient and let's them
become aware of it. Just as in medicine, it is not
the wonder drug which heals the patient but the effect
that drug has on super-charging existing natural healing
mechanisms of the body which cures the patient. The
patient always heals him/herself. Coping with
mental illness is a process leading to a resolving of the
issues by the patient but continuous application
of 'therapy' of the DID kind does nothing
but incarcerate the patient in a perpetual psychoses and
therefore using DID a resolution is impossible.
Radical
therapists campaigning to highlight the mass of hidden
sexual abuse they felt existed looked back in the annals
of psychiatry to justify their beliefs and found that an
unproven theory coined Multiple Personality Disorder
(MPD) had first been identified in the 1840s, when
psychiatry was in its infancy. It was VERY
rare but there was one recorded case by Dr. Morton
Prince of Boston, USA, in 1898 when he was consulted by
one Sally Beauchamp, a young single woman aged 23 who
claimed to suffer various nervous disorders. A long period
of psychoanalysis resulted in 3 'personalities' surfacing
during a seven year period. None of this was
conclusive and there is no insistence that the
'personalities' were anything other than figments of Ms
Beauchamps subconscious.
At
the time, competing psychiatric syndromes were vying
against each other to explain why some people acted out of
character; one minute contented, the next tortured
and depressed. Books like Dr Jekyll
and Mr Hyde, and other fictional accounts of
people whose personality 'split' and was taken over
by their 'evil' self. These ideas were
actually the result of much older memes, combining the
religious idea of 'possession' of the body by devils with
the then novel psychiatric theory of schizophrenia,
or split-personality.
In 1908 Eugene Blueler had published the first works on
Schizophrenia and coined the syndrome. MPD / DID is
squarely based on Schizophrenia and DID therapists have
hi-jacked Schizophrenia syndrome and corrupted it to suit
their beliefs in DID.
So a valid syndrome which went on to become the basis of
the treatment of hundreds of thousands of mentally ill
people, was hi-jacked in the 1950s by people who believed
that multiple personalities could infest a
person's mind, which is something entirely
different. There is one important distinction
between Schizophrenia syndrome and DID/MPD and that is
that schizophrenia has never ever made claims to be a
mechanism to hide sexual abuse. Hiding supposed
sexual abuse is the sole purpose of DID according to its
devotees.
Technically since the 1950s MPD / DID has since come to
mean 'schizophrenia with more than two
personalities'.
The Great Reality Shift
- Reincarnation and UFOs
As the growth of the Scientific Enlightenment
proceeded apace to produce the Industrial
Revolution, and the medical and technical
achievements of the Victorian era occurred, the world
then suffered two brutal wars made ever more heinous by
the very weapons which technology had created for mass
killing (e.g. the machine-gun, high-explosives,
motorised tanks, mega-cannons, ballistic missiles, and
atomic bombs). The horrors of these wars
undermined more than anything else the idea that a
benevolent deity was directing mankind.
By the 1950s orthodox religion had become something of
a hollowed-out shell for many. By the 1960s church
attendance had fallen to 6% and pews were virtually
empty. People now trusted more in Science to
guide the State, Education and Health, relegating
Religion to the cultural pomp of the State. But
Superstition is a component part of the human condition
and had not been defeated. This battle
between Religion and Science gave rise to a new
techno-religion which was being formed in The Great
Reality Shift. The story of the development
of MPD / DID encompasses this shift as belief in
extra-terrestrial god like beings who visited Earth
began to develop alongside claims of the hidden evil of
a Secret Cult of Satanists and the Bridey Murphy case
illustrates it well.
Bridey Murphy - MPD falsification of memories reaches
back into past lives.
In 1952 an experiment by amateur hypnotist Morey Bernstein
put housewife Virginia Tighe from Pueblo, Calif, in a
trance that sparked off startling revelations about
Tighe's alleged past life as a 19th-century Irish woman
called Bridey Murphy.
Bernstein used an untested technique now called
hypnotic regression. Today the method is almost
exclusively used by MPD therapists under the name of Recovered
Memory Therapy [RMT] ). During Recovered Memory
Therapy the hypnotised subject is gradually taken back to
childhood supposedly to relive scenes and situations from
that time which they have forgotten or
repressed. This is of course where DID
therapists stop; for it would undermine their
pretentions towards academic rigour if they allowed
their patients to delve back into past lives!
However Bernstein wasn't a therapist, or a medical person;
he was a self-taught hypnotist. Bernstein wasn't
interested in medical outcomes and attempted to take
Virginia Tighe one step further; he suggested she cast her
mind back to BEFORE
she was born. He was astonished to find that a
personality called Bridey Murphy came through,
speaking from Tighe's mouth. Bridey Murphy
claimed to be from a previous incarnation but it could
easily have been portrayed as Tighe 'channelling' the
spirit of Bridey Murphy in true spiritualist
tradition.
Bernstein, who had no medical qualifications but a deep
interest in the supernatural, concluded that Bridey
Murphy was an earlier incarnation of Tighe's. The
corollary was that the Soul was eternal and could
transmigrate into different bodies through various
lifetimes. Murphy was reincarnating through
the body of Tighe! The Bridey Murphy story
became BIG news at the time because of these claims of
reincarnation which was believed to offer 'evidence' of
life after death.
Bernstein
concluded that Bridey Murphy was an earlier
incarnation of Tighe's Soul.
DID / MPD therapists today regularly use the same
recovered memory techniques (RMT) to take their patients
back in time to their childhood but NEVER EVER try to take
them back into previous lives; because that would
simply part with any semblance of scientific method and
show up their DID syndrome as just a form of Psychiatric
Voodoo.
So was there actually any truth to the Bridey Murphy
case? Read on:
Bernstein hypnotised Tighe
many times and began to build an entire life story of Bridey
Murphy in Ireland in the late 1880s. Her
story was impressively detailed and took months to
relate. The more questions Bernstein asked the
hypnotised Tighe, the more 'facts' Bridey Murphy
would come out with, and the more complex her
'life-story' became. All very impressive and
convincing. Just like the outpourings of MPD /
DID patients.
The Bridey Murphy experiment turned into a media
phenomenon and created a lot of controversy at the
time. Bernstein milked the situation. In
1954 The Denver Post wrote sensational articles
on the experiment and it became a national
sensation. By early 1956 Doubleday had published
Bernstein's book 'The Search for Bridey Murphy' and
later that year the movie 'In search of Bridey Murphy'
was released. The public were hooked, all
this publicity caused massive sensationalism and uproar
throughout the USA and Europe. Could this REALLY be proof
of the survival of the Soul after death?
By the time sceptical researchers began checking the
'history' and 'facts' which had been given by Bridey
Murphy under trance, reincarnation had become
accepted as a possibility by many observers and a large
slice of the public. Other amateur hypnotists were jumping
on the bandwagon, getting similar results from regressing
their subjects too.
It was then discovered that NONE of the details
'Bridey' had given under hypnosis were factual.
Locations could not be traced, people did not exist,
happenings were incorrect, wrong or invented.
Investigators travelled from the US to Ireland to get
first-hand knowledge and it was all bunkum. The
whole thing was a perfect exercise in CONFABULATION.
Unconsciously and without guile, whilst in an hypnotic
trance Tighe, an unexceptional and mousey woman, had
created an amazingly convincing 19th century
life-story in Ireland which she had never ever visited,
and the whole thing was complete fantasy.
It was then found that NONE of
the details 'Bridey' had given under hypnosis were
factual. The whole thing was a perfect exercise in
CONFABULATION.
Although Bernstein never called Bridey Murphy an 'Alter'
of Tighe's, clearly the phenomenon was a perfect fit for a
nervous woman confabulating convincing stories under
hypnosis whilst being lead by a hypnotist/therapist using
leading questions. Today Tighe's story would be
identical to the prognosis for MPD / DID and would
probably include fantasised claims of Satanic Ritual
Abuse imposed upon her mind through leading questions by
her DID therapist.
Today Tighe's story
would be identified by DID therapists as
real and a factual repressed account of
Abuse
Of course those who believe in MPD might say that Tighe
must have somehow been abused and used the persona of
Bridey to hide that abuse from Bernstein.
However Tighe did not go to Bernstein because of personal
problems, she was a friend who was a particularly easy
subject to hypnotise and so ideal for Bernstein's amateur
experiments. Most psychiatrists of course
would simply say that as there was no psycho-sexual
admissions or any other repressions mentioned by Bridey in
her life story, it was simply the willingness of Tighe's
subconscious to create a fictional personality from
suggestive questioning. The only difference
between the Tighe case and current cases of MPD is that
it occurred long before the idea of Ritual Sex Abuse had
been invented. There was no prejudiced therapist asking
leading questions about Satanic Abuse to tip the balance
into fantasies about Satanic gangs and sexual torture.
Alien Abduction and the psychiatric cross-over
Contemporaneously with the burgeoning interest in
Reincarnation during the 1950s, mostly caused by the
success of Theosophy (Itself an evolution of
Spiritualism), came a parallel interest in Alien
contact. George Adamski, was the first man in modern
times to have claimed to have been abducted by
Aliens. In 1953 the first book in his 'trilogy' was
published titled 'Flying Saucers Have Landed'. The
astonishing success of this ensured that it was quickly
followed by Inside The Space Ships (1955) and
Flying Saucers Farewell (1961). By 1960
Adamski's books had reached over 200,000 eager readers
and created the entire mythology of UFOs which has
developed since.
Adamski was a cult-leader, occult philosophist and
mountebank with a long history of lecturing on ancient
philosophies and fantastic ideas. He had tried various
projects including bootlegging liquor during prohibition,
before he latched onto the UFO shtick.
The end of Prohibition in 1933 also marked the
decline of his profitable wine-making business, and
Adamski later told two friends that's when he "had
to get into this [flying] saucer crap."
Yet Adamski's idea of Alien Abduction triggered
something in the popular mind and other people claiming to
have had Encounters of the Third Kind,
followed in his wake. The idea of visiting Alien beings
has almost become de-rigeur to hundreds of thousands of
people world-wide today.
The Reality Shift
Largely thought lunacy at the time and thoroughly
dismissed by all scientists, the flames of Alien Abduction
which Adamski had stoked were fanned by none other than
Carl Gustav Jung, Sigmund Freud's
contemporary. In 1958, Jung wrote Flying
Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies.
Jung's intention was to try to place Alien Abduction in
perspective with earlier religious experiences throughout
history and posit it, correctly, as mankind's constant
search for Omniscience. However the nuances of this
approach were drowned out by UFOlogists promoting
the book as 'academic proof' of historical visits to the
Earth by Aliens!
Cue Erich Von Daniken's first book, Chariot of
the Gods (1968) an attempt at a chronology of
imagined Alien visits to Earth throughout mankinds'
history. Daniken went on to sell sixty three
million similar diatribes across the world,
supporting the unproven idea that Aliens exist and
occasionally visit Earth to contact humans. All of
these books and more which appeared during the same period
cemented the idea in the popular mind that world
governments were conspiring to hide the fact that
technologically advanced god-like Alien beings could
secretly visit the Earth at whim and had controlled the
history of mankind on Earth through all eras.
This of course played into the 'Illuminati' myth which
underpins the New World Order conspiracy theory meme
and which found its latest manifestation in the Qanon
Christian-Right political phenomenon in the U.S. Qanon is
simply the compression point where the tectonic plates of
science and religion collide.
Yet, in Flying Saucers, Jung clearly stated that
outpourings from patients of claimed meetings with Aliens
are, like other visions and dreams, messages from the
unconscious and must be taken into account during
psychoanalysis.
"If the round shining objects that appear
in the sky be regarded as visions, we can hardly avoid
interpreting them as archetypal images. They would
then be involuntary, automatic projections based on
instinct, and as little as any other psychic
manifestations or symptoms can they be dismissed as
meaningless and merely fortuitous." (pps 16-17)
The similarities between a secret project by omniscient
Aliens to steer mankind's history and abduct and perform
horrific operations to 'study' human development, with a
cabal of evil Satanists who have controlled the evolution
of society throughout the ages by abusing children and
adults is too obvious to state. Except to say that both
are of course figments of the imagination.
Compare these two panels below.
"Hilary says she
has been abducted so many times she has lost
count and is convinced that aliens are already
among us and only a government cover-up
continues to keep it a secret. 'They know what is going on but
they are absolutely powerless to stop it,'
said Hilary. However, the active member of the
British Earth and Aerial Mysteries Society
(BEAMS) believes the tide is turning as people
increasingly come forward with their own tales
of alien abduction. Later this month she will be
among a host of speakers at the Anomalous
Mind Management, Abductee, Contactee,
Helpline project (AMMACH) conference,
which is expected to attracted
hundreds. Hilary, who has had two
experiences of aliens in Wales, holds the
belief that extra terrestrials are targeting
the Celtic tribe. " - Wales
Online:
|
"The
police investigation eventually exonerated Mr
and Mrs Dallimore.
Their daughter's accusations were found to be
pure invention and seemed
to have derived from Rebecca's experiences at an
evangelist church,
whose priest, the Rev Arthur Row, believed in
the power of Satan. He
had enthusiastically taken up her allegations.
Personal testimony has a
peculiarly powerful effect in persuading
people.... It is cases like
that of the Dallimores that demonstrate the
importance of corroborating
"memories" before rushing to the conclusion that
they are true. But
the uncorroborated testimony of "survivors" is
enough to convince many
people of the reality of satanic abuse - even
though some of the
"survivors" also have "memories" of being
abducted and sexually abused
by aliens." ....If
those who believe in satanism get their way, the
law will eventually be changed to make
uncorroborated testimony of satanism sufficient
for conviction. That is why we should be deeply
alarmed - not about Satan, but about Ms
Sinason." - Excerpt
from The Sunday Telegraph 13th February
2000. - SATANIC ABUSE MEETS THE
MUTANT NINJA TURTLES. by Alasdair
Palmer
|
The only difference
between the Tighe case and current cases of MPD is
that there was no prejudiced therapist asking
leading questions about abuse linked to Satanism.
Three Faces of Eve - Psychiatry jumps
on the MPD bandwagon
All the publicity around Bridey Murphy spawned more
cases. In 1957, with the publication of the
best-selling book The Three Faces of Eve by
psychiatrists Thigpen and Cleckley, the idea of
MPD was brought to the fore again, based on their
experiences with just one patient ( Chris Sizemore
). The Media got in on the act, again, and soon
the sensational film Three Faces of Eve was
distributed. The public's interest, already primed
by the Bridey Murphy case which was occurring
concurrently, was given an additional boost with claims
of Multiple Personality Disorder. Even
though the vast majority of psychiatric professionals
at the time still perceived MPD as an accessory to
dissociation caused through schizophrenia and not a
syndrome in and of itself.
SYBIL: The Book which launched a thousand MPD
sufferers.
Despite the sensationalisms of Bride Murphy and
Three Faces of Eve, MPD was to remain
simmering for another 17 years until in 1974, when the
highly influential book 'Sybil' was
published, and later made into a sensational TV Series
in 1976. It described what Robert Rieber called "the
third most famous of multiple personality cases."
It presented a detailed discussion of the problems of
treatment of "Sybil Isabel Dorsett,".
"Though the book and subsequent
films helped popularize the diagnosis of MPD and
trigger an epidemic of the diagnosis; later
analysis of the case suggested different
interpretations, ranging from Dorsett's problems
having been caused by the therapeutic methods
used by her psychiatrist....
Dr. David Spiegel, a Stanford psychiatrist whose
father treated Dorsett [AKA Mason] on occasion,
says that his father described Mason as "a
brilliant hysteric. He felt that Dr. Wilbur
tended to pressure her to exaggerate the
dissociation she already had."
As media attention on MPD increased, so too did
the controversy surrounding the diagnosis. Source:
Wikipedia
He felt
that her psychiatrist pressured her to
exaggerate on the dissociation she already had.
Ironically even though the story of Sybil was
proven to be suspect there was a remake of the film in
2007, and it still portrayed the case as
reality!
Indeed,
Simone Reinders, a leading light in the post-SRA
generation of DID promoters, has herself
admitted that Sybil's DID was false. In her
2008 paper for Kings College titled: Cross-examining
dissociative identity disorder she writes:
'One of the best known DID cases,
Sybil (Schreiber,
1973), has been found (Rieber, 1999) to have
been
a manufactured iatrogenic case of multiple
person-
ality. Rieber (1999) discovered how easily
‘The fine
line between self-deception and deception of
others’
can be crossed when wanting to make a
dissociative
identity disorder case ‘no matter what’. Sybil
was
manufactured through hypnosis, pentothal and a
close emotional involvement between subject and
therapist. Using the subject’s given capacity
for suggestion,
false memories of sexual abuse were created and
the notion of multiple personality
implanted. Neurocase:
The Neural Basis of Cognition, A. A. T.
Simone Reinders. 28 May 2008,
Clearly, the history of DID and MPD show
unequivocally that false 'alters' and false memories
CAN easily be created under DID therapy and this is a
problem known by those who practice it. The
question is how often does confabulation occur and
who decides whether the patient's outpourings are
fact or fiction? Of course, in
normal psychiatry fact or fiction hardly matters,
because the psychiatrist does not look at what the
patient is saying, they look at WHY they are saying
it. Their outpourings are a symptom of
an underlying psychiatric malaise and therefore what
they say is not seen as an exact statement of
fact. For instance, if the patient is a teenager
and has repressed a history of childhood incest then
to avoid the extensive repercussions of admitting this
fact ( the resulting break-up of a family, the
prosecution of the father, the personal shame, the
harm to mother and siblings, etc) it is quite
likely that the patient might project the abuse onto
another imagined perpetrator, or create another
narrative blaming the abuse on unspecified evil
entities and Satanic mysteries.
There are many motives for many fantasies produced by
DID patients, not the least of which is continuing to
obtain continuous attention and care from the
psychiatrist or therapist with whom the patient has
enjoyed a transferrence.
History
proves that false 'alters' and false memories CAN
easily be created under DID therapy and this
problem is known by those who practice it.
The frequency of confabulation is open to debate but
statistics of cases derived through MPD / DID since
the late 1980s show clearly that in almost ALL of
those sensational SRA cases that came to court and
were tested the evidence gained through DID was
proven false or inaccurate - you can see
details of them in the time-line in the leftmost
column. This would suggest that if not all,
then the majority of DID/MPD stories are
confabulated. The SAFF has been tracking
the Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth for 32 years in
great detail. We can make the categoric
statement that despite thousands of DID indoctrinated
patients claiming to have suffered Satanic Abuse
not one case of claimed Satanic Ritual Child Abuse
has ever been prosecuted successfully through the
courts. Every single one of
them failed.
The real tragedy is that victims' accounts of
'normal' abuse can be checked and questioned for
situation, time, locality, paraphernalia, etc. but the
confabulated accusations of abuse under MPD / DID
cannot because they are infactual, and the truth is
that hundreds if not thousands of innocent men have
been incarcerated as a result of DID therapy because
their daughters confabulated untrue accusations about
imagined abuse during RMT sessions. The Carol
Myers (aka Felstead) case is a classic example
of how DID can not only put innocent people into
prison, but cause the death of patients.
By the 1980s, fictional accounts of MPD cases and
motion picture outpourings of schizophrenic crimes had
resulted in a cross-over between fact and fiction in
the popular mind. Confusion about
Schizophrenia, Multiple Personalities, and a lack of
understanding of the confabulation which invariably
occurs during hypnosis, mislead people and a few
psychiatrists who should have known better, to
believe that 'Alters' were a reflection of the
patients' subconscious when in fact they were an
invention of the patient's
subconscious.
Believers in
MPD held that 'Alters' were a reflection of the
patients' subconscious when in fact they were an
invention of the patient's subconscious.
Earlier in the 1970s, the spiritual revolution of the
'sixties' had developed into a wholesale melding of
fringe philosophical ideas, spirituality and self-help
during what was termed the Aquarian Age. A new
breed of 'psychologists' and 'therapists' were being
trained. A psychiatrist is a trained
medical doctor but anyone can call themselves a
psychologist or therapist. Thus therapists who
had not been properly trained in Freudian Analysis
thought that these new 'Aquarian Age' techniques
( such as re-birthing, role-playing, recovered
memories, primal scream, and the use of
hypnotic trance, etc. ) were short-cuts to the
traditional and accepted method of Analysing patients.
Freudian Analysis is a gradual and minutely detailed
technique which could take years of weekly sessions to
uncover key neuroses in patients, but modern
life required a quick-fix and many therapists began
experimenting with questionable New Age techniques to
get it. Moreover many of the
new caucus of 'psychologists' and 'therapists' were in
fact Neo-Marxist feminists whose whole world was
coloured by the ideology of radical feminism.
Radical Feminists saw Freud's teachings as a
patriarchal system designed to blame and control women
so tried to transform it. MPD became their
weapon to do so.
Radical
feminism saw Sigmund Freud's system as patriarchal
and intent on perpetuating the control of women so
tried to transform it. MPD became their
weapon to do so.
In 1980 the book '
Michelle Remembers' was published, it was the
account of a relationship between Michelle Smith and
her psychiatrist Laurence Pazder (whom Smith later
married) which was an updated re-run of Sybil
but placed squarely in the context of SATANIC ritual
abuse. It was the first ever book to expose
the idea of Satanic Abuse to the public.
During Recovered Memory Therapy Smith
'remembered' minute details of repetitive abuse in a
Satanic Coven. This was the first time
that SRA had been mentioned in connection with
MPD. Earlier claimed MPD cases had not had
any Satanic content.
The book was highly successful, in part powered by the
intense media interest. It became the 'bible' of MPD
promoters in the Western World as it shot to success
'proving' they claimed, both the existence of Satanic
Ritual Child Abuse, and of the MPD syndrome. Nobody
mentioned Bridey Murphy then.
Michelle Remembers was arguably the main influencer
of the Satanic Panic in the U.S. and it was
then imported into the UK where the SRA hysteria hit
during 1989. When the hullabaloo had died
down researchers checked the facts in the book and
found them unverifiable.
Michelle
Remembers became the 'bible' of MPD believers
'proving' they claimed, both the existence of
Satanic Ritual Child Abuse, and of the MPD / DID
syndrome.
Why had Satanism suddenly
been injected into MPD / DID stories? The
first-wave feminists who campaigned for equality
between the genders had by the mid 1970s been replaced
by Radical Neo-Marxist feminists whose intent was to
portray all men as inherently abusive.
'[the radical feminists] platform throughout the
1980s was not the traditional class warfare but
the new politics of gender. This became translated
into a theory where men were substituted for the
capitalist ruling class as the oppressors with
women and children their captives. In this
world-vision sexual abuse was posited as a
universal means of control of women and children
as an induction into patriarchy, perpetuating the
evils of history which had been caused by the
violence of men poisoned by testosterone. '
Note well that the ancient stereotype of Satanism
perfectly symbolised all the RadFems'
complaints. A secret cult of evil men supposedly
sadistically abusing, raping and killing women and
children. As one leader of a UK rape crisis
centre said 'Satan is the ultimate Rapist'.
The fact that Satan is an anthropomorphic religious
Christian invention appeared irrelevant.
There was no proof of a global network
of abusing Satanists but that failed to register in
their prejudiced minds. So they set out to
invent one with the help of manic fundamentalist Christians
with whom they worked in close liaison during the
1980s to create the Satanic Panic beginning in
1987 and spanning most of the 1990s.
The fundamentalists wanted to scare nominal
Christians back into the fold, the Radical Marxist
Feminists were 'separatists'. They wanted to destroy
'patriarchy' ( masculine control of society) and
use imagined incidences of an epidemic of sexual abuse
to do it. Key to this was the numbers
game. Everyone knew that sexual abuse existed in
the shadows, the Radical Feminists wanted to
exaggerate the incidence of it and portray it as
omnipresent by making fraudulent claims that '1 in
3 children will be abused by their fathers'.
Obviously on the basis of an average progeny of 2.5
children per family this would mean that 50% of
fathers were abusers! Every other Dad was a
sexual criminal. they said! It was a bonkers
claim but SRA gave the Radical Feminists the
shock-value to get a national debate going on the
prevalence of sexual abuse, helped along by
money-grubbing child-protection charities such as the
NSPCC
who saw the scare as a new source of funding.
Courage to Heal, the start of Victimhood
In 1988: Ellen Bass and Laura Davis published their
controversial book 'Courage to Heal
A Guide for Women Survivors
of Child Sexual Abuse'. Which contains
many stories of how adult women have 'liberated'
themselves from unexplained unhappiness using
self-help techniques and also includes a
self-diagnosed case of a woman who recovered memories
of having been Satanically abused as a child.
The premiss of the book is that there
is an epidemic of childhood sexual abuse of girls
which has been repressed due to the trauma involved
and can be 'remembered' using New Age techniques.
It is one of the mainstays of those who believe in
DID / MPD and at the root of much of it. Courage
to Heal has been reprinted three times and many
academics and commentators accuse the book of creating
an avalanche of false-memories and wicked false
allegations.
'Courage
to Heal has been criticized for being used
primarily by incompetent therapists,[3]
for creating in children false memories of abuse,[4]
as well as for its authors' lack of
qualifications[4][5]
for creating an industry which has isolated and
separated family members despite having no
positive proof the abuse occurred,[6]
and for destructively replacing individual
identities with that of a "survivor".[7]
Bass and Davis have also been criticized for
leaping to unwarranted, implausible conclusions
with significant consequences and for scientific
errors found in the first edition that were not
corrected in subsequent reprintings.[4]
Bass and Davis responded to the controversy
surrounding the book by writing "Honoring the
Truth: A Response to the Backlash", a new
chapter included the 1994 edition to respond to
and rebut criticisms of the book, though this
was removed from the 20th anniversary edition.[8]
' (source: Wikipedia)
Satan's Underground, final proof of the existence of
SRA?
In 1988, after Michelle
Remembers had percolated through into the
popular mind and Courage To Heal had set all
discontented women on a trajectory towards blaming
their parents for their under-achievement, the
compulsive liar and confidence trickster Rose Laurel
Wilson published 'Satan's Underground'
a horrific autobiography of how she supposedly was
repetitively sexually abused and tortured by murderous
child-killing Satanists. Wilson used the
pseudonym Lauren Stratford to write her
book. There was no psychiatric intention in
Wilson's book and she had no feminist
pretensions, but it became a best-seller.
Satan's Underground was what both the fundies
and the feminists had been looking for for a
decade; 'first hand proof' of the existence of a
pan-global network of child-abusing Satanists!
Actually it was all lies.
Bob and Gretchen Pasantino, two journalists
working at the Christian Cornerstone magazine
investigated Wilson's claims and found them to be
utterly false in
every respect.
She had not been abused.
She had not known any Satanists.
Her story was entirely fabricated.
They wrote a now famous article which totally
undermined the book.
So much so that Wilson's publishers withdrew Satan's
Underground from sale.
Even so Satan's Underground is
still included in SRA bibliographies as though real;
Currently Google Books still has it billed
as:
' an
incredible true story of mind control,
pornography, sexual abuse, ritualistic abuse,
and Satan worship.'
Even though the publisher voluntarily withdrew it
from sale because of the harmful lies it contained!
Wilson's Satan's Underground was incredible
because it was untrue in every respect, yet millions
still believe it had a grain of truth because that is
what they want to believe. The old
tabloid axiom comes true again 'tell them what
they want to hear'.
Wilson did a runner to avoid the Pasantino's
enquiries. She was later discovered using the assumed
Jewish name Lisa Grabowski, pretending to be
a WWII child Holocaust survivor from Auschwitz, "Wilson
collected thousands of dollars in donations
intended for Holocaust survivors. As Grabowski,"
those people who had pinned their
colours to the mast by giving Satan's Underground
credence to support the lie of SRA, looked the other
way and still refuse to see the truth.
Although claimed by DID /
MPD therapists as proof of their own contentions
it is important to remember that Wilson's book
was not connected in any way with DID therapy;
Satan's Underground was just out and out
fabrication by a compulsive fundamentalist liar
who knew how to manipulate the minds of gullible
people. What it is proof of is how easily DID/
MPD therapists can be mislead into believing
nonsense.
A year later a similar Satan book was
published in Britain which fanned the flames of belief
in non-existent SRA, titled 'Dance
With The Devil'.
The Author, Audrey Harper, a British fundamentalist
Christian had, like Wilson, not undergone any MPD
therapy but she had been exorcised numerous
times. She was part of a campaigning Christian
group which backed the new Satan Scare (Reachout
Trust). She told horrible tales
of a baby being slaughtered and its blood drunk by a
coven of Witches. When the details were
checked it turned out to be another pack of
Sectarian Lies.
Yes, dear reader, MPD / DID was not simply
over-diagnosed by overly enthusiastic 'therapists', it
also opened up opportunities for the Christian
Fundamentalist circuit, a major feature of which is
the Exorcism of sinful devils from women who are
brought to the churches for healing and
conversion. Audrey Harper herself
underwent many full blown exorcisms after joining
several fundamentalist churches and later wrote a book
recommending it titled 'Deliverance Means Love'.
The profile of people looking to Christian
churches for help to cope with life is an almost
cookie-cutter copy of those who seek help from
psychologists and therapists. They are often
one in the same. Harper had been a
dead-beat, addict and drug-pushing prostitute when
young. In later life she tried to escape her
seedy past and turned to God to help her do it.
The church blamed her dissolute early life on Satan
and it was a good enough excuse for many.
Exorcism, the early form of MPD
Many
of the women now saddled with a diagnosis of MPD / DID
have actually been 'trained' in it by Churches and
gone through exorcisms BEFORE they are passed on to
MPD therapists. DID is in fact nothing more
than a secularised form of Exorcism. Just
as fundamentalists blame the Devil for corrupting a
Soul, so do therapists using DID blame the Devil's
associates (Satanists) for corrupting a patient's
mental state with sexual and physical abuse.
An exorcism involves the calling forth of devils,
which are nothing other than the 'Alters' of DID
therapists. The 'devils' are then exorcised through
dramatic and emotional religious ceremonies where the
person being exorcised confesses their past sins and
identifies the devils (Alters) who made them do
it. Such as The Demon of Lust, The Demon of
Drink, etc. In DID therapy the process is
exactly the same, rituals of emotional catharsis such
as 're-birthing', or 'reverse remembering' are used. You
can see one happening here. Both Exorcism
and DID put the parishoner/patient into a kind of
trance. Often there are multiple devils to be
exorcised just as there are multiple Identities
discovered in MPD. Ultimately DID is
nothing more than superstition clothed in
pseudo-psychiatry.
Ultimately
MPD/DID is nothing more than superstition, in
psychiatry.
Doreen Irvine who wrote From
Witchcraft to Christ, an early polemic
against Paganism and Witchcraft published her book in
1973 ( which did not, by the way, mention Satanic
Abuse because it had not then been invented). Irvine
was exorcised many times over a period of some weeks
and claimed that 88 Devils (Alters) were cast out of
her by Pastor Arthur Neill of the Yate Christian
centre in Bristol, before she was 'cured' of
Witchcraft. Disconnected from the
sectarian world most medical professionals have
absolutely no idea of how prevalent Exorcism
actually is in the self-help world of DIY therapy.
With the help of irresponsible and unwise
programs from the BBC Exorcism has
had a massive resurgence in the last few
decades.
- Exorcisms are regularly held in Pentecostal and
house-churches throughout the land.
- The Church of England and Catholic
Churches have trained Exorcists for use on
demand.
- The Witch-Children
scare of 2006 was created by thousands
of children being abused in church exorcism
ceremonies. Some were actually killed.
- On 3 November 2011 The Archbishop of York,
Sentamu, made a public demand for Exorcisms to be
paid for by the NHS!
- In 2014 the Vatican, with the support of pope
Francis, held an exorcism training seminar for 200
Priests.
- The SAFF regularly collates cases of exorcism
which have gone wrong and harmed or killed people.
There are hundreds of them.
Anyone who assumes exorcism is consigned to mediaeval
history needs to think again. The MPD / DID caucus
and the army of Christian 'counsellors' work together
because, of course, The Devil and 'Satan' are
synonymous. The hosting of academic papers on the
use of Exorcism (termed Spirit Releasement) in the Royal
College of Psychiatry website is proof positive
that psychiatry is being pushed back into mediaevalism.
How MPD eventually created so many
problems it was repackaged as DID
With an understanding of how easily the human mind
can confabulate things like 88 Devils and 100
'Alters', the lessons of the detailed fantasies of
non-existent Bridey Murphy, the ease with which
professionals can be taken-in to create the Sybil
myth, the corrupt lies of frauds like Laurel
Rose Wilson, and the way the Media successfully
dramatises and pushes prurient public interest in MPD
/ DID, the reliance on MPD as a 'real'
psychological syndrome is obviously very much in
question, yet it is such a money-making device that
more and more DID 'therapists' are jumping on the
bandwagon and teaching the method to other health
workers so that it is becoming a kind of pyramid
selling scheme - a dangerous bandwagon which is
growing exponentially.
The explosion of people wrongly diagnosed with MPD in
the 1980s and the failure of ALL of the 21 claimed SRA
cases in Britain in the 1990s, most of which resulted
from fantasies generated during MPD sessions, made MPD
a watch-word for Snake-Oil Psychiatry. So bad
was its reputation that MPD therapists had to arrange
a PR switcheroo and began using the term DID
instead of MPD. So after 1990 you will rarely
hear the acronym MPD but whenever you hear DID it is
without doubt THE SAME THING.
After
1990 you will rarely hear the acronym MPD but it
is exactly the same thing as DID.
DID is Dissociative Identity Disorder, but it
means exactly the same as Multiple Personality
Disorder. The term
'dissociation', is fundamental to the established
syndrome of schizophrenia. As the name indicates,
schizophrenia causes a split-personality where the
mind appears to involve two personalities or aspects
of the Self. It is a form of introspection where
the 'good' mind blames the bad mind for its own
negative actions. It is a way for the Id to come
to terms with one's conscience and escape the guilt
which is a corrosive aspect of all mental illnesses,
and it is a way for a psychotic mind to pretend to be
'normal' whilst leaving the split side of the
personality comits acts which it knows are wrong so
that it can live with itself afterwards. The
'bad' mind serves as an outlet for release of
psychopathic episodes which are normally repressed by
the 'good' mind.
The word schizophrenia was coined by Eugen
Blueler and is from the Latin, meaning literally Split
Mind ( Schizo + Phrenia) 'split' + 'mind' Thus
schizophrenia involves TWO personalities,
(split-personality) because that is all the mind
requires to offset it's abnormal perspectives. This
is why the original term used by promoters of MPD
when it hi-jacked Schizoprenia was MULTIPLE
Personality Disorder. They took the
accepted psychiatric framework of split-personality
(schizophrenia) and made the radical assertion that
patients could have MULTIPLE personalities instead
of the two Bleuler had originally theorised.
This radical, unproven extension of the syndrome of
schizophrenia which its discoverer Blueler never
accepted or intended, has been foisted on the rest of
the medical fraternity. Most mainstream
psychiatrists repudiate the DID sydrome and so it is
the crusade of all DID therapists to establish it as
true regardless of history and regardless of the
facts.
As we have seen patients can easily fantisise
multiple pseudo personalities but the actual
psychological mechanism of schizophrenia remains
dualistic. A conflict between what the patient's mind
sees as good and evil within him/herself.
MPD therapists made the crucial error of believing
that each of their patients' imagined 'Alters' was
actually a different part of the mind, a kind of
memory bank that was holding and hiding factual
experiences the patient had actually undergone from
the everyday personality of the patient.
Not a mistake any psychiatrist versed in schizophrenia
would ever do. Conflicts between the split
personality are due to repressions, not memories.
These MPD
therapists did a very similar switcheroo with false
accusations of SRA. During 1988-1991 they spoke
ONLY of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse. When
the first UK SRA case occurred in Nottingham in 1988
they declared it to be SATANIC and then named every
other case as SATANIC until 1991 when the false
Rochdale SRA case tipped the sentiments of the public
and media against them. When the extent of the
stupidity, foolishness and plots to incriminate
innocent families were known during the collapse of
the Rochdale
Satanic Ritual Child Abuse case, the media
turned on the therapists and social workers involved.
Public inquiries castigated those who foolishly
believed in SRA and MPD was blamed for producing false
memories in small children and adults.
From then on for about 8 years no SRA believer ever
used the word 'SATAN'. It was verboten within
the therapy lobby. Instead they switched to
using the term Ritual Abuse. The full
definition of 'Ritual Abuse' given by RAINS to
the SAFF in correspondence in 1996 was:
'The Systematic physical, sexual and emotional
abuse supported by rituals or symbols with or
without a religious or occult ideology.'
NO mention of Satanism at all! Yet they're
still chasing Satanic Abusers today 24 years later, as
we will show below and you will clearly see from the
unique Timeline in the leftmost column that DID is
simply a repackaged and rehabilitated MPD with all
it's earlier excesses!
When these DID Satan Hunters are talking to patients
confabulating fantasies, or their friends in the
fundamentalist network about abuse, they refer without
question to 'Satanic Ritual Abuse, but when
talking to mainstream psychiatrists and the media
generally they avoid using the 'S' word because of the
mistakes of the 1990s. They talk instead
of 'Sadistic Abuse', 'trigger words', 'mind control'
'post traumatic stress' and infer that 'paedophiles
use bizarre occult symbols and paraphernalia to
frighten children into compliance' but they
avoid using the word Satan. Now you see
it, now you don't. After a few years, when the
public's memory has waned, they started to push the
'Satanic boat' out again. You can see it in the
timeline and you can see it outlined below. They
have done this so cleverly that many of the therapists
who have taken up DID as a method are ignorant of the
fact that mad claims of Satanic Abuse are at the root
of it. In short the ludicrious idea of a
pan-global network of Sadistic Satanic Abusers is
central to the promotion of DID and one of the MAIN
intentions of the fundie-feminist axis within current
MPD / DID therapy is to establish the idea that
Satanic Ritual Abuse exists.
The MAIN
intention of MPD/DID therapy is not primarily to
to cause patients to recover, but to establish the
idea that Satanic Ritual Abuse exists.
Why is this? Why would such a nonsensical idea
as Satanic Abuse be insisted upon by erstwhile
intelligent people? Because these DID
therapists are being driven by the fears and
fantasies of their patients. Question any
group of humans, adults or children, and the
fundamental phobias of life will be present.
Instinctive fears of snakes (Ophidiophobia), being
buried alive (Taphophobia), fear of death
(Thanatophobia), fear of giving birth (Tokophobia),
fears of being injected (Belonophobia), Fear of
Spiders (Arachnophobia), fear of caves,tunnels
(Claustrophobia), fear of cemeteries and graveyards
(Coimetrophobia), Fear of spilled blood (Hemophobia),
all these
instinctive fears are within adults and
children. When asked to concentrate on these things by
a social worker or therapist they loom large and the
scenario which allows full, unrestricted reign to the
outpouring of these fears are the spooky images of
horror which fairy stories implant in children and
which the Churches indoctrinate into them with
tales of the devil and which the media make a reality
on the screen and in fictional books and horror
stories. That is why all these phobias and
more are present in almost every single diagnosed
case of SRA (see SAFF's Satanic
Footprint here).
Rumplestiltschin = Abduction and killing of
children from mothers cribs by an ugly demon.
Hansel & Gretel = A Witch imprisons two
children in cages and prepares them for Sacrifice
after which she proposes to eat their flesh.
Pied Piper of Hamelin = Children groomed by
enchanted music to leave their parents and follow the
piper into the woods, forever to be lost or killed.
King of the Golden Mountain = An evil dwarf
tricks a man to give up his son in exchange for
illusory riches. The outcast son goes on a series of
harrowing adventures involving a snake, a princess and
a magic ring.
Little Red Riding Hood = Evil disgusing
itself using robes and hoods in order to kill and eat
a young girl.
There were many early folklorists who noted their
respective nation's folk-stories but since the Grimm
brothers popularised their collection of German Fairy
Stories in the minds of the populace with their books
aimed for the general adult market in 1812,
the Media have mined them for a host of popular
children's films, plays and books. The original
Grimm Stories were compiled by the brothers from
spoken history and were often brutal and horrific
tales of hobgoblins, ghosts, shape-shifting,
werewolves and the supernatural which no child would
be shown today, yet the Media sanitised these and kept
the memes in the minds of the young.
The scenario
which allows full reign to the emergence of these
fears are the spooky images of horror and
supernatural which fairy stories implant in
children and which the Churches then activate in
their teachings of the devil which the media make
a 'reality' on the screen.
DID is a money-making bandwagon to keep the new
generation of therapists lucratively busy at
taxpayers' expense.
DID is a fantastic opportunity for the mental health
industry. Because there is no real
definition of DID it is a catch-all diagnosis for
ANYONE who falls into the clutches of DID
therapists. I have yet to meet or hear of a
person who has been told to go away because they
don't have DID! The confirmation rate must
be 99.9%. Higher than any other illness pro-rata per
capita of the population.
Governments in the West have all backed the idea of
mental health and the UK government is pouring money
into all kinds of therapies, including DID. An
hour's DID therapy will cost you about £200.00, though
most therapists fleece the taxpayer by getting the NHS
to pay for it. The therapist may spend an hour
with you and another half hour or so writing up
afterwards. They can get through four to five sessions
in a day easily. That's £1,000.00 a day, £5,000
a week, over £200,000 per year. This does
not of course include extra income from writing books
or articles for magazines, attending and speaking at
DID workshops, being a special advisor to the police
or social services on cases, all of which are highly
paid (£450.00 per 'expert' letter).
What's not to like? They're not helping you for the
good of your health are they?
I have yet
to hear of a MPD therapist telling a patient to go
away because they don't have DID!
But why is the British Government and the General
Medical Council and the Royal College of
Psychiatry supporting this nonsense when the
history of this illegitimate daughter of Schizophrenia
has ALREADY been discredited historically and most
recently in the US? The situation in North
America is even clearer and rapidly turned against DID
therapy as you can see from this extract:
"Academics and clinicians in the
fields of psychiatry, psychology and psychotherapy
clashed over the validity of recovered memories and
the diagnoses of MPD and DID. Researchers (such as
Paul McHugh and Robert Sapolsky) likened the
conflict to a civil war, reminiscent of the “memory
wars” over false versus recovered memories.
But the deciding battles were
fought in the US law courts in the mid to late
1990s. People claiming they had been falsely
accused, and former patients claiming their memories
and diagnoses of MPD and DID were induced in therapy
began to sue the therapists and the hospitals. In
a series of high profile medical malpractice cases
millions of dollars were awarded by juries or won
in settlements paid out by insurance companies.
Licensing boards revoked or restricted the
licences to practise of some of the main advocates
of recovered memory therapy and proponents of
MPD/DID.
As a result, in north America,
the recovered memory movement and the diagnoses of
MPD and DID were abruptly reduced and by the end
of the 1990s a majority of published academic
papers were sceptical about the scientific
validity of DID. In a commentary
published in the journal Current Psychiatry
in September 2009, Numan Gharaibeh, a staff
psychiatrist at Danbury Hospital Danbury,
Connecticut, called for DID to be removed from
DSM-5. He cited a 1999 survey of 301 US
psychiatrists by Harrison Pope and colleagues about
their attitudes toward DSM-IV dissociative disorders
diagnoses: only 35% had no reservations about DID as
a diagnosis; 43% felt that it should be included
only with reservations (e.g., only as a ‘proposed
diagnosis’); 15% indicated that the diagnosis should
not be included in the DSM at all. In response to a
question regarding the status of the evidence in
support of the diagnosis, only 21% believed there
was strong evidence for DID’s scientific validity.
Gharaibeh wrote: “On balance, published papers
appear sceptical about DID’s core components:
dissociative amnesia and recovered-memory
therapy”. In 2006 Pope and colleagues published an
analysis of academic publications associated with
DID and dissociation from 1984 to 2003 which
showed a sharp peak in articles in the late 1990s
followed by a steep decline."
Source: The Woman Who Had 48
Personalities in The New Scientist (Sept
2013).
Clearly, the experience of the 1990s stigmatised DID
and MPD as not only unproven, but actually
harmful to patients, so why is the RCP
still supporting it?
In Britain the tracking of false memories created during
DID / MPD therapy has been done by the august British
False Memory Society (BFMS) a group of
psychiatrists and academics specialising in the human
mind which has for decades analysed, criticised and
validated or discredited various false ideas about the
memory and how it works. Their website (www.bfms.org.uk)
is
replete with scientific research, lectures and case
histories of how DID has CAUSED trauma in thousands of
patients. Professor Christopher French wrote
in an
article originally carried in the Guardian
newspaper on 18 November 2014:
"As I have written in the past in these pages,
the use of various dubious techniques by
therapists and counsellors aimed at recovering
allegedly repressed memories of childhood sexual
abuse can often produce detailed and horrific
false memories. In fact, there is a
consensus among scientists studying memory that
traumatic events are more likely to be remembered
than forgotten, often leading to post traumatic
stress disorder."
The corollary of what Professor French is saying is
that false memories created during DID sessions
create Post Traumatic Stress disorder in those
patients. The old axiom proves
true again; The true meaning of a thing always
resides in its opposite. DID therapists tell
their patients that Sadistic Sexual Abuse causes
post-traumatic stress disorder and DID uncovers it, whereas
in reality DID creates post-traumatic stress
disorder in the patient
Do-It-Yourself DID
You don't need a psychiatrist to sell someone DID
therapy, in fact Colin Ross, one of the front-runners
who has popularised DID for decades, promoted a 'Self-Declared
DID questionnaire'. This is a tick-box
questionnaire which the patient uses to 'diagnose' their
own DID! (see right) You can sit at home
and discover you've been Satanically abused!
The questionnaire is a travesty of science,
including false positives and sections which would
probably diagnose every single person in the world with
DID if taken seriously. It is no more
scientific than the interminable 'Answer these 20
questions to see if you are attractive to the opposite
sex' questionnaires in the Weekend Supplements.
For instance, one of the most frequent human
happenings which almost everyone will experience at
some time or another is Deja-vu, ( the impression that
one has been in that same place before or heard a
person saying what they just said before) , you can
probably remember having an experience like this
yourself. In the Ross Self Declared DID
questionnaire' Deja-vu is a sign that you have
DID!
And there are dozens more.
You can't escape it!
At £200.00 a session.
DID by its very method creates false memories in
those treated with it.
In a presentation at Goldsmith's University of London
in March 2013
Professor Elizabeth Loftus said numerous
experiments and research conducted by herself and
others over 40 years showed about 30% of people were
susceptible to false memories. In one of these
now famous experiments Loftus persuaded subjects to
believe that they had met Bugs Bunny on a visit to
Disneyland, an impossibility considering Bugs is a
Warner Brothers Cartoon Character, not a Disney
one. Switch Bugs Bunny for Satan and
Disneyland for a Satanic Temple and you have the
source of the consistent fantasies produced
predominantly by DID patients.
A good illustration of what can go wrong when DID is
diagnosed can be seen in the terrible case of Roma
Hart a woman who, going by her own legal sworn
affidavit was tortured by her DID therapist using
drugs and other methods which have a striking
resemblance to similar tales coming out of other DID
therapists' consulting rooms about Satanic
Abuse. Are these tales simply a
projection onto imagined Satanists of the DID
therapy being imposed on the patient?
Judge for yourself in Roma
Hart's story in the leftmost column here:
Satan Hunters get in on the act
Not long after Colin Ross's DID questionnaire became
'fashionable' with MPD/DID therapists a version of it
was used by RANS (Ritual Abuse Network Scotland)
in conjunction with Dundee University to
distance-diagnose Satanic Ritual Abuse.
RANS have a long history of making false claims about
SRA and network with loony US outfits who underpinned
the Qanon phenomenon. See here for
background. A key worker at RANS, Joseph
Lumbasi, headed an 'experiment' which collated
and 'analysed' hundreds of DSM5 type
questionnaires sent out to people already known to
believe themselves to have been Satanically abused.
You get the gist? The utter
bankruptcy of such junk-science can be seen when you
realise that the questionnaire wasn't distributed
across a population but only given to people who
already believed that they had been
Satanically Abused.
Lumbasi's DSM5 type DID questionnaire was doing just
one thing; officially CONFIRMING the false beliefs of
schizophrenics about SRA and adding more corrupted
data to underpin the fundamentally false premiss of
DID, that SRA exists if patients exist
who say they've been abused by Satanists.
We will no doubt see the forgone 'results'
touted at the continuing Satan Seminars these people
use to network 'new evidence' to back up their
nonsensical ideas.
A classic illustration of how mentally ill patients were
brainwashed into accepting memories of Satanic Ritual
Abuse by their therapists is outlined in the case
of Roma Hart which we give in detail in
the leftmost column. It makes horrifying reading,
to think that there may be literally thousands of people
like Roma Hart who have been 'treated' by DID therapy at
the taxpayers' expense. Yes dear reader, your tax
money has been co-opted into persecuting mentally ill
patients.
These deceits are just one arm of the DID
industry, in what has become one of the most
lucrative and fast expanding sections of the mental
health field. Is this why the Royal
College of Psychiatry is backing it?
'Therapists' with Micky-Mouse qualifications are being
churned out by the thousands. From Diplomas on Baby
Massage to honours in Culinary Medicine and
'qualifications' in using crystals to heal. The
RCP appears to have given up trying to keep proper
control of this avalanche of junk-science.
Follow the money! The august Royal
College of Psychiatrists was supposed to act as
mediator to protect the public from unscrupulous
therapy but is in fact backing it. Not only has
it accepted DID as a real syndrome (even though it is,
as we have amply shown, unproven) but the RCP
library contains papers written by DID fanatics on
EXORCISM.
Shameful Exorcism From The RCP
Yes
folks, there is actually a paper on how Demons and
Angels are archetypal aspects of the Self, and
another on the therapeutic benefits of EXORCISM!
The RCP is a joke. It's as though all
scientific progress over several hundred years has
been thrown in the bin in favour of a cut-and-paste
DID therapy which has no substance, which is
incorrectly diagnosed and therefore has no hope of
cure for patients.
The case of Tara Tully of the ISSTD who exorcised a
patient who then stabbed herself in the throat to kill
the 'demons inside her'.
A classic example of this apparently common
acceptance of the use of 'spiritual cleansing' or
'demon revocation' (i.e. EXORCISM) occurred with an
ISSTD member and influential DID therapist who was
struck off in October 2020 for exorcising her DID
patients.
Tara Tulley is a licensed clinical social worker and
midwife located in Arizona and member of the
International Society for the Study of Trauma and
Dissociation (ISSTD) who claims to be a
survivor of Satanic ritual abuse, with Satanic symbols
burned onto her uterus. No talk of
mambey pambey Ritual Abuse here, like many in the
ISSTD Tulley is a full blown no-holds barred
fundamentalist DID practitioner who believes in a
pan-global satanic conspiracy to abuse and kill
children and indoctrinates her vulnerable patients
with those horrors. Grey Faction's
biography here
makes the details of her irrational beliefs very
clear. The official letter cancelling her licence is
even more stark:
CONCLUSION
Your pattern of using demon and chant
revocations with an extremely vulnerable DID
patient group shows a genuine lack of
judgement and awareness on your part that
supports a conclusion that the best interests
of the public are not served by renewing your
licence as an LCSW in the state of Utah.
This reckless and dangerous form of therapy,
which is not based on recognised knowledge
relevant to social work, created confusion,
anxiety and fear in a number of your clients.
In one especially alarming case, one of your
patients started stabbing her throat because
she believed she had demons in her throat
after going through demon revocation sessions
with you.
|
To any specialist versed in the appallingly
destructive history of Exorcism, the Tulley case was
not exceptional, it was predictable. In
our paper on Exorcism
the SAFF covered the Gawber Exorcism. In 1974
church evangelists from Gawber, a village just south
of the City of Wakefield, spent days exorcising a
mentally vulnerable man. Pronounced 'cured' he
was sent home and promptly saw his wife as a demon
sent to attack him and killed her by
clawing at her throat until she bled to death.
The subsequent inquest pronounced that her murder
was a direct result of the exorcism. Public
outcry was so great that the Church of England brought
in new rules banning exorcism except through a small
number of CofE sanctioned and trained exorcists.
Yet even with these clear examples of the
dangers of DID, (and there are plenty of other
terrible cases shown on our webpage)
today the Royal College of
Psychiatrists have still not
yet removed the papers enthusiastically supporting
'spirit easement' using DID from their library,
even though the SAFF have brought this problem to
their attention several times!
Why? Follow the money!
How DID, an unproven and unnecessary syndrome,
fleeces the taxpayer to the tune of £60 million a
year.
The world of psychiatry is a relatively small place and in
the UK the centre of it is in London - King's College,
The Maudsley, The Institute of Psychiatry,
the Tavistock Clinic, The Institute of
Dissociative Studies, The ISSTD (International
Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation) ESTDUK
and the Bowlby Centre.
There are approximately 300 key players in the promotion
of DID all networked within and without these
organisations. There are appoximately 1,500
supporters and promoters of DID known in the Western
world.
If each of the 300 key players has four patients a day
that is nearly half a million ill-people being
persecuted by a syndrome that is totally
unproven.
The crucial thing is this.
DID does not offer a cure.
It does not offer a resolution of the patient's
illness.
It can only offer permanent chronic lifelong
treatment.
The cost of that treatment to taxpayers is estimated at
over £1.2M per week which amounts to over £62M per
year!
Psychiatric gobbledegook certainly pays doesn't it?
And does that go some way to explaining why the Royal
College of Psychiatry dare not tell the truth about
how useless DID really is? At a time when
stupid politicians have earmarked 'mental health' as the
new growth service economy Psychiatric Voodoo has become
BIG business.
This does not even begin to unearth the real problem which
is that the malpractice of offering DID, a worthless
psychiatric method, is being used in place of other
more orthodox techniques which might actually work to
help the patient but which are considerably costlier to
the State. Yet the bean-counters in the NHS
have it wrong again. Psychiatry at least has an
end-point where care drops back into an 'idling' cost;
but once diagnosed as having DID, those patients are
locked into a permanent and continuing therapy with no
hope of escape from life-long medical intervention and
continuous expensive medication.
The real problem is the
malpractice of using a worthless psychiatric
method in place of more orthodox techniques which
might actually work to help the patient.
The originators of DID and it's professional body
the ISSTD have questions to answer.
Mike Salter appears proud of his involvement with
the ISSTD but I haven't heard him discuss this:
'One of the founders of the ISSTD was
Psychiatrist Bennett Braun, M.D., who recently
(2000) had to surrender his medical license in
Illinois. He pressured
one of his patients into believing she was
the high priestess of a huge Satanic cult.
Then he insisted that as head witch, her job
duties included the regular consumption of
babies during supernatural rituals.'
http://www.stopbadtherapy.com/experts/junk.shtml
Speak to most DID therapists and they will have
no idea of how Bennett Braun fell from grace, the
founder of their movement is still held in high
regard and his early writings/books are still
recommended to new DID devotees.
Neither have we seen Salter explain the actions of
another key DID promoter, Tara Tulley who put her DID
patient through exorcism rituals. (see above).
The latest scandal to hit the ISSTD was in November
2019 when its vice-president and long-time promoter
Ono van der Hart, who had written several seminal
works which expanded on the DID theory, to train-up
new DID therapists, was struck off the
Netherlands' Psychotherapy list for malpractice for
life. The full extent of the free-style
therapy breaches by Hart is outlined here: http://saff.nfshost.com/disciplinaryhealthcourtrulingagainsonovanderhart.pdf
and are considerable.
Ironically when Mike
Salter later gave an interview to a dutch organisation
which promotes the idea of DID related to Satanic
Ritual Abuse in 2021 he was not asked about the errors
of Hart, who had manipulated one patient's mind for
21 years, nor did Salter volunteer
information about this ISSTD scandal, instead he
attacked the British False Memory society for
'harming' children by maintaining the professional
view which is current amongst the majority of
psychiatrists, that recovered memories are almost
entirely fabricated, often by the bias of the DID
therapists themselves. Here is that
interview: http://saff.nfshost.com/mikesalterdutchinterview2021falsememoryattack.mp4
The caucus of people intent on establishing the MPD /
DID syndrome in psychiatry are almost universally
believers in the equally as disproven idea of Satanic
Ritual Abuse. As we have explained above
MPD was the method used to infect patient's minds with the
idea of SRA through leading questioning during MPD
sessions where almost exclusively 'hidden memories' of
abuse by Satanists resurfaced in the patient. This
statement is so obvious as to not bear repeating but
ordinary folk tend to think that intelligent people within
medicine are mostly scientific minded and work on the
strict establishment of fact. This is often untrue
and the case of Russell Black and Stuart
Checkley is a good example of why the judgement of
not all doctors should be trusted all the time.
Links between the Institute of
Psychiatry, Maudsley and the Christian Association of
Psychiatrists.
In the 1990s Black and Checkley were leaders of the Christian
Association of Psychiatrists, a network of activist
Christian evangelists within psychiatry and therapy who
believed that demons and devils could possess
people's minds and cause symptoms which could be
mistaken for psychiatric illnesses. Yes,
I know, anyone who thought that this idea might be
considered to be an enemy of science will be astounded,
but they got away with it. The instigation of a
belief in demons as precursor of insanity is of course a
mediaeval religious concept and has absolutely nothing
whatsoever to do with modern medical science. It
should be shunned, yet members of the Christian
Association of Psychiatrists not only believed that
was the case but actually interfered with some
patients' orthodox NHS treatment standing by and
exorcising some ill people in their hospital beds!
Members of
the Christian Association of Psychiatrists
actually interfered with patients' orthodox
NHS treatment by exorcising some people in
their hospital beds
As far back as
1991 the SAFF had exposed the cadre of Christian
evangelical Psychiatrists who were trying to revivify
mediaeval concepts of demonology and insert them into the
mental health system. We wrote officially to the General
Medical Council, (GMC) and began a campaign to alert
Medicine to the dangers. The GMC did not deny that
unofficial exorcisms were taking place because we sent
them a file of articles and documents which categorically
proved it, but they still refused to take action.
They concluded that the religious beliefs of their doctors
was beyond their control. We had of course not asked
the GMC to stop doctors from believing in Christianity, we
had asked them to stop them forcing EXORCISM on ill people
instead of orthodox medicine, as it could be making their
illness worse. By becoming protectionist when
provided with evidence of wrong-doing the GMC is
therefore directly responsible for the development
within psychiatry of the barmy idea of MPD.
First Ever Satan Seminar held by Blacker and Checkley.
In case you don't immediately see the dangers we point out
that Russel Blacker and Stuart Checkley, who then
worked at the Maudsley Hospital, were key players
in starting the 1990 Satanic Panic when they organised the
FIRST ever UK conference on Satanic Abuse at the
Royal Society of Medicine rooms in London in April
1989.
150 delegates attended that conference on Satanic Ritual
Abuse, including many other members of the Christian
Association of Psychiatrists and some key
players in the SRA myth who are now largely forgotten but
who were instrumental in hyping Satanic Abuse without any
real evidence, such as Maureen Davies, the director of Reachout
Trust, a fundamentalist group which had set
itself up to attack Alternative Beliefs and who made the
most disgusting false allegations against non-Christian
religions; and Dianne Core, the leader of Childwatch
and aide-de-camp to Geoffrey Dickens MP, who
eventually ended up making the astonishing claiming that
4,000 children A YEAR were
sacrificed to the Devil in the UK alone. In the
intervening 32 years they haven't been able to find just
ONE example of that ever happening but that's what these
people claimed then and backed by 'specialists' with a
high and respected position within the medical
fraternity they were believed. National
newspaper reports of the The Blacker/Checkley Satan
Seminar was pivotal to belief in SRA in the UK and a
precursor to the 1990 Satanic Panic which did so much to
create the tsunami of false-accusations which have reached
epidemic proportions today.
Where were they getting these barmy stories from in
1989?
From the patients they had used MPD / DID on!
That's right folks, under the guise of 'counselling' (a
precursor to exorcism) their twisted evangelical ideas
of demons and devils infecting the body was being
reinterpreted as hidden satanic memories which were
being unearthed during recovered memory sessions run by
people utterly sold on the idea that Satan existed and
who had an urgent inner need to find him/it.
Blacker and Checkley's 1989 Satan Seminar was a watershed
and caused massive nationwide publicity. One might
have thought that 'coming-out' like that would have
damaged their careers in medicine but nothing could be
further from the truth. For many years until
the mid-2000s Checkley was the director of the Institute
of Psychiatry. The IOP is now one of
the key players in trying to establish the idea of MPD/DID
as an official psychiatric syndrome, indeed all the
players mentioned in this article either work at the IOP
or are closely allied to it and its research.
Checkley and Blacker's loony
opinions on the existence of SRA popped up in various
articles and books published during the 1990s to promote
the false idea of SRA.
Tim Tate's book Children
For The Devil. includes input from them both
and Andrew Boyd's book Blasphemous Rumours also
quoted them. Whenever anyone mentioned psychiatry or
therapy linked to cases of SRA in those days it would
almost always source back to these two psychiatrists as an
'authoritative source'.
Ironically Children for the Devil was
withdrawn and pulped due to libellous inaccuracies a few
months after publication but even worse happened
with Beyond
Belief a Channel 4 TV programme by Andrew
Boyd, in 1991. Boyd, a fundamentalist
Christian, based his TV documentary squarely on his
Blasphemous Rumours book. It turned out to be one
of the biggest hoaxes of the 20th century and was roundly
castigated as untrue.
Indeed the main 'witness' to the existence of Satanic
Abuse in his Beyond Belief programme was exposed
within days as a mentally unstable woman who had been
given 'counselling' at Ellel Grange, a Christian
deliverance ministry group (i.e. EXORCISM) near Preston,
Lancs. Jennifer had been programmed with false SRA claims
in counselling sessions. Ellel worked with the
Reachout Trust and other evangelical organisations who
promoted the idea of SRA. It was Ellel Grange which passed
'Jennifer' to Boyd who exploited her for his programme.
Thus here we have incontrovertible proof of how
DID/MPD is used to create false memories by the very
fundamentalist circuit set up to cycle them around and
maximise the shock-horror so it could be injected into the
mainstream as 'evidence' of SRA. This is not
medicine, it is an Inquisition.
As the news report ( right ) shows Checkley appeared
to SUBORDINATE orthodox psychiatry to his own Christian
world-view - patients whom orthodox psychiatry fails, he
says, can be cured by Christian exorcism! How this
person managed to stay in position with this superstitious
drivel is a wonder.
During
Checkley's tenure as head of the Institute of
Psychiatry (IOP) there were the first experimental
attempts to try to discover if the brain gave reliable
indications of psychoses. This involved the taping
of electrodes to the heads of patients, recorded on
electroencephalographs.
It all came to nought for brain-activity cannot be
consistently placed into areas of the brain because the
brain works in unison, not in isolation and different
areas work in tandem at different times in response to
varying interior and exterior stimuli. However it is an
interesting anomaly when comparing with the latest
witch-pricker from the IOP, the magnetic resonance
imaging of brains, which we shall expose below.
Stuart Checkley specialised in the impact of dreams and
visions on the brain and linked these to exorcisms (which
he thought therapeutic). He was active in Church
activities during his tenure at the IOP but after
retirement he committed himself to travelling around the
church-circuit lecturing Christians on dreams and exorcism
and the laying on of hands to heal!
We have no way of knowing how much
Checkley's own peculiar Christian world-view affected and
directed research at the Institute of Psychiatry
but we do know that he was an active evangelical.
According to Kher Cuhulain, a US historian of the SRA myth (August 1993) Checkley was one
of the authors of the fundamentalist Christian tract Doorways
To Danger, an infamous smear-sheet published by the
Evangelical Alliance in late 1987. You can see,
right, a photo of Checkley at the launch of Doorways To
Danger which appeared in Redemption Christian
Magazine January 1988, thirteen months before Checkley
held the first SRA Satan Seminar in rooms at the Royal
College of Medicine, announcing the existence of Satanic
Ritual Abuse. ' Checkley is the one on
the far right. The pamphlet was crammed full of
idiotic, irrational and manically religious claims about
supposed 'dangers' of the Occult, Witchcraft, Tarot,
Astrology and all the other hypersensitive fundie
targets. Redemption said:
'Seemingly innocent pastimes such as
horoscopes,Halloween celebrations, tarot cards, and
ouija boards are doorways to evil and destruction
according to a report by the Evangelical Alliance,
representing more than a million church-goers. Such
activities can be the first-step down an occult path
which may lead to mental, spiritual and physical
damage for growing numbers of people many of them
still at school. The report cites evidence
from leading psychiatrists, a former witch, and those
who have suffered serious harm as a result of
involvement with the occult. Doorways to Danger
cites chilling examples of people who have suffered
depression and even possession by evil spirits
following involvement with so-called harmless
entertainments. '
Sorry? Did I just hear that the Christian
Association of Psychiatrists were trying to convince
everyone that demons and evil spirits exist and can
possess the body? Well YES! Unbelievably,
these doctors and psychiatrists were doing just that and
nobody but the SAFF complained about it!
The 'former witch' mentioned in that paragraph was in fact
Audrey
Harper a crusading Christian who travelled to
lecture at churches throughout the UK and later in the
U.S.A. to make a number of wild unproven accusations about
her supposed time in a Witches coven in the 1960s.
In 1987 in Doorways to Danger the worst she could
invent was:
'She [Harper] witnessed real spiritual powers being
exercised by the witches as they cast spells. On one
occasion she witnessed the death by heart attack of a
previously healthy person who had been cursed. Death,
sacrifice and fear?’
In fact once the Satanic Ritual Abuse Scare had gained
traction Audrey upped her accusations to include claims of
being present at the ritual sacrifice of a new born
baby. However she had told the exact same tale a few
months previously to a newspaper in which it wasn't a baby
which was sacrificed but a Cockerel, she said. The changed
story caused uproar and the police investigated her
claims. They found no case to answer. The SAFF
analysed and completely undermined Audrey
Harper's Sectarian lies here.
The Redemption review goes on to say that Stuart Checkley
said
'I have seen someone who as a result of one
experiment with an ouija board, suffered frightening
experiences outside his control. '
Checkley does not elaborate on what experiences those
were, nor whether spirits or demons were involved but the
implication is that they were and indeed Doorways To
Danger is replete with similar insinuations like
these:
A 15-year—old boy who stood bolt upright in a
geography lesson, shouting at a spirit to get off his
shoulder—before he ran out of the classroom....
One child who told of how, after a ouija session in a
block of recreation park toilets, he was barred by a
spirit from leaving the building.
Now I hope you've understood what Checkley and the other
psychiatrists who contributed to Doorways to
Danger are saying here. They are insisting
that discarnate spiritual intelligences linked to the
Devil, exist and can possess people causing hysterical
trauma in the mind of humans. This goes
against ALL known scientific knowledge and contradicts
almost all established psychiatry.
Then Checkley himself says: ’Such things as ouija
boards and tarot cards can definitely harm.
They open up the mind to outside forces.’
Outside Forces? What Outside Forces? This
religiously obsessed Christian is going against all known
scientific variables to insist that spiritual and psychic
forces exist autonomously in nature and can infect or
possess the human mind.
It is absolutely bonkers and completely outwith the sphere
of science and psychiatry. But don't think
that Checkley and Blacker were alone in their
loopiness. A number of psychiatrists ,
presumably also obsessed members of the Christian
Association of Psychiatrists are used to
authoritatively back up these illogical claims in Doorways
to Danger.
Dr Roger Moss, a consultant psychiatrist,
'Peoples mental state can be
seriously affected by contact With the occult,
particularly among the vulnerable. This is a factor
that we have to reckon with and study more
closely.’ [Ed: There is
more scientific
evidence to show that people's mental state is
affected by extremists of the orthodox religions than
by occultism.].
Psychiatrist Dr David Enoch from Liverpool,
'If people’s lives are controlled by
Astrology then it causes confusion and perplexity
and could lead to disaster.’ [Ed: There is no evidence to show
that people who follow astrology are less able to
cope with the vagaries of life than those who don't
and there are no quoted cases of people who have
suffered disasters from believing in it]
Psychiatrist, Dr Michael David,
'Patients who have suffered because of
their involvement with the occult. are very often
vague, generally miserable, anxious and
discouraged without knowing why,’
[Ed: The vast majority of Patients who have NOT been
involved with the occult are very often miserable,
anxious and discouraged without knowing why.]
Consultant child psychiatrist, Dr Graham Melville-Thomas,
'Ouija boards are, he says, ’potentially
damaging and can unbalance children who are
vulnerable.’ [Ed: So can
watching any film classified as PG (Parental Guidance)
]
Psychiatrist Dr Chris Andrew.
'Any involvement with the occult is
dangerous, ’There is a risk of mental and
spiritual disease at every possible level.’
[Ed: What, for goodness sake, is a 'spiritual disease'
? ]
Dr Keith Sanders:
’I am in touch with 20,000 doctors around
the world who would say there is no doubt that
involvement with spirits other than the Holy
Spirit will lead to suffering in body, mind and
spirit.’ [Ed: he
means 20,000 CHRISTIAN EVANGELICAL doctors. We
doubt he knows them all by name! For
comparison there are over 300,000 registered doctors
in the UKalone. I wonder how many of them
would agree with the idiotic Keith Sanders that
spirits cause suffering? ]
The only conclusion one can come to is that the loony
ideas of the obsessed people in the Christian
Association of Psychiatrists had a MARKED
influence on the progress and direction of psychiatry in
Britain and is one of the reasons why MPD / DID has
prospered.
Doorways to Danger was so well received around the
fundie circuit that in 1990 it was re-issued as a
video. Fundies took part in a campaign to supply
every school in the country with a free copy of that
video. The controversy this caused was immense and
on 21 October 1990 the Independent newspaper
exposed 'Doorways to Danger, the video', in a large
article headed Evangelists Campaign against Halloween.
They reported that Rushcliffe Comprehensive School
(Nottingham) had immediately banned the video, as had
some other schools. David Hart, General Secretary of the National
Association of Head Teachers said the video should
be banned from schools.
Yet despite this mainstream reaction to the nonsense in Doorways
to Danger the Institute of Psychiatry, The Maudsley,
Kings College and the psychiatric concensus said
NOTHING about key people in their caucus flogging
mediaeval concepts of mental illness.
The Psychiatric
establishment kept their heads down and said
nothing about Christian evangelicals introducing
mediaeval concepts of mental illness which science
had erradicated several hundred years earlier.
If you still do not think that the idea of possession and
exorcism has been imported into psychiatry we offer
the evidence found in the Research Annals of the Royal
College of Psychiatry which holds papers on
Exorcism, Spirituality and Spiritual Healing for new
intakes of students to indoctrinate themselves with!
Do not make the mistake of thinking that these papers are
CRITICAL of anyone who believes in spirit possession, or
believes that praying over a person can cure their mental
illness, these papers actually support and promote those
ideas. This is how far psychiatry in Britain has
sunk.
Articles like Multiple Personality Disorder - Demons
and Angels’ by Dr Haraldur Erlendsson, and 'Spirit
Releasement Therapy' by Dr Alan Sanderson. These
are just two papers which should have been discredited and
instantly rejected by the RCP library but were not and are
now corrupting psychiatric treatments in the
UK.
Presumably it won't be long before the Royal College
of Psychiatry carries a paper from some fundie
obsessive who insists that sufferers of epilepsy should be
burned at the stake for being in league with the Devil, as
was usual in the fifteenth century?
Valerie Sinason, doyenne of Satan Hunters world-wide
The RCP can rightly come in for a lot of the blame for
being gullible and malleable, but the Clinic for
Dissociative Studies was the key instigator of DID
work in the UK. The CDS was set up by Valerie
Sinason. Sinason is one of the foremost believers in
Satanic Ritual Abuse and a key promoter of it during the
1990 panic, and ever since. We remind readers that despite
years of Sinason warning about children being abused and
killed in satanic ceremonies there was not a single SRA
case which she was involved in which turned out to
confirm her warnings. Not one.
Moreover in the intervening three decades, despite
consistent searching and hunting for cases of SRA by the
fundamentalists, with Sinason's coterie of DID therapists
at their side, there has not been a single case of SRA
prosecuted through UK courts.
Sinason's methods of treating her patients who then went
on to fantisise themselves as victims of SRA involved the
usual MPD techniques, but because of the failure of
first-wave 1990 SRA allegations the coterie of therapists,
psychiatrists and social workers who believed implicitly
in its existence had become discredited in the eyes of the
public and most commentators. Sinason's move away
from the now unfashionable term MPD and towards DID came
in 2002 when she published “Attachment, Trauma
and Multiplicity: Working with Dissociative Identity
Disorder” Early the
following year she gave an interview to Graeme Galton, and
during this she outlined her understanding of DID.
"Valerie Sinason: Some
newspapers have mentioned claims that amazingly high
numbers of people have been murdered in these rituals.
Now I'm realising, through the DID work, that where
people have experienced an inside person being killed,
where there is no corpse to show, that still was a
person, a death.
GG: Inside people being other
personalities . . .
Valerie Sinason: Other
personalities that are perceptually seen as another
person. So the external figures could have been very
different. We have certainly found the alleged murder
of an outside person very small - well, `very small',
what an awful thing to say, it's like talking about
`ordinary abuse'. In terms of the kind of excited,
`thousands of microwaved babies' bonkers ideas, there
were something like, I suppose, an average of three
murders that any individual aged 40, say, was
mentioning, outside of induced abortions. "
Compare this approach for professional consumption with
the irrational article 8 years earlier, 'Devil
Cults Slay 100' from the Daily Mirror of 26 May 1994
where Sinason unequivocally is reported as claiming that:
"More than 100 children have been murdered
in Satanic Sex rituals, shocked MPs heard yesterday.
Valerie Sinason said: - 'The authors have treated
patients who have detailed at least 100 murders'...
'They are mutilated, made pregnant, their babies used
in sacrifices.They are tortured and killed and the
bodies disposed of'
So clearly for Valerie Sinason in the early 2000s DID
meant exactly the same as MPD - believe any shocking and
atrocious allegation outpouring from the minds of mentally
ill people who are made to confabulate memories through
recovered memory therapy to suit the bias of the
therapist. In other words business as usual.
Earlier, in 1988, when
the idea of SRA first burst upon the UK Sinason was one of
the founders of a group called RAINS (Ritual Abuse
Information Network and Support). RAINS has
a despicable history of involvement in the creation of
false cases and false allegations against innocent
people. It still exists today, along with it's
Scottish affiliate RANS (Ritual Abuse Network
Scotland). RAINS was involved in all the
infamous 1990 Satan Seminars which poisoned the minds of
social workers and lead to the 'dawn lifts' of little
children from their innocent parents. You can see
the utter paucity and unprofessionalism of their work on
SRA here:
Of course, when the truth came out the voluble Sinason and
other RAINS members went largely quiet to avoid direct
criticism. Even so, they didn't get off unscathed as
the cutting from the Scotsman newspaper (right) in 2000
(two years before she switched to DID) clearly shows. when
journalist Tim Williams wrote:
"The author of the study, Valerie Sinason,
says that she has 'treated' (I wonder if that means
'cured': I doubt it somehow) 75 children and adults
over the past 15 years who had claimed to be victims
of or to have witnessed Satanic abuse. More
blood-curdlingly 46 of them claimed to have seen
murders whilst a further 15 said they had
witnessed..the murder of babies. Only 14 saw
nothing interesting, though maybe further therapy will
enable them to recover those memories of baby-killing
warlocks which they are clearly at the moment
repressing........I don't believe a word of it and
neither should any serious academic. " [View
the newspaper article alongside in large format by
right clicking and choosing 'view image', then
clicking on it to enlarge to a readable size. All SAFF
documentation on this web-page can be enlarged like
this for easier reading]
The
'study' the Scotsman was referring to was what came to be
known as Valerie Sinason's Devil
Report. On the strength of repetitive
claims from RAINS The UK Department of Health (DoH)
gave Sinason £22,000 for a 'study' of SRA.
They did this in the face of opposition by many groups and
academics, including the SAFF who took up correspondence
with them and even telephoned key people like P. Baldrin
and Rob Greig at the DoH as early as 1990 to warn them
that RAINS were misguided and prejudiced people using MPD
to force confabulations into patients.
The grant of £22,000 of taxpayers' money was a complete
waste of time, but on the strength of her own prejudiced
evaluation of the mid-term analysis of her
'research' Sinason obtained several bouts of
national publicity falsely accusing Satanists of abusing
and killing children again.
The cutting right Children Born for Sacrifice to
Satan' is just one of them - there are dozens in
SAFF files. So here in February 2000 Valerie
Sinason had reverted back to disproven Satanic Abuse
claims she first used in 1994, dropped in the
intervening years in favour of 'Ritual Abuse' and then
reinstated in 2000 when demands to see her 'Devil
Report' grew.
Whenever any SRA case collapsed Sinason's 'study' was
waved in the air by RAINS members with the promise of
incontrovertible evidence of SRA
when it was finished. It was in fact
propaganda. Sinason's report was NEVER published
because it was a travesty of scientific research which
proved absolutely nothing.
Her report was so academically flawed that the DoH
dare not even send it out for peer review and kept it
secret for years until all those DoH
numpties whom the SAFF had first warned about it had
retired and got their pensions. Then much later, 24
years after Sinason had waived it in
the air, SAFF obtained a copy and found it inaccurate,
incomplete, partial, prejudiced and offered no new
evidence. It amounted to 12 pages of nonsense!
We published it here: Valerie
Sinason's Devil Report and you will see just how bad
it really was and how sensational and deceitful
those Children Born for Sacrifice to Satan
headlines really were.
So what actually is DID? Well despite three decades
of DID therapists making a fortune out of it you may be
surprised to learn that there is no official definition of
what DID is. The World Heritage Encyclopaedia
described it thus:
DID is one of the most controversial psychiatric
disorders with no clear consensus regarding its
diagnosis or treatment.[3]
Research on effectiveness of treatment has been
concerned primarily with clinical approaches and case studies.
Dissociative symptoms range from common lapses in
attention, becoming distracted by something else,
and daydreaming, to pathological dissociative
disorders.[6]
No systematic, empirically-supported
definition of "dissociation"
exists.[7][8]
So DID is whatever the therapist can convince you it
is! WHE goes on to say:
Dissociative disorders including DID have been
attributed to disruptions in memory caused by trauma
and other forms of stress, but research on this
hypothesis has been characterized by
poor methodology. So far, scientific
studies, usually focusing on memory, have been few
and the results have been inconclusive.
An alternative hypothesis for the
etiology of DID is as a by-product
of techniques employed by some therapists,
especially those using hypnosis, and
disagreement between the two positions is
characterized by intense debate.
DID became a popular diagnosis in the 1970s, 80s and
90s but it is unclear if the actual incidence of the
disorder increased, or if it was more recognized by
clinicians, or if sociocultural factors caused an
increase in iatrogenic presentations. The
unusual number of diagnoses after 1980, clustered
around a small number of clinicians and the
suggestibility characteristic of those with DID,
support the hypothesis that DID is
therapist-induced.
The explosion of diagnoses
of DID during the Satanic Panic clustered around a
small number of clinicians and the suggestibility
of those with DID confirms that DID is
therapist-induced.
Self-Victimisation Syndrome destroys all DID / MPD
credibility.
Yet by 1994 the Self-Victimisation Syndrome had
already been academically established as a problem in MPD
/ DID therapy by Jim Schnabel in his seminal Chronic
Claims of Alien Abduction and some other traumas as
self-victimization syndromes: Schnabel's
academic paper confirmed that some patients who were
Dissociative would invent scenarios to traumatise
themselves as a form of self-punishment. He
researched and analysed a large number of DID patients who
claimed to have been abducted and tortured by Alien beings.
Most all of these cases occurred prior to the late 1980s
before Satanic Ritual Abuse Claims surfaced. Schnabel
insisted that claims of Alien Abduction and Torture were
caused by exactly the same Self-victimisation Syndrome
as that which created Satanic Abuse Allegations.
Both were equally unreal.
'This paper discusses the case of an
alleged alien abduction victim who claimed a
wide range of dissociation-related and traumatic experiences,
with a heavy thematic emphasis upon sexual abuse,
extending back to a traumatic non-abuse incident in
childhood, for which she apparently was never
amnesic. Certain aspects of her history seem
consistent with dissociative disorders, organic mental
dis-
orders, and Munchausen 's syndrome. This case and
the alien abduction syndrome as well
as some oral narratives associated with multiple personality
disorder and "Satanic ritual abuse, " do not derive
exclusively from severe exogenous
trauma and may be viewed more usefully
as manifestations of manipulative self-victimization
syndromes.'
claims of
Alien Abduction and Torture were caused by the
same Self-victimisation Syndrome as that which
created Satanic Abuse Allegations. Both
were equally unreal yet in DID therapy Aliens
are ignored completely in favour of falsely
accusing Satanists!
The Self-Victimisation Syndrome should have
brought into question the entire reasoning behind MPD /
DID and caused a re-evaluation of all existing cases of
claimed SRA, but as usual, the therapists who were wedded
to DID and making big bucks out of it ignored Self-Victimisation
Syndrome entirely, just as they ignore any and every
case which they had claimed was SRA but which later failed
and made them look like fools.
Valerie Sinason started the Clinic for Dissociative
Studies in 1998, it is therefore the forerunner of
the groups trying to establish DID in the UK.
Astonishingly, devoid of the evil history of MPD and
dissociated from the continuous failures of Sinason and
RAINS to produce ANY firm evidence to back the mental
meanderings of their MPD patients, DID became the new
watch-word amongst SRA-leaning psychiatrists and
therapists.
In 2006 the ESTD (European
Society for Trauma and . Dissociation) was established.
Later that same year the British branch of ESTD (ESTDUK)
was opened and run by Sue Richardson.
Richardson was an old campaigner for SRA and the idea of
network abuse, she was heavily involved in a group of
activists who championed the disgraceful actions of
paediatricians Marietta Higgs and Geoffrey Wyatt during
the 1987
Cleveland Scandal in the UK.
Higgs used a discredited method ' Anal Dilation
Syndrome' to 'diagnose' abuse in children which
lead to 197 children being kidnapped from their innocent
parents in 'Dawn Lifts' in the county of Cleveland,
UK. The same ADS technique, taught and
popularised by Dr. Jayne Wynne and Dr. Christopher Hobbs
was used to incriminate hundreds of families who had their
kids taken away in Leeds the same year.
The ADS method was a witch-pricker to try to uncover what
these feminist child-campaigners imagined was a hidden
strata of sexual abuse within society. They
inspected the anuses of children for tell-tale signs of
abuse. When proper doctors saw it they said that any
of the so-called symptoms could've been diagnosed from
children with constipation!
The parents' rights were championed by local MP Stuart
Bell a courageous man without whom their persecution would
have proceeded apace. His 1988 book : 'When
Salem Came to the Boro’ was an indictment of
Cleveland child protection practices.
A 'spoiler' book supporting the radical feminists involved
in CAUSE was penned by Neo-Marxist Feminist Beatrix
Campbell, later to be discredited for her part in the Shieldfield
false accusations. Campbell's book 'Unofficial Secrets'
came out the same year. Publishing 'spoiler' books
to counterbalance opposing views was a common practice for
the Satan Hunters and shows the crusading zeal of the DID
lobby revealing the political context behind the claims.
However the apologists for Higgs and Wynne and ADS rarely
speak of the clutch of ADS cases created in Leeds,
Yorkshire, which occurred parallel with Cleveland where
Jayne Wynne and Christopher Hobbs had pioneered the
ADS technique. Thirty Nine families had apparently
been falsely stigmatised as abusers using the ADS
technique in Leeds which caused a massive jump in the
average statistics for abuse in that location, just as it
did in Cleveland. The idea that Cleveland was an
aberration was false. Cleveland and Leeds were a
symptom of a new broom sweeping through Child-Protection
services in the U.K. A change orchestrated by
radical feminists. They had decreed a hidden epidemic of
incest in British families and were out to prove it.
Although no directly Satanic claims were made in the
Cleveland or Leeds cases it is widely considered to be the
opening shots which drove the 1990 Satanic Panic and
lead to similar Dawn Lifts of children in spurious
SRA cases in Rochdale, Orkney, Ayr, Manchester and other
false investigations pursued at the time based on the
testimony of children who were manipulated by therapists
and social workers into imagining things which the
believers in SRA might consider indicated Satanic Ritual
Abuse.
This list of Satanic Indicators
included everyday things like children passing wind when
sitting at the table before a meal ( a completely natural
part of the digestive process ) and many other situations,
such as pulling the arms off dolls during play, which were
considered a result of sadistic Satanic abuse, not the
usual curiosity from children about how things are
made.
These Satanic Indicators came from Catherine Gould, a
child therapist in the USA and were widely used in British
social Services during the early part of the panic to
identify cases of SRA, all of which turned out to be
false. The JET report said these indicators were first
imported by Tim Tate into the Broxtowe
false SRA case in 1987. Yet Gould had simply made up
the Satanic Indicators without any scientific analysis or
research, from her own prejudiced observations. She
was later utterly discredited along with her Satanic
Indicator list after claiming that Satanists had
tried to kill her by pumping poisoned gas into her
office.
So here we see another TWO examples of supposed
techniques which have been invented by child-therapists
and psychiatrists to prove an ideology about the
prevalence of child-abuse which have no basis in
scientific fact.
When the government BANNED social workers from
interrogating children after the utter mess they made of
the 1991 Rochdale SRA case, new cases of SRA driven by
childrens' testimony simply stopped. Note that
disclosure questioning of children still occurred but
perpetual interrogations by biased social workers until
children gave in and 'confessed' were disallowed.
The coterie of SRA believers then switched from
repetitively interrogating children
to using MPD sessions where they repetitively
interrogated adults to implant similar fantasies.
These firmed-up back-stories from adults were then held
as proof that children were being Satanically abused!
People who, had they been treated by
orthodox psychiatry, would hardly have imagined anything
Satanic at all.
When the government
BANNED social workers from interrogating children
after Rochdale, cases of children-driven SRA
simply stopped
By December 2007 Sinason was lecturing on DID to the
influential , but obviously poorly informed,
London Safeguarding Children Board. Sinason
was billed as the Director of the Clinic for
Dissociative Studies and her presentation; Dissociative
Disorder and Ritual Abuse , proved conclusively that
NOTHING had changed. She was still hunting for
non-existent Satanists on the basis of recovered memories
of mentally vulnerable people sent to her for DID
treatment.
"This seminar will outline the work of
Valerie Sinason, a child psychotherapist and adult
psychoanalyst who has been at the forefront of the
growing awareness and understanding of ritual abuse
and the ways that psychoanalytic psychotherapy can be
used to treat its victims. Delegates will have an
opportunity to explore some of the difficulties
encountered in trying to support children who have
experienced ritual abuse, including where the
consequences of ill treatment can lead to a further
condition, dissociative disorder (DID). Treatment can
be complicated by the fact that this type of abuse,
and DID, is not well understood or believed. The
presenter will use her extensive experience of
providing assessment and long term therapy for ritual
abuse survivors to consider some of the paths which
can be taken and their consequences.
Dissociative Identity Disorder used to be called
multiple personality disorder. It is closely linked to
long-term sadistic abuse in childhood. In the United
Kingdom most cases of Dissociative Identity Disorder
appear to be the result of abuse within the family,
including ritual abuse and mind control.
"
No mention of Satanic Abuse in this conference flyer
eh? No mention of the untimely death of poor Carol
Myers either. Sadistic Ritual Abuse is
the DID euphemism for Satanic Ritual Abuse.
At this point the acronym DID was relatively little
known. Most people were unaware that it was simply
discredited MPD by another name. By presenting DID as a
new form of psychiatry which is
'not well understood' SRA believing therapists
avoided drawing attention to the fact that it is in
reality simply a witch-pricker used by believers in SRA to
uncover what they believe to be a pan-global network of
abusing Satanists which had already been discredited in
the 1990 Satanic Panic. The London Safeguarding
Children Board is so uninformed it was oblivious to
the switcheroo.
To show how MPD/DID 'therapists' created false victims of
SRA we need to
return to the late 1980s, in the lead up to the SRA
witch-hunt, and cover the astounding and tragic case
of Carol Myers. Carol died in
mysterious circumstances in 2005 whilst undergoing MPD
therapy for Satanic Abuse during which she falsely accused
her own parents of being Satanists. A police
investigation ensued which cleared them. Her
parents have since conducted a crucial campaign to
discover why Carol turned against them and to unearth the
true facts surrounding her death. They published a book in
2013 titled Justice
for Carol which is an astonishing indictment
of how the medical profession covers up its own
mistakes. Below is an extract from that book which
covers Valerie Sinason's involvement in the case, as taken
from Carol's medical records.
"Treating
Survivors of Satanist Abuse (edited
by Valerie Sinason) was published in 1994. The
book has the distinction of being voted in a
peer review as the second worst psychiatric
publication of the last hundred years. Simon
Wesley, professor of psychiatry at Kings College
commented that one nomination for Sinason's
book stated it was credulous,
superstitious,
iatrogenic, illness-inducing, self-righteous,
incendiary garbage.
Chapter 32 is a
jointly authored essay
by Robert Hale and
Valerie Sinason. It
focuses on three adult
case studies who they
treated in the Tavistock Clinic.
Using the pseudonym
of Rita to disguise
Carol's real identity,
the authors state that she was their first joint
patient. As another of
Carol's many psychiatrists would write a few
years later:
"With regard to the special nature
of her case, I do believe she was Valerie Sinason's
first case at the Tavistock and it was
based on Carols experiences that Valerie
wrote
a book and started her interest in Satanic
abuse.
In other words, Carol's case propped up
the whole field of Satanic Ritual Abuse in the
UK. Carol's history is demonstrably false; it
begs the question of how many other patients
treated for Satanic Ritual Abuse have befallen
the same fate. " [full chapter here]
Simon
Wesley, professor of psychiatry at Kings
College commented that one nomination for Sinason's "Treating
Survivors of Satanist Abuse stated it was
'credulous, superstitious,
iatrogenic, illness-inducing, self-righteous,
incendiary garbage'.
Despite Valerie
Sinason's 32 year failed track-record of multiple false
accusations of baby sacrifice and imagined sadistic abuse
in Satanic Ceremonies which she has never been able to
prove and despite her much vaunted Devil Report
commissioned and funded to the tune of £20,000 in 1996 by
the Department of Health and still unpublished 15
years later, and despite the controversy over
Carol Myers' death; by 2010 Sinason's putative
Clinic for Dissociative Studies was being funded
entirely by the NHS as Private Eye Magazine pointed
out (right).
In 2019 CDS financial records show a funding income of
£870,656.00
Carrying the NHS banner on
CDS letter-heads and literature gave the CDS great kudos.
By April 2011 Sinason and her followers were far more
bullish. They collectively started a campaign to
have DID formally recognised within psychiatry as a
genuine therapeutic technique (see
rightmost panel).
Among the great and the good who joined in this was one
Jacqui Dillon, a
'survivor of organised ritual abuse,
torture and mind control'.
Dillon is a schizophrenic patient who first came to the
notice of the SAFF in 2009 when she attended a Satan
Seminar held at the Bowlby Centre in London (see
here). At this seminar she gave an account of
her SRA abuse in a lecture the sole purpose of which
appeared to be to accuse orthodox psychiatry of not
understanding schizophrenia and attendant symptoms because
they refused to believe in Satanic Abuse.
Dillon later started a self-help group for
schizophrenics. It was called 'Hearing Voices'
and was one of the groups supporting the Campaign for
Recognition of DID ( as you will see in the above
panel). Sometime after the 2009 Satan Seminar Dillon
began using the prefix 'Dr.'. Check the panel above
and you will see that Sinason's Clinic for
Dissociative Studies is listed alongside ESTD
(European Society for Trauma and Dissociation) and you
will also find RAINS back on the bandwagon again after
many years in decline. Same old Same old.
That
2009 Satan Seminar was attended by many SRA hunters
from across the world, including the discredited Ellen
Lacter a key speaker who gave two keynote lectures
on SRA and DID.
A deeper look into the
activities of Lacter is revealing. Her
'professional facing' website
www.endritualabuse.org
contains links to many of the old satan scare
motifs, but she also has another site
http://truthbeknown2000.tripod.com/Truthbeknown2000/id23.html
where links to claptrap on Satanic
Worldwide Conspiracies occurs. According to
postings from Lacter published on some of these
links she
appears to agree with and assist people who
believe in the Illuminati conspiracies. (The
Illuminati are supposed to be a race of
demi-gods from a distant planet who have steered
mankind's progress by occasionally
transmogrifying into the bodies of great and
influential historical personages like George
Washington at crucial points in world
history... need I go on?)
Lacter admits to having been
tutored in SRA and DID by Reverend Stephen Oglevie, ( consultant to Elijah
House ministries and minister of the Church of
the Nazarene).
Oglevie's reputation for identifying and treating
DID patients who were diagnosed as having been Satanically
Abused was shattered in 2006
(three years before Lacter was invited to speak at the
London 2009 Seminar) when an SRA patient
sued him for implanting false memories!
This lawsuit was a direct unmasking of the dangers and
falsities of DID which are ignored by its proponents and
the Royal College of Psychiatry, yet there
have been many such instances in the U.S. and Canada where
therapists have been sued for harming their patients with
DID. So Lacter's mentor, the person whom she freely
credits with teaching her all about SRA was utterly
discredited three years prior to her appearance in
London
flogging SRA and DID to UK therapists in 2009!
These people have absolutely no shame.
The Bowlby Centre which hosted the 2009 Stan Seminar turns
over about £200,000 a year in running costs and was also
included in the 2011 conference to formally establish
DID; as was a relatively new 'survivor's group'
called NAPAC (National Association for People Abused in
Childhood). In 2020 NAPAC turned over
£640,000 which included a £345,000.00 government
grant. NAPAC had worked-up a head of steam in
the previous few years in response to the hysteria
surrounding historical sexual abuse claims and the
enthusing of victims to network together to talk about
their experiences. This movement spawned the government's
extensive
IICSA Historic Abuse Inquiry which was also
encouraging victims to come forward and tell their tales
in a kind of therapy of 'Truth and
Reconciliation'. As you will see from the
flyer bove, speakers in the 2011 DID conference included Peter
Saunders who ran NAPAC. Unfortunately Saunders
fell from grace a few years later when he had to resign
for having
sex in a restaurant toilet with a woman who had been an
abuse-victim.
David Icke filtered SRA 'victims' to Valerie Sinason
and RAINS
Ironically whilst this 2011 'push to establish DID
as real' campaign was actually ongoing the SAFF unearthed
evidence that Valerie Sinason was being sent 'Satanic
Abuse Victims' by David Icke, the infamous
anti-semitic conspiracyloon troublemaker who thinks that
Alien reptiles have taken over the bodies of key personal
in the British Establishment and that Queen
Elizabeth II is the head of a Satanic Abusive
cult.
In June 2011 a moderator for Icke's forum replied to a
poster who, like many there, claimed to have been
Satanically Abused:
"Hello Sweetheart, you might like to check
out the RAINS website (ritual abuse information and
network and support). It is run/supported by David
Icke and Valerie Sinason. You will find a
wealth of informaton here and support/help , should
you need it. "
Sinason has never been questioned about this source of
'victims' nor whether she supports Icke's views on Qannon,
EMF fallout from 5G telephones, anti-vaxxing and other
bonkers ideas. However this is an
incontrovertible piece of evidence showing the cross-over
between Alien Abductees and Satanic Abuse Victims within
the panoply of DID / MPD therapy. You can see an overview of Icke's history of
failed accusations and ideas spanning 30 years in
parallel with the SRA myth, here: http://saff.nfshost.com/davidicke.htm
The
European society for Trauma and Dissociation (ESTD) a
front-runner in the push to establish DID, also gave a
talk at the 2011 campaign launch. It has carried articles
promoting the idea of Satanic Ritual Abuse in it's
journal.
In 2014, just a few years after this 2011 campaign to
officialise DID was started, the ESTD published an article
by Suzette Boon-Langen headed: The treatment of
victims reporting ritual abuse by organised networks; a
reflection on 30 years of clinical experience. This
is simply a Dutch re-run of the accusations about
Satanic Abuse which Sinason and others in RAINS were
making in the 1990s in the UK and which were subsequently
utterly disproven here and in the Netherlands. In
fact Boon-Langen uses the very same failed arguments. She
states:
"The networks are similar in the following
ways: the abuse is systematic and there are multiple
perpetrators; both men, women and children are
involved; the group or organisation knows a strict
hierarchy; children are systematically trained to be
obedient. All clients report forms of sadistic torture
aimed at teaching them to be obedient and loyal to the
group. Clients who (also) report ritual abuse, in
particular, all have experiences of becoming
perpetrators themselves at a young age, committing
acts of abuse and torture on other children, adults or
animals. The systematic indoctrination of the beliefs
and ideas of the group are an important part of the
so-called training. And perhaps most importantly:
early attachment relationships are systematically
manipulated and exploited as the children are
neglected, abused and isolated by their primary
care-givers, only to be lovingly received and praised
again when they have demonstrated "good" behaviour
within the group. Siblings are also systematically
played off against one another to prevent them from
forming an alliance or confirming each other's
testimonies later in life. Subsequently, children (and
later: adults) are continually intimidated with
threats to their own lives or the lives of loved ones
and with the possibility of having movies and
photographs distributed of the acts in which they have
engaged. Moreover, wide use seems to be made of
deception and trickery in these "trainings", including
the use of drugs and medication that induce
hallucinations. Memories seem to be systematically
manipulated. Reality is manipulated and distorted to
such an extent that any testimonies given about the
network and its activities will seem to be inaccurate
and therefore not pose a threat to the network."
Again, note that the word SATAN is completely absent, yet
it is abundantly clear that is what Boon-Langen is talking
about. This summation is, like it was in the 1990s
scare, absolutely untrue and misleading in every
respect.
- No Satanic Networks have ever been found,
- No corpses of sacrificed humans or animals have ever
been discovered.
- Numerous in-depth police investigations over three
decades have never ever turned up any pornographic
Satanic films or pictures and no self-declared victims
who claim to have been photographed have ever saved
any to show. There is NO proof of it.
- The annals of occultism do not have any ceremonies
or documents where children are required to be abused.
- There are no rites or ceremonies which require
abusive group indoctrination.
- There has been no instance of children being found
drugged in Satanic Ceremonies.
- There have been 14 extensive/national public
inquiries across the globe and many official
investigations into false claims of SRA since 1988 and
every single one of them concluded that it was
nonsense.
The epidemic of hysteria surrounding Satanic Ritual
Abuse propagated out from the U.S. via international
fundie links right across the Western World during the
1980s and was seeded by fundies and feminists who
imported the scare locally. The ESTD is
widening the scope of the use of DID for diagnosing
Satanic Abuse into other non-Western countries where,
ironically, evidence is appearing showing that SRA
DOES NOT EXIST.
There is a single reference to Satanic Ritual Abuse on
the ESTD's website. It is a review of DID cases in
Turkey where
Prof. Dr. Vedat Şar the ESTD's representative in Turkey,
writes:
"Satanic Ritual Abuse has never been an issue in
Turkish psychiatry (there are no patients who
claim it; therefore it seems to be a culture-bound
syndrome); "
[http://www.estd.org/countries/turkey.html]
This finding is a bombshell to the ESTD and is fully in
accord with the SAFF's own research over the past 30
years. Evidence of Satanic Ritual Abuse is
ONLY found in Christianised countries. Countries
which espouse Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu and other
religions DO NOT HAVE cases of SRA even though
psychiatrists there may use MPD and DID therapy on
their patients they do not create images of a network
of evil cults claimed to be abusing them.
The reason is obvious, the patients' thoughts are lead
by already sold therapists to create false memories of
Satanic Abuse to match local cultural
abominations. Archetypes which have currency in
their society.
This can be clearly seen in cases of DID in the U.S.
and the U.K. in which patients who do not come from a
religious background create false memories of being
abducted and abused by Aliens, not
Satanists. Strangely the ESTD
website contains not one mention of patients producing
memories of Alien abducters using DID even though
there are hundreds if not thousands of these cases
recorded.
The 'experts' at DID simply ignore the fact that these
claims of Alien abduction occur during DID sessions.
There is no record of them in ESTD annals, therefore the
Self-Victimisation Syndrome highlighted by Jim
Schnabel which accounts for patients creating false
experiences of suffering in order to punish themselves,
can be ignored. Could it be that DID therapists
who DO believe in SRA are simply projecting those
beliefs onto their patients in leading questioning which
creates the SRA fantasies? Well YES, that is
definitely the case, and the main reason why Alien
abductees are never represented in ESTD papers.
Alien abductors are not mentioned because DID therapists
don't ask about them. If they did they would get stories
about shape-shifting alien lizards, anal probing and the
other stuff common to those fantasies, instead of
stereotypes about SRA.
The Oude Pekela Case and the ESTD
In the Netherlands the SRA scare began in 1987 when a
child was diagnosed by his doctor, Dr Freddy Jonker, as
having been abused, because there was instance of annal
bleeding. The remarkable similarity to the UK's
1987 Cleveland
Scandal where 197 children were wrongly taken
into care using the discredited 'Anal Dilation
Syndrome' (also used in another 500 cases in Leeds,
England) to falsely incriminate hundreds of
other false cases of abuse cannot be overlooked] .
Jonker was a general practitioner in Oude-Pekela,
a small socially deprived village in Groningen. By
1989 the story of the child's abuse started a hysteria
where hundreds of children were diagnosed as having been
Satanically Abused by a process of continual questioning
and implanting of ideas in childrens' minds by teachers,
social workers and worried parents. Just as it did
during the same period in the UK.
The rumour broke nationally when a Christian
evangelical programme, Tijdsein, broadcast fundie
suspicions about mass-abuse in Oude Pekela from
whence it grew into a national and then international
phenomenon where Freddy Jonker became a celebrity
lecturing to academic audiences. He attended one at
London University and contributed to influential
articles such as the NSPCC funded BAPSCAN's journal The
Child Abuse Review in 1991.
Like all such hysterias the trajectory of development
of the rumour was almost identical to those which
occurred in the UK and elsewhere. The
Oude Pekela and Rochdale
SRA cases are virtually identical in
profile. And both were of course inventions created by
hyper-sensitive Christians in social care. A
special Social Services Investigation into Rochdale
proved that the cause of 13 children being taken into
care there in 1990 was prejudiced badgering of small
children with leading questions during long hours of
interrogation and this technique was outrightly banned
by the Inquiry in 1991. In June 1994 the UK
Government's detailed La Fontaine
report was published which had analysed all 84
claimed UK cases of SRA during the 1990 panic in great
detail. Prof La Fontaine had special dispensation
to see all the confidential documents and disclosure
audio-recordings and videos right across all cases and
her report concluded that this 'first wave' of SRA
allegations was entirely created by people in social
work and therapy who created false memories in the minds
of children by insisting on a predetermined Satanic
outcome until, after the children grew exhausted
following hours of continuous interrogation, they
'confessed' that what they had denied 100 times before,
was true. After the Social Services Inspectorate
banned inquisitorial questioning of children the
fundie/feminst SRA hunter axis switched from using
children and began cultivating adult 'victims'
instead.
A classic example of this torturing of small children
to 'confess' SRA is given in the SAFF exclusive here,
where Laura, a child victim of the 1990 panic, now an
adult with a family of her own, tells how the media,
academics, social workers and therapists let her down by
allowing her mentally unstable mother to physically beat
her and verbally assault her until she 'admitted' that
she had seen children sacrificed just to stop the
punishment. Laura tells how she was then dragged
in front of social workers and made to repeat the false
claims which she did because her mother was present and
she knew she would be beaten again when they got home if
she didn't comply.
In 1989 Benjamin Rossen published a full
outline of how the hysteria had been created in Oude
Pekela in a paper for the Institute for
Psychological Therapies journal. titled
'Mass
Hysteria in Oude Pekela' which makes a very
valuable snapshot of what was truly happening in
Groningen at the time. In response to
the nationwide outcry the Dutch government set up the
Hulsenbek Committee which looked into the Oude
Pekela case in great detail and found, exactly as in
the British experience, that it was created by mass
hysteria. There had been NO satanic abuse at
Oude Pekela
Of course we can see from Suzanne Langen-Boon's 2014
article for ESTD that she had been involved in hunting
down Satanic Ritual Abusers for '30 years' ; in
other words she must have
been one of those people at the heart of the Oude
Pekela case and the coterie of SRA believers in
Groningen are a scion of those busted 1989
claims. The question is: Why is the ESTD
giving these people with a track record of failure
upon damaging failure, house-room?
Therefore Boon-Langen's paper published by the ESTD is
nothing more than a causal link back to the bad old days
of the SRA panic. The mad Satan-Hunters
who massaged the hysteria in the 1990s, who invented
the DID method to brainwash patients into believing
they had been Satanically Abused, are at the
core of modern DID therapy, regardless of the
technical veneer of the second generation of DID
therapists. DID was invented to
rubber-stamp claims of Satanic Ritual Abuse, and it
has consistently failed to do so.
Behind
DID is the SRA hysteria, plain and simple.
In three decades of striving to find evidence of SRA
police forces across the world with an army of literally
millions of volunteer religious zealots have been trying
to hunt down imagined Satanic Abusers and there has not
been one case of it found anywhere. It is
bunkum. Yet again, here, Boon-Langen and
the ESTD and the CDS and the Institute of Psychiatry
plus numerous fundamentalist Christian agitators who
work with them; and over 300 DID therapists on the make
are insisting that it exists. The words
of Anatole France come to mind:
' If 50 million people believe a
foolish thing, it does not make that thing any the
less foolish'.
SAFF work over the years has informed and attenuated the
damage false accusations of SRA caused in the UK,
but in Europe there is no counterpart group to the SAFF
and so a caucus of believers have flourished there.
In 2017 at the yearly ESTD conference in Berne,
Switzerland, Dr. Brendan O’Mahony, Professor Becky Milne
and Dr. Kevin Smith presented a revolutionary paper
demanding that DID therapists be compulsorily called
to attend first-level police interrogation of claimed
SRA victims to 'interpret' the evidence!
What this means of course is that it would be impossible
for the police to obtain that crucuial unguarded and
unadulterated first-hand legal statement from any person
claiming to have been abused. What would be
obtained is an interpretation of the view of their
supposed abuse filtered by SRA hunting DID therapists, who
would intervene to 'explain' what the 'victim' was saying,
moderating their lunacy to make it palatable for police
ears.
As yet government has not allowed this to occur
nationally but some police forces who are predisposed to
belief in SRA do indeed allow intermediaries in on formal
interviews with people who make SRA allegations,
especially if they are classed as MPD/DID
therapists. Trust the DID/MPD crowd to spot an
opportunity to push their poison! They are a
mirror image of the Ecclesiastical Inquisitors whose
silken tongues turned any statement a witness made to
their prime purpose which was to burn as many witches at
the stake as they could. We don't see much
difference between, some DID therapists and Sir Edmund
Anderson who addressed a witchcraft trial jury in 1603 by
saying:
"The malice of witches is great, their practice
devilish, AND IF WE DO NOT CONVICT THEM WITHOUT THEIR
OWN CONFESSION OR DIRECT PROOF WHERE THE PRESUMPTIONS
ARE SO GREAT AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES SO APPARENT, they
will in a short time overrun the whole land".
In her article Suzette Boon-Langen heavily criticises LEBZ
and infers that it is suppressing the truth about the
prevalence of Satanic Ritual Abuse in the
Netherlands. In fact LEBZ, a Dutch government body
which analyses claims of abuse ( which have been recovered
during therapy) has been the saviour of the
Netherlands, protecting it's innocent inhabitants from the
wave of ludicrous false-allegations which have swept
Britain in the past decade. LEBZ avoided imprisoning
innocent people, destroying lives and careers and wasting
child-protection resources on the wild-goose-chase of
SRA.
"In
the Netherlands, most cases involving alleged
recovered memories no longer make it to court. This is
probably a result of the governmental regulation
“Investigation of Sexual Abuse in Co-dependent
Relationships” (Government of The Netherlands, 1999)
introduced in 1999, which states that if a case [of
family break-up] involves a claim of recovered memory,
the prosecutor should consult the Dutch National
Expertise Group on Special Cases of Sexual Misconduct
(Landelijke Expertisegroep Bijzondere Zedenzaken)
before deciding whether to prosecute or not. This
recommendation also applies to cases involving claims
of memories of abuse before the accuser’s third
birthday and to allegations of ritual abuse. The
Expertise Group is keenly aware of the risk of
questionable therapeutic techniques resulting in the
creation of false memories and will therefore
typically advise caution when it comes to these cases.
The fact that recovered memories no longer make it to
court in the Netherlands does not mean, however, that
the problem [ of falsely created memories] does not
exist there. From 2011 to 2018, 13 new cases were
reported to the Dutch equiva-lent of the BFMS, the
Fictitious Memory Group
(Paper on Memory Wars in Europe by Julia Shaw and
Annalies Vredeveldt, for the Association of
Psychological Science, 2018)
Of course the ESTD cannot successfully push its DID poison
whilst LEBZ exists so removing it is a prime strategy for
them and their new trick MRI diagnosis method (outlined
below) is clearly a method of side-steping both LEBZ and
the majority of mainstream psychiatrists who think DID is
dangerous and harmful.
In a knee-jerk reaction to a sensational documentary on
Satanic Ritual Abuse by Argos Radio in October
2020, (Shards of Glass) members of the Dutch
Parliament made an unwise but unanimous decision to demand
a new official inquiry into SRA even though there had
already been one earlier in 1994 during the Dutch version
of the Satanic Panic (the Hulsenbek Committee)
which found it didn't exist.
Readers should note that this radio programme 'Shards
of Glass' was made up almost wholly of 'evidence'
given by patients of ESTD aligned DID therapists and was
contributed to by ESTD members and other life-long satan
hunters. The programme was utterly biased
and prejudiced towards promoting DID regardless of the
suffering it has caused many thousands of people over
the past 30 years, Its shocking narrative featured
unproven allegation of a small girl being abused by
having a glass bottle pushed en uterus which broke;
hence Shards of Glass. This
perverted image was new to claims of SRA and carried a
high-impact emotional charge which rightly caused
outrage amongst Dutch citizens. Such a claim
was unique, SAFF research spanning three decades can
only find one instance of a similar claimed act of
abuse. The 2009 Irish national Inquiry into abuse by
Catholic priests (The Ryan
Report) had one case where a priest Fr Noel
Reynolds, pushed a crucifix into a child's vagina.
The objective of Argos was not to present a balanced
documentary of facts but to prejudicially re-ignite the
idea of Satanic Ritual Abuse in the minds of Dutch
citizens. But why did the Dutch parliament fall
like dominoes to give the DID therapists what they
wanted? To outsiders it was puzzling. All
became clear a few months later when
it was discovered that a police inquiry into
maladministration of child-benefit to Dutch children
spanning decades ruled that the Government was
implicated in bankrupting and breaking up hundreds of
families who had been mistakenly given child-benefit
through no fault of their own. The scandal of the
government persecuting children whom they were charged
to protect caused the immediate resignation of the
entire Dutch government! Shards of Glass was
made during the ongoing police special investigation and
the instant capitulation of the Dutch parliament to
calls for a new Satanic Abuse Inquiry can now be seen as
an easy opportunity to portray the caring bona-fides of
a soon to be disgraced government.
Argos are clearly in league with the
ESTD crowd as many of their journalists are networked
into and followers of Simone Reinders' twitter
account @AATSReindersftp
whereas none of them are followers of @SAFFtweets
(the only organisation in the world that has been
tracking and dissecting the Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth
since 1988)! You will see how this current
lobby has gained influence beyond its size when we
analyse Simone Reinders' new method of diagnosing DID
from MRI scans, below. First we discuss Carl
'Nick' Beech the archetypal SRA victim.
Carl 'Nick' Beech. The Victim-Imposter whose story
exemplifies the dangers of DID intermediaries.
The classic
example of why DID therapists SHOULD NOT be allowed to
act as intermediary in police investigations which
involve recovered memories is the 2015 Carl 'Nick' Beech
case. Beech made heinous allegations of
sexual and sadistic abuse and murder by past
prime-minister the late Edward Heath and others,
including Harvey Proctor whose life Beech more or less
destroyed with his lies.
One of the pertinent facts in an expose of the run of
events by
barrister Matthew Scott here, was that an on-line
newspaper, Exaro, which had scooped exclusive
access to Carl Beech , was present at his interrogation
by the police. To show how this kind of
intervention can corrupt proceedings, it was later
discovered that prior to one of these interviews Exaro
staff had 'primed' Beech about people he couldn't
identify by showing him a photograph to make it easier
for him!
Ironically that is exactly the same intervention that
Satan-Hunter Dianne Core was accused of using in Hull in
1990 when, according to police, she interfered in an
investigation of abuse by several men who groomed kids
in an amusement arcade. Convinced that this was
her first case of SRA (it wasn't, she never had any real
cases) Core showed the kids photographs of the men she
suspected and in the process ruined the police
case. For a while the Hull police were considering
prosecuting her for perverting the cause of justice.
Clued-in observers may know that the police wasted over
2 million pounds in chasing Carl Beech's lies and
persecuted many innocent and upstanding members of
society based on his accusations. On 26th July 2019
Beech was sentenced to 18 years for perverting the
course of justice by pretending to be an abuse victim to
claim £22,000.00 in compensation.
The year previous he had pleaded guilty to another
charge after a police investigation found that although
he was claiming to be a 'survivor' he was actually a
paedophile who had been secretly filming young boys
with clandestine cameras.
These revelations made the high-level politicians, and
survivor groups and stars of child-protection who had
believed Beech implicitly, look like
the fools they really were. Real survivors of
sexual abuse were done a great disservice by the
unquestioning acceptance of Beech's fantasies and by the
stories of other liars who jumped on the compensation
bandwagon, because when the bubble burst for
Beech, a shadow was also thrown across their genuine
claims. It is in everyone's interest to get at the
Truth and stop abuse but chasing phantom Satanists does
not help.
The reign of nonsense created by Beech's lies about
networked abuse at Westminster was not the only instance
of survivor-imposters being exposed but it was the most
high-profile when it was realised that he had taken
in many therapists and survivor groups,
including NAPAC who accepted Beech's false
abuse-story without question and published a 'weeping'
poem by Beech in 2012 supposedly outlining how
terrible his abuse had been.
None of it was true of course.
That's what you get when you unquestioningly accept the
word of self-declared 'victims' without checking the
veracity of them. The dangers of instantly
believing any self-identified abuse victim is clearly
shown, yet that is EXACTLY what DID therapists seek to
do.
The dangers of
instantly believing any self-identified abuse
victim is clearly shown, yet that is EXACTLY
what therapists in DID seek to do.
It was the unquestioning belief in ALL allegations of
abuse by self-declared victims which drove the massive
increase in accusations of abuse during 2011 to 2019 and
the many prosecutions of VIPs and celebrities which were
eventually overturned. The highest profile one was
of course Cliff Richard, but there were dozens more,
Harvey Proctor, Lord Brammall, Jimmy Tarbuck, Benjamin
Herman the Queen's Equerry, William Roache, Paul
Gambaccini, Lord McAlpine and many, many more.
This resulted in the official Judge Henrique Inquiry
in October 2016 which found serious errors in police
investigations and castigated them for not using
common-sense and checking allegations before believing
in them. What the DID caucus wants of
course is to turn time back to those bad old days.
Yet on 28 July 2019, just two days
after Carl Beech was sentenced to 18 years for
knowingly perpetrating the most despicable untrue lies,
the same old crowd of SRA believers and DID therapists
had the temerity to get the letter you see (right)
published in the Guardian which basically tried to
misrepresent Beech as a Victim of circumstance and
mental illness!
These DID pushers were pandering to the Feminista
Guardian audience, railing back to try to minimise the
impact of Beech's case on DID. They were
maintaining that a lying pervert who set up hidden
cameras to film boys and who was imprisoned for a stack
of kiddie-porn, who tried to claim TWO lumps of £22,000
compensation for abuse which had never happened, who
accused an innocent man of child-murder, who went on the
run to avoid the truth being aired at trial, who
delighted in the pain of his innocent victims
- that such a man was himself a
victim! With DID practitioners up is down
and down is up.
Beech lied about facts time after time after time.
-
He said he feared water because of his abuse trauma
- then someone produced a photograph of him swimming
in a pool on holiday.
-
He gave a knife to the police which he said had been
used in the murder of a child - then his grandmother
said she had given him it as a present after
the date Beech specified for the murder.
-
He said Ted Heath had abused him on a double-bed in
his yacht Morning Cloud - Heath's boat was
a racing boat and only had hammocks.
-
He named a child who had been murdered from his
class at school who didn't even exist.
-
Even Beech's own mother tried to tell the police and
the therapists that he was an out and out vicious
liar but of course she was ignored - what would she
know? She was only his MOTHER and DID
therapists always know best.
The sympathy of these DID pushers has always been
misplaced. They cloyingly hang on every word of
neurotics who manipulate them, like Beech did, and
apparently have absolutely no care whatsoever for the
thousands of people who have been falsely accused of
abuse using their favoured Recovered Memory
Therapy; nor those who have had their lives and
careers destroyed.
People have died.
Some have committed suicide.
Yet these DID pushers don't seem to care.
In contradistinction they molly-coddle any dead-beat who
comes to them with incredible tales of Satanic Abuse.
This is a blindness which calls into
question everything they say and do, and particularly
their judgement of who is and who is not 'dissociated'.
How relevant is their DID/MPD syndrome
if they can make so many continuous mistakes over so
many decades? Not once, not twice, not
thrice, but HUNDREDS of times? The full story of
Beech and the REAL victims of DID (the innocent
people whose lives he destroyed), is set out in this
excellently detailed Daily
Mail article here.
After reading it you will wonder how on earth any of
these DID pushers could have the gall to try to
ameliorate what Beech did but as SAFF have stated many
times, they live in a Bizarro world of their own making.
In February 2020 the IICSA (Indpendent Inquiry into
Child Sexual Abuse) reported on their long and
detailed inquiry and questioning in open court of
police, politicians and institutions connected with
allegations of abuse by a supposed network of Sadistic
Child Abusers centred around parliament.
False memes about VIP abusers at Westminster were
first created by DID patients of the
psychiatrist Joan Coleman, a founder of RAINS (Ritual
Abuse Information Network & Support) which
the SAFF first exposed here:
and were built upon much older rumours and gossip
surrounding a Gay brothel close to Dolphin Square, which
the SAFF had earlier shown was nonsense here:
IICSA's report said that 'there was no evidence to
support these sensational allegations that there has
been a powerful paedophile network operating within
Westminster.'
Most of the
people who claimed to have suffered abuse from this VIP
clique were, like Beech, fantasists; and many of
them had undergone Recovered Memory Therapy
during DID sessions. It is difficult to estimate
how much money and resources DID has wasted but the SAFF
reckon it now stands at about 400 Million pounds worth
since 1988. Money which could have gone to real
children at risk but which instead went to
false-accusers and a sequence of unnecessary and
expensive Public Inquiries paid for by the
taxpayer.
This does not take into account compensation pay-outs
for historical claims of child-abuse which
ambulance-chasing lawyers have got rich upon over the
past two decades. The government's CICA
(Criminal Injuries Compensation) paid out £71 Million to
claimants in 2019. The vast majority of these
claimants deserved compensation but a not inconsiderable
number, like Beech, were later found to have lied, some
making multiple false allegations to get
money. DID / MPD plays into the hands of
fraudsters like these enabling them to make up any old
tosh and be implicitly believed by DID therapists. They
know it and they string DID therapists along because
those 'professionals' have proven themselves gullible
fools.
ESTD and the European Satanic
Circus.
The European Society for Trauma and Dissociation
(ESTD) was formed in 2006. It appears to be
a highly funded organisation and impressively
professional in style, but it has clear links with
dozens of first-wave Satan Hunters and their
nonsense. In the 2017 ESTD annual conference
held in Berne attended by delegates from all over Europe
and from the USA, in which Dr. Brendan O’Mahony,
Professor Becky Milne and Dr. Kevin Smith, presented
their paper to formalise a 'registered DID therapist'
being present at the interrogation of every accuser
which that therapist had treated' there was a
veritable firmament of VIPs, including the head of
the UK government's Historic Abuse Inquiry, Alexis
Jay!
However amongst those august people were also SRA
troublemakers like Rainer Kurz. Kurz is a
chartered psychologist who bridges the gap between
academic psychiatry and the SRA lunatic fringe. He
delivered two lectures at ESTD 2017; one on Lost
Memories (a subsidiary term for Recovered
Memories) and another on the 'Organised
Ritualised Crime Abuse Network (ORCAN), a supposed
network of criminal Satanic abusers in the UK imagined
by Kurz through rolling together unconnected historical
crimes and incidents. There is absolutely no
evidence of ORCAN's existence, but how were delegates to
ESTD to know that? Kurz is a colleague of Wilfred
Wong, a fanatical Catholic fundamentalist agitator who
was intimately connected behind the scenes with pushing
the 1990 Satanic Panic in Britain. Wong was recently
imprisoned after trying to kidnap an alleged Satanic
Child Abuse Victim 'at knifepoint'. Full Background
here:
Wong and Kurz appeared together as the
only speakers at another Satan Seminar held in London on
22nd September 2017, organised by Canadian
counsellor Sandra Fecht, another long-time believer in
SRA and DID. Wong spoke on Satanic Ritual
Abuse and mounted his sectarian campaign to convince
listeners that it exists. Kurz took to the podium
to lecture on 'Family court Child Snatching',
the idea being that the Family Courts are supposedly in
the thrall of Big Boss Satanists and in some unspecified
way thwart people like him from getting evidence of SRA.
(
Ironically on 4th November 2020, Wong and five other
people were arrested and remanded in custody for
'abducting an 8 year old child at knife-point' after
kidnapping him and driving him 230 miles from his
home. The case is ongoing as we write and we
will report
on it soon. )
Kurz's idiotic beliefs in SRA are clearly revealed in
the illustration (right) from his own website where he
declares that a bronze statue of a 16c Swiss folklore
character is evidence of Satanic Child Abuse!
The question is, why are the ESTD and DID therapists
giving these extremists house-room?
Another SRA fanatic at the ESTD is the Dutch SRA
activist Suzette Boon-Langen who in March 2014 wrote an
article on her 30 years involvement in trying to
persuade the Dutch government that SRA exists. In
her article she claims to have been involved in leading
edge investigations into SRA through her work with
'survivors' of SRA as far back as the mid 1980s.
Indeed Langen-Boon's article even includes references
and quotes from two leading pushers of the 1990 Satanic
Panic, Valerie Sinason and Tim Tate, a TV producer and
writer whose documentary 'The Devil's Work' for
the Cook Report has since been roundly condemned and
discredited as bogus
here.
and his 1991 book on the panic, supposedly providing
incontrovertible proof, is reviewed here.
Both Sinason and Tate became involved in promoting the
idea of SRA during the late 1980s. Precisely the
time that SRA was first 'discovered' in the
McMartin Case in the USA, and began
to grow into a panic of national and then international
importance.
As you can see, despite the academic psychobabble
now put out by a new generation of therapists about
the importance of DID to mental health practitioners,
the source of it is an a priori belief in Satanic
Ritual Abuse of adults and children, even though
there has not been one successful case of it found in
over three decades of these people searching for it.
The danger to DID patients and to those falsely accused
by those patients is that this now wealthy and expanding
faction of psychiatry is bleeding enough funding from
the NHS and government to be able to amply propagandise
their DID promises and manipulate governments, as they
have just done in Holland. On 5th October 2020, a motion
was accepted unanimously by the Dutch Parliament for the
Dutch government to start an investigation into the
existence of SRA in Holland.
Readers should know that such an in-depth investigation
had already been undertaken in response to the 1990
false SRA claims which also occurred in Holland just as
they did in the UK. This official inquiry (the
Hulsenbek committee) concluded in 1994 that SRA
did not exist; just as the British government's own
official inquiry, The La
Fontaine report, said that it was a figment of the
minds of fundamentalists searching for evidence of the
Devil to suit their own religious beliefs.
Just
as the Cook Report's 'The Devil's Work', started
the 1990 panic in Britain by working with Members of
Parliament and accepting 'expertise' from DID
psychiatrists and therapists in RAINS, this new
push to get SRA recognised in Holland was also done with
the aid of a media company, Argos, in league with the
ESTD which had produced a documentary called 'Shards
of Glass'. The programme was basically a
re-run of what the Cook Report did in 1989. That
is; portraying weeping 'survivors' of SRA that tugged at
the heart-strings of viewers and inciting rage in the
audience with heinous unproven tales of accusations of
torture and abuse of children.
The public and media outrage generated in Holland when
the circumstancial evidence contained in 'Shards of
Glass' was broadcast in September 2020 was
typical of what happened in 1989 with the Cook Report.
Equally as typically, the Dutch government
capitulated to the unproven false allegations just as
the British government did in 1990. Having
manipulated Dutch MPs, the DID satan-hunters have
renewed optimism in pushing for more money and resources
for a Psychiatric Voodoo which has been proven harmful
to many, if not all, patients who are given
it.
People often forget the end result of believing the
outpourings of recovered memories, so we will remind
them; literally hundreds of innocent men and women
are rotting in jails for things they never did due to
false-accusations against them derived from Recovered
Memories which were
put into 'survivors' minds by DID therapists. Thousands
of innocent people have had their careers, and homes
destroyed, far too many have committed suicide, whilst
many thousands of small children have been
unnecessarily ripped from their families and taken
into care to be traumatised for their later adult
lives. Presumably these poor victims will
then fall into the hands of DID therapists again
who will start the cycle all over. DID is an
EVIL, not a therapy.
The pan-European caucus of Satan Hunters comes to
the UK Institute of Psychiatry to inflict
Frankenstein medical practices onto patients.
In September 2019 Simone
Reinders a Netherlander who is a leading player in the
coterie of SRA hunters in Europe within the panoply of
the ESTD published the results of a Dutch and English
funded project to try to use MRI scanners to identify
people suffering from DID. Apparently the
Dutch gave her 300,000 Euro for it!
Reinders is now claiming to be able to identify DID
patients by looking at MRI scans of their brains.
It is a witch-pricker of enormous implication for the
future of psychiatry and the expansion of mental health
treatment and will produce literally millions of SRA
patients 'on demand'. The full paper was
published by the British Journal of Psychiatry
(the RCP outreach) and you can see it here:
Pattern Recognition Study of Brain Biomarkers to Aid
in the Diagnosis of DID
Despite the paper's impressive technological
discombobulation, in reality it is nothing more than a
reinvention of the quackery that was Phrenology and
it is scandalous that the people who
run British psychiatry have portrayed it as accepted
scientific research.
DID
Magnetic Resonance Imaging diagnosis (DIDMRID) is
yet another 'witch-pricker' by the same SRA crowd.
For those that do not know, 'witch-prickers' were
fraudulent devices that witch-finders of the 15c/16c
used to convince the public that anyone they wanted to
accuse and burn, was a witch. They used bodkins
(pointers) with retractable blades which, when pressed
on a mole or birthmark, made the point go back into the
handle. It appeared to onlookers that the point was
penetrating the skin, but when removed there was of
course no wound, no blood. This was 'evidence' of
the accused being a witch and literally hundreds of
thousands of innocent old women were burned alive at the
stake in Europe using similar deceitful
devices. DIDMRID diagnosis is nothing
but the same clothed in scientific jargon.
However this is not the first foray that Reinders' has
undertaken to find a witch-pricker for DID. In
2012 along with several others she undertook experiments
at Groningen University and Kings College
(both are hotbeds of DID fanaticism) where electrodes
were taped to patient's scalps and read-outs taken to
try to find brain activity which was peculiar to DID
patients. A. A. T. Simone Reinders, Antoon T.
M. Willemsen, Herry P. J. Vos, Johan A. den Boer, and
Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis organised the
experiment. The idea was to identify a certain
method of concluding that a person was suffering from
DID and avoid the 'Fantasy Model'
explanation of DID memories.
Fantasy Vs Trauma
The arguments for and against DID can be brought down to
Fantasy versus Trauma. There is the 'Fantasy
Model' (It's all made up) and the 'Trauma
Model' (Sadistic abuse causes repression of
memories) . The latter is clearly
nonsense as survivors of the horrors of the Nazi
death-camps suffered far worse trauma than
self-identified SRA victims can imagine and can always
remember their sufferings in great detail. In fact
the problem Holocaust victims have is to forget these
awful images, which they have to live with almost
daily.
Indeed, there are Holocaust
Museums in almost every major country around the
world and their problem is that they have so many
first-hand accounts of truly despicable acts against
human beings that they must censor the worst of what
camp inmates went through because some of the situations
are so heinous that in today's world of uber-sensitivity
they cannot be shown to a mixed audience.
If the theory that PTSD routinely causes repression of
memories were true, none of the thousands of books and
documentary programmes on the Holocaust would have ever
been produced.
Reinder and other 'second wave' DID pushers now believe
that Sadistic Abuse causes actual physical trauma in the
brain. There is absolutely no evidence to indicate
this is true, nor how that can happen, but that is what
they would like to believe. No scientist has ever
been able to discover where the Mind actually resides
(the Mind-Body problem) so suffering cannot cause the
mind to physically alter the brain but it is one theory
to counter the objections of the 'Fantasy Model'
held by most of mainstream psychiatry. Currently
the general belief in psychiatry is that false memories
are easily confabulated by vulnerable people under DID
therapy and there are many studies which show this.
For years DID practitioners have been casting around for
a way of proving their 'Trauma Model' and the
2012 brain-activity readouts were one failed attempt to
do so. Ironically the Institute of
Psychiatry also attempted this in the 1990s when
similar studies were undertaken from a general
psychiatric angle, of changes in brain-waves of mentally
ill patients. It came to nothing and was
jettisoned, which is what probably happened to Reinders'
Groningen experiments and why she moved on to DIDMRID.
Reinders is a trustee of Sinason's
Clinic for Dissociative Studies. In 2019
financial records show a funding income of £870,656.00
at the CDS. Reinders' relationship with Sinason's
work can be seen in this recent tweet by Reinders
recomending and promoting Sinason's latest nonsense on
DID. Let us hope that it is a little more academic
than the dross in Sinason's Devil
Report. I wonder if Reinders believes
in those failed allegations and Sinason's earlier claims
that 100 children had been satanically sacrificed?
Simone Reinders' most recent academic paper ( on MRI
scanning for DID ) has been extremely well received into
psychiatry without much criticism, because it not only
identifies as many DID patients as they could ever want
(follow the money), but it also confirms DID as
a 'genuine syndrome' and therefore rehabilitates them
all from their past MPD excesses. Reinders is
therefore running on a high at the moment and getting
plaudits world-wide.
However, when anyone with insight looks in detail at the
research it can be seen to be very weak on several
counts.
1: Reinders checked MRI scans of 32 people who
had been diagnosed as having DID and then compared
them with scans of a control sample who were not
diagnosed with DID. This is obviously utterly
unscientific. What should have happened is that
the 32 DID and 43 Non-DID scans should have been
shuffled, mixed up and then each analysed for DID
using Reinders' stated premiss and then the results
calculated and checked to see if correct. As it
is, she appears to have simply confirmed earlier
diagnosis in each set! The brains of those
she believed to suffer from DID
appeared to show divergence but
unless Reinders method can identify DID patients
from a mixed bunch of scans unknown to her then this
new technique is non-definitive and not as claimed.
2: Peoples' bodies and brains are not the same, just
as people come in various sizes so do brains.
After the age of 20 brain size and weight diminishes
in a regular curve as the person ages. Thus the
brains of patients diagnosed with DID will be
proportionately different in mass and weight at age
40, than DID patients at age 30. How will
Reinders tell the difference in her MRI
scans?
Reinders technique relies on the preponderance of grey
matter in relation to white matter in the bran
scans. The hypothesis is that a difference here
might indicate cellular changes due to
psychological trauma. This difference
between DID brains and non-DID brains white and grey
mass is worked out by trick computer modelling.
The same kind of computer modelling that is used in
weather forecasting and which predicted, wrongly, half
a million people would die from Covid19 in the
UK!
The qualifying criteria for white/grey proportion is
set in the computer by the observer. There has
been no prior work on the percentage of natural
divergence and average preponderance of grey/white
matter in brains across the population and across ages
and races, therefore the grey/white matter variable
used by Reinders is complete and utter guesswork.
It could simply be that some people are born
with different grey/white brain matter masses and
that has no implication whatsoever for their mental
function. We have no analysis of grey/white
matter distribution in races, nor in gender, nor by
human size or body-mass. Therefore her
entire hypothesis is utterly flawed and inevitably
inconclusive.
We draw readers' attention to the controversy over
the Body-Mass-Index
relied upon by hundreds of thousands of dieticians and
medics which turned out to be thoroughly misleading
and of no consequence to the campaign against obesity.
3: There is absolutely no evidence in any
scientific literature that the mind can physically
alter the brain. If so it would prove
telekinesis! It is all just mental health
voodoo. Diseases can physically alter the
structure of the brain and continuous use of some
medicines may do, but the mind and its fears
cannot alter the structure of the brain. This
is so self-evident that it was entirely ignored by
the Reinders' research because it would have
invalidated the experiment at the start.
Moreover although Reinders claims to have made
allowances for the people in her sample having used
medicines and drugs (obviously most of them will have
been on tranquillisers at least and maybe others on
Litharge to quieten their schizophrenic symptoms and
some on anti-depressants or both) there is no detail
of how she differentiated these people and we cannot
see how it would be possible to compare the
multiplexities of a person's medical history and their
profile of medicine intake and then relate that to
affects, or not, on the structure of the brain.
It could well be said that any differences between
the DID and non-DID MRI scans are more likely to
have been caused by exterior variables such as
medicine intake, than the supernatural idea that
psychological trauma causes changes in the physical
structure of the brain, yet Reinders' experiment did
not test that key point.
4: There is a fourth and most important final point
about the misuse of MRI and DID. Researchers
now think that false memories created during DID
sessions are so intolerable that they create Post
Traumatic Stress disorder in those patients.
DID therapists falsely tell their patients that
Sadistic Sexual Abuse causes post-traumatic stress
disorder and that DID will uncover it by seeking out
buried memories, whereas in reality DID therapy
actually creates
post-traumatic stress disorder in the patient by
furnishing them with intolerable memories of
Sadistic and Satanic Abuse during DID therapy
sessions. Thus even if we give credence to
Reinders' interpretation of grey/white matter
preponderance (which we do not accept) any PTS
found in patients undergoing DID therapy will be
as a result of that therapy and not an indication
of a pre-existing state. The experiment therefore
nullifies itself.
Thus Simone Reinders' entire research is shot
through with false premises and misleading
conclusions. Unfortunately there are now
sufficient players in the DID industry (1,500 at last
count) that Reinders' findings have been given a
respectability it simply does not deserve. Thousands
more DID aligned people who support MRI scanning as a
new witch-pricker are cheering her on so they can
happily go on confirming SRA in mentally vulnerable
people who need proper psychiatric care instead of this
DID nonsense.
You can see where this is going. All the
earlier SRA victims in cases which failed during the
1990 Satanic Panic will now be MRI scanned and their
stories pronounced true! The fact that all
of them were tried in court and found to be either lies
or confabulations, will be ignored. Demands will
be made, as they were successfully in Holland recently,
that the government instigate a new inquiry into SRA to
overturn the conclusions of the 1994 La
Fontaine Report. based on MRI
diagnosed DID. It is yet another form of
historical revisionism using junk-science as
justification. British psychiatry should be
ashamed of how it has allowed these interlopers to
corrupt established science.
The
most shocking thing about all this is that this push on
DID has for many years now been supported and promoted
by the Royal College of Psychiatry and the Institute
of Psychiatry at King's College. Academics who
should know better, but who are even now offering
articles to students on EXORCISM as a therapy for
DID. Truly an insane abdication of scientific
thinking. And they are doing it by diverting YOUR
tax money which could be better used in other areas of
the NHS.
History warns us to be VERY careful of eugenics and what
they can lead to. The SAFF see the use of MRI scans to
diagnose DID as dangerous in the extreme. Few
people realise that it wasn't the Nazis who invented
Eugenics, it was the British scientist Francis Galton
whose immoral teachings migrated to the USA where they
were expanded and built upon by the medical profession
there for decades before they were exported to Nazi
Germany and ended up killing an estimated six million
Jews and hundreds of thousands of mentally ill children
and adults in asylums. Race purification
theories weren't invented by Hitler, they were
invented and pursued by scientists and clinicians from
major centres of Western
Medicine and then hi-jacked by Hitler
when it suited his political purpose.
Had academe restricted or shaped the growth of eugenics
sensibly in the late 19th century then this might not
have happened so they are arguably just as guilty for
the Holocaust as German scientists who ended up
measuring Jewish noses to see if they qualified for
extermination.
Although we have featured the state of play in the UK
with regard to the promotion of DID their are coteries
of DID therapists networking together to push DID onto
patients in the Netherlands, Australia and Canada.
In the Netherlands many of these researchers and
therapists are based at Groningen University which has
also 'set standards' which some may find disturbing, for
instance, in relation to establishing protocols to
enable the killing of new-born infants who are found to
have incurable diseases. The Groningen
Protocol is a collection of rules enabling
doctors to kill those babies born with 'futile' lives.
Conclusions:
- We have shown how MPD was an unproven method which
corrupted orthodox psychiatric teaching related to
schizophrenia.
- We have shown the history of MPD and how it
evolved into its present state, not from scientific
analysis, but through sensational cases which were
popularised by the media and later found false but
used by the coterie of MPD believers anyway to
further their claim for it to be established within
orthodox psychiatry.
- We have explained how the very earliest recorded
cases of MPD had absolutely no Satanic Content and
the idea of Satanic Abuse was piggy-backed on to the
MPD theory in the 1980s when Feminists and
Fundamentalists found it politically useful.
- We have explained how MPD was monopolised by the
clique of
motley therapists who believed in Satanic
Abuse in the 1990s to confirm their prejudices and
preconceptions about suspected widespread networks
abusing children which never existed.
- We have exampled the fact that every case of MPD
produced by these people turned out to be false and
damaging for patients who were treated with
it. We have illustrated how MPD is not a cure
(there is no recovery from MPD) and that it
lengthens, not shortens, therapy for patients and
has in some instances caused suicides.
- We have shown that the work of Jim Schnabel
identified the Self-Victimisation syndrome
in 1994 which accounts for most if not all
confabulations and false accusations accruing from
DID , yet those therapists promoting DID ignored his
findings and went on using DID regardless.
- We have shown how a 'new generation' of therapists
are jumping on the DID bandwagon with little or no
understanding of it's appalling early history
embodying sectarian hatred and the harm it can do.
- We have further shown that millions of pounds
worth of resources is redirected from genuine cases
and wasted on suspect MPD and recovered memory
therapy.
- We have Illustrated how the cadre of believers in
MPD/DID have ensconced themselves within orthodox
psychiatry to influence it and promote supernatural
ideas. They are now attempting to establish
MRI scans for DID which are nothing more than a
modern form of phrenology, condemned by all
psychiatrists everywhere as
junk-science.
- We have categorically proven that we have warned
the government, the department of health and the Royal
College of Psychiatry about these things many
times and predicted hundreds of thousands of
unnecessary and false DID cases which MRI testing
will produce. Yet the government appears totally
disinterested and the Royal College of
Psychiatry and Kings College ignore
our warnings and still continue to allow this cadre
of Satan Hunters to do their
worst.
The SAFF has long experience of this kind of cognitive
dissonance. It usually continues, as officials
turn a blind-eye to avoid facing it head on, until
deaths begin to occur, whereupon they deny that they
could have known about the problem and are therefore not
responsible for those unnecessary deaths.
When in fact they are directly responsible.
That is what will happen again in the next decade.
Watch this space!
There are very few people who understand and know the
full history of how MPD / DID has been foisted onto the
modern world. This SAFF Special Report of the
Dangers of DID is being published so that in coming
years people victimsed by DID therapists can have all
the information necessary to sue the therapists and
organisations which promoted this psychiatric voodoo.
John Freedom, Mortlake,
and
Tony Rhodes, Director SAFF.
With additional research and contributions from
'Vagdavercustis', Groningen.
Parentalia, 2021
Ends:
|